Committee Summary for House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (01/30/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB56 00:00:53.160 - 9:01:30 AM	Public Hearing	requiring a background check and mandatory waiting period during certain firearm transfers.	Meuse, David(D)[CT]2024
HB207 01:09:03.399 - 10:09:40 AM	Public Hearing	relative to repealing the prohibition on the possession or sale of blackjacks, slung shots, and metallic knuckles except by or to minors.	Spillane, James(R)[A]2024
HB352 02:00:33.599 - 11:01:10 AM	Public Hearing	prohibiting possession of a firearm at a polling place.	Horrigan, Timothy(D)[CT]2024
HB56 03:30:07.120 - 12:30:44 PM	Public Hearing	requiring a background check and mandatory waiting period during certain firearm transfers.	Meuse, David(D)[CT]2024
HB506 04:00:23.720 - 1:01:00 PM	Public Hearing	relative to background checks during motions to return firearms and ammunition.	Mannion, Dennis(R)[A-]2024
HB551 04:59:56.878 - 2:00:33 PM	Public Hearing	repealing the license to sell pistols and revolvers.	Granger, Michael(R)[A+]2024
HB609 06:00:04.958 - 3:00:41 PM	Public Hearing	relative to the general court's authority over the sale, purchase, ownership, use, possession, transportation, licensing, permitting, taxation, and other matter pertaining to firearms, stun guns, Tasers, pepper spray devices, knives and other self-defense tools.	Farrington, Samuel(R)
HB56 06:46:37.520 - 3:47:14 PM	Executive Session	requiring a background check and mandatory waiting period during certain firearm transfers.	Meuse, David(D)[CT]2024
HB207 06:51:20.958 - 3:51:57 PM	Executive Session	relative to repealing the prohibition on the possession or sale of blackjacks, slung shots, and metallic knuckles except by or to minors.	Spillane, James(R)[A]2024
HB352 07:00:29.200 - 4:01:06 PM	Executive Session	prohibiting possession of a firearm at a polling place.	Horrigan, Timothy(D)[CT]2024
HB381 07:08:06.558 - 4:08:43 PM	Executive Session	exempting firearms and firearm accessories manufactured for in-state use only from the National Firearm Act.	Belcher, Mike(R)[A]2024
HB506 0182H 07:12:01.878 - 4:12:38 PM	Executive Session	relative to background checks during motions to return firearms and ammunition.	Mannion, Dennis(R)[A-]2024
HB609 07:15:15.360 - 4:15:52 PM	General Working Session	relative to the general court's authority over the sale, purchase, ownership, use, possession, transportation, licensing, permitting, taxation, and other matter pertaining to firearms, stun guns, Tasers, pepper spray devices, knives and other self-defense tools.	Farrington, Samuel(R)

HB56: Representative David Muse, Portsmouth, Newington, Newcastle Support00:00:53.160 - 9:01:30 AM; Representative David Muse introduced House Bill 56, which he described as a common sense public safety measure. The bill aims to implement universal firearms background checks and establish a 72-hour waiting period before a firearm transfer can take place. He explained that the objectives are to reduce the risk of firearms falling into the hands of ineligible individuals and to help decrease gun homicides and suicides. Muse highlighted the current loophole in New Hampshire law that does not require background checks for private sales, which he argues creates a dangerous gap. Under HB56, any transfer of ownership of a firearm, except for certain specified exceptions, would require a background check facilitated by a licensed firearms dealer. The 72-hour waiting period would start after the initiation of the background check and would provide a cooling-off period to potentially prevent impulsive acts of violence or suicide. Muse concluded by asking the committee to recommend the bill for passage.
HB56: Representative Sue Newman, Nashua Ward 2 Support00:07:52.120 - 9:08:29 AM; Representative Sue Newman briefly expressed her support for HB56, emphasizing that background checks are a common sense measure. She mentioned conversations with constituents in Nashua who were surprised and supportive of background checks, comparing it to the requirement for a driver's license. Newman concluded by urging the committee and the entire house to support the bill as a common sense approach to preventing gun violence.
HB56: Representative Tom Manion Information Only00:09:43.640 - 9:10:20 AM; The transcript ends with Representative Tom Manion being recognized to speak, but no further details of his testimony are provided.
HB56: Representative Tom Manion, Hillsborough 1 Oppose00:09:47.120 - 9:10:24 AM; Representative Manion testified in opposition to HB56, arguing that it unnecessarily involves the federal government in private property transfers. He emphasized that transferring firearms to prohibited persons is already a federal crime and that criminals do not adhere to such laws. He highlighted the potential violation of the Fifth Amendment due to the ATF Form 4473, which prohibits firearm acquisition for those who admit to using cannabis medically. Manion believes the bill would not impact violent crime and would only hinder law-abiding citizens, urging a vote of inexpedient to legislate.
