Committee Summary for House Commerce and Consumer Affairs (01/14/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB242 00:11:35.200 - 9:10:41 AM	Public Hearing	relative to brew pub licenses.	Hunt, John(R)[B+]2024
HB81 00:19:51.000 - 9:18:57 AM	Public Hearing	(NEW TITLE) relative to consumption of beverages or liquor in areas not approved for service by the liquor commission.	Sullivan, Jared(D)[D+]2024
HB81 00:38:06.680 - 9:37:12 AM	General Working Session	(NEW TITLE) relative to consumption of beverages or liquor in areas not approved for service by the liquor commission.	Sullivan, Jared(D)[D+]2024
HB77 00:47:40.559 - 9:46:46 AM	Public Hearing	(New Title) prohibiting certain licensees from electronically recording or storing personal information obtained from an identification card.	Verville, Kevin(R)[B+]2024
HB79 03:20:08.680 - 12:19:14 PM	Public Hearing	establishing a commission to study the privatization of the liquor commission.	Leishman, Peter(D)[D-]2024

HB242: Scott Shire, New Hampshire Beer Distributors Association Support00:11:35.200 - 9:10:41 AM; Scott Shire explained the background of the bill, emphasizing the three-tier system for alcohol regulation in the U.S. He discussed how the system was established post-prohibition to prevent monopolization and ensure fair market practices. He highlighted New Hampshire's unique position with the State Liquor Commission acting as both distributor and retailer. Shire mentioned the case of a restaurant group, Lensey, which wanted to open a brewery but faced challenges due to cross-tier ownership restrictions. The bill aims to correct a clerical error from the previous legislative session that affected the agreed-upon language to allow this. Shire supports the bill as it stands.
HB242: Mike Summers, New Hampshire Lodging and Restaurant Association Support00:15:02.279 - 9:14:08 AM; Mike Summers expressed support for the bill, noting that it corrects a clerical error from the previous session. He mentioned working closely with Scott Shire and his group and confirmed that the association has no issues with the bill.
HB242: Lieutenant Matt Culver, New Hampshire Liquor Commission Division of Enforcement Information Only00:15:02.279 - 9:14:08 AM; Lieutenant Matt Culver from the New Hampshire Liquor Commission was about to provide information or testimony on the bill, but the transcript ends before he speaks.
HB242: Mark Armaganian, Chief of Liquor Enforcement Licensing, New Hampshire Liquor Commission Information Only00:16:00.639 - 9:15:06 AM; Mark Armaganian introduced the topic by mentioning the presence of his colleague Matt, who would discuss technical aspects of the bill. He highlighted that the bill addresses a clerical error from a previous session, which Senator Bradley attempted to fix before retirement. Armaganian emphasized that the bill focuses on a specific issue related to the Brew Pub license, which is unique in requiring both manufacturing and an on-premise restaurant. The bill aims to correct distribution rights for Brew Pubs, allowing them to self-distribute up to 2500 barrels to their own on or off-premise licenses, while any distribution beyond that must go through wholesale distributors.
HB81: Representative Sullon Support00:19:51.000 - 9:18:57 AM; Representative Sullon introduced House Bill 81, which seeks to allow patrons to take their alcoholic beverages into restrooms at bars and restaurants. He shared a personal story about a close friend who was drugged and raped after leaving a drink unattended, highlighting the importance of maintaining control over one's beverage to prevent such incidents. Sullon argued that the current law, which prohibits taking drinks into restrooms, may inadvertently increase the risk of drink tampering. He acknowledged concerns about adding alcohol to drinks in restrooms but maintained that the bill would not increase restaurant liability as long as they adhere to serving limits and existing laws. He also mentioned that the bill would not force establishments to allow drinks in restrooms, leaving the policy decision to them.
HB81: Mike Summers, President CEO of the New Hampshire Lodging and Restaurant Association Oppose00:35:47.800 - 9:34:53 AM; Mike Summers expressed strong opposition to House Bill 81, citing concerns about increased liability for restaurant owners and the potential for underage consumption in restrooms. He argued that allowing drinks in restrooms could facilitate illicit activities, such as passing alcohol to minors, which are harder to monitor in these private spaces. Summers acknowledged the horrific incident that motivated the bill but suggested that businesses should work with customers to address such issues without changing the current law. He also mentioned that many establishments use cameras to monitor service areas for liability reasons, which would not be possible in restrooms.
