Committee Summary for House Election Law (02/18/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB711 00:03:27.560 - 9:01:48 AM	Public Hearing	relative to voting machine contractors.	Bernardy, JD(R)[A-]2024
HB270 00:24:23.039 - 9:22:44 AM	Public Hearing	requiring the preservation of electronic ballot counting device memory chips.	Burnham, Claudine(R)[A]2024
HB472 00:32:39.519 - 9:31:00 AM	Executive Session	requiring voters to prove domicile.	Potenza, Kelley(R)[A]2024
HB141 00:35:30.520 - 9:33:51 AM	Executive Session	relative to campaign disclosures for limited liability companies.	Lane, Connie(D)[F]2024
HB172 00:37:51.880 - 9:36:12 AM	Executive Session	restricting undeclared voters from same-day voting in a presidential or state primary.	Sellers, John(R)[A-]2024
HB341 00:44:00.920 - 9:42:21 AM	Public Hearing	requiring the secretary of state to check voter records prior to every election.	Ward, Gerald(D)[CT]2024
HB281 01:02:12.200 - 10:00:33 AM	Public Hearing	requiring electronic voter checklists to be supplied in a sortable format.	Wherry, Robert(R)[A]2024
HB311 01:07:21.440 - 10:05:42 AM	Executive Session	relative to permissible campaign contributions by business organizations and labor unions.	Read, Ellen(D)[D]2024
HB423 01:11:16.560 - 10:09:37 AM	Executive Session	requiring the consent of property owners for the placement of political advertisements on public property abutting their land.	Weyler, Kenneth(R)[B+]2024
HB308 01:23:24.679 - 10:21:45 AM	Public Hearing	requiring the election checklist to have a column to annotate if a non-New Hampshire issued form of identification is provided to vote.	Potenza, Kelley(R)[A]2024
HB130 2025-0423d 01:43:09.560 - 10:41:30 AM	Public Hearing	relative to the arrangement of candidates on primary election ballots	Flanagan, Jack(R)[B+]2020
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet 03:03:32.640 - 12:01:53 PM	Public Hearing	creating a single primary ballot.	Muirhead, Russell(D)[CT]2024
HB175 2025-0461h 03:58:35.199 - 12:56:56 PM	Executive Session	relative to defined coordinated expenditures.	Muirhead, Russell(D)[CT]2024
HB154 04:03:39.720 - 1:02:00 PM	Public Hearing	enabling voters to request to have their ballots hand-counted.	See, Alvin(R)[A]2024
HB154 04:16:29.080 - 1:14:50 PM	Executive Session	enabling voters to request to have their ballots hand-counted.	See, Alvin(R)[A]2024
HB423 04:17:15.960 - 1:15:36 PM	General Working Session	requiring the consent of property owners for the placement of political advertisements on public property abutting their land.	Weyler, Kenneth(R)[B+]2024
HB693 04:32:48.279 - 1:31:09 PM	Public Hearing	relative to ballot counting procedures and permitting the hand counting of ballots.	Porcelli, Susan(R)[A-]2024
HB317 05:22:54.480 - 2:21:15 PM	Public Hearing	preventing a supervisor of the checklist from verifying a person's identity without identification, even if they personally know that person.	Burnham, Claudine(R)[A]2024

HB711: Representative JD Bernardi, Rockingham 36, Hampton Falls, Kensington, South Hampton, Newton, Plaistow Support00:03:27.560 - 9:01:48 AM; Representative Bernardi introduced House Bill 711, which requires contractors repairing voting machines to register with the Secretary of State and the Department of Insurance (not the Attorney General, as initially mentioned in the bill). The registration process involves obtaining a registration number, proving bonding and insurance, and obtaining a contractor ID. The ID must be presented to local officials and visibly worn while working on voting machines. The Secretary of State would provide training on these measures. The rationale for the bill is to enhance election integrity by ensuring contractors are vetted and reliable, and their work is completed properly. He suggested an amendment to replace the Attorney General with the Department of Insurance in the bill.
HB711: Wayne P. Saya, Nashua Support00:07:23.560 - 9:05:44 AM; Wayne Saya's testimony was read by another individual as he was unable to attend due to accidents. He supports HB711 but suggests an amendment to include OSHA safety certification requirements for electronic voting machines. He references his September 7, 2021, expert witness report in the case of Richard vs. Sununu, which exposed state and federal violations related to electronic voting machines. He claims these machines are used unlawfully and that New Hampshire lacks a federally approved OSHA state plan for these devices.
HB711: Al Brandano, Kensington Support00:09:44.920 - 9:08:05 AM; Al Brandano supports the bill, emphasizing the need for background checks on individuals working on voting machines, comparing it to the requirements for youth hockey coaches and kindergarten teachers. He presented examples from the Senate District 24 review, highlighting issues with machine repair logs and the use of subcontractors by LHS, the primary contractor. He stressed the importance of knowing who works on the machines for election integrity.
HB711: Lyn Briggs, Amherst Support00:12:03.680 - 9:10:24 AM; Lyn Briggs supports the bill and raised concerns about the safety and efficacy of Dominion ACU Vote machines. She mentioned that these machines were not voted on by the public and that LHS, hired to maintain them, was not certified by Dominion. She discussed modifications to the machines, such as wire cutting and part replacements, which nullify their certification and affect vote tally accuracy. She also highlighted potential medical issues and the lack of safety certifications since the machines' initial maintenance.
HB711: Sarah Burke Cohen, New Hampshire Municipal Association Oppose00:16:49.440 - 9:15:10 AM; Sarah Burke Cohen from the New Hampshire Municipal Association opposes the bill due to ambiguities regarding who the designated municipal official is, the process of photographic identification, and the registration process. There are concerns about how municipalities ensure the validity and expiration of registration numbers. She indicated a need for clarification on these points.