HB56: Kathleen Slover, Portsmouth Support00:10:51.000 - 9:11:28 AM; Kathleen Slover supported HB56, recounting a recent incident where a young man threatened a mass shooting at Portsmouth High School and was found with weapons and ammunition. She emphasized the potential danger posed by such individuals and the need for background checks to prevent felons like him from easily acquiring firearms upon release. Slover stressed the importance of responsibility and leadership in ensuring community safety, advocating for the passage of HB56.
HB56: Kimberly Moren Oppose00:13:10.880 - 9:13:47 AM; Kimberly Moren opposed HB56, criticizing the merging of two unpopular gun control measures into one bill. She argued that the background check requirement, drafted by an out-of-state organization, would hinder private gun safety training, particularly impacting low-income women. Moren also critiqued the mandatory waiting period, stating it does not address suicide awareness or help those in need, and could endanger women in emergency situations. She called for a vote of inexpedient to legislate, arguing the bill does not enhance gun safety or decrease suicide rates.
HB56: Marcela Duie, Volunteer Member of Moms Demand Action, Suicide Prevention Lead for Moms Demand Support00:17:03.160 - 9:17:40 AM; Marcela Duie supported HB56, highlighting the benefits of waiting period laws in preventing impulsive acts of gun violence, including suicides and homicides. She cited studies suggesting that waiting periods could reduce firearm suicide rates by 7-11% and gun homicides by roughly 17%. Duie also noted that waiting periods could protect both potential victims of domestic violence and prevent abusers from immediate access to firearms.
HB56: Representative Henry Gson, Hillsborough 29th District Oppose00:20:34.520 - 9:21:11 AM; Representative Gson opposed HB56, arguing that it infringes on the rights of the people as outlined in the state and federal constitutions. He compared the right to bear arms with other rights that do not require permits or waiting periods, such as freedom from illegal searches or the right to free speech. Gson urged the committee to protect these rights and vote inexpedient to legislate on HB56.
HB56: Kate Giddens, State Director of Women for Gun Rights Oppose00:22:11.240 - 9:22:48 AM; Kate Giddens opposed HB56, supporting the testimonies of other opponents. She argued that the bill is redundant as current laws already prohibit firearm possession by felons and those deemed mentally unfit. Giddens emphasized that responsible gun owners should handle transfers without additional government oversight and that criminals do not follow legal processes. She also highlighted the vulnerability of women in emergency situations, suggesting that immediate access to firearms could be crucial for their safety. Lastly, she referenced her experience in Australia to argue that gun control measures do not necessarily reduce suicide rates.
HB56: Ni Penovich, Retired Trauma Surgeon Information Only00:24:56.559 - 9:25:33 AM; Ni Penovich, a retired trauma surgeon, shared insights on gun-related trauma based on his extensive career. He mentioned that while in hospitals, about 5% of suicide attempts involve guns, but when successful, over 50% of suicides are by firearms. He highlighted the impact of gun violence through his personal experiences and teaching, mentioning the Sandy Hook incident and the American College of Surgeons' response, including the 'Stop the Bleed' initiative. He also referenced a commission formed by the College of Surgeons, which included many NRA members, and their support for similar legislation. His testimony aimed to provide a perspective from those who deal with the aftermath of gun violence.
HB56: Justin Davis, National Rifle Association, New Hampshire resident Oppose00:28:15.320 - 9:28:52 AM; Justin Davis, representing the National Rifle Association and a New Hampshire resident, opposed the bill, criticizing it as a combination of two failed California gun control measures. He argued against the proposed three-day waiting period post-background check, stating it infringes on immediate self-defense rights, particularly affecting women in danger. He also discussed the economic impact on New Hampshire's firearm industry and tourism, mentioning Maine's experience with similar laws. Davis opposed universal background checks, arguing they criminalize private transfers between known individuals and do not deter criminals, referencing the Obama administration's findings on gun acquisition by criminals.
HB56: Simon Thurber, Exeter, New Hampshire Support00:33:44.840 - 9:34:21 AM; Simon Thurber from Exeter, New Hampshire, supported the bill, emphasizing the importance of saving lives as the top priority. He highlighted New Hampshire's gun death rate ranking and suggested implementing universal background checks and waiting periods to lower it, noting that neighboring states with lower gun death rates have these measures in place. He stressed the effectiveness of waiting periods in preventing impulsive suicides, citing statistics and a peer-reviewed journal to support his argument.
HB56: Jonathan Stone, Clam, New Hampshire, Black Op Arms Oppose00:37:29.520 - 9:38:06 AM; Jonathan Stone from Clam, New Hampshire, and a partner at Black Op Arms, opposed the bill, arguing that waiting periods are unnecessary and do not improve the quality of background checks. He highlighted the impact on women seeking firearms for self-defense and noted New Hampshire's low gun crime and suicide rates compared to other issues like fentanyl. He criticized the bill for being similar to last year's and questioned the lack of law enforcement support, suggesting the bill be deemed inexpedient to legislate.