HB81: Danielle Elon, Deputy Chief of New Hampshire Liquor Enforcement and Licensing Information Only00:38:06.680 - 9:37:12 AM; Danielle Elon clarified the current law and the investigative process regarding over-service and underage consumption. She explained that if over-service occurs, a thorough investigation is conducted, including reviewing receipts, interviewing staff, and examining surveillance footage. She noted that establishments are liable if minors possess or consume alcohol on their premises, regardless of how they obtained it. Elon emphasized that businesses can still prohibit drinks in restrooms under the current law and that it's up to them to implement practices to safely operate within the law. She addressed concerns about under-reporting of incidents like the one mentioned by Representative Sullon, noting that such complaints typically go to local police rather than their organization unless staff involvement is suspected.
HB81: Danielle Elon, Deputy Chief of New Hampshire Liquor Enforcement and Licensing Information Only00:38:06.680 - 9:37:12 AM; The testimony of Danielle Elon was not provided in the given snippet, as she was finishing her speech before this segment.
HB77: Representative Kevin Verell, Auburn, Candia, and Deerfield Support00:47:40.559 - 9:46:46 AM; Representative Kevin Verell introduced HB77, emphasizing it was inspired by a constituent's concern about privacy when purchasing cigarettes. He expressed worries about establishments scanning IDs, leading to potential privacy breaches and misuse of personal information. Verell highlighted that his bill aims to prevent businesses from scanning and storing personal identification data when selling alcohol or tobacco, citing potential risks such as hacking and misuse of personal data. He acknowledged the possibility of amending the bill to focus on the storage of information rather than the act of scanning itself.
HB77: Unnamed Committee Member Information Only00:52:41.280 - 9:51:47 AM; An unnamed committee member questioned the necessity and functionality of scanning machines used by businesses, suggesting they only verify age without retaining personal information. They expressed concern that the bill's language might hinder businesses' ability to quickly verify age, suggesting the removal of the word 'scan' to clarify the bill's intent.
HB77: Representative Burough Information Only00:55:03.200 - 9:54:09 AM; Representative Burough inquired about any legitimate reasons for businesses to retain personal information from scanned IDs. Verell responded by suggesting that while there may be specific scenarios requiring such storage, the consumer's consent is typically required, and businesses should not demand it unless legally required.
HB77: Representative Walsh Information Only00:56:34.359 - 9:55:40 AM; Representative Walsh asked about the inclusion of specific business types like pawn brokers and scrap metal dealers in the bill. Verell clarified that these references are part of existing law, with the bill's amendments highlighted in different font styles.
HB77: Representative Civan Information Only00:57:27.520 - 9:56:33 AM; Representative Civan raised concerns about the potential use of scanning machines to detect fake IDs, questioning how this aspect would be affected by the bill. Verell acknowledged the concern and reiterated his willingness to amend the bill to focus on the storage of information rather than the act of scanning.
HB77: Unnamed Committee Member Information Only01:02:21.799 - 10:01:27 AM; Another committee member raised a hypothetical scenario about scanning groceries and whether a similar restriction would be considered. Verell clarified that his bill does not intend to restrict scanning for pricing purposes at grocery stores and emphasized the focus on preventing the storage of personal identification information.
HB77: Representative Dave Walker from Rochester Oppose01:04:08.160 - 10:03:14 AM; Representative Walker expressed concerns about the mandatory scanning of identification, specifically highlighting an issue he faced with his temporary driver's license. He recounted being unable to purchase alcohol or tobacco because the temporary license did not have a barcode. He argued that there should be changes to the law to accommodate individuals with temporary licenses or passports, which do not scan, suggesting that visual inspection should suffice for age verification.
HB77: Deborah Johnson from Grantham Support01:07:38.960 - 10:06:44 AM; Deborah Johnson testified in support of the bill, emphasizing the dangers of identity theft and the need to protect personal information. She provided detailed information on how scanning systems work, citing an example of a software that scans and stores driver's license data. Johnson also referenced a federal law from 1993, intended to protect against misuse of driver's license information, and suggested broadening the bill to prohibit all scanning of driver's licenses, except where specified by law. She expressed concerns about the widespread use of such systems in various settings, including retail and election polls, and urged for vigilance against identity theft.
