Committee Summary for House Executive Departments and Administration (02/05/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB180 2024-1453h 00:05:55.759 - 9:02:46 AM	Public Hearing	relative to critical incident stress management teams.	Proulx, Mark(R)[B]2024
HB180 0261h 00:13:32.639 - 9:10:23 AM	Executive Session	relative to critical incident stress management teams.	Proulx, Mark(R)[B]2024
HB438 00:38:12.640 - 9:35:03 AM	Public Hearing	relative to immigration detention facilities.	Horrigan, Timothy(D)[CT]2024
HB598 01:03:48.559 - 10:00:39 AM	Public Hearing	establishing a committee to study data sources of all entities operated by all branches of government that are or are potentially made available to the public, identify the data formats of those sources, and recommend legislation to standardize types and formats of data output from all or select governmental entities.	Corcoran, Travis(R)[A]2024
HB702 03:03:16.760 - 12:00:07 PM	Public Hearing	relative to defining extra duty pay hours for a retired part-time police officer's hour limit for yearly calculations.	Doucette, Fred(R)[A-]2024
HB727 03:52:43.439 - 12:49:34 PM	Public Hearing	relative to the New Hampshire retirement system.	Foote, Charles(R)[B]2024
HB727 04:23:20.279 - 1:20:11 PM	Executive Session	relative to the New Hampshire retirement system.	Foote, Charles(R)[B]2024
HB598 285H 04:27:29.399 - 1:24:20 PM	Executive Session	establishing a committee to study data sources of all entities operated by all branches of government that are or are potentially made available to the public, identify the data formats of those sources, and recommend legislation to standardize types and formats of data output from all or select governmental entities.	Corcoran, Travis(R)[A]2024

HB180 2024-1453h: Mark PR, Hillsboro, Ward 8 in Manchester Support00:05:55.759 - 9:02:46 AM; Mark PR introduced an amendment to HB180, specifically aimed at defining the role of a team leader. He explained that the amendment was necessary due to the introduction of a costly certification test by the International Critical Incident Stress Foundation, which he believes is unnecessary for volunteer team members. He highlighted the financial burden this test places on volunteers, many of whom reached out to him unable to afford it. PR emphasized that the teams are already conducting adequate training and have access to mental health professionals, suggesting that the certification does not add value to their current practices.
HB180 2024-1453h: Unnamed Speaker Oppose00:09:01.560 - 9:05:52 AM; The speaker expressed opposition to the certification test required by HB180, citing the high cost of $400 as unnecessary. They offered background information on the International Critical Incident Stress Foundation (ICISF) but did not elaborate further. The speaker also discussed their team's status as an independent critical incident stress management team, emphasizing the importance of not being required to affiliate with any municipal department to continue providing services throughout New Hampshire and neighboring states.
HB180 0261h: Representative Lon Information Only00:13:32.639 - 9:10:23 AM; Representative Lon moved to pass HB180 with Amendment 0261h, which was seconded by Representative Broa. They discussed the amendment's purpose to clarify the bill's language regarding the affiliation of critical incident teams with municipalities.
HB180 0261h: Representative Schmidt Information Only00:14:22.639 - 9:11:13 AM; Representative Schmidt supported the amendment, noting its clarification provided by Representative Pu. They emphasized the self-certification aspect of the teams and the absence of formal state certification, with training provided by an independent organization.
HB180 0261h: Representative Cre Information Only00:14:22.639 - 9:11:13 AM; Representative Cre confirmed the self-certification process and the availability of optional tests provided by an independent organization. They stressed the importance of ensuring that class attendees understand the material learned.
HB180 0261h: Representative Re Information Only00:14:22.639 - 9:11:13 AM; Representative Re provided background on Representative PR, identifying him as the state expert on critical incident response management teams and acknowledging his contributions to the bill's structure.
HB438: Representative Timothy Horan, Strafford County District 10, Durham Support00:38:12.640 - 9:35:03 AM; Representative Horan, the prime sponsor of HB438, supported the bill, which updates and expands on a previous bill (HB558) concerning immigration detention practices. He highlighted the Strafford County Jail's role in detaining nonviolent immigration offenders and emphasized the bill's aim to enforce best practices and prevent abuses like mass deportations. He also mentioned that the bill prohibits detaining U.S. citizens and large groups based solely on ethnicity or national origin, and it mandates civilian control of facilities, with no operation by for-profit entities.
