Committee Summary for House Environment and Agriculture (02/10/2026)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB1621 00:04:53.440 - 8:33:34 AM	Executive Session	requiring a baseline environmental impact study to be completed prior to development of certain manufacturing and storage facilities.	Perez, Kristine(R)[B+]2025
HB1053 2026-0580h 00:40:58.319 - 9:09:39 AM	General Working Session	establishing a study committee to determine if and how the department of agriculture could receive electronically-submitted pesticide use reports.	Bixby, Peter(D)[F]2025
HB1186 2026-0613h 00:44:33.200 - 9:13:14 AM	General Working Session	relative to the sale and labeling of eggs.	Barbour, Liz(R)[B+]2025
HB1780 00:53:59.520 - 9:22:40 AM	General Working Session	increasing penalties for persons violating laws relative to the sale of seeds, plants, and nursery stock.	Comtois, Barbara(R)[B+]2025
HB11766 01:01:07.200 - 9:29:48 AM	General Working Session	relative to cruelty to livestock	Likely Text to Speech Error on Bill #
HB1622 2026-0629h 01:10:42.719 - 9:39:23 AM	General Working Session	requiring the state to develop additional solid waste disposal capacity.	Haskins, Linda(D)[F]2025
HB1013 01:43:01.760 - 10:11:42 AM	General Working Session	prohibiting games in which the object is to capture a pig.	Harvey, Cathryn(D)[F]2025
HB1096 03:51:27.680 - 12:20:08 PM	Public Hearing	establishing a committee to study ways to manage disposal of vapes and e-cigarettes.	Germana, Nicholas(D)[F]2025
HB192 04:09:49.439 - 12:38:30 PM	Public Hearing	relative to recommendations of the joint committee on employee classification.	Schmidt, Peter(D)[F]2025
HB1620 04:20:15.439 - 12:48:56 PM	Public Hearing	establishing closure and remediation requirements for abandoned or leaking on-premises-use fuel oil tanks and requiring disclosure of tank status during property sales.	Perez, Kristine(R)[B+]2025
HB1282 04:43:50.718 - 1:12:31 PM	Public Hearing	establishing a commission to advise the department of environmental services on food waste diversion.	Parshall, Lucius(D)[F]2025
HB1275 05:21:10.240 - 1:49:51 PM	Public Hearing	relative to the effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances on agriculture.	Thomas, Wendy(D)[CT]2025

HB1621: Representative Bixby Information Only00:04:53.440 - 8:33:34 AM; Representative Bixby discussed the subcommittee's work on HB1621, noting challenges in defining industrial, manufacturing, and storage facilities, determining enforcement levels, and procedures. He mentioned discussions with Representative German and concluded that the bill is not ready for implementation due to these unresolved issues.
HB1621: Representative Scully Oppose00:06:18.800 - 8:34:59 AM; Representative Scully expressed concerns about unintended consequences, such as varying environmental settings (pristine vs. industrial areas). He referenced past environmental issues in New Hampshire that occurred before current compliance frameworks like RCRA, arguing against overreach based on historical sins. He recommended treating the bill as inexpedient to legislate (ITL).
HB1621: Representative King Oppose00:07:32.720 - 8:36:13 AM; Representative King agreed the bill is not ready, highlighting that enforcement would occur at the municipal level, which lacks sufficient definition. She supported the idea of advanced risk assessment for large manufacturing but emphasized the need for clearer definitions before proceeding, endorsing the ITL motion.
HB1621: Representative Bixby (Full Committee) Oppose00:35:26.160 - 9:04:07 AM; In the full committee, Representative Bixby reiterated doubts about defining facilities, assessments, municipal implementation, and site variations. He noted the committee cannot perform the necessary work with municipalities and counties, recommending ITL unanimously from the subcommittee.
HB1621: Representative Wheeler Information Only00:38:06.320 - 9:06:47 AM; As a co-sponsor, Representative Wheeler agreed the bill takes a large bite but is worth pursuing later. He hoped Representative Perez and co-sponsors would refine it over the summer for future legislation involving environmental baseline studies.
HB1621: Representative German Information Only00:39:10.000 - 9:07:51 AM; Representative German appreciated comments and offered to work with Representative Perez over the summer. He suggested directing studies to local permitting authorities, fitting better with municipal and county governments.
HB1053 2026-0580h: Representative Comtois Support00:40:58.319 - 9:09:39 AM; Representative Comtois presented amendment 2026-0580h, allowing the department a database for electronic pesticide use reports with confidentiality provisions similar to animal databases. She noted checking if it's non-germane and shared it with the department for feedback.
HB1053 2026-0580h: David Russo Information Only00:43:23.520 - 9:12:04 AM; David Russo from the Division of Pesticide Control appreciated the amendment but requested more time to review terms for alignment with existing rules and statutes regarding licensed pesticide use reporting.
HB1053 2026-0580h: Representative Bixby Information Only00:42:14.880 - 9:10:55 AM; Representative Bixby suggested working with the department to improve the amendment and agreed to further work without action today.
HB1186 2026-0613h: Representative Comtois Support00:44:33.200 - 9:13:14 AM; Representative Comtois introduced amendment 2026-0613h, exempting small producers from rules except labeling (RSA 428:23), while keeping the rest of the bill to conform with federal law and protect small producers currently violating state law.
