Committee Summary for House Executive Departments and Administration (02/11/2026)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
Unclear 00:06:06.080 - 9:04:57 AM	Executive Session	Unclear
HB1024 00:17:55.200 - 9:16:46 AM	Executive Session	prohibiting investments by the New Hampshire retirement system in businesses owned by a sitting president or their family.	Caplan, Tony(D)[D-]2025
HB1585 00:19:48.960 - 9:18:39 AM	Executive Session	relative to environmental, social, and governance-related investment strategies by the state retirement system.	Ammon, Keith(R)[A]2025
HB1458 0638H 00:22:54.880 - 9:21:45 AM	Executive Session	relative to the licensing of massage, reflexology, structural integration, and Asian bodywork facilities.	Layon, Erica(R)[A+]2025
HB1469 2026-0615 00:43:11.839 - 9:42:02 AM	Executive Session	relative to the licensing and inspections requirements for massage therapy establishments, and making an appropriation therefor.	Foote, Charles(R)[B]2025
HB1469 2026-0615h 00:49:48.240 - 9:48:39 AM	Executive Session	relative to the licensing and inspections requirements for massage therapy establishments, and making an appropriation therefor.	Foote, Charles(R)[B]2025
HB1457 2025-0560h 00:54:33.680 - 9:53:24 AM	Executive Session	relative to natural organic reduction of human remains.	LaMontagne, Jessica(D)[F]2025
HB1109 2025-0620h 01:07:37.200 - 10:06:28 AM	Executive Session	relative to notice and update requirements regarding state employee investigations.	Flanagan, Jack(R)[B]2025
HB1328 2025-0618h 01:14:13.679 - 10:13:04 AM	Executive Session	relative to alcohol and other drug use professionals.	Grote, Jaci(D)[CT]2025
HB1328 2025-0618h 01:16:20.480 - 10:15:11 AM	Executive Session	relative to alcohol and other drug use professionals.	Grote, Jaci(D)[CT]2025
HB1555 2025-0668h 01:18:38.080 - 10:17:29 AM	Executive Session	relative to the administration and enforcement of the state fire code.	Layon, Erica(R)[A+]2025
HB1572 0654H 01:40:54.880 - 10:39:45 AM	Executive Session	relative to licensure as a master licensed alcohol and drug counselor.	Kesselring, Steven(R)[A]2025
HB1683 01:46:10.400 - 10:45:01 AM	Executive Session	relative to the modification of administrative rules by the joint legislative committee on administrative rules.	Potenza, Kelley(R)[A]2025
HB1052 01:52:47.920 - 10:51:38 AM	Executive Session	relative to qualifications for licensure as a LADC, or licensed alcohol and drug counselor.	McGuire, Carol(R)[A+]2025
HB1458 0638h 01:54:49.679 - 10:53:40 AM	Executive Session	relative to the licensing of massage, reflexology, structural integration, and Asian bodywork facilities.	Layon, Erica(R)[A+]2025
HB1675 03:02:40.080 - 12:01:31 PM	Public Hearing	establishing a commission to investigate the New Hampshire Coalition Against Sexual and Domestic Violence and requiring funding only be provided for the direct services materially benefitting survivors of sexual and domestic assault.	Read, Ellen(D)[D]2025

Unclear: Committee Chair Information Only00:06:06.080 - 9:04:57 AM; The chair welcomes the committee to the House Executive Departments and Administration Committee on February 11th, noting it is the day to take final action on bills needing to go to a second committee. Mentions several amendments have been emailed but emphasizes the need for review. Announces a recess of at least 10 minutes to distribute and read the amendments after the Pledge of Allegiance.
Unclear: Representative Scitec Information Only00:06:06.080 - 9:04:57 AM; Leads the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
Unclear: Committee Chair Information Only00:07:02.000 - 9:05:53 AM; Thanks the representative after the Pledge and announces the recess for at least 10 minutes to distribute amendments.
HB1024: Representative Howard Information Only00:17:55.200 - 9:16:46 AM; Moved for interim study on HB 1024, stating the bill needs additional work to better understand its impact on the New Hampshire retirement system and encouraged support for the motion.
HB1024: Representative Grotto Information Only00:18:30.000 - 9:17:21 AM; Seconded the motion for interim study and deferred to Representative Howard's explanation.
