Committee Summary for House Election Law (02/04/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
CACR5 00:05:13.320 - 9:01:59 AM	Public Hearing	relating to absentee ballots. Providing that no excuse shall be needed by the voter to receive an absentee ballot.	Lane, Connie(D)[F]2024
HB418 00:39:58.720 - 9:36:44 AM	Public Hearing	relative to eligibility for absentee voting.	Sellers, John(R)[A-]2024
HB136 00:46:37.200 - 9:43:23 AM	Public Hearing	extending the time period for delivery of an absentee ballot from 5:00 p.m. to the close of the polls.	Maggiore, Jim(D)[CT]2024
HB418 00:56:06.480 - 9:52:52 AM	Public Hearing	relative to eligibility for absentee voting.	Sellers, John(R)[A-]2024
HB464 01:47:00.080 - 10:43:46 AM	Public Hearing	prohibiting candidates for political office from participating in counting ballots.	de Vries, Erica(D)
HB158 01:51:02.560 - 10:47:48 AM	Public Hearing	relative to public inspection of absentee ballot lists.	Hill, Gregory(R)[A]2024
HB217 01:54:09.199 - 10:50:55 AM	Public Hearing	relative to absentee ballots.	Lynn, Bob(R)[A]2024
HB464 02:08:47.079 - 11:05:33 AM	Public Hearing	prohibiting candidates for political office from participating in counting ballots.	de Vries, Erica(D)
HB288 03:05:28.040 - 12:02:14 PM	Public Hearing	requires that absentee ballots be requested at least 6 months prior to any election for which the absentee ballot is requested.	Wherry, Robert(R)[A]2024
HB261 03:21:36.399 - 12:18:22 PM	Executive Session	relative to election audits.	Berry, Ross(R)[A-]2024
HB498 03:24:34.160 - 12:21:20 PM	Public Hearing	relative to when a person may receive an absentee ballot.	Potenza, Kelley(R)[A]2024
HB107 03:34:27.120 - 12:31:13 PM	Executive Session	relative to political advertising printed in newspapers, periodicals, or billboards.	Perez, Kristine(R)[A]2024
HB336 03:38:09.800 - 12:34:55 PM	Executive Session	relative to the placement of political advertisements on public right-of-ways.	Aron, Judy(R)[A]2024
HB448 03:41:30.279 - 12:38:16 PM	Executive Session	establishing a committee to study violations found by the April 25, 2023 ballot law commission.	Bernardy, JD(R)[A-]2024
HB403 03:44:13.840 - 12:40:59 PM	Public Hearing	relative to weather conditions which enable absentee voting.	Miller, Seth(D)
HB626 2025-217h 03:49:02.040 - 12:45:48 PM	Executive Session	directing the secretary of state to implement a vulnerability disclosure program for certain election systems.	McFarlane, Donald(R)
CACR3 03:53:22.239 - 12:50:08 PM	Executive Session	relating to recall elections. Providing that the general court may authorize recall elections.	Moffett, Michael(R)[A-]2024
HB630 03:55:50.080 - 12:52:36 PM	Executive Session	preventing the dissemination of deepfake materials of political candidates before an election.	Cormen, Thomas(D)[CT]2024
CACR4 03:59:10.239 - 12:55:56 PM	Executive Session	relating to voting eligibility. Providing that only legal resident citizens who are at least 18 years of age or older who reside in the place they claim as a domicile shall be eligible voters.	Ulery, Jordan(R)[A-]2024
HB327 2025-237h 04:02:24.560 - 12:59:10 PM	Executive Session	relative to filing for office and witnessing affidavits.	McFarlane, Donald(R)
HB294 04:06:35.159 - 1:03:21 PM	Public Hearing	relative to the processing of absentee ballots.	Daniels, Gary(R)
HB389 2025-0195h 04:25:16.640 - 1:22:02 PM	Executive Session	requiring candidates to attest they have not spent more than $1,000 in an election.	Howard, Heath(D)[F]2024
HB686 04:36:04.879 - 1:32:50 PM	Public Hearing	requiring a voter to provide identification when requesting an absentee ballot.	Potenza, Kelley(R)[A]2024
HB686 04:42:55.280 - 1:39:41 PM	Public Hearing	requiring a voter to provide identification when requesting an absentee ballot.	Potenza, Kelley(R)[A]2024
HB474 2025-0216h 05:08:06.280 - 2:04:52 PM	Executive Session	requiring a second witness at the counting of write-in votes.	Burnham, Claudine(R)[A]2024
HB344 05:14:44.280 - 2:11:30 PM	Public Hearing	enables the processing of absentee ballots before election day.	Daniels, Gary(R)
HB269 06:01:46.440 - 2:58:32 PM	Public Hearing	relative to the date for correction of the voter checklist.	Kuttab, Katelyn(R)[A-]2024
HB345 06:07:34.958 - 3:04:20 PM	Public Hearing	enabling selectmen to add additional polling places and requiring selectmen to give notice to voters 30 days before providing such additional polling places.	Perez, Kristine(R)[A]2024

CACR5: Connie Lane, Representative from Manchester District 16 (Ward 2 in Concord) Support00:05:13.320 - 9:01:59 AM; Representative Lane introduced CACR 5, which aims to improve voter access by allowing no-excuse absentee voting, similar to 37 other states. She highlighted that this change has bipartisan support and emphasized the low incidence of fraud in absentee voting, citing a study that compared the likelihood of fraud to being struck by lightning. She urged the committee to let New Hampshire voters decide on this issue rather than the legislature making the decision for them.
CACR5: David Scanlan, Secretary of State Information Only00:08:47.440 - 9:05:33 AM; Secretary Scanlan provided historical context on the development of absentee voting in New Hampshire, noting its necessity-based origins. He discussed the proposed change to make absentee voting a matter of convenience, expressing concerns about balancing voter access with election security. He referenced a study from MIT that compared voting practices across states, indicating New Hampshire's unique position with traditional election day voting. He emphasized the importance of maintaining voter confidence and suggested that any constitutional change should also address voter qualifications.
CACR5: Timothy Horgan, Representative from Strafford County 10 (Durham) Support00:18:24.480 - 9:15:10 AM; Representative Horgan supported the right to absentee voting as a fundamental right, arguing that the resolution expands conditions for absentee voting without diminishing the right. He suggested that if the committee felt the expansion was too broad, they should retain the bill over the summer rather than kill it prematurely, emphasizing the long timeline before a public vote in 2026.
CACR5: Mr. Richard Oppose00:20:35.880 - 9:17:21 AM; Mr. Richard opposed the bill on constitutional grounds, arguing that creating a no-excuse absentee ballot would violate the 14th Amendment and federal election laws due to differing standards. He also mentioned conflicts with existing state statutes and the potential for creating a second class of voters, suggesting that such a significant change should be considered carefully due to its impact on voting equality.
CACR5: David Trumble, from the town of Ware Support00:22:12.960 - 9:18:58 AM; David Trumble supported the bill, emphasizing voting as a fundamental right and highlighting New Hampshire's position as the most difficult state to vote in. He referenced a study showing low instances of voter fraud in absentee voting across 35 states, arguing that New Hampshire should catch up with these states. He cited a study from Columbia Law School to further support his point on the security of absentee voting.
