Committee Summary for House Commerce and Consumer Affairs (05/14/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB162 2024-1453h 00:09:28.800 - 9:08:14 AM	Public Hearing	relative to informed consent for law enforcement searches of houses or other property.	Roy, Terry(R)[B]2024
HB162 2024-1453h 01:10:43.000 - 10:09:29 AM	Executive Session	relative to informed consent for law enforcement searches of houses or other property.	Roy, Terry(R)[B]2024

HB162 2024-1453h: Representative Lily Walsh, Rockingham 15, Hampstead Support00:09:28.800 - 9:08:14 AM; Representative Walsh introduced an amendment to HB162, aiming to address concerns raised during the initial public hearing. The amendment modifies the bill to focus solely on purchases and sales, excluding short-term leases such as those for Airbnbs or bed and breakfasts. It changes the requirement for notarization to electronic filing with the Department of Justice (DOJ), adjusting the notification timing to 3 days for purchases and 5 days for leases. Additionally, it clarifies that real estate agents and sellers are not required to verify the validity of the qualified renter or purchaser affidavits. Representative Walsh requested the committee to consider the bill with the amendment, emphasizing the importance of securing military installations in New Hampshire.
HB162 2024-1453h: Unnamed Real Estate Practitioner Oppose00:13:38.399 - 9:12:24 AM; The speaker, a real estate practitioner, expressed concerns about the bill's potential to involve the state in international relations, which they argued is beyond the state's authority. They highlighted the heavily regulated nature of real estate in New Hampshire and pointed out the challenges of enforcing the bill's requirements, such as the transfer tax affidavit. They argued that the bill might not effectively stop bad actors and could lead to discrimination against legitimate buyers or renters, using an example of a colleague from Russia or Romania. The speaker felt the requirements were burdensome and could lead to discriminatory practices.
HB162 2024-1453h: David Denwy, Defense Force Director, New Boston Space Force Station Support00:20:12.880 - 9:18:58 AM; David Denwy provided background on the New Boston Space Force Station, one of eight worldwide ground stations that monitor Department of Defense satellites. He emphasized the critical nature of their mission and the importance of the proposed legislation for national defense. He explained the risks posed by proximity of adversaries, including the ability to observe and potentially interrupt operations, and the vulnerability to radio frequency interference. Denwy stressed that the Department of Defense invests heavily in security measures at the station, underscoring the need for the legislation to protect their operations.
HB162 2024-1453h: Thaddius Dickinson, Anti-Terrorism Program Manager, New Boston Space Force Station Support00:23:04.960 - 9:21:50 AM; Thaddius Dickinson expressed strong support for the bill, emphasizing the critical need for enhanced security measures around military installations. He highlighted the evolving threat environment and the limitations of the current setup at New Boston Space Force Station. Dickinson stressed the necessity of extending the security footprint to push adversaries away from the installation, arguing that this was not just a federal issue but a state and national concern. He advocated for the state's involvement in making it difficult for adversaries to operate within New Hampshire, thus protecting the only active duty military installation in the state.
HB162 2024-1453h: Representative Burrows Information Only00:26:09.320 - 9:24:55 AM; Representative Burrows questioned the effectiveness of state-level legislation versus federal intervention, particularly mentioning the Committee for Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). He expressed concerns about the lack of federal action and the state's capability to handle such issues, given the complexity and the need for technical expertise.
HB162 2024-1453h: Representative Spear Information Only00:39:48.640 - 9:38:34 AM; Representative Spear, with a background in electronic warfare, questioned the technical feasibility of the bill. He expressed doubts about the effectiveness of a 10-mile radius around the installation, citing the potential for adversaries to use other means like the internet or trucks to carry out attacks. He suggested alternative measures like increased local police monitoring.
HB162 2024-1453h: Representative Mater Information Only00:40:49.599 - 9:39:35 AM; Representative Mater expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of the bill, comparing it to trying to capture an elephant with a mouse trap. He questioned whether the 10-mile limit would have any real impact on deterring adversaries and sought clarification on the bill's practical implications.
HB162 2024-1453h: Representative Bros Information Only00:44:13.440 - 9:42:59 AM; Representative Bros questioned the enforceability of the bill, noting that spies would not likely admit their status. He emphasized the need for clear consequences and questioned the practicality of the bill's requirements, especially for renters who might not have the means to comply quickly.