HB77: Chief Mark Armaganian, Director of Liquor Enforcement and Licensing, and Deputy Chief Danielle Ston, Deputy Director of the same entity Information Only01:21:12.040 - 10:20:18 AM; Chief Armaganian and Deputy Chief Ston provided technical and regulatory insights on the use of scanning for age verification in the sale of alcohol and tobacco. They emphasized the importance of scanning as a tool for licensees to verify age and prevent sales to minors, while also acknowledging the concerns about retaining personal information. They discussed the 'Red Light Green Light' scanning systems and the challenges of identifying fake IDs, which have become more sophisticated. They noted that while scanning is not mandated by law, it is a useful tool for businesses to comply with age restrictions.
HB77: Tom Prol from Deur Prol and Thomas, representing the New Hampshire Retail Association Oppose01:39:56.119 - 10:39:02 AM; Tom Prol testified in opposition to the bill, emphasizing that the retail sector takes age verification and customer privacy seriously. He mentioned existing laws that protect consumer information and allow for its purging upon request, highlighting Senate Bill 255. Prol supported the use of scanning as a tool for ensuring compliance with age restriction laws and looked forward to participating in the upcoming subcommittee discussion.
HB77: Rich Parsons from R Young Pelli, representing the New Hampshire Grocers Association Oppose01:42:34.119 - 10:41:40 AM; Rich Parsons opposed the bill, echoing concerns about the importance of scanning for age-restricted products to avoid penalties. He mentioned the recent implementation of Senate Bill 255, which allows consumers to know what information businesses collect on them and request its deletion. Parsons highlighted the 'Red Light Green Light' system used for age verification and noted compliance with privacy laws.
HB77: Chris Gagen, Safety Director for Halfers Gas Stations, representing the New England Convenience Store Association Oppose01:43:26.000 - 10:42:32 AM; Chris Gagen opposed the bill, stressing the importance of scanning IDs for Halfers Gas Stations as part of their commitment to safety, family values, and preventing underage sales. He explained that their scanning system does not store personal information but helps in accurately verifying age, reducing the risk of violations. Gagen emphasized the role of scanning in upholding the company's core values and community responsibility.
HB77: Kate Fry from New Futures Oppose01:45:21.199 - 10:44:27 AM; Kate Fry, representing New Futures, opposed the bill, but specific details of her testimony were not provided in the transcript snippet.
HB77: Kate Fry, New Futures Information Only01:46:03.000 - 10:45:09 AM; Kate Fry, Vice President of Advocacy at New Futures, spoke to add additional information regarding the importance of checking IDs as a measure to prevent alcohol and tobacco misuse and underage use. She highlighted the potential risk to federal funding under the Sinar law if non-compliance rates for tobacco regulations fall below 20%. Fry supports the use of ID scanning as a tool for businesses to ensure compliance and protect their liability but emphasized that businesses should not retain private information.
HB79: Peter Leechman, representing Peterborough and Sharon Support03:20:08.680 - 12:19:14 PM; Peter Leechman, the prime sponsor of House Bill 79, spoke in support of establishing a commission to examine the privatization of the Liquor Commission. He expressed concerns about the significant growth in expenses without a corresponding increase in revenue at the Liquor Commission. Leechman highlighted that the commission could involve not only legislators but also individuals affected by the liquor industry to assess whether privatization makes sense. He mentioned the potential for realizing over a billion dollars if the Liquor Commission were sold, suggesting this could be managed through an appropriate fee or tax structure.
HB79: Representative Post Information Only03:24:39.960 - 12:23:45 PM; Representative Post inquired about the expenses related to the proposed commission, specifically if there would be costs beyond mileage reimbursement for legislators. It was clarified that the only expense mentioned in the bill would be for legislators' commuting costs, with no additional compensation for other appointees such as those from the Restaurant Association or the Attorney General's office.
HB79: Representative Burrow Information Only03:25:33.760 - 12:24:39 PM; Representative Burrow raised concerns about the decline in liquor sales revenue across multiple states, questioning if this could be attributed to the increasing consumption of cannabis. The response acknowledged a general decline in liquor sales worldwide, citing factors like 'Dry January' and competition from stores like Total Wines in Massachusetts, which might impact New Hampshire's revenue.
HB79: Representative Ammon Information Only03:26:23.640 - 12:25:29 PM; Representative Ammon discussed the issue of creating new commissions, mentioning a suggestion to eliminate two commissions for every new one created. The discussion focused on whether the proposed commission under HB79 would be a candidate for such a policy, with the speaker suggesting that this commission should be considered due to the importance of addressing declining liquor revenue and the potential for privatization.