CACR5: John Sellers, Representative from Bristol, Bridgewater, Grafton 10 Information Only00:24:52.720 - 9:21:38 AM; Representative Sellers introduced House Bill 418, which focuses on the New Hampshire Constitution's Article 11 regarding absentee voting. He pointed out the specific reasons allowed for absentee voting in the Constitution and the historical amendments that have not changed those reasons. He expressed a desire to bring any changes to the reasons for absentee voting back to the people for a vote, rather than allowing legislative or executive expansion without public input.
CACR5: Jean Barnes, Moderator of Ward 2, Concord Information Only00:30:29.799 - 9:27:15 AM; Jean Barnes provided information on the process of handling absentee ballots during the COVID outbreak in Concord. She explained that over 500 absentee ballots were processed with the permission of the Attorney General's office and the Secretary of State. They used a system to highlight names in the register to track absentee ballots, emphasizing the seriousness and thoroughness of the process. She highlighted that processing such a large number of absentee ballots on Election Day would be impossible, and even with 142 ballots, it took four hours to process them meticulously.
CACR5: Kristen Evans, Policy Director for AEL New Hampshire Support00:32:06.440 - 9:28:52 AM; Kristen Evans testified in strong support of CACR 5, emphasizing the importance of absentee voting for individuals with disabilities. She argued that the current system requiring a specific reason for absentee voting places an undue burden on disabled individuals, who face barriers to in-person voting due to transportation and health issues. She cited research indicating that removing restrictions on absentee voting increases voter participation among disabled individuals. Evans also mentioned that New Hampshire's existing safeguards ensure the legitimacy of mail-in votes, and stressed that voting is a fundamental right that should not be dependent on health or mobility.
CACR5: Kaylee Estadio, Durham voter and Public Policy Fellow with Open Democracy Support00:35:33.680 - 9:32:19 AM; Kaylee Estadio testified in strong support of CACR 5, arguing that New Hampshire is one of the few states still requiring an excuse for absentee voting. She cited the increased voter turnout during the 2020 election when no-excuse absentee voting was temporarily allowed. Estadio emphasized that absentee voting meets the needs of Granite Staters and should be a priority for state representatives. She argued that various personal reasons might necessitate absentee voting, and that it should be a bipartisan issue to facilitate civic duty.
CACR5: Henry Clemento, Deputy Legal Director of the American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire Support00:37:55.160 - 9:34:41 AM; Henry Clemento supported CACR 5, noting that historically, about 9% of New Hampshire voters use absentee ballots, but this number increased to 30% during the 2020 election due to expanded absentee voting. He argued that passing CACR 5 would reduce Election Day lines and costs for local election officials. Clemento emphasized New Hampshire's robust process for evaluating absentee ballots and responded to a question about missing reasons for absentee voting, highlighting the issue of voting while sick.
HB418: Timothy Horgan, Representative, Strafford County District 10, Durham Oppose00:39:58.720 - 9:36:44 AM; Representative Horgan opposed HB 418, arguing that eliminating a large number of exceptions for absentee voting is unnecessary. He emphasized the importance of maintaining these exceptions, as they are crucial for individuals who might otherwise be denied the right to vote. Horgan also mentioned a bill he proposed about guns at polling places and suggested that while he would not oppose no-excuse absentee voting, the current exceptions should remain.
HB418: Betsy Ferguson, Exeter, New Hampshire Oppose00:42:52.359 - 9:39:38 AM; Betsy Ferguson strongly opposed HB 418, arguing that it limits access to absentee ballots for those who need them. She highlighted New Hampshire's low ranking in voting access and the bill's potential to remove protections for people with work conflicts. Ferguson mentioned that other states with low voting access still provide absentee ballots for various reasons, including age, caregiving, and illness, suggesting that making voting more restrictive is not the solution.
HB418: Fidelma McKenna, Certified Nurse Midwife, New Hampshire Oppose00:45:19.680 - 9:42:05 AM; Fidelma McKenna opposed HB 418, expressing distress over the potential removal of accommodations for workers, parents, elder care providers, and the immunocompromised. As a healthcare provider, she appreciated the current options for absentee voting, which allow her to participate in the democratic process despite her work schedule. McKenna also emphasized the public health benefits of providing more voting options to reduce the spread of contagious diseases.
HB418: Bonnie Bruno Oppose00:48:42.200 - 9:45:28 AM; Bonnie Bruno opposed HB 418, criticizing it as part of a broader effort to restrict and disenfranchise voters. She argued that such bills undermine democracy and that a political party confident in its policies would instead make voting more accessible. Bruno suggested alternative voter-friendly policies, such as early voting and measures to assist people with disabilities, and emphasized the importance of public hearings in a healthy democracy.
HB418: Sue Nastasi, Undeclared registered voter, Exeter Oppose00:52:13.440 - 9:48:59 AM; Sue Nastasi opposed HB 418, arguing that the reasons for requesting an absentee ballot should remain private. She shared a personal experience of missing a vote due to unexpected work commitments and criticized the requirement to check off 'disability' during the COVID outbreak, even when not applicable. Nastasi emphasized the need for reasonable and sensible options on absentee applications to avoid such experiences.
HB136: Jim Maori, Representative from North Hampton Support00:46:37.200 - 9:43:23 AM; Representative Jim Maori introduced HB 136, which aims to extend the deadline for submitting absentee ballots at polling locations to the close of polls. He recounted a real-life situation in North Hampton where a resident arrived just before the polls closed and was unable to submit an absentee ballot. Maori noted that most states allow absentee ballot submissions until 8:00 PM and argued that extending the deadline in New Hampshire would increase voter participation.
HB418: Kristen Evans, AEL New Hampshire Oppose00:56:06.480 - 9:52:52 AM; Kristen Evans, Director of Policy for AEL New Hampshire, a disability justice organization, testified against HB 418, arguing that it undermines democracy by limiting the right to vote, particularly for individuals with disabilities. She highlighted that the bill creates unnecessary burdens by requiring disclosure of medical conditions and proof of personal obligations for absentee voting, which she sees as isolating and stigmatizing. Evans stressed the importance of inclusive and equitable policies that enhance voter participation rather than restrict it.
HB418: Joan Dargy, New Hampshire City and Town Clerks Association Oppose00:58:12.119 - 9:54:58 AM; Joan Dargy, representing the New Hampshire City and Town Clerks Association, opposed HB 418. She explained that the bill's proposed changes would make absentee voting more stringent, potentially discouraging legal requests for absentee ballots among caregivers who cannot leave their loved ones unattended. Dargy used her personal experience with caring for a father with Alzheimer's to illustrate the challenges caregivers face, emphasizing that the bill would negatively impact those who are already marginalized.
HB418: Liz Torelli, League of Women Voters of New Hampshire Oppose01:00:30.599 - 9:57:16 AM; Liz Torelli, President of the League of Women Voters of New Hampshire, opposed HB 418, emphasizing that it contradicts the organization's mission to empower voters. She highlighted past legislative efforts to improve voter access, such as allowing voting the day before town meeting day due to weather concerns and enabling incarcerated individuals to vote absentee. Torelli urged the committee to maintain these progressive changes and reject the bill, which she believes would regress voter rights.