HB56: Donna MO, Parent Support00:39:48.359 - 9:40:25 AM; Donna MO shared a personal and emotional testimony in support of the bill, recounting her son Nathan's suicide by a firearm purchased just half an hour before the act. She detailed the traumatic aftermath and argued that a waiting period could have saved her son's life by allowing time for rational decision-making. She emphasized that her son's suicide was spontaneous, triggered by emotional distress, and not indicative of mental illness or substance abuse. She supported the bill as a measure to prevent similar tragedies, aligning it with both the Second and Ninth Amendments and the New Hampshire Constitution's provisions for safety.
HB56: Dr. John Henk, New Hampshire Psychiatric Society Support00:47:23.960 - 9:48:00 AM; Dr. John Henk, representing the New Hampshire Psychiatric Society, supported HB56. He highlighted the public health crisis of gun violence, advocating for legislation to reduce related deaths through background checks and mandatory waiting periods. He emphasized that guns increase the likelihood of fatalities in violent incidents, including suicides, where the use of a gun significantly raises the chance of death. Henk noted that guns are the leading cause of death for children and adolescents in the U.S. since 2020. He argued that background checks could prevent firearms from reaching high-risk groups, and mandatory waiting periods could reduce impulsive acts of violence and suicide by allowing time for suicidal thoughts to subside.
HB56: Joe Hannah, Gunners of New Hampshire Oppose00:50:33.559 - 9:51:10 AM; Joe Hannah, Vice President of Gunners of New Hampshire, opposed HB56, arguing that it creates an undue burden on exercising Second Amendment rights, comparing it to First Amendment rights. He criticized the notion of delaying rights due to potential violence by bad actors, and highlighted the importance of immediate access to firearms for self-defense, particularly in situations like natural disasters or domestic violence. He mentioned a significant increase in background checks post-disasters as evidence of the need for immediate firearm access, arguing that waiting periods infringe on property and natural rights.
HB56: Ray Banger, Tilton, New Hampshire Oppose00:55:59.160 - 9:56:36 AM; Ray Banger from Tilton, New Hampshire, opposed HB56 by sharing a personal experience from jury duty where a woman used a handgun to defend herself against an abusive ex-partner. He argued that waiting periods could have prevented her from having the means to protect herself. Banger also discussed the ineffectiveness of background checks in preventing crimes committed with illegally obtained firearms, using an example from Franklin, New Hampshire, and questioned the relevance of waiting periods for those serious about suicide.
HB56: J. Simin Oppose01:00:20.960 - 10:00:57 AM; J. Simin opposed HB56, arguing that it would subvert public safety and suggested that supporters might prefer a high-crime state like Massachusetts. As an international economic consultant, he presented data showing lower violent crime rates in New Hampshire compared to Massachusetts over nearly 40 years. He argued that with around 512 million firearms in the U.S., control is impractical without police state measures. He also mentioned that states with fewer gun laws, like Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont, have been among the safest in terms of violent crime. Lastly, he controversially suggested that gun control could lead to genocide.
HB207: Representative, for Representative James Spain Support01:09:03.399 - 10:09:40 AM; The representative introduced HB207, which would legalize the possession of blackjacks, metallic knuckles, and slung shots for individuals over 18. He described these items as collectibles rather than practical for self-defense, emphasizing the bill's focus on liberty and the right to own such items. He acknowledged the potential for misuse but noted that similar violence can occur without these items. He expressed openness to discussing amendments that could prohibit their use as weapons while preserving the right to collect them.
HB207: Tom Manny, Hillsboro 1, Pelham Support01:12:51.520 - 10:13:28 AM; Tom Manny from Hillsboro 1, Pelham, supported HB207, arguing that while he believes in the right to carry firearms for self-defense, not everyone is comfortable with or able to use them. He advocated for alternative means of self-defense, suggesting that the bill provides a non-lethal option for those who prefer it, and requested the committee vote in favor of the bill.
HB207: Murray Information Only01:13:35.120 - 10:14:12 AM; Murray asked about the outcome of the Senate interim study from the last session regarding the bill. He expressed uncertainty about the changes that might affect the Senate's decision on the bill and mentioned consulting his Senator who was involved in the interim study.
HB207: Dr. Joe Hannan, Second Vice President for G of New Hampshire Support01:14:20.880 - 10:14:57 AM; Dr. Joe Hannan, representing G of New Hampshire, supported the bill, arguing that the items in question, while not firearms, fall under the legal definition of arms covered by the Second Amendment. He discussed the historical use of slung shots as maritime tools and weapons, and argued that banning such easily made weapons is unnecessary. He also touched on the potential racial motivations behind historical bans on certain weapons and compared the banning of brass knuckles to banning someone from using car keys defensively.
HB352: Representative Muse Support02:00:33.599 - 11:01:10 AM; Representative Muse, filling in for the prime sponsor, introduced HB 352, arguing for its necessity to prevent voter intimidation and ensure safety at polling places. He cited historical and recent instances of armed intimidation at polls and noted that 21 states and the District of Columbia already have similar prohibitions. He emphasized that the bill aims to protect the fundamental right to vote without fear, referencing Supreme Court decisions that support such regulations in sensitive places. He suggested the committee give the bill an ought-to-pass recommendation and expressed openness to amendments focusing on intentional open carry.