HB1186 2026-0613h: Representative Bixby Information Only00:45:20.880 - 9:14:01 AM; Representative Bixby suggested defining two producer types or clarifying exemptions and requested more time to ensure clarity, but accepted the amendment's structure after discussion with legal counsel.
HB1186 2026-0613h: Commissioner Sean Jasper Information Only00:47:09.680 - 9:15:50 AM; Commissioner Jasper, after hearing the amendment, suggested repealing the entire egg sales section to let USDA regulations apply, as New Hampshire has few commercial producers and no current enforcement. He requested a week to review impacts with Director Wyman, noting USDA may cover larger producers and exemptions could eliminate state need.
HB1186 2026-0613h: Representative Scully Support00:49:22.640 - 9:18:03 AM; Representative Scully noted backyard producers violate current law without enforcement due to limited personnel. He suggested passing the amendment to protect them while exploring repeal.
HB1186 2026-0613h: Representative Comtois (Response) Support00:50:31.440 - 9:19:12 AM; Representative Comtois urged quick action within a week to protect small farmers, emphasizing the bill's origin from Director Wyman to conform with federal law and the need for state exemptions if federal ones are absent.
HB1186 2026-0613h: Commissioner Sean Jasper (Response) Information Only00:51:35.680 - 9:20:16 AM; Commissioner Jasper clarified no enforcement occurs, even during the pandemic, and guaranteed no action against backyard flocks. He recommended time to confirm if exemptions allow repealing state law entirely, noting the bill's delayed effect.
HB1780: Commissioner Sean Jasper Information Only00:53:59.520 - 9:22:40 AM; Commissioner Jasper discusses ongoing amendments focusing on labeling laws for seeds in New Hampshire. He notes issues with seed labeling, such as requiring a production date and germination rate testing. He expresses concern that testing at month 25 might show low germination (e.g., 50%), which could be unfair to consumers, and is awaiting feedback on federal minimum germination rates for sales.
HB1780: Representative (Unspecified) Information Only00:55:11.760 - 9:23:52 AM; The representative shares personal experience with seed viability, noting that tomato seeds can last up to 10 years while some pepper varieties only 2 years. They emphasize the standard process for testing germination rates and argue that if seeds meet those standards, they should be salable, regardless of age variability.
HB1780: Tom Praol de Prol and Thomas, representing Retail Association and Scotts Miracle Grow Company Support00:56:20.319 - 9:25:01 AM; Tom testifies on agreements with the department to amend labeling laws, allowing multiple relabeling (unlike current NH limit of one), adding production dates via rules, and prohibiting sales over 36 months from production. He clarifies no federal germination standards for grass seed but notes Scotts' third-party testing, relabeling if rates drop below 95% to 90%, and pulling from shelves below 80%. He argues against adding a state germination cap, as labels already provide test dates and rates, and suggests NH lacks resources for independent testing. He assures integrity from Scotts but acknowledges concerns for other companies.
HB1780: Representative Comto Information Only00:59:12.240 - 9:27:53 AM; Representative Comto thanks the witness and expresses concern about companies leaving low-germination seeds (e.g., 40%) on shelves, emphasizing the need for consumer protection beyond company integrity.
HB11766: Representative Comtois Information Only01:01:07.200 - 9:29:48 AM; Representative Comtois discusses department-desired amendments, notes some are good but one questionable, and stresses the need for in-depth committee discussion due to the controversial nature of animal cruelty laws. She apologizes for mistakenly stating the New Hampshire Humane Society attended a meeting (it was SPCA instead). She clarifies 'designate' means department-appointed experts (e.g., SPCA, Humane Society, shelters) for livestock evaluation, emphasizing distinctions from pets like dogs/cats. She highlights shortages of large animal vets and nuances in assessing livestock health (e.g., visible ribs/hips on cows don't indicate neglect; factors include age, feed, breed).
HB11766: Representative Bixby Information Only01:04:32.799 - 9:33:13 AM; Representative Bixby amplifies the need for expertise in assessing different livestock (e.g., confident with horses but not cows/goats/sheep). He supports the designate system for rapid deployment of regional experts and agrees the bill requires more work, suggesting referral to the animal protection subcommittee for stakeholder input. He proposes explicit roles for humane societies in seized animal care and conflicts of interest (e.g., no involvement in both confiscation and care).
HB11766: Chairwoman Information Only01:05:45.520 - 9:34:26 AM; The Chairwoman agrees with subcommittee referral, lists members (Rep. Comto chair, Kenny, Freeman, Haskins, Sopakitis), tasks Rep. Comto to convene with stakeholders. She notes an animal protection task force idea is promising but not feasible this year, better for budget cycles under Dept. of Agriculture or law enforcement.
HB11766: Representative Wheeler Information Only01:08:19.279 - 9:37:00 AM; Representative Wheeler asks to attend the subcommittee due to Rep. Sophocitis's personal issues; the Chairwoman and Rep. Bixby discuss allowing non-voting attendance and potentially subbing Rep. Sophocitis.
HB1622 2026-0629h: Representative Patenza Support01:10:42.719 - 9:39:23 AM; Representative Patenza presents her amendment (minor changes to Rep. German's 0629h, e.g., 'may' instead of 'shall' for department processing, 'unsuitable' sites using accessible tools). She supports prioritizing brownfields/expansions over greenfields, incorporating HB215 public benefit standards (need for at least half facility lifetime), statement of purpose from Senate, and tools for unsuitable site identification (e.g., setbacks from schools/homes). She addresses concerns by noting permits precede major costs, no digging until need, and context of defined need to prevent exploitation (e.g., post-2023 Supreme Court case). Emphasizes NH priority trash in contracts could extend capacity 75-100 years with Rochester expansion.