HB418: Rebecca Sky, New Hampshire State Commission on Aging Oppose01:03:39.079 - 10:00:25 AM; Rebecca Sky, Executive Director of the New Hampshire State Commission on Aging, opposed HB 418. She focused on the impact on older adults, noting that their population is growing and that weather-related concerns significantly affect their safety. Sky cited data on fall-related injuries among the elderly and stressed the importance of absentee voting options for this group. She also discussed the challenges faced by unpaid caregivers and healthcare workers, advocating for policies that support their voting rights.
HB418: Christina Fitzpatrick, AARP New Hampshire Oppose01:14:28.520 - 10:11:14 AM; Christina Fitzpatrick, State Director for AARP New Hampshire, testified against HB 418, focusing on its impact on caregivers. She pointed out that the bill would eliminate many qualified reasons for requesting an absentee ballot, which is crucial for the 168,000 caregivers in the state who might face unpredictable situations on Election Day. Fitzpatrick urged the committee to consider the negative effects on family caregivers and vote against the bill.
HB418: Olivia Zinc from Franklin New Hampshire, reading testimony from Bob Perry from Strafford Oppose01:16:18.600 - 10:13:04 AM; Olivia Zinc read Bob Perry's testimony, who strongly opposes HB 418. Perry argued that the bill contradicts the New Hampshire Constitution's principle of ensuring people's freedom in their relationship with elected officials. He cited progress in voting rights since 1784 but noted that HB 418 repeals statutes that have been in place for years, making voting more burdensome by restricting absentee voting to only those absent on voting day or with disabilities. He highlighted the impact on various groups, including young, elderly, and different political affiliations, and shared a personal story about his father, a retired veteran who was wheelchair-bound but would not identify as disabled. Zinc emphasized that such restrictions would harm people like her father.
HB418: David Trumble from Derry Information Only01:19:13.800 - 10:15:59 AM; David Trumble provided a constitutional analysis regarding HB 418. He argued that the New Hampshire Constitution sets a floor, not a ceiling, for absentee voting provisions. He pointed out that if the Constitution intended to limit absentee voting to only two categories, it would have explicitly stated so, similar to how it sets ceilings for other matters like treason. Trumble's argument was that the legislature could extend voting categories beyond what the Constitution specifies as a minimum.
HB418: Kaylee Estro from Durham, Open Democracy Oppose01:21:04.000 - 10:17:50 AM; Kaylee Estro vehemently opposed HB 418, describing it as a blatant attempt to disenfranchise voters. She argued that New Hampshire's absentee voting eligibility is already restrictive, and this bill would remove valid reasons such as religious observance, work, childcare, and extreme weather events. Estro emphasized that not everyone can take time off work to vote in person and criticized the bill as part of a broader effort to make voting harder under the guise of security concerns, which she argued are unfounded based on evidence from the Brennan Center.
HB418: Matt Musian from Claremont, 603 Forward Oppose01:23:14.639 - 10:20:00 AM; Matt Musian opposed HB 418, highlighting its unnecessary restriction on absentee voting. He noted the bill's disproportionate impact on young, working-age Granite Staters, especially those with families or caregiving responsibilities. Musian argued that the bill would force many to miss work to vote in person, which is not feasible for those in low-income or rural areas. He stressed that absentee voting has been secure and reliable, ensuring all voters can participate regardless of their ability to vote in person, and criticized the bill's repeal of absentee voting during winter storms as a risk to voter safety.
HB418: McKenzie Taylor from America Votes Oppose01:25:46.159 - 10:22:32 AM; McKenzie Taylor opposed HB 418, arguing that it would limit access to voting by removing provisions that allow absentee voting for various reasons. She expressed concerns about the impact on parents, caregivers, and working individuals, including first responders like firefighters and doctors, who might be unable to vote in person due to extended work shifts. Taylor submitted written testimony from Paul King III, a career firefighter, to illustrate the challenges faced by those affected by the bill.
HB418: Henry Clemento from the American Civil Liberties Union of New Hampshire Oppose01:27:37.719 - 10:24:23 AM; Henry Clemento opposed HB 418 for two main reasons: it attacks the right to vote by removing excuses for absentee voting and it infringes on religious liberty by preventing people from voting absentee due to religious obligations. He shared a personal story about the challenges of voting while caring for a sick child, underscoring the real impact on caregivers. Clemento urged opposition to the bill, highlighting its negative effects on voting access and personal freedoms.
HB418: Richard from an unspecified location Support01:29:37.239 - 10:26:23 AM; Richard supported HB 418, arguing that the New Hampshire Constitution limits the legislature's authority to create absentee voting provisions beyond what has been explicitly amended into the Constitution. He cited historical Supreme Court rulings and the 1942 amendment that established the current exemptions for absentee voting. Richard argued that any expansion of voting rights beyond these provisions would require another constitutional amendment, emphasizing the state's status as a constitutional republic where government originates from the people's consent.
HB418: Tina Guilford, Town Clerk in Derry Support01:32:29.920 - 10:29:15 AM; Tina Guilford shared a personal story about a voter in Derry who missed the deadline to submit her daughter's absentee ballot, resulting in emotional distress. She highlighted the need for extending the time to submit absentee ballots, explaining that this bill would help prevent similar situations. She noted that while some clerks oppose the bill, she believes it would not lead to a significant increase in last-minute ballots.
HB418: Joan Dargy, New Hampshire City and Town Clerks Association Support01:35:58.520 - 10:32:44 AM; Joan Dargy supported the bill but suggested an amendment to allow absentee ballots to be submitted up to half an hour before the polls close. She expressed concern that accepting ballots right up to the close of polls could be problematic due to the busy nature of election workers at that time.
HB418: Dan Healey, Nashua City Clerk Support01:38:46.840 - 10:35:32 AM; Dan Healey supported the bill but echoed the need for a buffer period before the polls close for submitting absentee ballots. He mentioned a situation in Nashua where the post office delivered ballots to the wrong location, emphasizing the need for time to correct such errors. He noted that while the number of late ballots is low, a buffer would help manage unexpected issues.
HB418: Kaye Estacio, Durham voter and public policy fellow with Open Democracy Support01:44:20.599 - 10:41:06 AM; Kaye Estacio strongly supported HB 136, arguing that the current law disenfranchises certain groups like working parents, the disabled, and college students. She criticized the reasoning behind the original statute, suggesting that allowing absentee ballot counting before polls close could help. She urged the committee to pass HB 136 to ensure all Granite Staters can exercise their right to vote.
HB464: Erica De Support01:47:00.080 - 10:43:46 AM; Erica De supported the amended version of HB 464, which aims to eliminate potential conflicts of interest in the ballot counting process by prohibiting candidates, except those essential to election administration, from participating in pre-election ballot counting. She emphasized the importance of maintaining public trust in the electoral process and argued that trained election officials and volunteers can handle the responsibilities without candidate involvement.