HB438: Representative Bailey Information Only00:44:03.000 - 9:40:54 AM; Representative Bailey inquired about the contractual obligations mentioned by Representative Horan, noting that Strafford County Commissioner McLara described their arrangement with the federal government as an 'agreement' rather than a 'contract'. Representative Horan acknowledged the clarification and suggested that the committee might want to consult with Commissioner McLara before finalizing their decision on the bill.
HB438: Representative Leon Information Only00:45:25.000 - 9:42:16 AM; Representative Leon raised concerns about the bill potentially allowing the state to create immigration detention facilities, questioning the long-term implications of such a policy. Representative Horan responded that while he would prefer no such facilities, having regulations in place would be beneficial to prevent potential abuses.
HB438: Representative Groa Information Only00:46:45.040 - 9:43:36 AM; Representative Groa presented an amendment to HB438 drafted by Representative Patrick Long, an immigration attorney. The amendment proposed removing several clauses, including prohibitions on private contracts, definitions of facility operators, and mentions of mass deportations, replacing them with different terms and definitions. The amendment sought a complete rewrite of the chapter.
HB438: Representative Le Information Only00:48:06.040 - 9:44:57 AM; Representative Le clarified a point about the existing bill, noting the presence of a definition for 'segregated housing' and questioning if a section on mass deportation of immigrants was removed. They suggested that moving from segregated housing directly to a new section about the National Guard might imply the removal of the deportation section.
HB438: Representative Howard Information Only00:48:59.960 - 9:45:50 AM; Representative Howard raised a point about the bill's paragraph on detaining immigrants, suggesting the potential addition of arrests to the text due to recent federal legislation. They noted that this might be more appropriate to discuss during an executive session.
HB438: Representative Long Information Only00:50:18.319 - 9:47:09 AM; Representative Long mentioned that the language chosen for the bill was intended to reflect what a contract should look like. They advised against voting on the bill until further discussion could be had with them.
HB598: Representative Coran Support01:03:48.559 - 10:00:39 AM; Representative Coran discussed the limitations of existing right-to-know laws under RSA 91a, pointing out issues like the need for citizens to know what they are looking for, government employees' response times, and the format of returned information. They highlighted the use of real-time data dashboards in the private sector and suggested that similar transparency could benefit public sectors in New Hampshire. They proposed a study committee to investigate existing data within government agencies, aiming to expose this information to enhance public awareness and potentially improve government operations. The committee's work could lead to iterative legislative actions to make data more accessible and standardized.
HB598: Representative Roa Information Only01:11:25.400 - 10:08:16 AM; Representative Roa asked for clarification on whether the study committee would examine data from all branches of government, to which Representative Coran confirmed. They also discussed Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), ensuring that the focus would be on data already tracked by agencies, not on imposing new measures.
HB598: Representative Howard Information Only01:14:52.920 - 10:11:43 AM; Representative Howard expressed concerns about the timeline for the committee's report, suggesting that the scope of reviewing all government data might require more time. They were informed about an amendment that would extend the reporting period to include reports in both 2025 and 2026, which they supported.
HB598: Representative Lon Information Only01:15:29.000 - 10:12:20 AM; Representative Lon interpreted the bill's intent as aiming to clarify existing data to facilitate better questioning and policy solutions, which Representative Coran confirmed.
HB598: Representative G Information Only01:16:27.920 - 10:13:18 AM; Representative G asked about handling confidential data, and Representative Coran assured that the study committee would respect existing protections for personally identifiable information and would not seek to weaken them.
HB598: Gary Merchant, Claremont Support01:16:56.800 - 10:13:47 AM; Gary Merchant, a former representative from Claremont, spoke in support of HB598, emphasizing the issue of redundancy in state agencies due to data silos. He shared his experience from working at the Dartmouth Medical Center, where a data warehouse allowed multiple departments to access data with proper authorization. He suggested that implementing a similar system could enhance government efficiency. Merchant recommended reducing the requirement for Senate members from three to one and suggested including subject matter experts from the House. He also mentioned that existing systems could be built upon, citing Dennis Gay from the Department of Information Technology as a valuable contact.
HB598: Representative GR Information Only01:19:55.080 - 10:16:46 AM; Representative GR provided a comment on the amendment for HB598, suggesting that the committee report should include members from both the majority and minority to ensure the issue is treated as non-partisan.