HB1622 2026-0629h: Representative German Support01:13:35.840 - 9:42:16 AM; Representative German explains amendment 0629h based on subcommittee work: adopts Senate purpose preferring brownfields; adds HB215 public benefit (need half facility life, not just one year); prioritizes expansions/brownfields over greenfields; respects municipal agreements/local control; adds biennial report on landfill capacity/projections. Notes it formalizes processes to favor expansions.
HB1622 2026-0629h: Representative Haskins Support01:23:47.360 - 9:52:28 AM; Representative Haskins thanks Reps. Patenza and German, supports Patenza's small improvements, hopes for favorable vote.
HB1622 2026-0629h: Representative Scully Oppose01:23:47.360 - 9:52:28 AM; Representative Scully praises improvements removing 'poison pill' but opposes restriction in 3F (no waste acceptance until first shortfall year), arguing it reduces competition, increases costs for municipalities (only one provider), and ignores high capital costs; suggests striking the sentence for better taxpayer savings.
HB1622 2026-0629h: Representative Bixby Support01:25:57.120 - 9:54:38 AM; Representative Bixby raises hypothetical of two companies where one gets permit but can't operate for 8 years until need, potentially harming competition; later supports Patenza's version for using 'may' (not 'shall') and applying only to new landfills (not expansions).
HB1622 2026-0629h: Representative Howard Support01:27:13.360 - 9:55:54 AM; Representative Howard questions 'new waste' in hypotheticals for existing facilities; later notes business supply/demand equality once need identified, no advantage to one provider.
HB1622 2026-0629h: Representative Gruber Support01:30:22.480 - 9:59:03 AM; Representative Gruber clarifies clause applies only to new landfills, not expansions; later warns removing restriction could invite out-of-state waste to cover capital costs, which no one wants.
HB1622 2026-0629h: Representative Freeman Support01:33:18.480 - 10:01:59 AM; Representative Freeman notes it's an early bill, urges completion today, suggests striking concern for Senate.
HB1622 2026-0629h: Representative Miner Support01:35:34.639 - 10:04:15 AM; Representative Miner argues limited competition (2-3 facilities, specialized), not mom-and-pop, so restriction not an issue.
HB1622 2026-0629h: Representative German (Motion) Support01:36:37.920 - 10:05:18 AM; Moves Ought to Pass (OTP) on amendment 2026-0629h; later moves OTPA on HB1622 with amendment; thanks collaborators, likes 'unsuitable' wording.
HB1622 2026-0629h: Chairwoman Erin Support01:36:37.920 - 10:05:18 AM; Entertains motions; notes early bill deadline pressure; after 13-1 vote, approves consent, tasks report; discusses fiscal note removal with finance.
HB1013: Chairwoman Information Only01:43:01.760 - 10:11:42 AM; The Chairwoman discusses the bill, notes amendment submitted but not ready; explains it targets poorly executed events (e.g., pigs in plastic bags) while allowing well-run fair activities; no executive action today, defer to next meeting.
HB1013: Unidentified Representative Information Only01:45:02.560 - 10:13:43 AM; The representative proposes an amendment to HB1013, suggesting a new section 644:8-h for contests involving pigs. In consultation with stakeholders like livestock farmers, veterinarians, state fair associations, and UNH Cooperative Extension, the Commissioner of Agriculture, Markets and Food shall develop and publish best handling practices and recommendations. These include handling during release and capture, supervision, guidance and training, transportation provisions, and enforcement to ensure humane and safe events. The effective date is upon passage. The representative shares research on fair rules, such as no steel-toed shoes and required carriers for transport, advocating for best practices over a ban.
HB1013: Unidentified Representative Information Only01:46:58.320 - 10:15:39 AM; The speaker continues detailing the amendment, emphasizing research from various fairs showing stringent rules protecting contestants and livestock. They note no greasing of pigs and suggest the department have leeway for non-compliance. They apologize for not having the written amendment but promise it soon.
HB1013: Representative Bixby Support01:48:20.800 - 10:17:01 AM; Representative Bixby supports the best practices approach and department involvement. Suggests considering a veterinarian's presence at events and having the department review the amendment for suggestions.
HB1013: Commissioner (of Agriculture, Markets and Food) Information Only01:49:29.280 - 10:18:10 AM; The Commissioner reviews the proposed amendment, initially concerned about added duties but believes it's feasible. Notes penalties must be in statute, not rules. Suggests prohibiting pig scrambles for a period like five years as enforcement. Doubts need for on-site veterinarian, favors training. Enforcement could rely on videos. Best practices protect against court actions if followed. Suggests no fines to avoid hearings; instead, temporary bans without appeal. Shares story of discussing the bill at a national meeting where other states were unfamiliar with pig scrambles.
HB1013: Unidentified Representative Information Only01:51:52.239 - 10:20:33 AM; The representative suggests including a penalty like a $100 fine per pig for non-compliance with best practices to ensure adherence, without turning the department into 'pig police'.