HB464: Chase Seon, New Hampshire Council on Developmental Disabilities Oppose01:50:00.199 - 10:46:46 AM; Chase Seon, representing the New Hampshire Council on Developmental Disabilities, expressed opposition to HB 464. He highlighted privacy concerns for individuals with disabilities, suggesting that a public list would expose them unnecessarily. He also mentioned the potential for outing individuals with early onset conditions like Alzheimer's, who may not want their status publicly disclosed.
HB158: Sarah Burke Cohen, New Hampshire Municipal Association Oppose01:51:02.560 - 10:47:48 AM; Sarah Burke Cohen, representing the New Hampshire Municipal Association, opposed HB 158. She argued that requiring ballot clerks to validate protective orders under RSA 173b is outside their scope of duties. Additionally, she stated that the 60-day requirement to prepare lists is burdensome and could potentially jeopardize individuals' safety and welfare if mistakenly publicized.
HB217: Representative Gazowsky Information Only01:54:09.199 - 10:50:55 AM; Representative Gazowsky introduced HB 217, stating that it requires absentee ballot voters to submit information demonstrating citizenship, age, domicile, and identity to qualify to vote. He took no questions.
HB217: David Trumble, Town of Wolfeboro Oppose01:54:41.639 - 10:51:27 AM; David Trumble from Wolfeboro opposed HB 217, arguing that voting is a right, not a privilege, and that there's no evidence of fraud justifying such measures. He cited a Brennan Center for Justice report indicating that many Americans lack readily available proof of citizenship, which could disenfranchise a significant number of voters in New Hampshire.
HB217: Daniel Richard Support01:57:43.239 - 10:54:29 AM; Daniel Richard supported the concept of a citizenship requirement for voting but criticized the approach in HB 217. He suggested that the removal of 'native born or naturalized' in 1973 from the state's voting laws led to the current issues and proposed restoring state citizenship as a prerequisite to vote.
HB217: Chenda Lynch, Contoocook Oppose01:58:47.159 - 10:55:33 AM; Chenda Lynch from Contoocook, who has experience as a deputy registrar in Manchester, opposed HB 217. She shared personal experiences with absentee voting during the COVID-19 pandemic and a hospital stay, arguing that additional requirements for absentee ballots are unnecessary and could disenfranchise voters, especially in future health crises.
HB217: M. Sue Nystrom Oppose02:02:27.040 - 10:59:13 AM; M. Sue Nystrom strongly opposed HB 217, asserting that it questions the integrity of local election officials. She explained that existing checks and balances in the absentee ballot process are sufficient and that the bill's requirements are unnecessary.
HB217: Mackenzie Taylor, New Hampshire Campaign for Voting Rights and America Votes Oppose02:03:59.760 - 11:00:45 AM; Mackenzie Taylor, representing the New Hampshire Campaign for Voting Rights and America Votes, opposed HB 217. She emphasized that the bill would add burdensome requirements for absentee voters, particularly those who are unable to travel easily, potentially disenfranchising the most vulnerable.
HB217: Kristen Evans, AEL New Hampshire Oppose02:05:55.400 - 11:02:41 AM; Kristen Evans, Director of Policy at AEL New Hampshire, a disability justice organization, testified in opposition to House Bill 217. She argued that the bill would create an undue burden for many eligible voters, particularly those with disabilities who rely on absentee registration and voting. Evans highlighted the challenges people with disabilities face in gathering and submitting additional documentation required by the bill, such as birth certificates and passports, which often involves travel, fees, and access to technology. She emphasized that the bill would disproportionately affect individuals with mobility limitations, cognitive disabilities, low-income residents, and those without reliable transportation. Evans also pointed out that the bill would complicate the process for voters who require support from guardians or caregivers to manage their personal records. She concluded by urging the committee to vote ITL (inexpedient to legislate) on HB 217, stating that New Hampshire should be working to expand accessible voting options rather than creating additional barriers.
HB464: Joan Dargy, New Hampshire City and Town Clerks Association Information Only02:08:47.079 - 11:05:33 AM; Joan Dargy from the New Hampshire City and Town Clerks Association testified regarding House Bill 464. She noted that many volunteers who count uncast ballots are also candidates for office, which could lead to delays and increased costs if these individuals are excluded from the counting process. Dargy explained that in some cases, town clerks and moderators are on the ballot simultaneously, and excluding them could necessitate hiring additional staff, potentially impacting smaller towns more significantly.
HB464: Tina Gilford, Town Clerk from Derry Information Only02:09:59.000 - 11:06:45 AM; Tina Gilford, the Town Clerk from Derry, provided testimony on House Bill 464. She mentioned that an amendment to the bill had been discussed, which she had not yet seen. Gilford explained that in Derry, ballot clerks are paid to count blank ballots, and during primaries, they are paired by party. She noted that election officials, including herself, the moderator, and town counselors, often assist in counting to ensure party balance, especially since they are sometimes on the ballot themselves. Gilford emphasized that these counts are done publicly and transparently. She expressed concerns about the bill's impact on the counting process and suggested that the amendment might address some of her concerns.
HB464: Brody Des, New Hampshire Municipal Association Oppose02:13:33.520 - 11:10:19 AM; Brody Des from the New Hampshire Municipal Association testified against House Bill 464 as amended. He argued that the bill is duplicative and unnecessary because the disqualification of certain election officials is already addressed in existing statutes (RSA 658:24 and RSA 659:58). Des expressed concern that having these disqualifications in multiple places in the statute could create confusion for election officials and those running elections. He acknowledged the intent of the bill but suggested that it could complicate the implementation of election procedures.
HB288: Robert Wuri, Representative from Hillsboro District 13, Hudson Support03:05:28.040 - 12:02:14 PM; Representative Robert Wuri introduced House Bill 288, which requires absentee ballots to be requested at least six months before an election. He explained that in the November 2024 election, a total of 87,846 absentee ballots were requested, with some requests coming very early in the process. Wuri noted that the bill would create a modest restriction on the timeframe for requesting absentee ballots, which could simplify administrative processes and provide a controlled variable. He detailed the distribution of absentee ballot requests over different quarters leading up to the election and clarified that the bill's text had a discrepancy in the title, which he intended to address.
HB288: Timothy Horgan, Representative from Strafford County District 10 Oppose03:09:54.760 - 12:06:40 PM; Representative Timothy Horgan opposed House Bill 288, arguing that it would disenfranchise voters, even if only 2% of absentee ballot applications are affected. He criticized the bill as unnecessary and pointed out a drafting error in the bill's title. Horgan expressed concern about the impact on voters who rely on absentee voting and urged the committee to oppose the bill and any attempts to restrict the right to vote absentee. He questioned the appropriate timeframe for requesting absentee ballots, suggesting it should be within the election cycle and raised concerns about the bill's applicability to special elections.
HB288: Aaron Henson, Deputy Secretary of State Information Only03:12:08.720 - 12:08:54 PM; Aaron Henson, Deputy Secretary of State, informed the committee about the federal postcard application allowing UOCAVA voters to request absentee ballots for an entire year, which would supersede any changes made to state law regarding UOCAVA voters. He clarified that the Secretary of State's office remains neutral on the bill if UOCAVA voters are excluded from the changes.