HB79: Representative Spear Information Only03:28:00.399 - 12:27:06 PM; Representative Spear shared insights from their experience in the railroad industry, suggesting that privatization could lead to increased profitability and safety. They speculated that privatizing the Liquor Commission might reduce expenses and increase tax revenue from liquor and wine sales.
HB79: Representative Sullivan Information Only03:28:50.640 - 12:27:56 PM; Representative Sullivan questioned the implications of privatization on regulation enforcement, noting that the current Liquor Commission has an enforcement division. The discussion included the possibility of transferring enforcement responsibilities to another state agency, such as the Department of Revenue Administration or a smaller agency.
HB79: Representative Herbert Information Only03:30:45.520 - 12:29:51 PM; Representative Herbert asked if privatizing the liquor sales would result in increased prices for consumers. The response indicated that this would be a question for the commission to address, suggesting that input from neighboring states could provide insights.
HB79: Representative Pelli Information Only03:31:34.520 - 12:30:40 PM; Representative Pelli inquired about the intended work product of the proposed commission, specifically whether it would conduct a detailed cost-benefit analysis. The response hoped for a thorough investigation into the profitability and potential changes to the Liquor Commission's structure.
HB79: Representative Gibbs Information Only03:33:14.920 - 12:32:20 PM; Representative Gibbs raised concerns about the potential impact of privatization on the 1400 employees of the Liquor Commission. The discussion highlighted that the commission would consider such issues and that new marketing strategies could be an alternative to privatization.
HB79: Representative Gibbs Information Only03:33:57.080 - 12:33:03 PM; Representative Gibbs followed up on Representative Sullivan's question about enforcement, asking if the commission's report would include recommendations on which agency should handle enforcement if liquor sales were privatized. The response referred to the bill, which mentions the involvement of the Department of Safety in such discussions.
HB79: Marjorie Smith Support03:35:30.760 - 12:34:36 PM; Marjorie Smith, a co-sponsor of the bill, expressed support for the commission but disagreed with the prime sponsor's view on privatization. She emphasized that the state's involvement in liquor sales is primarily for revenue generation, noting that the current system is not delivering as promised. Smith advocated for reevaluating the state's role in liquor sales, suggesting options like returning to state control or exploring new alternatives to improve revenue.
HB79: Representative Ammon Information Only03:41:56.800 - 12:41:02 PM; Representative Ammon asked if the concerns raised were coming from the finance committee, given the recurring bills concerning the Liquor Commission. The response clarified that the speaker, although not currently on the finance committee, has a background in finance and remains interested in how the state is governed, particularly in relation to the Liquor Commission's performance.
HB79: Representative Spear Information Only03:42:49.800 - 12:41:55 PM; Representative Spear discussed the broader context of declining liquor sales and the potential biases in commission outcomes. They questioned the effectiveness of privatization and suggested that improving the current operations of the Liquor Commission might be a viable alternative, emphasizing the need for an open-minded commission approach.
HB79: Representative M Information Only03:46:57.319 - 12:46:03 PM; Representative M sought clarification on what was meant by bringing liquor sales back under state control, specifically if it related to retail store operations. The response clarified that it was about governance and oversight within state government, not necessarily about changing the retail model.
HB79: Representative Sullivan Information Only03:48:57.960 - 12:48:03 PM; Representative Sullivan discussed the broader implications of liquor sales beyond revenue, such as service to underserved communities. They highlighted the challenges of accessing liquor in rural areas, suggesting that this aspect should be considered alongside revenue when evaluating the state's liquor policies.
HB79: Representative Information Only03:53:21.479 - 12:52:27 PM; The representative raised the question of the social implications of liquor sales, emphasizing the state's responsibility to consider these factors alongside revenue. They noted the state's libertarian past and the ongoing need to balance social responsibility with economic goals.
HB79: Joe Mikica, Chairman of the New Hampshire Liquor Commission Information Only03:57:33.399 - 12:56:39 PM; Joe Mikica, Chairman of the New Hampshire Liquor Commission, provided a detailed overview of the liquor industry's trends and the operations of the New Hampshire Liquor Commission. He highlighted a national and global decline in alcohol sales over the past few years, attributing it partially to the rise in cannabis use. Mikica explained the structure of control states, emphasizing New Hampshire's position as a successful control state with exclusive state control over alcohol sales. He discussed the benefits of the control system, including lower alcohol density, reduced sales to minors, support for local producers, and the prevention of counterfeit or tainted alcohol. Mikica also addressed the potential impacts of privatization, arguing that it could lead to job losses, increased alcohol availability, and loss of state revenue. He stressed the importance of maintaining the current system and highlighted the commission's contributions to the state's general fund and health initiatives.