HB1013: Commissioner (continued) Information Only01:53:02.560 - 10:21:43 AM; The Commissioner advises against fines due to administrative burden, suggesting bans instead. Notes appeal processes complicate enforcement. Emphasizes time and expense involved.
HB1013: Unidentified Representative Information Only01:54:08.080 - 10:22:49 AM; Suggests removing 's' from 'state fair associations' as there's only one, and corrects department name to 'Agriculture, Markets, and Food' without comma.
HB1013: Representative Patenza Support01:54:08.080 - 10:22:49 AM; Agrees with avoiding fines and quotes 'pig police'. Raises concern about plastic bags for transporting pigs as animal cruelty. Asks if best practices would address this. Shares that grain bags are breathable but still inappropriate; emphasizes food, water, shade, and proper cages.
HB1013: Representative Howard Information Only01:56:48.639 - 10:25:29 AM; Asks if training would come from the department. Suggests changing 'training' to 'guidance for training' in the amendment language.
HB1013: Unidentified Representative Information Only01:56:48.639 - 10:25:29 AM; Asks the Commissioner for a reasonable timeline to develop best practices. Commissioner estimates basic guidance for upcoming season on prohibited practices, but full development for 2027 fair season due to consultations.
HB1013: Unidentified Representative (follow-up) Information Only01:58:03.760 - 10:26:44 AM; Suggests clarifying for 2026 season, department issues guidance on prohibited practices without full consultations, as they can't be completed quickly.
HB1013: Representative Bixby (continued) Information Only01:59:10.800 - 10:27:51 AM; Reminds of legislative timeline to Senate and Governor, possibly mid-July signing. Suggests non-binding guidance for this year, binding later. Recommends department help draft amendment for timeline.
HB1013: Representative Freeman Information Only02:00:08.800 - 10:28:49 AM; Notes original bill effective January 1, 2027. Asks if that's sufficient; Commissioner suggests July 1, 2027, for practicality as fairs start in July.
HB1013: Representative Miner Support02:01:17.360 - 10:29:58 AM; Acknowledges problem exists and appreciates guidance before 2026 fair season.
HB1013: Chairwoman Information Only02:01:17.360 - 10:29:58 AM; Thanks committee for discussing amendment with Commissioner's input. Notes they've covered pending bills, will reconvene tomorrow without executions, and breaks for lunch.
HB1013: Chairwoman Information Only03:34:05.600 - 12:02:46 PM; Later, reconvenes meeting, notes attendance, and opens public hearing for HB1096.
HB1013: Representative Germana (Nick Tana) Support03:35:50.800 - 12:04:31 PM; Introduces HB1096 to establish a committee studying vape and e-cigarette disposal. Represents Cheshire District 15 (Chesterfield, Hinsdale, Keene Wards 1,3-5, Surry, Westmoreland, Walpole). Thanks Donnie Tibaldi, Keene's recycler, for highlighting issues. Vapes combine batteries, plastics, metals, chemicals; not simple trash. Sales: 215-250M US yearly, 1.3-1.5M NH. Challenges: disposable vs. rechargeable units; batteries cause fires (banned); nicotine is hazardous waste. Disposal issues lead to leaching, costs for municipalities via taxes/fees. Other states: VT EPR for hazardous waste, NY pilot recycling, ME EPR bill. Proposes study committee with stakeholders for timely legislation, aligning with 'one bite at a time' EPR approach like batteries, paint.
HB1013: Unidentified Representative Information Only03:46:46.239 - 12:15:27 PM; As solid waste working group member, questions if issue should be handled by the group instead of a study committee to avoid duplication. Supports research but suggests collaboration.
HB1013: Representative Germana (response) Support03:48:01.520 - 12:16:42 PM; Emphasizes working together without duplication. Study committee with solid waste group and stakeholders can build buy-in for legislation by year-end, given issue's complexity.
HB1013: Unidentified Representative Information Only03:48:01.520 - 12:16:42 PM; Suggests solid waste group could spend more time than a study committee's 2-3 meetings for thorough work.
HB1013: Representative Comtois Information Only03:49:02.160 - 12:17:43 PM; Thanks for bill. Notes Rep. Eel's email: no state has solved it, many studying. Suggests deferring to existing studies and solid waste group, then form committee later with gathered info to avoid redundancy.
HB1013: Representative Germana (response) Support03:50:02.720 - 12:18:43 PM; Agrees no full solution yet but some states passed laws to learn from. Waiting 2-3 years increases municipal costs and delays implementation (3-5 more years), totaling 7-8 years. Urges action for timely resolution.
HB1013: Representative Ju (follow-up) Information Only03:50:59.680 - 12:19:40 PM; Confirms current law requires recycling vapes due to lithium-ion batteries.
HB1096: Representative Gruber Information Only03:51:27.680 - 12:20:08 PM; Representative Gruber noted the absence of mention of the solid waste working group in the bill, emphasizing their importance as a key resource. He suggested engaging them in the study committee and inquired about the role of the battery recycling bill in handling batteries from vapes.
HB1096: Representative Patenza Information Only03:53:25.760 - 12:22:06 PM; Representative Patenza asked about the history of electronic nicotine devices, whether they come with end-of-life disposal instructions, and how the battery recycling bill would apply to combined battery and hazardous waste units in vapes, highlighting concerns about disassembly and responsibility.