HB288: Dan Healey, Nashua City Clerk Support03:13:01.800 - 12:09:47 PM; Dan Healey, the Nashua City Clerk, expressed support for the bill provided the UOCAVA issue is addressed. He highlighted the issue of the six-month validity of absentee ballot requests, noting that residents often submit requests far in advance, leading to potential address changes and confusion. He used an example of a couple who submitted their request in January for a November election and were upset when the ballot was mailed to an outdated address.
HB288: Sue Nastasi, Rollinsford Oppose03:16:14.680 - 12:13:00 PM; Sue Nastasi from Rollinsford opposed the bill, citing concerns over the realism of the timing involved with absentee ballot requests. She argued that the bill's provisions, especially regarding the six-month lead time, could cause confusion among voters.
HB288: Betsy Ferguson, Exeter, New Hampshire Oppose03:17:41.239 - 12:14:27 PM; Betsy Ferguson from Exeter opposed the bill due to the discrepancy between the title and content of the bill, which she found confusing. She suggested that the bill should be resubmitted with a title that accurately reflects its content.
HB288: Representative Kelly Potenza, Strafford District 19, Rochester Support03:19:06.920 - 12:15:52 PM; Representative Kelly Penza supported the bill, noting that similar issues had occurred with one of her bills and she had submitted an amendment to address it. She highlighted concerns from her constituents in Strafford County regarding the six-month lag in absentee ballot requests, particularly in relation to the first-in-the-nation primary and college students.
HB261: Chairman Information Only03:21:36.399 - 12:18:22 PM; The Chairman announced that due to a posting error, the previous vote on HB 261 relative to election audits did not count, and the committee needed to revote. He mentioned that the previous vote was unanimous at 18 to 0.
HB261: Committee Members Support03:22:40.520 - 12:19:26 PM; The committee members unanimously supported the motion to pass HB 261 with a vote of 16 to 0, as some members were not present for the revote.
HB498: Representative Kelly Potenza, Strafford District 19 Support03:24:34.160 - 12:21:20 PM; Representative Kelly Penza introduced HB 498 FN, explaining that it was filed at the request of a constituent involved in elections. The bill aims to limit the time frame for sending absentee ballot applications to city or town clerks to no more than 45 days before an election, to address issues with ballot curation and chain of custody.
HB498: Representative Timothy Horgan, Strafford County District 10, Durham Oppose03:26:45.040 - 12:23:31 PM; Representative Timothy Horgan opposed HB 498 FN, arguing that the 45-day window proposed in the bill is too short, especially for UOCAVA and overseas voters who need more time for ballots to be sent abroad. He also stated that the bill could unnecessarily cast doubt on election validity and suggested it should be deemed inexpedient to legislate.
HB498: David Scanlan, Secretary of State Information Only03:28:14.560 - 12:25:00 PM; David Scanlan, the Secretary of State, expressed confusion about the intent of HB 498 FN, questioning whether the language truly reflected the sponsor's aim. He explained that the bill's focus on absentee ballot applications was problematic as these are mostly available online, and third parties can distribute them. He also noted that voters do not necessarily need to use an application to request an absentee ballot.
HB498: Tina Guilford, Town Clerk from Derry Oppose03:31:52.279 - 12:28:38 PM; Tina Guilford expressed concerns about the proposed 45-day window for accepting absentee ballot applications as outlined in HB 498 FN. She highlighted the practical challenges this would pose, especially for 'snowbirds' who leave New Hampshire post-Christmas and typically apply for absentee ballots around that time for the March election. Guilford explained that the current system allows for early application and timely mailing of ballots, which is crucial for voters heading to destinations like Florida, where mail delivery can take a week. She also mentioned having already placed a ballot order due to a recent school district deliberative session, indicating the importance of early preparation. Guilford concluded by emphasizing the need for a longer application window to accommodate voters' needs.
HB107: Representative Wood Support03:34:27.120 - 12:31:13 PM; Representative Wood moved to pass HB 107 as 'ought to pass,' indicating support for the bill which deals with political advertisements. The motion was seconded by Representative Harvey Bolia.
HB107: Representative Lane Oppose03:35:43.520 - 12:32:29 PM; Representative Lane opposed the motion to pass HB 107, citing concerns over disinformation and the need for clarity in distinguishing between candidate-driven content and factual information. Lane argued that the term 'political advertisement' has been used for a long time without significant burden, suggesting the existing system should remain unchanged.
HB336: Representative Wei Oppose03:38:09.800 - 12:34:55 PM; Representative Wei moved for HB 336 to be deemed inexpedient to legislate, suggesting opposition to the bill concerning political advertisements on public rights of way. The motion was seconded by Representative Woods.
HB448: Representative Lane Oppose03:41:30.279 - 12:38:16 PM; Representative Lane moved for HB 448 to be deemed inexpedient to legislate, indicating opposition to the bill that aimed to establish a committee to study ballot law commission violations. The motion was seconded and passed without further discussion.
HB403: Representative Seth Miller from Strafford 21 in Dover Support03:44:13.840 - 12:40:59 PM; Representative Seth Miller introduced HB 403, which proposes to expand the conditions under which absentee voting is allowed due to severe weather. Miller, also a moderator for Ward Five in Dover, argued that the current guidelines in the election manual allow for absentee voting the day before an election if severe weather is forecast, but the bill aims to include any National Weather Service warning or watch. This change would accommodate voters during various severe weather events beyond just winter storms, ensuring safety and accessibility. Miller emphasized the importance of allowing voters to cast their ballots safely without risking travel in hazardous conditions.
HB626 2025-217h: Unnamed Representative Support03:49:02.040 - 12:45:48 PM; An unnamed representative moved for HB 626 to pass with Amendment 2025-217h, which addresses the Secretary of State's concerns about disclosing vulnerabilities before they are resolved. The amendment proposes a timeline for fixing vulnerabilities in consultation with the cybersecurity advisory committee. The motion was seconded by Representative Wood, and the amendment was adopted by voice vote. The bill, as amended, was then passed by roll call.
CACR3: Representative Prudhomme O'Brien Oppose03:53:22.239 - 12:50:08 PM; Representative Prudhomme O'Brien moved for CACR 3 to be deemed inexpedient to legislate, indicating opposition to the bill related to recall elections. The motion was seconded by Representative Mirad, and passed without further discussion.
HB630: Representative Nome Support03:55:50.080 - 12:52:36 PM; Representative Nome spoke in favor of HB 630, arguing that it would close a loophole allowing the spread of potentially false deep fake materials by political candidates. Despite the motion to deem the bill inexpedient to legislate, Nome highlighted the public support for the bill, with a ratio of 41 to 1 in favor, and suggested it should pass.
CACR4: Representative Wei Support03:59:10.239 - 12:55:56 PM; Representative Wei moved to retain CACR 4, which proposes changes to voting eligibility requirements. The motion to retain was seconded by Representative Burnham.