HB711: Aaron Hennessy, Deputy Secretary of State Information Only00:18:35.679 - 9:16:56 AM; Aaron Hennessy provided information regarding the bill. He highlighted language concerns, such as the need to define 'contractor' clearly, as it could refer to the vendor or an individual hired by a town clerk. He also mentioned confusion about the purpose of the bond and who it applies to, as well as the process for obtaining and verifying photo IDs. He clarified that towns and cities purchase voting devices directly from vendors, and these vendors handle maintenance without subcontractors. He stressed the need for clarifications in the bill.
HB711: Unnamed Speaker Information Only00:20:55.799 - 9:19:16 AM; The speaker discusses the voting system's software, specifically mentioning that it is open-source software provided by the vendor, Voting Works. They clarify that while the software can be viewed by anyone who understands coding, it is not open for external coding or modifications. The vendor is responsible for updates and issues with the device.
HB711: Unnamed Speaker Information Only00:21:55.080 - 9:20:16 AM; The speaker recalls discussions at the Ballot Law Commission about the programming capabilities of Voting Works machines, specifically mentioning the use of Extensible Markup Language (XML). They inquire if local clerks can program these machines. The response clarifies that local clerks can design ballots but do not program the device's functioning.
HB711: Gilmer Information Only00:22:59.240 - 9:21:20 AM; Gilmer asks if there have been any incidents in the last 30 years that necessitated the legislation. Aaron Hennessy, Deputy Secretary of State, responds that he is not aware of any such incidents but is willing to look into it.
HB270: Representative Claudine Burnham, Strafford District 2, Milton, Rochester Ward 5 Support00:24:23.039 - 9:22:44 AM; Representative Burnham introduces HB270, emphasizing the importance of preserving electronic ballot counting device memory chips similarly to how ballots and other election materials are preserved. She argues that these memory cards are crucial for the integrity of elections and should be kept secure for at least 22 months post-election.
HB270: Unnamed Speaker Information Only00:25:08.080 - 9:23:29 AM; The speaker questions the terminology used in the bill, noting the difference between memory chips and memory cards. They express confusion about whether the bill covers all relevant technologies, including USBs and hard drives. Representative Burnham clarifies that the bill refers to the external memory cards used in the machines.
HB270: Aaron Hennessy, Deputy Secretary of State Information Only00:26:51.320 - 9:25:12 AM; Aaron Hennessy clarifies that the bill refers to external memory devices and not internal components. He notes that current practices involve securely storing these devices with ballots. He mentions upcoming changes with the ImageCast devices and requests an exemption for older devices due to supply issues and the need to recycle and reuse the memory cards for future elections.
HB270: Albert Andano, Kensington, NH Oppose00:29:38.840 - 9:27:59 AM; Albert Andano from Kensington, NH, expressed opposition to HB270, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a strict chain of custody for election records as mandated by federal law. He argued that current practices violate federal laws such as 42 USC 20701 and 42 USC 20702, which pertain to the retention and preservation of election records and penalties for their alteration or destruction. Andano also referenced 44 US Code 3301, highlighting issues with electronic records retention. He criticized the use of memory cards by contractors, stating that the state's non-compliance with federal law has been ongoing and that the law should be followed regardless of administrative or corporate challenges.
HB472: Representative Wei Information Only00:32:39.519 - 9:31:00 AM; Representative Wei moved to recommend HB472 as inexpedient to legislate (ITL). The motion was seconded by Representative Lane. The discussion highlighted that while the bill had good aspects for tracking domicile, it was inappropriate as it focused on checking domicile during the check-in process rather than registration. The subcommittee unanimously recommended ITL, which was then passed with a unanimous vote of 17-0 in the committee.
HB141: Representative Wood Information Only00:35:30.520 - 9:33:51 AM; Representative Wood moved to recommend HB141 as inexpedient to legislate (ITL). The motion was seconded by Representative Gasowski. Representative Lane supported the motion, emphasizing the need for transparency in campaign disclosures similar to standards for individuals and corporations. The motion passed with a vote of 10-7, with Representative Wood responsible for the majority report and Representative Lane for the minority report.
HB172: Chair Barry Information Only00:37:51.880 - 9:36:12 AM; Chair Barry moved to recommend HB172 as inexpedient to legislate (ITL). The motion was seconded by Representatives Ward and Wilham. Chair Barry discussed concerns raised by his party regarding undeclared voters potentially misusing primaries. He presented data showing that even in the most coordinated effort to influence a primary, the impact of 'bad actors' was minimal, with only 7.3% of the vote in the 2024 Republican presidential primary potentially affected. He argued against excluding all undeclared voters due to the actions of a small percentage and highlighted philosophical objections to taxpayer-funded elections excluding certain voters. The motion passed unanimously with a vote of 17-0.
HB341: Representative Jerry Ward, Rockingham 27, Portsmouth, NH Support00:44:00.920 - 9:42:21 AM; Representative Jerry Ward from Rockingham 27, representing Ward 4 in Portsmouth, introduced HB341 FN, which was requested by the city of Portsmouth's Board of Registrars. The bill aims to ensure that the National Change of Address (NCOA) list is received at least 90 days before any election, allowing sufficient time for voter list maintenance. Ward highlighted the challenges faced by registrars in 2024 when they received the NCOA list late, which impacted their ability to process voter registrations and absentee ballots. He argued that the proposed change would enhance voter list accuracy and respect voter rights without causing undue issues for the Secretary of State's office.
HB341: Unknown Information Only00:48:39.400 - 9:47:00 AM; The speaker discusses the impact of the proposed legislation on the workload of supervisors of the checklist, suggesting that conducting the process annually would ease their work. The general consensus among those present seems to be in agreement with this view.