HB1096: Representative Freeman Information Only03:55:25.600 - 12:24:06 PM; Representative Freeman explained that some disposable vapes have separable components, and empty devices with drained fluid should be covered under the battery recycling bill. He emphasized concerns about empty cartridges potentially leaching chemicals into landfills.
HB1096: Representative Jamanna Support03:56:22.479 - 12:25:03 PM; Representative Jamanna supported the bill, clarifying that even empty cartridges have residual chemicals. He discussed the challenges of disassembling integrated units and argued that producers should bear disposal costs rather than taxpayers or municipalities.
HB1096: Representative Miner Oppose03:58:18.239 - 12:26:59 PM; Representative Miner questioned the sudden concern for vape disposal compared to traditional tobacco products like cigarettes and cigars, suggesting it might lead to overregulation once initiated.
HB1096: Representative Haskins Support03:59:16.960 - 12:27:57 PM; Representative Haskins thanked the bill sponsor and noted the presence of DES members to answer questions on hazardous waste and disposal.
HB1096: Representative Bixby Information Only04:00:16.080 - 12:28:57 PM; Representative Bixby raised a point of order, cautioning that the hearing should not transition into a work session, especially with a committee member testifying.
HB1096: Todd Piskovitz, NH DES Support04:01:06.000 - 12:29:47 PM; Todd Piskovitz from NH DES explained that most vapes have non-separable batteries and liquid nicotine, classifying them as hazardous waste. He noted that used vapes are not considered empty under EPA rules if not rinsable, complicating collection under the battery bill due to exemptions for embedded batteries.
HB1096: Representative Patenza (follow-up) Information Only04:03:16.080 - 12:31:57 PM; Representative Patenza sought clarification on whether combined vape devices could be collected under the battery program, acknowledging the hazardous waste complications.
HB1096: Representative KTO Information Only04:04:17.040 - 12:32:58 PM; Representative KTO thanked for the nicotine explanation and questioned the battery stewardship program's obligations for embedded batteries.
HB1096: Michael Noror, NH DES Information Only04:05:37.520 - 12:34:18 PM; Michael Noror from NH DES confirmed that HB6002 does not address embedded battery devices, so the stewardship program would not be obligated to collect non-dismantlable vapes, similar to other jurisdictions.
HB1096: Representative Comtois Information Only04:06:41.199 - 12:35:22 PM; Representative Comtois urged focusing on establishing the study committee rather than delving into battery recycling details.
HB192: Representative Haskins Support04:09:49.439 - 12:38:30 PM; Representative Haskins introduced the bill as a housekeeping measure requested by the department to amend RSA 147 B, C, D, and E for consistency in hazardous waste definitions regarding pharmaceutical collections.
HB192: Wendy Bonner, NH DES Support04:11:13.760 - 12:39:54 PM; Wendy Bonner from NH DES explained that the 2016 HB1490 updated RSA 147A but not B, C, D, making this bill necessary for consistent exclusion of pharmaceutical waste collected under RSA 318E, which governs takeback programs by law enforcement, pharmacies, and facilities to safely dispose of drugs, especially during the fentanyl crisis.
HB192: Representative Wheeler Information Only04:12:11.760 - 12:40:52 PM; Representative Wheeler requested repetition of Wendy Bonner's name for the record.
HB192: Representative Bixby Information Only04:13:27.359 - 12:42:08 PM; Representative Bixby asked for a description of RSA 318E, which enables no-questions-asked pharmaceutical takeback programs in line with DEA and state requirements to remove controlled substances from circulation.
HB192: Representative Fenza Information Only04:14:36.399 - 12:43:17 PM; Representative Fenza inquired about the disposal process for prescription medications at pharmacies like CVS and Walgreens, expressing concerns about drugs entering landfills and contaminating drinking water.
HB1620: Representative Peter Bixby, District 13 Support04:20:15.439 - 12:48:56 PM; Representative Bixby introduces HB1620, explaining it establishes requirements for closing and remediating abandoned or leaking on-premises fuel oil tanks and mandates disclosure during property sales. He notes input suggesting amendments to align with existing statutes and avoid duplication, but emphasizes the need to address unused tanks to prevent hazards.
HB1620: Robert Bishop, Administrator, Oil Remediation Compliance Bureau, NH DES Information Only04:21:43.680 - 12:50:24 PM; Bishop provides testimony via letter and answers questions. He clarifies that DES does not regulate residential or abandoned residential fuel tanks, though the state fire code requires removal after abandonment. He notes potential conflicts in the bill with fire code for non-residential tanks, which are fully regulated. He discusses spill response, remediation programs, and the infrequency of underground tank spills compared to above-ground ones. He explains that any oil spill is regulated, with thresholds for notification and cleanup.
HB1620: Joanie McIntyre, Real Estate Agent, Concord, Vice Chair of Public Policy, NH Association of Realtors Oppose04:31:13.279 - 12:59:54 PM; McIntyre opposes the bill, acknowledging its intent but stating that residential property disclosures already cover buried oil tanks comprehensively, including questions on presence, use, age, materials, and issues. She highlights concerns about timelines for removal (180 days for buried tanks unspecified in detail), lack of records for tanks, enforcement challenges, and risks to buyers unaware of tanks. She shares personal experience with buried tanks and notes no prohibition on new installations, suggesting that as a first step.