HB352: Representative Horgan, Prime Sponsor Support02:05:58.159 - 11:06:35 AM; Representative Horgan, the prime sponsor of HB 352, shared his personal history with elections and his concerns about the potential for violence at polling places. He supported the bill, emphasizing the presence of police at polling places for security and the handling of election materials. He discussed the bill's provisions, including exceptions for law enforcement officers and the option for absentee ballots for those unwilling to comply with the firearm prohibition. He also expressed openness to a friendly amendment replacing 'carry' with 'openly display' to gain more support for the bill.
HB352: Tom Manion, Hillsboro 1, Pelham Oppose02:14:52.760 - 11:15:29 AM; Tom Manion from Hillsboro 1, representing Pelham, opposed HB 352, arguing that in an increasingly divisive political climate, individuals should not have to choose between exercising their right to vote and their right to self-defense. He also disagreed with expanding reasons for absentee voting, preferring to maintain the status quo, and requested the committee vote ITL (inexpedient to legislate) on the bill.
HB352: Donald McFarland, Orange Oppose02:15:54.239 - 11:16:31 AM; Representative McFarland argued that HB352 is unconstitutional and would disenfranchise voters by prohibiting traditional in-person voting participation. He criticized the bill for its impact on election workers and its potential to turn absentee ballots into early voting, suggesting it should be referred to the House Election Law Committee for further review. He believes the bill violates parts of the state's constitution.
HB352: Henry Gon, Philbo 29th District Oppose02:18:12.478 - 11:18:49 AM; Representative Gon opposed HB352, arguing that restricting firearms at polling places creates areas where people are more vulnerable to attacks. He cited statistics on mass shootings in gun-restricted areas and emphasized the insecurity of storing firearms in vehicles, suggesting that such restrictions violate both state and federal constitutions.
HB352: Sel Ors Oppose02:19:43.599 - 11:20:20 AM; Sel Ors shared personal experiences of assault and robbery in cities where he was unable to carry a firearm, arguing that HB352 would leave people defensible in similar situations. He stressed the importance of having a firearm for personal safety and opposed the bill on these grounds.
HB352: Kathleen Slover, Portsmith Support02:21:37.280 - 11:22:14 AM; Kathleen Slover supported HB352, sharing an experience at a public event in Portsmouth where armed individuals appeared to intimidate participants. She argued that firearms at polling places could deter voting and intimidate voters, advocating for a safe voting environment without firearms to ensure the right to vote is protected.
HB352: Jonathan Stone, Clamont Oppose02:24:41.600 - 11:25:18 AM; Jonathan Stone opposed HB352, arguing that it requires citizens to give up one constitutional right to exercise another, which he finds unnecessary and problematic. He referenced his experience in elections and discussions with local law enforcement, suggesting that there's no significant issue with firearms at polling places in New Hampshire, and criticized the bill for being based on feelings rather than facts.
HB352: Kimberly Moren Oppose02:27:55.800 - 11:28:32 AM; Kimberly Moren opposed HB352, arguing that it infringes on two rights: the right to self-defense and the right to vote. She criticized the bill's logic and suggested it could make citizens more vulnerable to crime. She also pointed out the inconsistency in supporting absentee voting while proposing such restrictions.
HB352: Jeie Loot, Amherst Support02:29:56.240 - 11:30:33 AM; Jeie Loot, an election official from Amherst, supported HB352, emphasizing the need for a safe voting environment. She mentioned increased political volatility and threats to election officials, arguing that allowing firearms at polling places could intimidate voters and threaten their safety. She believes ensuring a safe voting environment should supersede the right to carry firearms at polls.
HB352: Rayel Lander, Tilton Oppose02:33:07.840 - 11:33:44 AM; Rayel Lander opposed HB352, arguing that it would compromise personal safety when traveling to and from polling places, especially in areas with potential safety concerns. He mentioned the importance of being armed for protection and the potential legal issues under federal law, urging the committee to vote against the bill to maintain safety for all citizens.
HB352: Kate Giddens Oppose02:36:14.840 - 11:36:51 AM; Kate Giddens opposed HB352, citing her belief in the natural right to self-defense and the importance of New Hampshire's robust Constitution. She argued that gun-free zones, like those proposed in the bill, could make polling places targets for violence and suggested an alternative approach to accommodate those who feel unsafe without compromising others' rights.
HB352: Justin Davis, New Hampshire State Director Oppose02:39:09.279 - 11:39:46 AM; Justin Davis opposed HB352, representing the NRA and highlighting the dangers of creating gun-free zones at polling places. He mentioned statistics on mass shootings and the potential impact on poll workers and survivors of sexual assault who might feel unsafe without their firearms. He urged the committee to vote against the measure.