CACR4: Representative Lane Oppose04:00:21.199 - 12:57:07 PM; Representative Lane opposed the motion to retain CACR 4, arguing that it involves constitutional changes with undefined terms that have been litigated for years, suggesting it should not be retained.
HB327 2025-237h: Unnamed Representative Support04:02:24.560 - 12:59:10 PM; An unnamed representative moved for HB 327 FN to pass with Amendment 2025-237h, which simplifies the filing process for state representatives by allowing them to file at either the Town Clerk or the Secretary of State's office. The amendment was described as a cleaner approach than specifying operational hours for clerks. The motion was seconded by Representative Prudhomme O'Brien, and the amendment was adopted by voice vote. The bill, as amended, was then passed by roll call.
HB294: Representative Daniels Information Only04:06:35.159 - 1:03:21 PM; Representative Daniels was recognized for the purpose of introducing HB 294, which deals with the processing of ballots. The introduction was limited to five minutes due to the pace of the session, but specific details about the bill were not provided in the transcript snippet.
HB294: Gary Daniels, Representative from Hillsborough District 43, Milford Support04:07:09.159 - 1:03:55 PM; Representative Gary Daniels, the prime sponsor of House Bill 294, explained that the bill aims to remove a provision in RSA 659:49 that allows the postponement of absentee ballot processing until after the polls close if requested by 10 or more individuals. He highlighted that this can significantly delay election results, potentially until very late at night or early morning, which burdens volunteer resources. He emphasized that the bill would not affect the requirement for the moderator to announce when absentee ballot processing would begin, and he urged the committee to support the bill.
HB294: Peter Baselier, Moderator for Milford Support04:10:02.000 - 1:06:48 PM; Peter Baselier, the moderator for Milford, supported HB 294, explaining that the current law allows a very small percentage of voters to delay absentee ballot processing until after polls close, which could extend election officials' workday to over 22 hours. He shared that in the last election, the last vote was cast at 8:45 PM, and if the provision were used, results might not be available until after 2 AM. Baselier stressed the strain this puts on unpaid volunteers and election officials, advocating for the change proposed by HB 294.
HB294: Autumn Rashik Goodwin, Program Coordinator for Open Democracy, Manchester Support04:14:10.239 - 1:10:56 PM; Autumn Rashik Goodwin from Open Democracy in Manchester supported HB 294, noting its bipartisan nature. She argued that allowing a small group of voters to delay absentee ballot processing is unrepresentative and could extend the time election results are announced, putting a burden on election officials. She encouraged the committee to pass the bill to alleviate these issues.
HB294: Jonathan Kip, Town Moderator of Londonderry Support04:16:05.159 - 1:12:51 PM; Jonathan Kip, the town moderator of Londonderry, echoed the sentiments of the previous speakers in supporting HB 294. He pointed out that a tiny fraction of voters could disrupt the entire election process by delaying absentee ballot processing, leading to increased errors and logistical challenges. He emphasized the disparity between the small number of voters needed to cause disruption compared to the majority needed for ballot measures, urging the committee to consider the bill favorably.
HB294: Dave Nelson, Town Moderator of Derry Support04:17:43.800 - 1:14:29 PM; Dave Nelson, the Town Moderator of Derry, supports HB 294, emphasizing the need for improved transparency in processing absentee ballots. He explains that processing absentee ballots late at night, especially after polls close, leads to fatigue among poll workers, which can result in mistakes. During the most recent presidential election, his team started processing absentee ballots at 9:00 AM and continued until 3:00 AM the next morning, highlighting the strain on workers and the potential for errors if processing were to be delayed further. He notes that while there have been attempts to delay absentee ballot processing in Derry, none have succeeded due to insufficient signatures.
HB294: Dan Healey, Nashua City Clerk on behalf of the New Hampshire City and Town Clerks Association Support04:20:47.159 - 1:17:33 PM; Dan Healey, representing the New Hampshire City and Town Clerks Association, supports HB 294. He explains that in Nashua, they start processing absentee ballots two hours after polls open to maximize processing time throughout the day. He believes delaying processing until polls close would only delay results without a clear benefit, especially since only a small number of voters (10) are needed to petition for a delay. He mentions that this issue has been on the association's radar and that there has been no successful implementation of delaying absentee ballot processing until recently.
HB294: Sarah Shanard, Voting Rights Program Manager with the New Hampshire Campaign for Voting Rights Support04:23:02.600 - 1:19:48 PM; Sarah Shanard, from the New Hampshire Campaign for Voting Rights, supports HB 294, arguing that delaying absentee ballot processing until the end of the day prolongs the entire process, strains poll workers, and delays election results. She highlights that absentee ballot processing is already public and noticed, and that delaying it serves no purpose other than to extend the workday for election officials.
HB389 2025-0195h: Representative Lane Support04:25:16.640 - 1:22:02 PM; Representative Lane moves that HB 389 FN ought to pass as amended with amendment 2025-0195h, which addresses comments from the Secretary of State's office to make terms consistent with last year's campaign finance reform. She argues for transparency by requiring candidates to check a box affirming their expenditures and receipts did not exceed $1,000.
HB389 2025-0195h: Representative Qua Oppose04:29:08.439 - 1:25:54 PM; Representative Qua opposes HB 389 FN, arguing that the current law under RSA 664:7 is already transparent and that the bill is redundant and unnecessary. He states that candidates who do not file a campaign finance report are clearly understood to have not exceeded the $1,000 threshold. He believes the bill would impose an unnecessary administrative burden on candidates, especially noting that over 400 candidates did not submit reports in a recent election.
HB389 2025-0195h: Representative Lane Support04:33:53.799 - 1:30:39 PM; Representative Lane reiterates her support for HB 389 FN, mentioning that last year, some candidates spent over $1,000 without affirming it, which leaves a gap in transparency. She disagrees with Representative Qua on whether the bill imposes an unnecessary burden.
HB686: Representative Kelly Penz, Stafford District 19 Support04:36:04.879 - 1:32:50 PM; Representative Kelly Penz supports HB 686 FN, emphasizing the need for voter ID when requesting absentee ballots to follow the constitution and prevent unchecked absentee voting. She cites an example from Rochester where a clerk was misled about ID requirements. Penz argues that the current system creates two classes of voters, which she believes is illegal. She proposes that absentee ballots should require notarization to verify voter identity, similar to in-person voting.
HB686: Representative William, Republican Information Only04:42:55.280 - 1:39:41 PM; Representative William inquired about the absence of identity verification for absentee ballots, contrasting it with the verification process at polling places. He confirmed that the bill aims to introduce notarization to ensure identity verification for absentee voting.
HB686: Representative Willams, Democrat Information Only04:43:55.718 - 1:40:41 PM; Representative Willams questioned the necessity of a color photocopy for the absentee ballot application. The bill's sponsor clarified that the color requirement was added by the Office of Legislative Services (OLS) to prevent ID manipulation, but they were open to reconsidering this aspect if it posed a problem.
HB686: Representative Grill, Democrat Information Only04:45:55.958 - 1:42:41 PM; Representative Grill discussed the potential use of technology for identity verification, suggesting online systems could streamline the process for absentee voting. The bill's sponsor expressed skepticism towards online solutions, preferring traditional methods and citing concerns about security and feasibility.