HB1620: Representative Perez Support04:36:59.359 - 1:05:40 PM; Representative Perez apologizes for a scheduling mix-up and explains the bill's intent to prohibit new underground residential oil tanks, require removal or closure within 180 days of abandonment, and test soil if under structures. She notes ongoing burials despite best practices, risks to aquifers from leaks (tanks last ~20 years), and availability of assistance funds. She differentiates from propane and emphasizes the need for law over regulations to protect the environment. She offers to amend for conflicts and notes supporters from realtors, conservation, and oil delivery.
HB1282: Representative Lucius Parshall Support04:43:50.718 - 1:12:31 PM; Representative Parshall introduces HB1282, describing visits to transfer stations and identifying limited composting infrastructure. He cites 2023 DES data on 171,785 tons of food waste in landfills (24% of total) and notes the recent ban on landfilling over one ton weekly if alternatives are accessible. He proposes a commission with diverse stakeholders to develop incentives (carrots) for diversion, preferring collaboration over mandates, and addresses potential overlaps with existing groups like the solid waste working group.
HB1282: Michael Norc, Solid Waste Management Bureau, NH DES Information Only05:06:48.000 - 1:35:29 PM; Norc states DES takes no position but provides context on the food waste ban creating market demand, ongoing infrastructure development, and a new EPA-funded generator study due in May for baseline data and capacity analysis. He mentions the HB2 solid waste surcharge funding grants for infrastructure (launching summer 2024). He notes challenges in equitable enforcement due to uneven facility distribution, some out-of-state, and a pending anaerobic digester permit. He emphasizes communication and education needs, with the law's 20-mile relief valve complicating implementation.
HB1275: Representative Wendy Thomas, town of Merrimack Support05:21:10.240 - 1:49:51 PM; Representative Thomas introduces HB 1275, which restricts the spreading of sludge containing PFAS forever chemicals on agricultural land to protect New Hampshire's land, water, and public health. She explains that PFAS do not break down, contaminate soil, groundwater, and drinking water, and cleanup is costly and often impossible. The bill has five sections: defining PFAS in state law; creating a PFAS relief fund for farmers affected by contamination from standard practices like sludge spreading, funded by litigation, settlements, fines, federal funds, grants, and donations; granting civil immunity to farmers for damages from PFAS in soil, water, or products due to standard practices; imposing a five-year moratorium on spreading sewage sludge and biosolids for agricultural use to evaluate alternatives; and specifying fund uses for testing, remediation, and economic losses. She presents an amendment to ban land application on agricultural and landscaping land statewide. During Q&A, she notes no safe PFAS level exists, PFAS are in 100% of sludge, and she's open to broader bans but focuses on PFAS as it's universally present.
HB1275: Cullen Jumper, urologist, Durham Support05:30:13.120 - 1:58:54 PM; As a urologist treating PFAS-linked cancers like kidney and testicular cancer, Cullen shares his personal experience: his family's four-generation dairy farm in Maine was contaminated with PFAS from prior sludge spreading, leading to high levels in milk, soil, well water, and feed. This shut down the farm overnight, forcing them to care for the herd without income; state support was crucial. Five years later, the land remains unusable, and wildlife like deer and turkeys are contaminated, prohibiting hunting in the area. He warns that similar issues are emerging in New Hampshire, poisoning fields, wildlife, and livelihoods, and urges support for HB 1275 to stop spreading toxic sludge and prevent further irreversible damage to farms, food supply, hunting, and fishing.
HB1275: April Sergeant, proxy for Maine Water Environment Association Information Only05:34:05.520 - 2:02:46 PM; As a last-minute proxy for the Maine Water Environment Association representing wastewater professionals, April shares a cautionary tale from Maine's biosolids ban, which caused a crisis leading to shipping sludge to New Jersey and New Brunswick. She emphasizes considering current biosolids management, alternative outlets' reliability, and being proactive to avoid putting wastewater facilities in similar binds, without advocating for or against the bill. She directs questions to the association's contact info.
HB1275: Allison Jumper, Durham Support05:36:17.120 - 2:04:58 PM; Allison testifies in support of HB 1275, recounting how PFAS contaminated her in-laws' Maine organic dairy farm via historic sludge application, affecting soil, cows, and milk above action levels. Unknowingly, her family in Durham consumed contaminated farm-raised beef, resulting in high PFAS blood levels in all five family members, including young children, causing lifelong health risks and developmental issues. She highlights that New Hampshire endorses sludge application without comprehensive PFAS contamination checks, exposing farmers and the public unknowingly. Farmers need protection via the relief fund as they didn't cause this; continuing biosolids use adds irreversible PFAS to land. She urges support to protect farmers and New Hampshire's lands.
HB1275: Leo Gardet, Assistant Director of Public Works Wastewater, town of Merrimack Oppose05:40:45.840 - 2:09:26 PM; Leo expresses appreciation for addressing PFAS impacts but opposes the five-year moratorium in HB 1275 due to unintended consequences for wastewater utilities, municipalities, and ratepayers. For Merrimack's facility, land application controls costs, ensures reliability, and supports reuse; they've met all standards for 40+ years and invested millions in composting (1994 build, 2015 upgrade, recent $5M). With limited infrastructure and no confident long-term disposal options, stopping operations would harm ratepayers. He notes PFAS ubiquity since the 1940s in products like Teflon; primary exposures are via water, food, and air. EPA 2022 data shows biosolids disposal: 27% landfilling, 16% incineration, 31% agricultural land application, 24% golf course, 2% other. Land application is beneficial reuse, adding nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus to rejuvenate soil. He shares concerns and looks forward to solutions as farmers will need better solids management.