HB341: Unknown Information Only00:49:05.680 - 9:47:26 AM; The speaker clarifies the meaning of 'annually' in the context of the bill, suggesting that it implies the process should be done once a year but no later than 90 days before any election. This leads to a discussion on whether the term 'annually' is appropriate if the process could happen more than once a year.
HB341: Unknown Information Only00:49:54.160 - 9:48:15 AM; The speaker seeks clarification from the bill's sponsor about the timing of the process described in the bill, questioning whether it should happen annually and no later than 90 days before any election. The sponsor confirms this understanding but notes that 'annually' might be interpreted as at least once a year, not necessarily limited to once.
HB341: Unknown Information Only00:50:46.440 - 9:49:07 AM; The speaker challenges the logic behind the term 'annually' in the bill, arguing that it should not preclude the process from happening more than once a year. There is some confusion about the requirement for the process to occur before every election, which is clarified to be a requirement for once per year.
HB341: Representative Lane Information Only00:51:32.000 - 9:49:53 AM; Representative Lane addresses confusion around the term 'annually' in the bill, suggesting that the existing statute implies 'no less than annually'. He proposes to clarify these issues in an executive session and suggests bringing in Deputy Secretary Hennessy for further discussion.
HB341: Unknown Information Only00:52:17.880 - 9:50:38 AM; The speaker points out a need for clarification in the bill's language regarding the movement of records, suggesting that it should be revised for clarity. The discussion is shifted towards an executive session to address these and other issues.
HB341: Aon Hennessy, Deputy Secretary of State Support00:53:02.960 - 9:51:23 AM; Deputy Secretary Hennessy expresses support for the legislation with a modification to conduct the process twice a year instead of the proposed 90 days before any election. He explains the logistical and financial considerations of the process, noting that multiple elections throughout the year make the current proposal challenging. He suggests June and November for 2025 and April and December for 2026 as feasible times for the process. Hennessy also discusses the role of supervisors in reviewing voter data and the notification system in place.
HB341: Unknown Information Only00:57:15.520 - 9:55:36 AM; The speaker seeks to understand the notification process after the voter registration system is updated twice a year. Hennessy confirms that supervisors are notified through a login screen alert whenever there are voters they need to address.
HB341: Unknown Information Only00:58:01.880 - 9:56:22 AM; The speaker asks if the Secretary of State's office supports the legislation, to which Hennessy responds affirmatively but with the condition that it be done twice a year due to the overlapping election schedules and the workload on supervisors.
HB341: Representative We Information Only00:58:48.160 - 9:57:09 AM; Representative We discussed the potential for an amendment to require supervisors of the checklist to update their lists within 90 days of receiving a National Change of Address (NCOA) update from the Secretary of State. They suggested that this might be a separate issue from how frequently the information is provided.
HB341: Representative Lane Information Only00:59:34.520 - 9:57:55 AM; Representative Lane followed up on Representative We's question, inquiring about the timeframe for towns to update their lists after receiving them. They noted that while some towns like Portsmouth act promptly, there's no legal requirement for a specific timeframe.
HB341: Representative Ward Information Only01:00:20.000 - 9:58:41 AM; Representative Ward mentioned that the Deputy Secretary might have additional comments but chose to waive them. They also noted the public hearing's results on HB341, which included comments about fluoride and IQ, though these were unrelated to the bill's content.
HB281: Representative Bob Wei, Hillsboro District 13, Hudson Support01:02:12.200 - 10:00:33 AM; Representative Wei introduced HB281, which aims to amend RSA 657:15 to ensure that electronic voter checklists are provided in a sortable format, such as CSV or Excel, rather than PDF, to facilitate easier review by candidates. He acknowledged potential redundancy in the bill's text but clarified the necessity of certain sections.
HB281: Representative Lane Information Only01:03:03.799 - 10:01:24 AM; Representative Lane questioned the necessity of including 'voter address' twice in the bill's text, suggesting that one instance might be redundant. Representative Wei agreed and noted that this could be amended.
HB281: Representative Wei Information Only01:04:41.119 - 10:03:02 AM; Representative Wei responded to Representative Lane's question, agreeing that one mention of 'voter address' was redundant but necessary in another section for clarification. They also discussed the need to define what constitutes a sortable format to avoid ambiguity.
HB281: Deputy Secretary Aaron Hennessy Information Only01:05:43.760 - 10:04:04 AM; Deputy Secretary Hennessy informed the committee that the Statewide Voter Registration System already provides voter information in sortable formats like CSV and Excel. He suggested that if the bill is amended, similar language should be applied to section 3A of the law.
HB311: Representative Harley Bullia Oppose01:07:21.440 - 10:05:42 AM; Representative Bullia moved to recommend 'inexpedient to legislate' on HB311, which was seconded by Representative Burnham. They argued against the bill, suggesting that they would consider it if New Hampshire adopted worker freedom policies.
HB311: Representative Lane Support01:08:08.319 - 10:06:29 AM; Representative Lane spoke in favor of HB311, arguing that it aims to level the playing field between corporations and unions, similar to pre-1999 regulations. They disagreed with Representative Bullia's stance on worker freedom.
HB423: Representative Kovski Information Only01:11:16.560 - 10:09:37 AM; Representative Kovski expressed a preference for local control, suggesting that towns should decide what to do with signs on public property within their jurisdiction. They deferred discussion on state property and highways.
HB423: Representative Toner Information Only01:12:05.280 - 10:10:26 AM; Representative Toner noted existing RSA laws that prohibit advertising signs on interstates and turnpikes, including onramps. They suggested that if the committee believes these laws need changing, it should be addressed. They also discussed the issue of signs on state-owned right-of-way land, suggesting a 300-yard buffer from private property.