HB1585: Representative Slouchy Information Only00:19:48.960 - 9:18:39 AM; Moved for interim study on HB 1585, noting the language needs refinement to improve wording.
HB1585: Representative Pearson Information Only00:20:40.080 - 9:19:31 AM; Seconded the motion and explained that restrictions beyond fiduciary responsibility would create significant administrative burdens, including increased staff needs for reviewing investments like mutual funds, making the bill not ready for passage.
HB1458 0638H: Committee Chair Information Only00:22:54.880 - 9:21:45 AM; Moved to adopt amendment 0638H to HB 1458, explaining it requires social security or taxpayer ID and state police background checks against specific sex-related crimes for proprietors. It clarifies that property owners not involved in operations are excluded, ensures proprietors and employed massage therapists hold licenses, prohibits unlicensed proprietors from acting in that role, provides rulemaking for exemptions in certain settings like chiropractor offices or public events, and operates under standard licensing with inspections via complaints.
HB1458 0638H: Representative Scitec Information Only00:26:04.159 - 9:24:55 AM; Seconded the motion to adopt the amendment and indicated the chair's explanation was sufficient.
HB1458 0638H: Representative Dere Information Only00:26:51.200 - 9:25:42 AM; Raised a question about the requirement for proprietors to hold both proprietor and massage therapy licenses, expressing concern that it might prevent out-of-state licensed therapists from operating in New Hampshire without local licensure, even with reciprocity, and emphasized the importance of proprietors knowing New Hampshire laws.
HB1458 0638H: Committee Chair Vote00:29:43.440 - 9:28:34 AM; The chair conducted the roll call vote on adopting amendment 0638H, resulting in an 8 to 5 vote in favor. The amendment was adopted. The chair then moved for ought to pass as amended on HB 1458, seconded by Representative Zitek. Noted that it was a replace all amendment and prepared for further roll call, but the proceedings were interrupted.
HB1469 2026-0615: Representative Groa Support00:43:11.839 - 9:42:02 AM; Representative Groa moves to adopt amendment 2026-0615 to HB 1469, addressing concerns with the original bill by removing the inspection component during licensing to reduce burdens on the office and massage therapists. The amendment defines massage establishments, excluding sole proprietors, requires a license to operate one, and provides rulemaking authority for the advisory massage board in collaboration with the office, covering standards for operations. It standardizes license renewals every two years from issuance date, exempts massages in residential or health facilities from establishment licensing, and does not require the owner to hold a personal massage license but mandates proper licensing for businesses using 'massage' in their name. It includes reflexology, structural integration, and Asian bodywork, aligns with OPLC complaint processes allowing inspections upon complaints, and emphasizes education and enforcement similar to other professions, with options to involve local police if needed.
HB1469 2026-0615h: Unidentified Speaker (OBLC) Information Only00:49:48.240 - 9:48:39 AM; The speaker explains that the amendment lacks an inspection element, resulting in no fiscal note or one less than previously presented. They confirm the intentional requirement on page 3, lines 14-17, for sole proprietors or independent contractors allowing walk-ins to obtain a proprietor license, noting that walk-in massage establishments are uncommon. They clarify that prior appointments, even if arranged same-day via messaging, would not require the additional license.
HB1469 2026-0615h: Committee Chair Information Only00:49:48.240 - 9:48:39 AM; The chair thanks the previous speaker for the rundown on the various versions and processes, acknowledges the challenges in tracking them, and invites Representative Pearson to speak but proceeds when declined. The chair then questions the speaker about the amendment's language regarding walk-ins for sole proprietors.
HB1469 2026-0615h: Unidentified Speaker Information Only00:50:44.319 - 9:49:35 AM; The speaker confirms that the language on page 3, Roman 3, lines 14-17, intentionally requires a license for walk-ins.
HB1469 2026-0615h: Committee Chair Information Only00:50:44.319 - 9:49:35 AM; The chair clarifies a reference to the correct page and lines, asks about prior appointments arranged via messaging qualifying as not walk-ins, and upon confirmation, inquires if there are other questions or discussions on the amendment.
HB1469 2026-0615h: Committee Chair Vote00:50:44.319 - 9:49:35 AM; The chair calls for a roll call vote on the adoption of amendment 2026-0615h to HB 1469.