HB1275: Leo Gardet, Assistant Director of Public Works Wastewater, Town of Merrimack Information Only05:44:21.760 - 2:13:02 PM; Leo Gardet continues his testimony, emphasizing that regulating PFAS contamination at the source by banning production and use is more effective than a moratorium on land application of biosolids. He notes that all biosolids likely contain some PFAS but a moratorium won't reduce national contamination. He discusses his recent NPDES permit requiring quarterly testing for PFAS in wastewater, but lacks regulatory power to stop industrial discharges. He advocates for labeling products with PFAS and state bans similar to mercury. He explains biosolids uses like composting for soil amendment, not direct fertilizer, and details extensive testing for metals, PCBs, VOCs, and PFAS to meet NH and MA standards, confirming compliance and oversight.
HB1275: Adam Nordell, Farmer from Freedom, Maine Support05:52:10.958 - 2:20:51 PM; Adam Nordell testifies in support of HB1275, sharing his experience as a PFAS-impacted farmer. He recounts how his organic farm in Maine was unknowingly contaminated from sludge application in the 1990s, leading to severe PFAS exposure for his family, employees, soil, water, eggs, and crops. He describes the broader contamination affecting wildlife and neighboring farms. He argues that sludge application is 'toxic roulette' with widespread issues across states, including New Hampshire. He praises Maine's ban on sludge spreading and urges support for the bill and Representative Thomas's amendment to prevent New Hampshire from becoming a dumping ground for contaminated sludge from other states.
HB1275: Ren Boddin, Residuals Management Section Supervisor, NH DES Wastewater Bureau Information Only05:56:11.520 - 2:24:52 PM; Ren Boddin provides background on NH DES's residuals management program, overseeing land application of biosolids. He highlights the robust testing for over 200 compounds, including expanding PFAS testing from 9 to 40 compounds since 2018, with plans for more. DES is modeling PFAS leaching to groundwater to set science-based thresholds and aims to require soil testing on farms before application. DES takes no stance on the bill but notes limited alternatives to land application: incineration capacity is insufficient, and landfilling poses stability risks. He discusses out-of-state sludge imports meeting strict NH standards and emerging technologies like foam fractionation to remove PFAS from wastewater before sludge formation.
HB1275: Jeff Martz, Administrator, Hazardous Waste Remediation Bureau, NH DES Information Only05:56:11.520 - 2:24:52 PM; Jeff Martz supplements Ren Boddin's testimony, referencing the USGS study on background PFAS levels in undisturbed soils (3-4 ppb, higher in southern NH). He confirms the study targeted non-agricultural sites to assess atmospheric deposition, not sludge-applied areas.
HB1275: Charlie Hansen, Resource Management, BioSolids Recycler and Farmer from Center Harbor Oppose06:07:29.440 - 2:36:10 PM; Charlie Hansen, a biosolids recycler and farmer using biosolids for 35 years, defends their use as an environmentally friendly fertilizer due to slow-release organic nitrogen and phosphorus, reducing runoff compared to commercial fertilizers. He acknowledges the Maine tragedy but attributes it to outdated practices, noting NH's robust program since 1995 has prevented issues. He stresses biosolids undergo extensive testing and are safe, while alternatives like trucking to Ohio are costly and unsustainable.
HB1275: Nate Brown, New Hampshire Water Pollution Control Association (NHWPCA) Oppose06:10:48.240 - 2:39:29 PM; Nate Brown represents NHWPCA, expressing concerns about the 5-year moratorium in HB1275. He notes NH's responsible management of biosolids via regulated pathways benefiting soil and reducing costs, with no known PFAS contamination from applications. A moratorium would raise costs, strain disposal options, and harm farmers and sustainability goals. He cites Maine's challenges and urges amendments for research and safeguards instead of a ban, offering collaboration and inviting committee to wastewater facility tours.
HB1275: Wilson, St. Paul's School student and 350 New Hampshire member Support06:17:11.600 - 2:45:52 PM; Wilson, a senior at St. Paul's School and member of 350 New Hampshire, testified in support of HB 1275 based on personal humanitarian concerns and research findings on PFAS governance in New England. He expressed sadness over farmers facing lawsuits for contamination they did not create, emphasizing economic survival and competitive disadvantages compared to states like Maine, which has a $60 million PFAS fund while New Hampshire offers none. He highlighted how the bill's civil immunity clause prevents perverse incentives against testing soils, encourages transparency, and protects farmers as victims of PFAS. Wilson urged support to close policy gaps, noting potential similar impacts in New Hampshire as seen in Maine.
HB1275: Sheila Connley, President of Resource Management, Inc. (RMI) Oppose06:21:34.160 - 2:50:15 PM; Sheila Connley, president of Resource Management, Inc., which recycles organic products including biosolids for farmers in the Northeast, opposed HB 1275, particularly the proposed 5-year moratorium on land application of biosolids. She described RMI's long history of beneficial reuse since 1994, including projects in Hooksett, Concord, Nashua, and Merrimack, regulated stringently by DES with testing for over 200 compounds. Since 2016, RMI has voluntarily tested biosolids for PFAS, finding levels far lower in New Hampshire (typically tens of parts per billion) than historical Maine impacts from paper coating industries. Connley emphasized that PFAS originates from everyday consumer products like fleece, rugs, lipstick, and ski wax, entering wastewater from households, not industry. She warned that a moratorium would jeopardize communities by limiting sustainable nutrient recycling, potentially leading to landfills or incineration, and stressed the program's environmental benefits. During questioning, she clarified low PFAS levels in NH materials (10-20 ppb vs. Maine's 15,000+ ppb), ongoing soil testing showing below 20 ppb, and the need to avoid discarding a successful program due to isolated past issues.