HB686: Representative C, Party not specified Information Only04:48:43.638 - 1:45:29 PM; Representative C asked about the notarization process for absentee ballot applications. The bill's sponsor confirmed that voters would need to show their ID to a notary but not send a copy of it.
HB686: Linda Bundy, Antrim Oppose04:49:52.520 - 1:46:38 PM; Linda Bundy from Antrim opposed HB686, arguing that the requirement for a notarized application and a color copy of a photo ID would be burdensome, particularly for senior citizens and people with disabilities. She highlighted the financial and time costs involved, suggesting these could discourage voting, and urged the committee to vote inexpedient to legislate.
HB686: Liz Tantarelli, President of the League of Women Voters of New Hampshire Oppose04:51:04.638 - 1:47:50 PM; Liz Tantarelli opposed the bill, focusing on the difficulties it would pose for those needing to vote absentee, such as people with health issues or those caring for others. She pointed out the scarcity of notaries, especially in rural areas, and the potential costs, describing these requirements as a form of poll tax that could deter voting.
HB686: Autumn Rashik Goodwin, Program Coordinator for Open Democracy, Manchester Oppose04:53:53.638 - 1:50:39 PM; Autumn Rashik Goodwin opposed HB686, emphasizing the barriers it would create for those with physical limitations or those out of town. She discussed the potential costs of notarization and its impact on voters, especially those on fixed incomes, suggesting it could act as a poll tax and disenfranchise voters.
HB686: Kristen Evans, Director of Policy for AEL New Hampshire Oppose04:56:08.840 - 1:52:54 PM; Kristen Evans strongly opposed HB686, arguing it erects discriminatory barriers to absentee voting. She highlighted the challenges for voters with disabilities, including transportation issues, financial burdens, and the lack of technology for color copying. She criticized the notarization requirement as another hurdle, particularly for those in rural areas or congregate care settings, and urged the committee to reject the bill to maintain voting accessibility for disabled individuals.
HB686: Mackenzie Taylor, New Hampshire campaign for voting rights and America votes Oppose04:59:18.200 - 1:56:04 PM; Mackenzie Taylor spoke in opposition to House Bill 686, emphasizing the challenges it would pose for voters, particularly those with disabilities and seniors who rely on absentee voting. She highlighted the additional burdens of requiring a printer, scanner, and notary services, which could deter these voters. Taylor shared a personal anecdote about her grandmother, illustrating how the bill could further complicate the voting process for those who are homebound and for whom voting is already a significant effort.
HB686: Richard Information Only05:01:57.000 - 1:58:43 PM; Richard provided information on the legal aspects of the affidavit requirement for absentee voting, referencing his case before the state supreme court and the historical use of affidavits in voting law. He pointed out the disparity in the application of voting laws and mentioned a previous bill (House Bill 1569) that required voter ID for all voting methods, emphasizing the legal binding nature of existing statutes.
HB686: Dan Healey, Nashua City Clerk Oppose05:03:55.760 - 2:00:41 PM; Dan Healey, opposing House Bill 686, discussed the practical implications of the bill on the absentee ballot request process. He noted that the requirement for notarization would eliminate the ability to receive requests via email or fax, which are common methods. Healey also raised concerns about the cost and accessibility of notary services for homebound voters and questioned the necessity of notarizing in-person requests, pointing out the differential treatment of absentee and in-person voters.
HB474 2025-0216h: Representative Burnham Information Only05:08:06.280 - 2:04:52 PM; Representative Burnham moved to adopt Amendment 2025-0216h to House Bill 474, clarifying that the counting of write-in votes should take place in the presence of another sworn election official, addressing concerns about the availability of officials during the process.
HB474 2025-0216h: Representative Grill Information Only05:09:16.480 - 2:06:02 PM; Representative Grill sought clarification on the amendment, confirming that it removes the requirement for the second witness to be from a different party, which was a point of discussion.
HB474 2025-0216h: Representative Ward Oppose05:10:26.160 - 2:07:12 PM; Representative Ward expressed his view that the amendment was unnecessary, citing his experience as a moderator and clerk where all elected officials are sworn in and the tabulation process is transparent.
HB474 2025-0216h: Representative Weary Information Only05:13:12.400 - 2:09:58 PM; Representative Weary suggested placing House Bill 448 on the consent calendar due to its overwhelming support in a previous vote, indicating no need for further discussion or a minority report.
HB344: Representative Gary Daniels, Hillsborough 43, Milford Support05:14:44.280 - 2:11:30 PM; Representative Gary Daniels, the prime sponsor of House Bill 344, supported the bill which aims to allow the processing of absentee ballots before election day. He explained the historical context and the temporary measures taken during the 2020 elections, highlighting how early processing could prevent votes from being invalidated due to correctable errors on the ballot envelopes.
HB344: Pete Baselier, Moderator for Milford Support05:19:23.840 - 2:16:09 PM; Pete Baselier, the moderator for Milford, supported House Bill 344, recounting the successful implementation of pre-processing absentee ballots during the 2020 elections. He emphasized the benefits of early processing, such as the ability to correct incomplete affidavits and the transparency of the process, which allowed for challenges and oversight by political parties and observers.
HB344: Representative Weary Information Only05:23:41.520 - 2:20:27 PM; Representative Weary asked a logistical question about the bill's proposal to process absentee ballots no more than one week earlier than the election day. They sought clarification on whether this would involve a single day of processing for all ballots received up to that point, with subsequent ballots processed on election day. The response confirmed that the proposal indeed suggests a single day of processing, properly noticed, within the week before the election, similar to the pre-processing done in 2020.
HB344: Representative C Information Only05:25:16.840 - 2:22:02 PM; Representative C asked about the process of handling the inner and outer envelopes of absentee ballots, specifically whether the inner envelope needs to be removed to check the affidavit. The response clarified that the outer envelope is slit to check the affidavit on the inner envelope without removing it, aligning with existing laws. Representative C expressed some confusion about the logistics but acknowledged the explanation.
HB344: Dave Nelson, Town Moderator from Derry Support05:27:44.680 - 2:24:30 PM; Dave Nelson supported the bill, highlighting its benefits for towns with significant absentee ballots. He mentioned that Derry has over 20,000 registered voters, and the ability to process ballots in advance would allow for better voter notification and the opportunity to remedy defective ballots. He endorsed a single day of processing to avoid logistical complications.
HB344: Jonathan Kip, Town Moderator from Londonderry Support05:29:36.440 - 2:26:22 PM; Jonathan Kip supported the bill, emphasizing its unintended positive consequences, such as voter education opportunities in a calmer pre-election environment. He referenced the special committee on voter confidence's report and highlighted the chance for voters to cure deficiencies in their ballots. Kip also mentioned logistical benefits like easier parking and security measures taken in Londonderry during the 2020 election.