HB352: Joe Hannon, Gers of New Hampshire Oppose02:40:44.960 - 11:41:21 AM; Joe Hannon opposed HB352, arguing that it disenfranchises firearms owners and poses unnecessary risks. He criticized the bill's provisions for absentee voting and the dangers of loading and unloading firearms in public. He also raised concerns about potential future misuse of the data collected from those opting for absentee ballots due to firearms restrictions.
HB352: Jay Simkin, Nashua, New Hampshire Information Only02:44:33.920 - 11:45:10 AM; Jay Simkin, a resident of Nashua, New Hampshire, and a federal firearms licensee for over 40 years, as well as an international economic consultant, presented data-driven testimony on the state's safety record. He highlighted that since 2015, violent crime in New Hampshire has decreased annually, including during the pandemic, unlike many other states. Simkin noted that New Hampshire, based on 2022 FBI data, is the second safest state, with Maine being the safest since 2001. He argued that the lack of violence at polling places in New Hampshire suggests a low risk, but recommended that if the legislature believes there is a risk, they should fund security at polling places rather than restrict firearms. He also warned against the practice of leaving firearms in vehicles, citing it as a significant source of firearms for criminals and referencing instances where cars with infants were stolen without the thief noticing the child, suggesting the dangers of such practices.
HB56: Prime Sponsor Support03:30:07.120 - 12:30:44 PM; The prime sponsor introduced HB56, clarifying that despite its misleading title, the bill is not about nullifying the National Firearms Act or directly about firearms. Instead, it is designed to provoke a federal lawsuit under the supremacy clause to challenge the expansive interpretation of the Commerce Clause by the federal government. The sponsor referenced the historical case of Wickard v. Filburn (1942) to illustrate the overreach of federal authority under the Commerce Clause, arguing that this interpretation allows the federal government to regulate private activities within states that have only tenuous links to interstate commerce. The sponsor expressed hope that the current Supreme Court might overturn or narrow this interpretation, thereby restoring states' rights and promoting federalism. The sponsor believes that the bill, if enacted, would lead to significant changes in the balance of power between the federal government and the states, potentially benefiting economic activity and reducing the impact of federal bureaucracy on citizens.
HB56: Tom Manion, Hillsborough 1, Pelham Support03:39:33.560 - 12:40:10 PM; Tom Manion, representing Hillsborough 1, Pelham, testified in support of HB381. He echoed the prime sponsor's sentiments, emphasizing the opportunity to challenge detrimental Supreme Court precedents like Wickard v. Filburn. Manion argued that overturning such precedents would restore the 10th Amendment and decentralize power from Washington, D.C. He noted that while the bill promotes New Hampshire as gun-friendly and could attract manufacturing jobs, its primary purpose is to serve as a vehicle for a court challenge against the National Firearms Act and the Wickard precedent. Manion urged the committee to recommend an 'ought to pass' (OTP) vote on HB381.
HB56: Unidentified, Pittsfield Support03:41:06.160 - 12:41:43 PM; The speaker from Pittsfield, New Hampshire, testified in favor of HB56, focusing on the use of sound suppressors. They argued that sound suppressors are rare due to excessive paperwork and believe that nearly every firearm should have one. They shared a personal story about their hearing being damaged despite wearing hearing protection at a shooting range, suggesting that sound suppressors could prevent such incidents. The speaker emphasized the responsibility that comes with the right to keep and bear arms and urged the committee to pass the bill to prevent similar stories of hearing damage.
HB506: Representative Manion, Hillsborough 1, Pelham Support04:00:23.720 - 1:01:00 PM; Representative Manion introduced HB506, which aims to expedite the return of firearms and property taken under court orders once those orders are vacated. He explained that last year's version of the bill, HB1339, passed through the committee and the House but was killed in the Senate. The current bill addresses issues related to delays in property return, which can take months, and proposes time limits for the court to act on property return requests.
HB506: Unidentified, no location provided Information Only04:04:15.720 - 1:04:52 PM; The speaker asked Representative Manion about the process for returning property once a court order is vacated. Representative Manion explained that individuals currently have to request a hearing, which can be scheduled weeks or months later, and suggested that HB506 would impose specific time frames to expedite this process.
HB506: Holly Noesi, no location provided Support04:05:09.560 - 1:05:46 PM; Holly Noesi supported HB506, sharing a personal story about a close associate whose firearms were confiscated due to a false claim of abuse. Despite the case being dismissed, it took over two months for the property to be returned. Noesi advocated for the bill's time frames for property return and suggested an amendment to include a time frame for court notification to the police about property return.
HB506: John Stone, Claremont Support04:10:29.960 - 1:11:06 PM; John Stone, the original sponsor of last year's bill, supported HB506, emphasizing the need for established time frames for the return of firearms. He highlighted issues with evidence rooms filling up with firearms and the potential for property damage. Stone endorsed the bill and the suggested amendment for a two-day notification period from the courts to the police.