HB702: Fred Duet, Rockingham 25, Salem Information Only03:03:16.760 - 12:00:07 PM; Fred Duet, representing Rockingham 25 from Salem, introduced HB702, which addresses the hours that retired police officers can work post-retirement. He noted that currently, a retired law enforcement officer can work up to 1664 hours per year if retired before a certain date, and 1352 hours otherwise, equating to about 26 hours per week. The bill aims to adjust these limits.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker, Salem Support03:05:43.239 - 12:02:34 PM; The speaker discusses the issue with the New Hampshire Retirement System (NHRS) counting extra duty hours towards the 1352-hour limit for retirees. They argue that these hours, such as traffic direction and outside details, should not be included in the calculation because they do not count towards active employees' retirement. The legislation aims to clarify this in statute, potentially aiding in retention and recruitment of service field employees like police and fire. It also benefits communities by keeping experienced retirees within the community for these duties and generates revenue through administrative fees without costing the state any money.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker, Salem Support03:07:19.200 - 12:04:10 PM; The speaker continues to explain that the bill would allow retirees to work up to 1352 hours on regular duties, but not count extra duty hours towards this limit. They mention seeing police from other towns like Pelham, Atkinson, Hampstead, and Windham doing details in Salem, suggesting that local retirees could do these jobs if the hours were not counted against their limit. They believe this is a common-sense solution that benefits all involved without any cost to the state or municipalities.
HB702: Representative CCH, Unnamed Town Information Only03:09:50.800 - 12:06:41 PM; Representative CCH clarifies that if extra duty hours did not count towards retirement benefits while officers were active, they should not affect retirees either. This supports the bill's intent to not include these hours in the calculation after retirement.
HB702: Representative Bro, Unnamed Town Information Only03:10:12.040 - 12:07:03 PM; Representative Bro inquires if similar bills have been considered before, specifically about post-retirement work hours. The chair confirms that bills about total hours have been seen but not ones specifically addressing extra duty hours.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker, Unnamed Town Support03:11:33.920 - 12:08:24 PM; The speaker reiterates that the proposed bill has no cost to the state or municipalities and is beneficial for everyone involved, reinforcing support for the legislation.
HB702: Mark Kavanagh, Deputy Counsel and Compliance Officer, New Hampshire Retirement System Information Only03:12:38.080 - 12:09:29 PM; Mark Kavanagh clarifies that the New Hampshire Retirement System does not take a position on the bill but points out concerns. He notes that special duty hours should be considered work hours, and if a retiree averages 40 or more hours a week over a significant period, they could be restored to active service, impacting their pension. He also mentions that for certain members in Tier C, compensation for special duty is not counted.
HB702: Mark Kavanagh, Deputy Counsel and Compliance Officer, New Hampshire Retirement System Information Only03:13:24.399 - 12:10:15 PM; Mark Kavanagh discussed the implications of special duty hours on retirement system enrollment and full-time service status. He explained that special duty hours are counted for enrollment to prevent situations where employees might work less than full-time hours in their primary role but accumulate enough hours through special duty to meet full-time status. He provided an example of sheriff's deputies working part-time regular shifts and additional special duty, which if not counted, would prevent them from being enrolled in the retirement system. He also noted that the system has policies to ensure that the actual hours worked are considered over the formal job classification, which could affect retirees' eligibility to work post-retirement. Kavanagh highlighted the need for a bifurcated reporting system for special duty hours and discussed potential policy implications of the bill, including the possibility of employers replacing full-time positions with part-time ones to avoid pension contributions.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:22:03.080 - 12:18:54 PM; The speaker, likely a committee member, raised a question regarding the effect of the bill on Tier C members, specifically about how special duty hours do not count towards their benefit calculation. They questioned why these hours should matter for post-retirement work limits when they are not counted towards benefits. The response clarified that this is a policy issue the committee must resolve, as there are competing objectives about counting special duty pay towards benefits versus limiting post-retirement work hours.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:23:56.760 - 12:20:47 PM; The speaker continued the discussion on Tier C members, questioning the consistency of counting special duty hours for full-time status before retirement but not after. The response indicated that this is a policy decision and the system does not take a position on it.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:25:43.680 - 12:22:34 PM; The speaker inquired about the applicability of the bill to different tiers of retirement system members, pointing out that the bill's logic might be flawed if it only applies to Tier C members. The response clarified that the bill's effect on counting compensation for benefits versus counting hours for work limits are separate issues, and it is a policy decision.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:27:51.399 - 12:24:42 PM; The speaker discussed the original intent of defining work hours to prevent retirees from working beyond a certain threshold post-retirement, and how the bill would expand those hours. The response confirmed that the bill would allow an expansion up to one hour less than full-time for Group Two employees.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:29:08.199 - 12:25:59 PM; The speaker, Representative Citak, asked about the number of people affected by the bill, focusing on Tier C members and the consistency of not counting special duty hours for benefits but considering them for post-retirement work limits. The response explained that the system does not count compensation from special duty for Tier C members and highlighted the potential for abuse if special duty hours were misused to bypass work limits.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:29:53.120 - 12:26:44 PM; The speaker discusses the hypothetical situation of a patrolman working a 32-hour week and adding 10 hours of extra and special duty pay, questioning if these hours would count towards the retirement system. The response indicates that this scenario has not been faced before and would require serious consideration if it were to arise. The discussion also touches on a unique situation in Strafford County regarding prison transports and how it affects retirement eligibility.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:30:53.479 - 12:27:44 PM; The speaker clarifies that a Tier C employee is not eligible to retire until 2036 and confirms that HB702 is intended for Tier A and B retirees, whose special duty hours did count towards their retirement benefits.