HB423: Representative C Information Only01:12:52.760 - 10:11:13 AM; Representative C suggested limiting signs to a specific distance from the front of a homeowner's or business's property, rather than using the entire property frontage as a buffer.
HB423: Representative Bay Information Only01:13:38.440 - 10:11:59 AM; Representative Bay questioned the purpose of signs on highways and expressed concern about the enforcement of any new laws on signs. They suggested that if a law is made, there must be a way to ensure it's followed, otherwise, it's ineffective.
HB423: Representative Mirad Information Only01:14:24.280 - 10:12:45 AM; Representative Mirad emphasized the need for clear standards regarding signs on federal, state, and municipal property. They highlighted the complication that state right-of-way extends into private front yards, which could restrict residents' ability to display signs.
HB423: Representative Freedom O'Brien Information Only01:15:10.080 - 10:13:31 AM; Representative O'Brien stated a preference for no signs on public property, acknowledging the difficulty this might pose for communities with established traditions.
HB423: Representative Bullia Information Only01:16:08.080 - 10:14:29 AM; Representative Bullia discussed the issue of homeowners removing signs in front of their homes. They addressed concerns about signs on corner lots and suggested that signs should be allowed to be removed if they are in front of a house, not necessarily the facade. They also clarified the term 'abutter', noting that it can refer to property across the street, potentially causing conflicts. Bullia mentioned draft legislation that would clarify the ban on signs on state property and allow homeowners to remove signs. They expressed a personal view against signs on public property.
HB423: Representative Wood Oppose01:17:40.639 - 10:16:01 AM; Representative Wood expressed strong opposition to the proposed changes, citing a love for signs but acknowledging that their town had already banned them, though enforcement was lacking. They discussed the importance of First Amendment rights and suggested that signs in front of someone's property should be removable by the homeowner. They believe the current law is sufficient and should not be changed.
HB423: Representative Ward Information Only01:19:11.080 - 10:17:32 AM; Representative Ward discussed the handling of signs in their town, mentioning that the state does a good job of managing signs on state roads. They noted that after elections, signs are taken down, and they personally assist in removing signs from both sides. They believe that cities and towns should be allowed to make their own decisions regarding signs, and they are waiting to be educated on state law.
HB423: Representative Quy Information Only01:20:22.639 - 10:18:43 AM; Representative Quy expressed interest in ensuring homeowners can remove signs from municipal or state rights of way that adjoin their property. They discussed personal experiences with unclear property boundaries and the potential for conflict between candidates and property owners. They supported the use of the term 'adjoin' over 'abutter' for clarity.
HB423: Representative Kazasi Information Only01:24:55.560 - 10:23:16 AM; Representative Kazasi discussed their town's challenges with signs due to the presence of state roads and the Spalding Turnpike, which limits public visibility unless signs are placed on private property. They believe that additional laws could complicate matters for local candidates and should be left to local authorities. They praised the state's current management of signs.
HB423: Representative Lane Information Only01:26:30.360 - 10:24:51 AM; Representative Lane expressed uncertainty about their stance on the issue, citing difficulties in their district where many areas are restricted from having signs. They acknowledged the existing law mentioned by Representative Toner as adequate but expressed concerns about signs on properties that adjoin others, favoring the term 'adjoin'. They were unsure about the effectiveness of setting a specific distance for sign placement.
HB423: Representative Wy Information Only01:28:02.199 - 10:26:23 AM; Representative Wy suggested maintaining existing laws but clarifying that the right of way should not pertain to the placement of election signs. They proposed that property owners, whether homeowners or business owners, should have the ability to remove election signs from their property.
HB423: Representative Wilhelm Information Only01:28:49.480 - 10:27:10 AM; Representative Wilhelm advocated for enabling municipalities to decide on sign placement while suggesting a general ban on political signs around town. They noted that the state's current handling of signs seems adequate and appreciated the diverse opinions shared during the session.
HB423: Representative R Nome Information Only01:29:35.800 - 10:27:56 AM; Representative R Nome supported the idea of leaving sign decisions to the towns and expressed concerns about First Amendment issues if private citizens were given control over speech on state land. They highlighted the potential for monetizing controlled speech and raised issues about property rights, using the bundle of sticks analogy.
HB423: Representative Gilmore Information Only01:31:09.960 - 10:29:30 AM; Representative Gilmore advocated for a total ban on political signage on town and county property but suggested that local ordinances could allow signs in specific times and locations. They clarified the concept of land ownership versus state right of way and expressed concerns about coerced speech on state land.
HB308: Representative Travis Toner, Belmont Support01:23:24.679 - 10:21:45 AM; Representative Toner introduced House Bill 308 FN, which requires the election checklist to have a column to annotate if a non-New Hampshire issued form of identification is provided to vote. He did not take questions.
HB308: Sarah Burt Cohen, New Hampshire Municipal Association Oppose01:24:05.920 - 10:22:26 AM; Sarah Burt Cohen from the New Hampshire Municipal Association opposed HB 308, stating that it would be burdensome, unnecessary, and would add confusion to the voting process. She was open to questions but none were asked.
HB308: Representative Kelly Potenza, Strafford District 19 Support01:35:33.520 - 10:33:54 AM; Representative Penza explained that HB 308 was introduced because some polling areas in Strafford County were not following protocol regarding the column for non-New Hampshire forms of identification. They noted that while the column exists in the election manual, it is not consistently used. Penza was open to amending the bill to include ballot clerks in the language.