HB506: Captain Muzy, State Police Support04:14:22.080 - 1:14:59 PM; Captain Muzy from the State Police supported HB506, discussing the potential amendment for an in-hand court order to expedite firearm return. He mentioned the police's interest in emptying evidence rooms more quickly and believed that having a signed order in hand would be beneficial for the police.
HB551: Representative John SS, Co-sponsor Support04:59:56.878 - 2:00:33 PM; Representative John SS, the co-sponsor, introduced HB551, explaining that it aims to eliminate duplication in licensing by removing the need for municipal approval for selling firearms, which is already handled at the federal level. He suggested that this would streamline the process for small business owners.
HB551: Representative Henry Gon, Hillsborough County Support05:01:29.360 - 2:02:06 PM; Representative Henry Gon supported HB551, arguing that it would repeal an unnecessary second layer of licensing that does not increase safety but can delay business operations. He highlighted that federal firearms license (FFL) compliance already involves notifying local police, making the municipal license redundant.
HB551: John Stone, Claremont, Operations Manager for Black Op Arms Support05:03:46.718 - 2:04:23 PM; John Stone, from Claremont and an operations manager for Black Op Arms, supported HB551, stating that it would remove an archaic requirement for a municipal license to sell pistols and revolvers. He explained that this license does not enhance safety but adds an unnecessary step, as the federal process already involves local zoning checks and police notifications.
HB551: Jr Hle, Dunbarton, Secretary for the New Hampshire Firearms Coalition Support05:12:21.040 - 2:12:58 PM; Jr Hle from Dunbarton, representing the New Hampshire Firearms Coalition, supported HB551, clarifying that the bill does not affect the prohibition on selling firearms to felons, as that is covered under a different section of the law. He emphasized that the bill would make it easier for businesses to operate without unnecessary hurdles and highlighted New Hampshire's status as a safe state with a strong firearms industry.
HB551: Unknown Information Only05:14:43.440 - 2:15:20 PM; The speaker clarified that the bill does not repeal the prohibition on sales to felons, which remains under RSA 159:7. The bill specifically repeals RSA 159:8-B and RSA 159:10, which deal with other aspects of firearm sales and advertising. The speaker emphasized that the current law's prohibition on selling to felons will remain unchanged.
HB551: Unknown Information Only05:15:29.120 - 2:16:06 PM; The speaker discussed the implications of repealing RSA 159:10, which criminalizes the advertisement or possession with intent to sell firearms without a license. They noted that this repeal would remove the legal requirement for a seller to know the buyer or for the buyer to provide clear evidence of identity, which could lead to concerns about firearm sales to unknown individuals.
HB551: Unknown Information Only05:17:04.680 - 2:17:41 PM; The speaker referenced a case in Brookline where an individual was convicted for advertising a firearm for sale, illustrating the impact of the current law on private sales. They argued that gun owners typically take precautions to ensure firearms do not end up in the wrong hands, even without legal mandates.
HB551: Unknown Information Only05:18:36.280 - 2:19:13 PM; The speaker further clarified that the repeal of RSA 159:10 and RSA 159:8 would remove the felony classification for merely advertising or possessing firearms with intent to sell without a license. They noted that federal and state laws still prohibit selling firearms to prohibited persons, and this aspect would not change with the bill.
HB551: Jay Simpkin, Nashua, NH Support05:23:12.958 - 2:23:49 PM; Jay Simpkin, a federal firearms licensee from Nashua, NH, supported the bill, stating it would eliminate a redundant $10 license fee and associated costs every three years. He explained the historical context of the law from 1923 and how federal laws have since made the state license unnecessary, advocating for its repeal.
HB551: Unknown, Grafton Support05:26:22.600 - 2:26:59 PM; The speaker, representing Grafton, supported the bill and emphasized that the FFL system already provides sufficient oversight, making the state statutes redundant. They clarified that RSA 159:7, which prohibits selling firearms to felons, would remain in effect, supporting the bill's passage.
HB609: Sam Farington, Rochester Ward 4 Support06:00:04.958 - 3:00:41 PM; Sam Farington from Rochester Ward 4 introduced House Bill 609, which aims to fix loopholes in New Hampshire's preemption statute. He explained that the bill would clarify the law to prevent state agencies from restricting employees' rights to defend themselves on the job, emphasizing the need for uniform gun laws across the state.
HB609: Unknown Information Only06:02:31.080 - 3:03:08 PM; The speaker inquired about the legal age requirements for possessing pepper spray and tasers in New Hampshire, expressing concern over the lack of clear regulations. They mentioned that the bill under discussion would include these self-defense tools in the statute. The response indicated that age limits would be set by the state legislature and that local regulations would be preempted by state law.
HB609: Unknown Information Only06:04:06.958 - 3:04:43 PM; The speaker asked if schools would be allowed to prohibit self-defense tools like stun guns under the bill. It was clarified that the bill would prevent political subdivisions, including school districts, from regulating these items, but federal law would take precedence.