HB702: Michael Gear, New Hampshire Police Association President, Salem Support03:32:24.600 - 12:29:15 PM; Michael Gear, President of the New Hampshire Police Association and a detective from Salem, strongly supports HB702. He argues that the bill would exclude extra duty hours, or details, from the yearly calculation of hours worked for retired part-time police officers. Gear emphasizes that these details are paid by local contractors, not the community, and should not count against the officers' yearly hours. This change would allow retired part-time officers to serve their communities more freely without unnecessary restrictions and at no cost to the state or taxpayers. He believes it would also help local police departments rely on these officers for outside details.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker from Hampton Information Only03:35:32.920 - 12:32:23 PM; The speaker from Hampton expresses concern about the difficulty in attracting part-time police officers during the summer, which leads to unfilled positions and overtime for full-time officers. They inquire if the passage of HB702 would make it easier to hire retired part-time officers. Michael Gear responds that if the hours are paid by the town, they count towards retirement, but if paid by a contractor as a detail, they should not be included in the part-time officers' yearly hours.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:36:41.439 - 12:33:32 PM; The speaker seeks clarification on whether extra and special duty hours can make an officer full-time, to which Michael Gear confirms that a full-time police officer must work 40 hours a week, and extra details do not contribute to becoming full-time. Gear also highlights the importance of separating detail hours from regular hours paid by the town to prevent retired part-time officers from running out of hours.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:37:12.760 - 12:34:03 PM; The speaker raises a concern about the payment source for services provided by part-time officers, clarifying that if a part-time officer works a patrol shift paid by the town, it contributes to the New Hampshire retirement system. However, detail hours paid by private entities do not contribute to the retirement system, yet they currently count against the part-time officers' yearly hours, which Gear argues penalizes them for wanting to work.
HB702: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:39:32.239 - 12:36:23 PM; The speaker emphasizes the importance of clarifying questions for the new committee members and mentions the need to understand the implications of keeping detail hours separate, referencing a previous bill about teachers' attendance bonuses as an example.
HB727: Representative Steve Pearson, Rockingham District 13, Derry Information Only03:52:43.439 - 12:49:34 PM; Representative Steve Pearson introduced House Bill 727 on behalf of Representative Foot, who was absent due to being in Committee Services to acquire an amendment. Pearson mentioned that HB727 is very similar to HB436 from the previous term, which had a veto-proof majority in the House, was inserted into the budget, but was later removed by the Senate. The purpose of HB727 is to address retroactive changes made in 2011 to the Group Two pension system. Pearson discussed the amendment, which was the result of stakeholder meetings aimed at clarifying existing language and adjusting dates to ensure the bill's functionality. However, he noted that the amendment presented was incorrect and not the intended one. Pearson offered to answer any technical or historical questions about the bill, emphasizing that it aims to restore some, but not all, of the benefits taken away in 2011 without creating new benefits.