HB79: Representative Herbert Information Only04:11:07.159 - 1:10:13 PM; Representative Herbert asked about potential areas for improving profit margins or increasing sales within the Liquor Commission. He inquired about the commission's advertising expenditures and whether there were plans to adjust prices or other operational aspects to enhance profitability.
HB79: Representative Miles Information Only04:16:26.199 - 1:15:32 PM; Representative Miles commended the Liquor Commission for its safety implementations and charitable contributions. He raised concerns about the potential job losses and loss of health insurance benefits if the commission were to be privatized, highlighting the value of state employment benefits.
HB79: Representative Sullivan Information Only04:17:11.560 - 1:16:17 PM; Representative Sullivan expressed curiosity about the future of the liquor industry given the declining sales trends mentioned by Mikica. He questioned whether it would be appropriate to consider selling the business while its value might still be high, and asked if there were any plans in place to address the future challenges facing the industry.
HB79: Representative Information Only04:23:19.680 - 1:22:25 PM; A representative asked about New Hampshire's standing in terms of revenue and profit margins compared to other states. They sought information on any studies conducted to assess the state's performance in the liquor industry.
HB79: Dean Williams, Bedford, New Hampshire Oppose04:25:46.000 - 1:24:52 PM; Dean Williams, a retired beverage alcohol executive from Bedford, New Hampshire, spoke against the privatization of the Liquor Commission. He shared his extensive experience in the industry, including managing a privatized control state in Maine. Williams argued that privatization could lead to increased prices, crime, and loss of state revenue. He emphasized the success and professionalism of the New Hampshire Liquor Commission and warned against dismantling a well-functioning system due to short-term financial challenges.
HB79: Joe Richie, Pine State Beverage, New Boston, New Hampshire Oppose04:34:42.199 - 1:33:48 PM; Joe Richie from Pine State Beverage in New Boston, New Hampshire, opposed the privatization of the Liquor Commission. He praised the state's operations as world-class and expressed pride in the state's successful partnership with his company. Richie argued that privatization could not compete with the current effective system in New Hampshire.
HB79: Bob Blaz Dell, New Hampshire State Employees Association Oppose04:35:50.520 - 1:34:56 PM; Bob Blaz Dell, representing the New Hampshire State Employees Association, opposed the privatization of the Liquor Commission. He shared historical data from Washington state, which privatized its liquor sales and experienced significant revenue loss and increased prices. Blaz Dell argued that privatization would harm long-term state revenue and negatively impact state employees' bargaining power for contracts.
HB79: Kate Fry, New Futures Oppose04:40:53.440 - 1:39:59 PM; Kate Fry from New Futures opposed the privatization of the Liquor Commission, emphasizing public health concerns. She provided resources on proven strategies to prevent excess alcohol use and argued that a control state model is more effective for public health. Fry highlighted the potential loss of federal funding for substance misuse prevention if the commission's enforcement division were dismantled. She suggested that if a commission were to be established, it should include public health representatives.
HB79: Joe R Laa, Wine and Spirits Broker Association Oppose04:44:31.000 - 1:43:37 PM; Joe R Laa from the Wine and Spirits Broker Association opposed the privatization of the Liquor Commission. He argued against the proposed changes, likely due to concerns about the impact on the industry and state control.
HB79: Joel Laaka, New Hampshire Wine and Spirits Brokers Association Support04:44:44.920 - 1:43:50 PM; Joel Laaka, representing the New Hampshire Wine and Spirits Brokers Association, testified in support of the New Hampshire Liquor Commission. He praised the commission's operations, calling them best-in-class and world-class, and expressed satisfaction with the partnership between his association and the commission. Laaka argued against privatization, stating that the state's liquor operations are superior to private retailers. He mentioned his long history in New Hampshire and his appreciation for the revenue the Liquor Commission brings to the state. He was open to answering questions about the operations of his company and others in Massachusetts.