HB609: Donald McFarland, Orange Support06:05:06.040 - 3:05:43 PM; Representative McFarland expressed strong support for HB609, emphasizing the importance of maintaining regulatory authority over self-defense tools within the state legislature to ensure consistency and protect individual rights. He highlighted the risks of regulatory fragmentation and the importance of uniform laws across the state to avoid confusion and ensure public safety.
HB609: J.R. Hoell, Dunbarton, New Hampshire Firearms Coalition Support06:06:42.600 - 3:07:19 PM; Former Representative Hoell supported the bill, explaining its historical context and the need for uniform laws regarding firearms and self-defense tools. He shared personal experiences and concerns about the safety of children and the need for non-lethal self-defense tools to be regulated at the state level. He also discussed the bill's impact on state agencies and the need to clarify regulations, particularly in sensitive areas like prisons and hospitals.
HB609: Unknown Information Only06:14:10.040 - 3:14:47 PM; The speaker raised concerns about the bill's potential impact on local jails and whether it would affect gun regulations within lockdown areas. It was suggested that if necessary, amendments could be crafted to address specific concerns about prisons and jails.
HB609: Unknown Information Only06:14:57.478 - 3:15:34 PM; The speaker sought clarification on the definition of 'other self-defense tools' in the bill, questioning whether new or unconventional self-defense devices would be covered. The response included a discussion on statutory construction and the importance of broad language to include future innovations in self-defense tools.
HB609: Unknown Information Only06:16:29.878 - 3:17:06 PM; The speaker raised a hypothetical scenario about an employee using a baseball bat as a self-defense tool under the bill, questioning where the line would be drawn. The response clarified the distinction between tools and self-defense items, emphasizing the intent to cover non-lethal self-defense tools.
HB609: Erica Layon Information Only06:18:40.680 - 3:19:17 PM; Erica Layon's testimony was cut off in the provided transcript, so no further details are available on her stance or comments regarding the bill.
HB609: Representative from Derry Support06:18:44.878 - 3:19:21 PM; The representative from Derry highlighted their experience with the Joint Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules, which broadened their understanding of government layers and the need for legislative oversight over state agencies. They support HB609 as it aims to eliminate the patchwork of rules by ensuring agencies are considered part of the state. They shared a personal anecdote about a neighbor who quit a state job due to feeling unsafe without self-defense tools, emphasizing the importance of allowing state workers to protect themselves. They mentioned the tragic case of officer Hos, suggesting that current laws might have disarmed him, and stressed the need for the bill to protect state employees in remote situations, like plow drivers.
HB609: Representative Ors from Pittsfield Support06:23:28.600 - 3:24:05 PM; Representative Ors from Pittsfield supported the bill, mentioning their wife's experiences with wildlife in remote situations, reinforcing the need for self-defense tools. They appreciated the discussion on plow drivers' vulnerability and acknowledged the coverage of this point by previous speakers.
HB609: Elliot Boting Support06:24:14.478 - 3:24:51 PM; Elliot Boting expressed strong support for HB609, emphasizing New Hampshire's commitment to personal liberty and the right to self-defense. They stressed the importance of recognizing non-firearm self-defense tools like stun guns, tasers, and pepper spray, quoting James Monroe to underline the sacredness of self-defense.
HB609: Dr. Hannon Support06:24:59.718 - 3:25:36 PM; Dr. Hannon supported the bill on behalf of the Gun Owners of New Hampshire, suggesting minor amendments to address concerns. They clarified that the bill does not legalize reckless use of self-defense tools, as existing laws cover misuse scenarios. They also discussed the preemption of laws by the state to avoid patchwork regulations and highlighted the potential for new self-defense technologies to be regulated under state laws.
HB56: Representative Rhs Oppose06:46:37.520 - 3:47:14 PM; Representative Rhs moved for Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL) on HB56, arguing that nothing had changed from last year's discussions, and expressing concern over the lack of exceptions for self-defense in cases of immediate threat. They felt the bill did not provide any positive changes.
HB56: Representative Appr Oppose06:47:22.558 - 3:47:59 PM; Representative Appr seconded the motion, agreeing with the concerns about the bill's lack of provisions for immediate threats, particularly in restraining order situations. They highlighted the absence of data showing crimes committed with firearms within 72 hours of purchase in New Hampshire.
HB56: Representative Muse Support06:48:08.040 - 3:48:45 PM; Representative Muse opposed the ITL motion, arguing that HB56 aims to keep firearms out of the hands of those legally prohibited from possessing them. They emphasized that the bill would extend background checks to private sales, a common-sense public safety measure developed with input from various stakeholders.
HB207: Representative Roads Support06:51:20.958 - 3:51:57 PM; Representative Roads moved for Ought to Pass on HB207, noting the items in question are mostly collector's items. They acknowledged ongoing discussions with the Senate and suggested passing the bill to see their response.
HB207: Representative Pro Support06:51:32.798 - 3:52:09 PM; Representative Pro seconded the motion, arguing that weapons like blackjacks and brass knuckles are less harmful than other legal defense tools. They emphasized these items are mainly of interest to collectors.