HB308: Aaron Hennessy, Deputy Secretary of State Information Only01:39:44.360 - 10:38:05 AM; Aaron Hennessy, Deputy Secretary of State, provided information regarding the current state of election day procedures as outlined in section 659:13 of the law. He explained that ballot clerks currently record the state of issuance of a voter's driver's license or identification card on the checklist and must enter this into the Statewide Voter Registration System within 30 days of the election. He noted that HB308 FN seeks additional information on the type of identification used, which could necessitate additional space on the checklist. This might double the size of the checklist, significantly increasing the number of pages needed for towns. He mentioned the possibility of producing a report on states from which IDs are received, as requested by the subcommittee chair.
HB130 2025-0423d: Jack Flanigan, Representative, Hillsborough 45 (Hollis, Brookline, Mason, Greenville) Support01:43:09.560 - 10:41:30 AM; Jack Flanigan, representing Hillsborough 45, introduced House Bill 130 FN, discussing his personal experience during the 2022 primary election where he felt disadvantaged by the ballot arrangement. He mentioned that the current system allowed the same candidate to be listed first in all four towns of his district, which he believed influenced the outcome of the election. He proposed changes to the ballot arrangement to ensure fairness, referencing a similar issue resolved for Senate primaries. He noted that the Secretary of State, David Scanlan, reviewed and suggested amendments to the bill to address the rotation of candidate names on ballots. Flanigan emphasized the importance of the amendment in preventing similar experiences for future candidates, regardless of their party affiliation.
HB130 2025-0423d: David Scanlan, Secretary of State Information Only01:47:31.599 - 10:45:52 AM; David Scanlan, Secretary of State, discussed the implications of the proposed rotation scheme for candidate names on ballots as outlined in HB130 FN. He explained that the current system uses a single ballot per polling place, and the proposed bill would require multiple ballots with different name configurations, complicating the counting process. Scanlan suggested an alternative rotation scheme that would work for state representative primaries, where the first seed candidate would be listed in the largest town of a multi-town district, and subsequent seeds would follow in descending order of town size, with a reversal when candidates run out. He cautioned about the complexity and potential for errors this would add to the ballot creation process, emphasizing the need for careful proofing to avoid mistakes.
HB130 2025-0423d: Unnamed Representative Information Only01:52:43.880 - 10:51:04 AM; The representative thanked the chairman and the Secretary of State for answering their question. They inquired about the number of multi-town or multi-ward districts that would be affected by the bill. The Secretary of State did not have the number readily available but offered to find it. The representative also asked about the impact on the Secretary of State's office, to which the response was that it would require additional manpower, particularly in proofreading ballots to ensure accuracy before printing, and occasionally reprints if mistakes are found.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: Russ Mirad, Grafton District 12 (Etna, Lyme, Hanover, NH) Support03:03:32.640 - 12:01:53 PM; Russ Mirad introduced HB714, explaining its origin from the New Hampshire Citizens Assembly, a three-day event where a diverse group of citizens discussed political solutions. The bill proposes a single ballot primary, allowing all candidates to appear on one ballot, enabling voters to choose any candidate regardless of party affiliation. The top two vote-getters would proceed to the general election. Mirad highlighted the benefits, such as increased voter turnout and representation, and addressed concerns about strategic voting, suggesting the reform would minimize it by making every primary contest competitive.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: Margerie Porter, Hillsborough, NH (New Hampshire Together) Support03:09:40.319 - 12:08:01 PM; Margerie Porter spoke in support of HB714, describing her work with New Hampshire Together, a nonpartisan group focused on civic engagement. She mentioned their statewide listening sessions and a poll that identified key issues, including political polarization and the need for better representation. She detailed the Citizens Assembly event, emphasizing its diverse representation and the consensus reached on the single ballot primary as a solution to polarization and better representation.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: Bill Black, Hanover, NH Support03:15:05.520 - 12:13:26 PM; Bill Black supported HB714, describing it as a nonpartisan single ballot for all statewide and congressional primary elections. He explained that it would benefit voters by allowing them to choose any candidate, improve fairness for non-major party candidates, encourage candidates to appeal broadly, and reduce partisan polarization. He also noted it would allow elected representatives to vote their conscience without fear of partisan backlash.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: Kate Marquee, Manchester, NH Support03:18:49.080 - 12:17:10 PM; Kate Marquee supported HB714, citing her experience as an election worker and the frustration voters express during primaries. She emphasized the high number of undeclared voters in New Hampshire and the potential for the state to lead in reducing electoral polarization. She highlighted the success of single ballot primaries in Manchester and other states, suggesting it would give a voice to all registered voters.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: Ellen Reed, Rockingham 10 (Newmarket, Newfields, NH) Support03:21:47.080 - 12:20:08 PM; Ellen Reed expressed support for the concept of open primaries but raised concerns about the bill's potential to cause harm due to 'single party sweeps'. She argued that without ranked choice voting, the bill could amplify the problem of low primary turnout and lead to only one party being represented on the general ballot. She suggested using ranked choice voting to ensure proportional representation.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: Tiani Coleman, New Hampshire Independent Voters Support03:25:41.120 - 12:24:02 PM; Tiani Coleman supported HB714, emphasizing the importance of independent voters' rights. She shared her experience with party politics and her belief in nonpartisan primaries as a solution to corruption and power imbalances. She referenced a law review article on the voting rights of independent voters, arguing that nonpartisan primaries would level the political playing field.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: Warner Horn, former legislator Support03:31:15.399 - 12:29:36 PM; Warner Horn expressed support for HB714, emphasizing the value of the citizens assembly held in June. As a former legislator, he was impressed by the civil discourse and respectful exchange of ideas at the assembly. He noted that the assembly brought forward new information that he had not considered before, which he found valuable for legislative decision-making. Horn highlighted the assembly's success in fostering communication and understanding among participants, suggesting that the process could be beneficial for legislators in understanding the perspectives of New Hampshire citizens.