HB727: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:57:22.279 - 12:54:13 PM; The unnamed speaker, likely a committee member, asked Representative Pearson for clarification about the similarities between HB727 and HB436 and the purpose of the amendment. Pearson confirmed the similarity and explained that since the filing of HB727, there had been changes, including a new governor and stakeholder meetings that led to adjustments in the concessions made in HB436. He clarified that the amendment aims to return the bill closer to its original concept of full restoration, which is now impossible due to the passage of time. Pearson further elaborated on the impact of time on group two members, who have been forced to work longer due to delays in addressing the issue.
HB727: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:00:14.760 - 12:57:05 PM; The unnamed speaker continued to seek clarification on the relationship between HB727 and previous legislative efforts, including a commission that worked on the issue over the summer. Pearson explained that HB436 was part of the budget two years prior but was removed by the Senate. He noted that the summer commission looked at parts of the problem, not the holistic issue, and that the current situation stemmed from a minority report of that commission. Pearson clarified that HB727 does not directly relate to the summer commission but that some ideas from the commission were incorporated into various pieces of legislation.
HB727: Representative Land Information Only04:03:15.000 - 1:00:06 PM; Representative Land sought clarification on a previous bill, House Bill 436, which was passed with a veto-proof majority and had been incorporated into the budget. The representative was trying to understand the differences between the language in HB436 and the current bill, HB727, noting that HB436 was amended to allocate $50 million for debt payment before passing the Senate. The clarification confirmed that HB436, as amended, was 90% similar to HB727.
HB727: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:04:48.840 - 1:01:39 PM; The speaker confirmed that HB436, as amended, was passed with a veto-proof margin and discussed its relevance to HB727. They highlighted that HB436 involved stakeholders' concessions and was designed to fit within a budget framework. The speaker emphasized that HB727 is seen as a 'final fix' for Tier B employees, although it does not affect Tier C employees, whose conditions remain as per their hiring terms.
HB727: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:07:15.120 - 1:04:06 PM; The speaker discussed the fiscal aspects of HB727, noting that there was no fiscal note available for the amended version of the bill, which was created 72 hours prior. They mentioned that the New Hampshire retirement system would provide a fiscal note by the end of the week. The speaker also referenced the governor's priority on this issue, suggesting that the budget process might be the most appropriate way to address it, given its policy implications.
HB727: Mark Kavanaugh, Deputy Counsel and Compliance Office, New Hampshire Retirement System Information Only04:09:10.800 - 1:06:01 PM; Mark Kavanaugh explained that the New Hampshire retirement system did not have a fiscal note for the amended version of HB727 due to receiving the actuary's report the night before. He provided general financial numbers and mentioned that the bill's current form would have a positive financial effect, reducing police and fire rates and the unfunded liability. However, this was contingent on the state making payments of $27.5 million annually for the next 10 years. Kavanaugh also discussed legal considerations and ambiguities in the bill's language, suggesting that these could be resolved at a subcommittee level.
HB727: John McAllister, Nationville Fire Department, Secretary Treasurer, Professional Firefighters of New Hampshire Support04:14:13.960 - 1:11:04 PM; John McAllister expressed support for reinstating benefits for firefighters as per HB727, emphasizing it as a priority for his organization. He noted the governor's intention to address this in her budget and suggested that the committee retain the bill out of respect for the committee and the governor's upcoming actions.
HB727: Frank Campo, New Hampshire Troopers Association, President Support04:15:17.199 - 1:12:08 PM; Frank Campo, a sergeant with the state police and president of the New Hampshire Troopers Association, expressed gratitude to the committee for their past work on retirement issues, particularly related to Group II. He referenced House Bill 436 from two years prior, which restored many benefits for first responders but did not pass the Senate. He thanked Representative Foot for bringing HB727, which is similar to HB436. Campo mentioned that the governor plans to address Group II retirement in her budget and suggested retaining HB727 to avoid duplicating efforts.
HB727: James Deur, New Hampshire Troop Association and New Hampshire Police Association Information Only04:16:12.399 - 1:13:03 PM; James Deur provided background information on the retirement issues, particularly focusing on House Bill 436 and its impact on the middle tier of Group II. He explained the historical context of the benefits lost by this tier 12 years ago and the efforts to reinstate them. Deur acknowledged the work of Representative Pearson and the committee's efforts two years ago. He mentioned the governor's priority to address this in the budget or House Bill 2 and supported retaining HB727 to allow for this.