HB344: Mackenzie Taylor, New Hampshire Campaign for Voting Rights and America Votes Support05:33:04.718 - 2:29:50 PM; Mackenzie Taylor expressed support for the bill, focusing on the security and transparency it offers. They explained the process of handling envelopes and ballots, emphasizing that the ballot itself remains sealed until election day. Taylor highlighted the opportunity for greater transparency and voter confidence through noticed sessions and the ability for voters to cure their ballots in advance.
HB344: Autumn Rost Goodwin, Program Coordinator for Open Democracy from Manchester Support05:35:08.558 - 2:31:54 PM; Autumn Rost Goodwin supported the bill, emphasizing the ease with which voters can make mistakes on absentee ballot envelopes and the importance of having a method to cure these mistakes in advance. They noted the popularity of the idea, mentioning that 43 states and the Virgin Islands permit early processing of absentee ballots, and encouraged an OTP vote.
HB344: David Scanlan, Secretary of State Information Only05:44:11.200 - 2:40:57 PM; Secretary of State David Scanlan discussed the specifics of HB344, which involves the responsibilities of moderators in processing absentee ballots. He highlighted the existing legal requirements under RSA 659:50 and RSA 657:7, explaining the current process where the moderator checks the voter's name on the checklist and the affidavit's execution. Scanlan pointed out that the proposed bill's language could lead to confusion because it requires the affidavit to be fully executed and witnessed, which conflicts with current statutory language that does not provide for such witnessing. He traced the historical evolution of absentee voting laws back to the 1940s, noting changes in terminology from 'certificate' to 'affidavit' and emphasized the potential for confusion with the new proposed requirements.
HB344: Linda Bundy from Antrim Oppose05:50:33.120 - 2:47:19 PM; Linda Bundy from Antrim expressed opposition to HB608, arguing that requiring notarization or signatures from authorized officials for absentee ballots would place an undue burden on voters, particularly seniors and people with disabilities. She researched the Attorney General's website and found no instances of voter fraud that would justify such measures, only letters about ballots not counted. Bundy believes the bill is unnecessary and could prevent eligible voters from participating, urging the committee to vote it as inexpedient to legislate.
HB344: Caitlyn Cab, Representative Support05:53:03.400 - 2:49:49 PM; Representative Caitlyn Cab introduced House Bill 269, which seeks to remove the word 'Saturday' from the statute concerning the last day to correct the voter checklist. She explained that the change aims to accommodate New England's unpredictable weather, particularly snowstorms, allowing supervisors of the checklist to choose a more convenient day within a specified timeframe. This adjustment is intended to improve voter access and ease the burden on election officials.
HB344: Dave Nelson, Derry Town Moderator Information Only05:54:49.760 - 2:51:35 PM; Dave Nelson, the Town Moderator of Derry, sought clarification on what moderators are required to verify on absentee ballot affidavits under HB608. He highlighted the legal restriction against signature comparison due to a Supreme Court decision and expressed concern over the ability to verify notarization or witnessing by election officers or other authorized persons, suggesting that these tasks might be beyond the skill set of moderators.
HB344: Dan Hy, Nashua City Clerk Oppose05:56:00.558 - 2:52:46 PM; Dan Hy, the City Clerk of Nashua, opposed HB608, citing concerns about the difficulty for homebound residents to get their affidavits notarized. He mentioned the potential fees associated with notaries and the practical issue of notary seals possibly damaging ballots. Hy believes these requirements could pose significant barriers to voting for certain populations.
HB344: Mackenzie Taylor with New Hampshire Campaign for Voting Rights and America Votes Oppose05:57:48.478 - 2:54:34 PM; Mackenzie Taylor, representing the New Hampshire Campaign for Voting Rights and America Votes, opposed HB608, echoing concerns about the burdensome process of notarization for absentee voters, especially those unable to travel. She highlighted the potential for disenfranchisement due to mistakes in the new process being discovered only on election day, when voters might not be able to correct their ballots in person.
HB344: Autumn Rashik Goodwin, Program Coordinator for Open Democracy from Manchester Oppose05:59:28.878 - 2:56:14 PM; Autumn Rashik Goodwin, Program Coordinator for Open Democracy from Manchester, opposed HB608, reiterating that the requirement for notarization could disproportionately affect disabled and elderly voters. She emphasized the potential for disenfranchisement due to the added step in the voting process and urged the committee to vote the bill as inexpedient to legislate.
HB269: Eileen Moshimo, Supervisor of the Voter Checklist from the town of Windham Support06:01:46.440 - 2:58:32 PM; Eileen Moshimo, a supervisor of the voter checklist in Windham, supports HB269 which aims to correct outdated RSA sections concerning voter registration. She recounted past legislative efforts led by former State Rep David Bates to modernize these laws, such as notifications of voter deaths across the state and flexibility in scheduling sessions before elections. Moshimo highlighted a specific issue where the word 'Saturday' remained in the law, causing major inconveniences and safety issues, especially during a snowstorm on March 4th, 2023. She urged the committee to pass the law to remove 'Saturday' from the RSA to prevent future difficulties for supervisors.
HB269: Tina Guilford, Derry Town Clerk Support06:05:10.878 - 3:01:56 PM; Tina Guilford, the Derry Town Clerk, supports HB269 for the same reasons mentioned by the previous speaker. She pointed out the resource diversion during the 2023 snowstorm to clear the Town Hall parking lot for a mandated session, and emphasized the need for flexibility in scheduling voter checklist sessions. Guilford noted that the week before elections sees increased voter interest, and allowing sessions at more convenient times could reduce long lines and facilitate voter registration.
HB345: Representative Christine Perez, Londonderry, Rockingham 16 Support06:07:34.958 - 3:04:20 PM; Representative Christine Perez supports HB345, which would allow selectmen to decide on adding or removing polling places to manage high voter turnout more effectively. She cited the long lines during the last election in Londonderry as a reason for needing this change. Perez mentioned that the bill allows for flexibility in managing polling places according to the size of the election, and addressed concerns about notice periods by suggesting they could be adjusted if necessary.
HB345: Secretary Scalin Support06:12:43.478 - 3:09:29 PM; Secretary Scalin expressed support for HB345, highlighting the issue of long lines due to high voter turnout and the need for additional polling places. He acknowledged the efficiency of larger towns in managing elections but pointed out struggles in smaller communities. Scalin suggested that technology and training could help alongside additional polling places. He also discussed the importance of communication and the potential for adjusting the notice period from 30 days to 60 or 90 days to better prepare for elections.

Berry, Ross(Chairman)(R)[A-]2024	Burnham, Claudine(Clerk)(R)[A]2024	Qualey, James(V Chairman)(R)[A-]2024
Ward, Gerald(D)[CT]2024	Prudhomme-O'Brien, Katherine(R)[B+]2024	Gilmore, Gary(D)
See, Alvin(R)[A]2024	Grill, Jessica(D)[CT]2024	Wood, Clayton(R)[A-]2024
Bay, Luz(D)[F]2024	Wherry, Robert(R)[A]2024	Harvey-Bolia, Juliet(R)[A]2024
Muirhead, Russell(D)[CT]2024	Wilhelm, Matthew(D)[CT]2024	Lane, Connie(D)[F]2024
Newsom, James(D)	Toner, Travis(R)	Guzofski, James(R)