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: Eric Herr, resident of Hill, New Hampshire Support03:34:17.120 - 12:32:38 PM; Eric Herr, a resident of Hill, New Hampshire, spoke in support of HB714. He criticized the current primary system for forcing voters to choose a party's primary ballot, which he felt was undemocratic, especially given that independent voters are the largest voting bloc in the state. Herr argued that the primary system should ensure that candidates reflect the will of all citizens, not just those affiliated with political parties. He proposed that HB714 would remedy the anti-democratic elements of the current system by ensuring all votes count, all votes are tallied correctly, and all candidates are treated equally.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: Steven Bourne, resident of Rye, New Hampshire Support03:36:47.840 - 12:35:08 PM; Steven Bourne, from Rye, New Hampshire, supported HB714, focusing on the issue of voter participation and the disproportionate power in the current primary system. He used a demonstration to illustrate how few voters participate in primaries compared to general elections, suggesting this leads to an imbalance in representation. Bourne shared his experience running as an independent and noted that many voters are unaware of their options or vote against parties rather than for candidates. He emphasized the need for more inclusive primaries to increase voter participation and representation, stating that the current system creates two classes of voters and that HB714 could help address these issues.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: Daryl D'Angelo, resident of Amherst, New Hampshire Support03:42:45.920 - 12:41:06 PM; Daryl D'Angelo, from Amherst, New Hampshire, supported HB714, arguing that it would increase freedom and choice for all Granite Staters. He discussed the toxic polarization affecting the state and how it leads to disenfranchisement and misuse of the voting process. D'Angelo criticized the current primary system for excluding the voices of unaffiliated voters, stifling competition and the marketplace of ideas. He highlighted the unequal ballot access and argued that as publicly funded events, primaries should be open to all, including the largest voting bloc, the unaffiliated. He believes HB714 would remove barriers to participation.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: Lynn Briggs, resident of Amherst, New Hampshire Information Only03:46:02.399 - 12:44:23 PM; Lynn Briggs, from Amherst, New Hampshire, provided observations rather than a clear stance on HB714. She shared her experience as a ballot clerk, noting aggressive behavior from undeclared voters who would change their affiliation to vote and then change back. Briggs suggested that if the Republican and Democratic parties are private entities, perhaps an independent party should be considered, which would be privately funded. She mentioned recent changes in voter registration deadlines, indicating a need for a more straightforward system for undeclared voters.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: Linda Bundy, Antrim, New Hampshire Support03:48:19.760 - 12:46:40 PM; Linda Bundy testified in support of HB714, highlighting the recommendation from the New Hampshire Together Citizens Assembly for a single ballot primary system. She emphasized that such a system would benefit Undeclared voters, who make up the largest group in New Hampshire, by allowing them to vote for candidates across party lines without having to declare a party affiliation. Bundy noted that this system would reduce polarization by encouraging candidates with broad support rather than extreme views. She shared her experience as a ballot clerk in Antrim, observing Undeclared voters' frustration with the current system and their desire to vote for candidates, not parties. Bundy believes that a single ballot primary would simplify voting and reduce the administrative burden on election workers.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: Kaylee Estacio, Durham, New Hampshire Support03:50:51.680 - 12:49:12 PM; Kaylee Estacio, a Durham voter and public policy fellow with Open Democracy, testified in support of HB714, focusing on the issue of party polarization. She argued that the current primary voting system does not serve the needs of the people, particularly Independent voters who are the majority in New Hampshire. Estacio cited examples of states like Washington, California, Nebraska, and Alaska, which use single ballot primaries without favoring one party over another. She urged the committee to pass HB714 to put people over party and better meet the needs of all voters.
HB714 Not provided in the transcript snippet: David Scanlan, Secretary of State Information Only03:53:04.600 - 12:51:25 PM; Secretary of State David Scanlan provided information on HB714, noting that it would represent a fundamental change towards nonpartisan elections similar to town elections. He discussed potential consequences such as increased ballot length due to more candidates and the need for statutory changes to handle scenarios where one party might dominate the primary or general election ballot. Scanlan expressed concerns about the administrative challenges and unintended consequences but was open to further discussion and questions on the matter.
HB175 2025-0461h: Representative Mirad Information Only03:58:35.199 - 12:56:56 PM; Representative Mirad moved to pass HB175 as amended, which was seconded by Representative Lane. The amendment, introduced by Representative Wilhelm, moved the effective date to January 1st, 2027, to avoid impacting the current election cycle.
HB175 2025-0461h: Representative Toner Information Only04:00:56.520 - 12:59:17 PM; Representative Toner moved that HB175 be deemed inexpedient to legislate, which was seconded by Representative Wood. The motion to pass HB175 as amended failed with a vote of 10 to 8, and the motion to deem it inexpedient to legislate passed with a vote of 11 to 7. Representative Toner was responsible for the majority report, and Representative Mirad for the minority report.
HB154: Representative Alvin C of Laconia representing eight towns in Representative Alvin See, Merrimack County District 26 Support04:03:39.720 - 1:02:00 PM; Representative Alvin C introduced House Bill 154, which allows individual voters to request their ballots be hand counted without causing an overvote that would force a machine rejection. He clarified that a memo from the Attorney General and Secretary of State caused confusion in the last state election regarding the reporting of voters requesting hand counts. He supports the bill to clarify that hand counting is permissible and encouraged committee questions.
HB154: Representative Bay Information Only04:04:51.159 - 1:03:12 PM; Representative Bay asked if the provision for hand counting would also apply to absentee ballots and how it would be implemented. Representative Alvin C responded that the bill does not include provisions for absentee ballots, as they are typically processed through machines unless there's an overvote, which then requires hand counting.