HB1275: Katherine Corkery, Sierra Club New Hampshire Chapter Support06:31:41.760 - 3:00:22 PM; Katherine Corkery from the Sierra Club New Hampshire Chapter, representing 15,000 members, supported HB 1275, advocating for a five-year pause on spreading sludge to better understand PFAS risks. She emphasized the serious health implications beyond revenue or business disposal, noting that New Hampshire farms have not been tested, leading to fear among farmers to test due to liability concerns. Corkery stressed the need to address unknowns about PFAS contamination in soils and its health impacts.
HB1275: Sean Jasper, Commissioner, Department of Agriculture, Markets, and Food Oppose06:33:18.240 - 3:01:59 PM; Sean Jasper, Commissioner of the Department of Agriculture, testified with concerns about HB 1275, rejecting a ban on biosolids without evidence and urging soil testing instead. He distinguished New Hampshire's situation from Maine's historical high PFAS levels due to paper plant coatings, noting non-detect results in NH milk testing over the past decade despite interstate milk flows. Jasper highlighted benefits of biosolids as cheap fertilizer for farmers and risks of untested alternatives like landfills or incineration. He advocated following science over emotion, banning PFAS manufacturing rather than burdening farmers, and enabling voluntary soil testing with liability protections. During extensive questioning, he addressed the lack of prior soil testing due to no legislative funding or authority for private property, confirmed ongoing product testing (e.g., vegetables showing no uptake), and supported mandates for testing with reasonable thresholds while criticizing the backwards approach of penalizing agriculture amid widespread PFAS presence from consumer sources.
HB1275: Sarah Thorne, Holderness Support06:45:28.478 - 3:14:09 PM; Sarah Thorne spoke in support of HB1275, sharing her personal experience with high PFAS levels. In 2019, she and her husband participated in the NH Trace Study, where their blood and urine tested higher in PFAS than 96% of participants. Despite living organically in Gilmanton with a clean well and soil, the likely source was fish and game from NH waters, such as shad from the Merrimack River and venison. She emphasized that PFAS uptake in wildlife from sewage effluent is a key issue. Thorne advocated for making polluters pay, identifying sources before sewage treatment plants, and imposing limits and fines, so farmers and treatment plants do not bear the costs.
HB1275: Rob Johnson, NH Farm Bureau Oppose06:48:12.000 - 3:16:53 PM; Rob Johnson opposed HB1275, particularly the moratorium in section four, arguing that biosolids are a beneficial and economical soil amendment used by NH farmers for decades on field corn and hayland. Removing it would impose substantial costs. He noted the bill lacks standards for contamination, raising concerns about public perception if fields test positive even at trace levels like parts per quadrillion, deterring buyers. He called for clear standards before testing and questioned the absence of a fiscal note, highlighting costs to the state and municipalities. Johnson advised against modeling after Maine and, while open to more discussion on liability protection and a compensation fund, insisted the moratorium is a non-starter. He supported anonymous testing but emphasized the need for standards.
HB1275: DES Representatives Information Only06:53:19.440 - 3:22:00 PM; DES representatives provided information on PFAS soil standards and ongoing studies in response to questions. In December 2024, they promulgated standards for four PFAS compounds: 0.4 ppb for PFOA, 0.5 ppb for PFOS, 0.4 ppb for PFHxS, and 1.3 ppb for PFNA, designed to protect sand and gravel aquifers with low organic carbon, making PFAS highly mobile. These standards focus on subsurface releases and groundwater protection, not directly transferable to agricultural soils which have more organic carbon. They are in phase four of a six-phase study on PFAS leachability from biosolids in agricultural soils, considering factors like recharge and climate, with modeling completion in three months and a final report by fall. The study uses eight years of data including USGS to assess PFAS loading to groundwater. On plant uptake, they noted limited NH-specific work but referenced FDA's total diet study showing low PFAS in food, with corn having minimal uptake (concentrating in stalks/leaves), while some grasses uptake more. They offered to provide references and mentioned a pilot study on vegetable uptake from contaminated water.

Aron, Judy(Chairman)(R)[A-]2025	King, Seth(Clerk)(R)[B+]2025	Barbour, Liz(V Chairman)(R)[B+]2025
Gruber, James(D)[F]2025	Bixby, Peter(D)[F]2025	Sofikitis, Catherine(D)[D-]2025
Freeman, Lisa(R)[B+]2025	Comtois, Barbara(R)[B+]2025	Scully, Kevin(R)[A-]2025
Howard, Molly(D)[D]2025	Wheeler, Jonah(D)[D-]2025	Haskins, Linda(D)[F]2025
Potenza, Kelley(R)[A]2025	Kenny, Catherine(R)[B]2025	Germana, Nicholas(D)[F]2025
Miner, Laurence(R)[B]2025