HB162 2024-1453h: Representative Pressa Information Only00:53:56.800 - 9:52:42 AM; Representative Pressa sought clarification on the process the state Attorney General's office would follow and how it would be more effective than federal processes. He questioned the speed and effectiveness of state action compared to federal action and the specific steps outlined in the bill for follow-up on potential violations.
HB162 2024-1453h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:10:43.000 - 10:09:29 AM; The speaker expressed concerns about lying and the problem of interference, suggesting that the police should be aware of the situation. They mentioned an amendment and the need for awareness about potential interference.
HB162 2024-1453h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:11:35.199 - 10:10:21 AM; The speaker continued to discuss the issue of interference and the need for police presence in certain areas. They also mentioned a reference to another country and the need to cover all bases.
HB162 2024-1453h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:13:57.960 - 10:12:43 AM; The speaker compared the legislative session frequency and duration between New Hampshire and Texas, noting the differences in session lengths and the need for revisiting budgets. They confirmed that no one had issues with the amendment.
HB162 2024-1453h: Unknown Speaker Support01:15:48.320 - 10:14:34 AM; The speaker moved to pass the bill as amended, and the motion was seconded by Representative Salvi. They mentioned the amendment number and reminisced about historical events.
HB162 2024-1453h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:16:46.239 - 10:15:32 AM; The speaker confirmed the motion to pass the amendment and conducted a vote, with seven members in favor.
HB162 2024-1453h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:19:21.239 - 10:18:07 AM; The speaker mentioned moving to the next topic regarding homeowners and certain types of service agreements.
HB162 2024-1453h: Mike Padmar, Director of Advocacy with AARP New Hampshire Support01:20:19.679 - 10:19:05 AM; Mike Padmar expressed support for the amendment, suggesting a minor change to the definition to make it clearer and more concise. He discussed the proposed changes with Mr. Quinn and the realtors, aiming to clean up the language.
HB162 2024-1453h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:22:16.000 - 10:21:02 AM; The speaker asked for clarification on why someone would need to petition a superior court if the agreement is already illegal. Mike Padmar explained that it provides recourse for individuals to remove the agreement from their title if it is recorded.
HB162 2024-1453h: Representative Saxton Oppose01:23:17.120 - 10:22:03 AM; Representative Saxton expressed concerns about the amendment, questioning whether it should be considered a net listing and regulated under existing real estate laws. He also questioned the need for a real estate license for executing such agreements and suggested restrictions on the duration of listing agreements.
HB162 2024-1453h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:26:44.639 - 10:25:30 AM; The speaker responded to Representative Saxton's concerns, explaining that the issue was addressed in a previous subcommittee and that the prohibition was meant to prevent unlicensed entities from engaging in such practices. They emphasized the need for a clear and narrow prohibition.
HB162 2024-1453h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:28:52.560 - 10:27:38 AM; The speaker further explained the rationale behind the amendment and its placement under the Consumer Protection Act, noting that it was designed to address practices by unlicensed entities rather than real estate agents.
HB162 2024-1453h: Mike Padmar, Director of Advocacy with AARP New Hampshire Support01:31:02.840 - 10:29:48 AM; Mike Padmar reiterated the suggested changes to the definition, aiming for clarity and consistency across the amendment. He confirmed the changes with Mr. Quinn and provided a detailed explanation of the revised definition.
HB162 2024-1453h: Unknown Speaker Information Only01:33:59.760 - 10:32:45 AM; The speaker confirmed the proposed changes to the amendment and noted that the committee would need to review the official amendment before taking any votes.

Hunt, John(Chairman)(R)[B+]2024	Post, Lisa(Clerk)(R)[A]2024	Potucek, John(V Chairman)(R)[A]2024
Salvi, Santosh(D)	Chourasia, Manoj(D)	Ammon, Keith(R)[A+]2024
Herbert, Christopher(D)[F]2024	Osborne, Jason(R)[A]2024	Thackston, Dick(R)[B]2024
Walsh, Lilli(R)[B]2024	Porcelli, Susan(R)[A-]2024	Spier, Carry(D)[CT]2024
Burroughs, Anita(D)[CT]2024	Gibbs, Merryl(D)[CT]2024	McAleer, Chris(D)[CT]2024
Sullivan, Jared(D)[D+]2024	Miles, Julie(R)	Presa, Adam(R)