HB154: Representative Flan Information Only04:06:26.040 - 1:04:47 PM; Representative Flan questioned whether Representative Alvin C was aware of studies showing that hand counting is more prone to errors than machine counting. Representative Alvin C mentioned his experience with recounts and acknowledged that hand count towns tend to have more errors, but he believes the bill could still increase voter confidence without slowing down results.
HB154: John Kron, Moderator for Ward 9 in Nashua, Senior Software Analyst Support04:08:32.840 - 1:06:53 PM; John Kron testified in support of the bill, stating that as a moderator, he has noticed an increase in voters who do not trust election machines and prefer hand counting. He believes it increases voter confidence without adding strain on election workers. He mentioned that in his ward, they count all ballots before and after the election, suggesting that hand counting a small portion would not be burdensome.
HB154: Representative P O'Brien Information Only04:10:04.960 - 1:08:25 PM; Representative P O'Brien asked if John Kron was aware of any instances where voters intentionally overvoted to have their ballots hand counted. John Kron responded that he had not heard of such instances, as overvotes are rejected by the machines in Nashua.
HB154: Representative Wei Information Only04:10:24.720 - 1:08:45 PM; Representative Wei asked about the memo from the state that John Kron mentioned. John Kron confirmed he received the memo but refused to comply with it, stating that it was akin to intimidation and he prevented his ward from following the order.
HB154: Representative N Information Only04:11:08.520 - 1:09:29 PM; Representative N asked about the process when there's an overvote on a ballot. John Kron explained that an overvote results in the entire ballot being rejected and voided, with the voter receiving a new ballot.
HB154: Al Brandano, Kensington, New Hampshire Support04:12:39.720 - 1:11:00 PM; Al Brandano supported the bill and emphasized the need for accuracy over efficiency, citing the Constitution. He criticized a memo from the Secretary of State and Attorney General that he felt intimidated voters into hand counting their ballots through write-ins. He mentioned potential legal challenges against the memo and supported the bill to prevent voter intimidation.
HB154: Representative Grill Information Only04:14:56.640 - 1:13:17 PM; Representative Grill asked Al Brandano about any court challenges regarding the memo, expressing concern over voter privacy. Al Brandano mentioned that while he was unaware of specific challenges, there were discussions about potential lawsuits against the Secretary of State and Attorney General.
HB154: Committee Chair Information Only04:16:29.080 - 1:14:50 PM; The Committee Chair closed the public hearing on House Bill 154 and announced the results of online and in-person testimonies, with 16 in support and 146 opposed online, and one in support and one against in person. The Chair then reopened the executive session for House Bill 423 but did not mention any specific actions taken on HB154.
HB423: Representative Grill Information Only04:17:15.960 - 1:15:36 PM; Representative Grill expressed a preference for allowing political signs, viewing them as a form of speech. He argued against any restrictions that might allow one person to dictate what signs can be placed on public or state property, suggesting signs should be allowed on public or neighboring properties.
HB423: Representative L Information Only04:18:48.359 - 1:17:09 PM; Representative L discussed the legal implications of easements concerning the placement of political signs. He explained that the rights to place signs would depend on the specific terms of the easement agreement granted by the property owner to the state or municipality.
HB423: Committee Chair Information Only04:20:20.439 - 1:18:41 PM; The Committee Chair proposed drafting multiple amendments to address the issue of political signs. The amendments would include options such as a total ban in towns, restrictions on state right of ways, and considerations for adjoining properties. The Chair suggested voting on these amendments separately to see which, if any, would be adopted.
HB423: Representative C Information Only04:24:16.760 - 1:22:37 PM; Representative C suggested considering unimproved areas along highways for sign placement and recommended bringing proposed amendments to the Office of Legislative Services (OLS) for drafting before the next voting session.
HB423: Committee Chair Information Only04:26:33.960 - 1:24:54 PM; The Committee Chair closed the executive session on House Bill 423 and opened and recessed the executive session for House Bill 158 and 684, indicating that no votes would be taken the following week due to school vacation. The Chair mentioned plans to file an amendment for HB158 that would release voter addresses at the town level 60 days post-election, but not tied to individual voters.
HB423: Subcommittee Member Information Only04:25:47.479 - 1:24:08 PM; A subcommittee member reported on the review of bills related to 65413, mentioning that one bill was killed and that upcoming meetings would discuss court cases related to the topic. The subcommittee was also expecting testimonies from Secretary Scanlan and Henry Clement from the ACLU.
HB693: Representative Susan Portelli, Rockingham District 19, Hampton Falls and Kensington Support04:32:48.279 - 1:31:09 PM; Representative Susan Portelli testified in support of HB693, which aims to permit hand counting of ballots and allow for a supplemental count at the discretion of selectmen or the town clerk. She emphasized the need for consistency across the state, referencing the New Hampshire Constitution's provision for hand counting. Portelli highlighted that some towns already hand count ballots, and the bill would codify this practice, preventing last-minute memos from the Secretary of State or Attorney General from interfering with the process. She explained that the supplemental count is not an audit or recount but a pre-certification check to confirm results, especially useful when machine counts are in question.
HB693: Representative C Information Only04:37:59.680 - 1:36:20 PM; Representative C asked about the inclusion of ballots not processed through a voting machine in the supplemental count, expressing concern about undervotes and overvotes. Representative Portelli clarified that the supplemental count is a double-check of machine results for a specific race before certification, not a comprehensive count of all ballots.
HB693: Representative Lane Information Only04:39:32.599 - 1:37:53 PM; Representative Lane inquired about the memo from the Secretary of State that caused confusion among moderators. Representative Portelli confirmed that the memo was received in Kensington, causing confusion as it was not law but a directive, highlighting the need for consistent state practice.