HB207: Representative Murray Oppose06:54:15.760 - 3:54:52 PM; Representative Murray, who had supported the bill in previous sessions, opposed the Ought to Pass motion this time, citing frustration over repeated attempts to pass the bill without change.
HB207: Representative Muse Oppose06:55:03.440 - 3:55:40 PM; Representative Muse opposed the bill, citing numerous cases of injuries caused by blackjacks and brass knuckles. They argued these weapons are not just antiques but are used to cause serious harm and should remain prohibited.
HB207: Representative Who Pette Support06:57:21.760 - 3:57:58 PM; Representative Who Pette supported the bill, arguing that other everyday items can also serve as force multipliers, suggesting the prohibition on brass knuckles and blackjacks was not justified.
HB207: Representative Sher Oppose06:58:07.200 - 3:58:44 PM; Representative Sher opposed the bill, noting the specific harmful intent of brass knuckles and blackjacks compared to other weapons. They questioned the logic behind legalizing such items when more dangerous weapons are already legal.
HB352: Chairman Roy Chotes Oppose07:00:29.200 - 4:01:06 PM; Chairman Roy Chotes moved for Inexpedient to Legislate on HB352, arguing against the bill's geographic restrictions on firearms at polling places. They felt these restrictions were unnecessary, as laws against menacing already exist, and expanding absentee voting was unwarranted.
HB352: Representative Pro Oppose07:01:15.000 - 4:01:52 PM; Representative Pro seconded the motion, agreeing with the chairman and adding that the suggestion to use absentee voting to avoid disarming at polls was flawed, as it should not be necessary to disarm to vote.
HB352: Representative Murray Information Only07:02:02.360 - 4:02:39 PM; Representative Murray added to the discussion, pointing out that schools, sometimes used as polling places, already have federal laws regulating firearms, suggesting that the bill's concerns were already addressed by existing laws.
HB352: Unidentified Speaker Oppose07:02:46.558 - 4:03:23 PM; The speaker expressed that they personally believe second amendment rights do not disappear at a polling place, but they will vote against the bill as per their constituents' request and with their caucus.
HB352: Unidentified Speaker Support07:03:32.280 - 4:04:09 PM; The speaker argued in favor of the bill, stating it addresses voter intimidation, citing historical and recent examples, including incidents in Manchester. They emphasized the need for precautionary measures and mentioned that similar precautions have been taken by some states since 1776. They also discussed balancing rights, specifically referencing Article 3 of the New Hampshire Constitution, and indicated they would vote against the ITL (Inexpedient to Legislate) recommendation.
HB352: Representative Shear Information Only07:05:50.680 - 4:06:27 PM; Representative Shear proposed a compromise to change the word 'carry' to 'clearly display' in the bill, acknowledging that this would be addressed in another context. He stated he would vote ITL on this bill.
HB381: Representative rhs Support07:08:06.558 - 4:08:43 PM; Representative rhs moved to pass HB381, yielding to the chairman for discussion. The bill aims to exempt firearms built and sold within New Hampshire from the National Firearms Act, potentially provoking federal government action on interstate commerce overreach. The sponsor hopes this will lead to a legal case against federal overreach.
HB381: Chairman Support07:08:53.920 - 4:09:30 PM; The chairman seconded the motion and discussed the bill's intent to challenge the federal government's use of the Commerce Clause. He supported the bill as a means to possibly initiate legal action against federal overreach, despite uncertainty about the outcome.
HB381: Representative Shear Oppose07:09:41.958 - 4:10:18 PM; Representative Shear, as a law professor, expressed opposition to passing legislation solely to challenge federal laws, stating he would vote against the bill.
HB506 0182H: Chairman Support07:12:01.878 - 4:12:38 PM; The chairman introduced a motion to pass HB506 with amendment 0182H. The bill aims to expedite the return of property to owners, reducing wait times and costs. The amendment allows for immediate court orders to return property upon receiving a proceed response from the Department of Safety, with options for property retrieval.
HB609: Chairman Information Only07:15:15.360 - 4:15:52 PM; The chairman announced the appointment of a subcommittee for HB609, consisting of himself, Representative Voyd, Representative New, and Representative Murray, to meet the following week.

Roy, Terry(Chairman)(R)[B]2024	Murray, Alissandra(Clerk)(D)[D-]2024	Rhodes, Jennifer(V Chairman)(R)[B]2024
Harriott-Gathright, Linda(D)[CT]2024	Proulx, Mark(R)[B]2024	Lascelles, Richard(R)[B+]2024
Morency, Pete(R)	Paquette, Kathleen(R)	Murphy, Nancy(D)[CT]2024
Newman, Ray(D)[CT]2024	Meuse, David(D)[CT]2024	Devoid, Ricky(R)
Newell, Jodi(D)[D-]2024	Scherr, Buzz(D)	Valerino, Brian(R)
Sabourin dit Choinière, Matt(R)