HB79: Representative Hemingway, Clont Information Only04:50:13.558 - 1:49:19 PM; Representative Hemingway from Clont was called upon to introduce the bill, although he was not the sponsor. He expressed his support for the bill in principle, which aims to remove food requirements for selling alcohol in restaurants. He shared his experience with a similar bill last year that he moved to interim study, effectively killing it. Hemingway highlighted that this bill would remove all food sales requirements for restaurants selling alcohol in New Hampshire, and he speculated about the absence of the actual sponsor, suggesting it might be a new state representative.
HB79: Representative Sullivan Information Only04:53:00.558 - 1:52:06 PM; Representative Sullivan, who was not the sponsor of the bill, provided an overview of the bill's intent to remove food sales requirements for restaurants selling alcohol. He responded to questions about the bill's impact on private clubs, suggesting that it would not affect them as they operate under different licenses. He also discussed the possibility of allowing patrons to bring their own food into establishments, citing examples from other states where this practice is common.
HB79: Representative Gibbs Information Only04:55:15.878 - 1:54:21 PM; Representative Gibbs shared an anecdote about attempting to bring food into a Massachusetts establishment, which was prohibited by health regulations. He discussed the differences in liquor licensing in New Hampshire, particularly regarding cocktail lounges that can serve alcohol without food after 9:00 PM. Gibbs also touched on the potential for increased DUIs if bars were to be introduced in New Hampshire, and the availability of Uber as a mitigating factor.
HB79: Representative Spear Information Only05:01:24.360 - 2:00:30 PM; Representative Spear discussed the existence of bars in New Hampshire, which are licensed to clubs like VFW and American Legion, and do not require food. He mentioned an upcoming bill related to licensing for barber shops and beauticians, which would create a new license category. He emphasized the complexity of liquor license categories in New Hampshire, each with specific requirements.
HB79: Chief Mark Armaganian, Liquor Enforcement Licensing Oppose05:03:11.760 - 2:02:17 PM; Chief Mark Armaganian of the Liquor Enforcement Licensing division expressed opposition to the bill. He discussed the safety concerns related to alcohol consumption without food, citing the burnoff rate and absorption rate of alcohol. He argued that consuming food with alcohol slows down the absorption rate, potentially reducing negative incidents both in establishments and on the highways. He handed over to Deputy Chief Danielle Elston to discuss the technical aspects.
HB79: Deputy Chief Danielle Elston, Liquor Enforcement Licensing Oppose05:05:01.520 - 2:04:07 PM; Deputy Chief Danielle Elston provided a technical analysis of the bill, highlighting its flaws. She explained that Title 13, which governs liquor licensing, is complex and interwoven. The bill, as proposed, does not address other license types that also have food requirements, nor does it address definitions and administrative rules that would be affected by removing the food requirement. She emphasized that such a change would require a comprehensive review and amendment of multiple sections of the law.
HB79: Mike Summers, New Hampshire Lodging and Restaurant Association Oppose05:07:27.000 - 2:06:33 PM; Mike Summers, President and CEO of the New Hampshire Lodging and Restaurant Association, expressed serious concerns about HB79. He highlighted that the bill could disadvantage existing restaurants in New Hampshire, which are required by law to invest heavily in kitchen infrastructure to meet food service requirements. He argued that allowing new establishments to open as bars with minimal infrastructure requirements would be unfair to current businesses. Summers also discussed safety concerns, emphasizing the importance of consuming food with alcohol to mitigate potential issues. He opposed the concept of allowing customers to bring their own food due to liability and lost sales concerns. In response to a question about the fairness of the situation, he clarified that food sales are not profitable for restaurants, and changing the law could lead to significant financial losses and business failures for existing establishments.

Hunt, John(Chairman)(R)[B+]2024	Post, Lisa(Clerk)(R)[A]2024	Potucek, John(V Chairman)(R)[A]2024
Salvi, Santosh(D)	Chourasia, Manoj(D)	Ammon, Keith(R)[A+]2024
Herbert, Christopher(D)[F]2024	Osborne, Jason(R)[A]2024	Cole, Brian(R)[B-]2024
Walsh, Lilli(R)[B]2024	Porcelli, Susan(R)[A-]2024	Spier, Carry(D)[CT]2024
Burroughs, Anita(D)[CT]2024	Gibbs, Merryl(D)[CT]2024	McAleer, Chris(D)[CT]2024
Sullivan, Jared(D)[D+]2024	Miles, Julie(R)	Presa, Adam(R)