HB693: Representative Nome Information Only04:40:18.920 - 1:38:39 PM; Representative Nome asked about the necessity of amending two sections of the RSAs and the process if a supplemental count yields different results. Representative Portelli noted that she would double-check with OLS about the amendment and explained that the moderator would review and balance the counts.
HB693: Representative Gilmore Information Only04:42:51.200 - 1:41:12 PM; Representative Gilmore, a long-time moderator, expressed unfamiliarity with the supplemental hand count but asked if it involves counting every ballot for a particular race. Representative Portelli confirmed it is for a specific race at the discretion of the town clerk or selectmen.
HB693: Albrand Dano, Kensington, New Hampshire Support04:45:40.200 - 1:44:01 PM; Albrand Dano supported HB693, referencing the election manual and the New Hampshire Constitution, particularly Part Two, Article 32, which assigns the moderator the duty to count votes. He argued that the bill would restore constitutional authority to selectmen and town clerks to verify election results through supplemental counts, addressing the confusion caused by the Secretary of State and Attorney General's memos.
HB693: John Kron, Moderator for Ward Nashua, Senior Systems Analyst Support04:50:22.878 - 1:48:43 PM; John Kron, a moderator and senior systems analyst, supported HB693, emphasizing the importance of supplemental hand counts to verify machine accuracy. He shared his experience of being threatened by the Attorney General's office for attempting a supplemental count, highlighting the need for the bill to protect moderators' constitutional duties. Kron also referenced a Supreme Court case affirming the moderator's authority and stressed the necessity of trust in the voting system.
HB693: Bob War, representing Hillsboro District 13, Hudson Support04:59:43.920 - 1:58:04 PM; Bob War discussed the necessity of updating the voter verification process in New Hampshire, specifically referencing the voter purge in 2021 which removed about a quarter of a million voters. He highlighted the workload on local supervisors of the checklist, using Hudson as an example, where nearly 900 people were at risk of being purged in 2024. He supported HB693, which proposes to decrease the interval of voter verification to annually and extend the look back period from four to five years, which would include at least one presidential election. He argued that this would lead to more accurate voter checklists, reduce workload stress on supervisors, and ensure consistency in the verification process. He also mentioned a synergy with another bill, HB341, which would further enhance the accuracy of voter checklists.
HB317: Representative Claudine Burnham, Strafford District 2, Milton, Rochester Ward 5 Support05:22:54.480 - 2:21:15 PM; Representative Claudine Burnham introduced HB317, emphasizing the need for consistency in voter identification processes. She noted instances where voters were allowed to vote without identification due to personal recognition by election officials, which she believes undermines the fairness and equality of the voting process. She advocated for the bill to ensure that all voters are verified equally and consistently, regardless of personal relationships with election officials.
HB317: Linda Bundy, Antrim Oppose05:24:38.558 - 2:22:59 PM; Linda Bundy from Antrim testified in opposition to HB317, which would prevent a supervisor of the checklist from verifying a person's identity without identification, even if they personally know them. She argued that there is no need for this change as it would primarily affect working people, the elderly, and those with disabilities. She mentioned that two supervisors from Antrim, Linda Morehouse and Aaron Pills Martin, also oppose the bill, with Morehouse providing online testimony.
HB317: Kayla Estacio, Durham, Open Democracy Oppose05:26:06.520 - 2:24:27 PM; Kayla Estacio, a Durham voter and public policy fellow with Open Democracy, testified against HB317. She argued that the bill undermines the trust and responsibility of election officials in New Hampshire, suggesting it addresses a non-existent problem. Estacio pointed out that the bill could disenfranchise groups like the elderly and disabled who may not carry ID, and it could erode public confidence in the electoral process by continuously changing established procedures without reason.
HB317: C.H. Barn, Moderator, Ward Two, Concord Oppose05:28:10.798 - 2:26:31 PM; C.H. Barn, the moderator for Ward Two in Concord, opposed HB317. He explained his 30-year experience where if someone arrives without ID, he asks poll workers if they know the person. If not recognized, he follows a procedure involving affidavits and photos. Barn himself does not provide ID when voting, relying on personal recognition, and believes this method is sufficient and more reliable than photo ID.
HB317: Representative Gilmore Information Only05:29:06.040 - 2:27:27 PM; Representative Gilmore, a fellow moderator, engaged in a discussion with C.H. Barn about the purpose and implications of HB317, particularly questioning its relevance to voter registration and the role of supervisors of the checklist. The conversation highlighted the practical aspects of election day procedures and the potential misunderstanding of the bill's intent.
HB317: Representative Bay Information Only05:30:22.240 - 2:28:43 PM; Representative Bay questioned C.H. Barn about the frequency of voters arriving without ID and the impact on election results. Barn responded that such instances are rare and have not affected election outcomes in his experience. The discussion provided insight into the real-world application of election procedures and the potential effects of HB317.

Berry, Ross(Chairman)(R)[A-]2024	Burnham, Claudine(Clerk)(R)[A]2024	Qualey, James(V Chairman)(R)[A-]2024
Ward, Gerald(D)[CT]2024	Prudhomme-O'Brien, Katherine(R)[B+]2024	Gilmore, Gary(D)
See, Alvin(R)[A]2024	Grill, Jessica(D)[CT]2024	Wood, Clayton(R)[A-]2024
Bay, Luz(D)[F]2024	Wherry, Robert(R)[A]2024	Harvey-Bolia, Juliet(R)[A]2024
Muirhead, Russell(D)[CT]2024	Wilhelm, Matthew(D)[CT]2024	Lane, Connie(D)[F]2024
Newsom, James(D)	Toner, Travis(R)	Guzofski, James(R)