HB727: Gary Burke, New Hampshire State Prison Department of Corrections, Captain, President of Correction Supervisors Support04:19:44.399 - 1:16:35 PM; Gary Burke, a captain at the New Hampshire State Prison and president of the correction supervisors, appreciated the committee's work on previous bills. He supported the idea of retaining HB727 and focusing on what the governor plans to do with HB2, suggesting that this could be a more effective approach to addressing retirement issues.
HB727: Cypher Regasa, New Hampshire Probation and Parole Association Command Staff Union, President Support04:20:54.600 - 1:17:45 PM; Cypher Regasa, president of the New Hampshire Probation and Parole Association Command Staff Union, thanked the committee for their work on HB436 and efforts to address the middle tier retirement issue. He mentioned the impact on recruitment and retention and supported retaining HB727 to see what permanent solution the governor might propose.
HB727: Saasa, New Hampshire Probation and Parole Officers, Chief, President of New Hampshire Probation and Parole Association Command Staff Union Support04:21:58.040 - 1:18:49 PM; Saasa, chief of probation and parole officers and president of the New Hampshire Probation and Parole Association Command Staff Union, reiterated support for retaining HB727 to allow for a durable solution to be proposed by the governor.
HB727: Representative Pearson Information Only04:23:20.279 - 1:20:11 PM; Representative Pearson moved to retain HB727, explaining that this is a procedural move to allow for the issue to be addressed in House Bill 1 or 2, which is a more suitable process for finding a solution. He noted that this approach is common when dealing with legislation that will be covered in the budget bills.
HB727: Representative SCH Information Only04:23:20.279 - 1:20:11 PM; Representative SCH seconded the motion to retain HB727, expressing hope for a more effective resolution through both legislative bodies.
HB727: Chair Information Only04:24:26.680 - 1:21:17 PM; The Chair explained the purpose of retaining the bill, stating that it prevents the establishment of a policy of killing the bill while allowing the committee to revisit the issue after the budget has been completed. This would give the committee the option to address any remaining policy issues or quietly kill the bill if the budget has covered everything.
HB598 285H: Representative Pearson Support04:27:29.399 - 1:24:20 PM; Representative Pearson moved Amendment 285H to House Bill 598, explaining that it cleans up the number of members and requires two reports, one preliminary and one final, and that it does not need an explicit repeal as it is chapter law.
HB598 285H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:28:46.199 - 1:25:37 PM; The speaker discusses the necessity of repealing a statute if it is specifically aimed at doing something through a particular chapter of law, mentioning that it expires. They express support for utilizing the expertise of House members on data to enhance efficiency and transparency, suggesting that this could be achieved by identifying easily accessible information and sharing it across departments without significant additional effort.
HB598 285H: Representative LAN Support04:29:32.119 - 1:26:23 PM; Representative LAN supports the formation of a committee or commission to better manage and utilize data for policy-making. They express enthusiasm for the potential of this committee, noting the capable individuals lined up to serve on it.
HB598 285H: Representative BRTO Oppose04:29:32.119 - 1:26:23 PM; Representative BRTO expresses opposition to the amendment, citing the lack of bipartisan representation on the proposed committee and the absence of any mention of Personal Identifiable Information (PII) protections. They mention having discussed these issues with Representative Corkran, who acknowledged the importance of addressing PII.
HB598 285H: Representative Corkran Information Only04:30:43.080 - 1:27:34 PM; Representative Corkran acknowledges the concerns raised about the amendment, particularly regarding bipartisan representation and PII. They express willingness to revise the amendment to address these issues, appreciating the feedback and the need for a more comprehensive approach.
HB598 285H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:31:42.880 - 1:28:33 PM; The speaker, while acknowledging the importance of the amendment's purpose, expresses inability to support the current version due to its complexity and potential overreach. They agree with the need for a revised amendment and appreciate the discussion.

McGuire, Carol(Chairman)(R)[A+]2024	Sytek, John(Clerk)(R)[B]2024	Layon, Erica(V Chairman)(R)[A]2024
Schmidt, Peter(D)[CT]2024	Thibault, James(R)	Howard, Heath(D)[F]2024
Sellers, John(R)[A-]2024	Sheehan, Vanessa(R)[A]2024	de Vries, Erica(D)
Dargie, Paul(D)	Davis, Fred(D)[F]2024	Bailey, Glenn(R)[A+]2024
Pearson, Stephen(R)[B]2024	Grote, Jaci(D)[CT]2024	Long, Patrick(D)
Slottje, Jeremy(R)