HB1469 2026-0615h: Representative Slatchie Vote00:50:44.319 - 9:49:35 AM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1469 2026-0615h: Representative Pearson Vote00:50:44.319 - 9:49:35 AM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1469 2026-0615h: Representative Bailey Vote00:50:44.319 - 9:49:35 AM; Votes nay on the amendment.
HB1469 2026-0615h: Representative Sers Vote00:50:44.319 - 9:49:35 AM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1469 2026-0615h: Representative Kelly Vote00:50:44.319 - 9:49:35 AM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1469 2026-0615h: Representative Groa Vote00:50:44.319 - 9:49:35 AM; Votes yes on the amendment.
HB1469 2026-0615h: Representative Groa Support00:52:01.680 - 9:50:52 AM; Moves for Ought to Pass as Amended (OTPA) on HB 1469 with amendment 0615H, noting that the amendment is a replace-all bill and the committee has already discussed it.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Representative (unidentified) Information Only00:54:33.680 - 9:53:24 AM; Introduces and circulates amendment 0560H, explaining it aligns the bill with cremation statutes and addresses recoverable reduced remains, based on sponsor input and committee questions.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Representative Kelly Support00:55:40.160 - 9:54:31 AM; Supports the amendment as a compromise that balances environmental concerns with New Hampshire's natural beauty and emphasizes individual liberty in choosing how remains are handled.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Representative Sli Information Only00:55:40.160 - 9:54:31 AM; Asks if the amendment addresses the broad rulemaking authority issue from earlier discussions; notes it does not, but explains the rulemaking process mimics cremation standards, involves the funeral board, and includes public hearings for input, with statutory requirements to address concerns.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Representative Sli (follow-up) Information Only00:58:01.280 - 9:56:52 AM; Expresses concern about the wording of rulemaking authority potentially allowing unnecessary hurdles, but decides not to oppose the bill over it, preferring to move forward.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Representative Dere Information Only00:58:01.280 - 9:56:52 AM; Inquires if the amendment addresses unclaimed remains, as raised by the New Hampshire Funeral Directors Association; is informed that it does, similar to cremation remains.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Representative Thibo Support00:58:55.119 - 9:57:46 AM; Supports the amendment as it improves the bill but will not support the bill itself due to ethical concerns with the natural organic reduction concept.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Representative Howard Support00:59:58.960 - 9:58:49 AM; Emphasizes the importance of personal liberties in deciding how remains are handled after death, arguing that the bill allows execution of individual choices in one's will.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Representative Pearson Oppose00:59:58.960 - 9:58:49 AM; Expresses concerns about the process: diseases not eliminated as in cremation, and potential requirement to disclose medical records for eligibility, which impacts privacy despite it being a choice.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Representative Ga Information Only01:00:55.760 - 9:59:46 AM; Points to page 10, line 12 of the amendment, noting rulemaking will address conditions for remains from infectious diseases, consulting the chief medical examiner.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Representative Pearson (follow-up) Oppose01:00:55.760 - 9:59:46 AM; Follows up on privacy concerns, noting recent constitutional privacy amendment, and uncertainty about future rules requiring disclosure without seeing them.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Representative Pearson (additional) Oppose01:02:05.599 - 10:00:56 AM; Raises personal concern about medical devices like a titanium rod potentially interfering with the process if not disclosed, highlighting unanswered questions and divided opinions on readiness.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Chair Information Only01:03:10.720 - 10:02:01 AM; Suggests voting on the amendment and bill to gauge support; if the bill fails, proposes interim study, giving it an opportunity to move forward.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Representative (unidentified) Support01:04:08.400 - 10:02:59 AM; Moves for Ought to Pass as Amended (OTPA) on HB 1457 with amendment 0560H.
HB1457 2025-0560h: Committee Chair Vote01:04:59.760 - 10:03:50 AM; The chair proceeds with the vote on the motion to pass HB 1457 as amended, after confirming the second from Representative Kelly. The clerk calls the roll for the vote on not to pass as amended, but it appears to be a vote on ought to pass as amended. The vote results in 10 yes votes and 4 no votes, passing the bill with the amendment.
HB1109 2025-0620h: Representative Pearson Information Only01:07:37.200 - 10:06:28 AM; Representative Pearson moved the amendment 2025-0620h to HB 1109, explaining that it adds sections 6 through 17 to the bill, incorporating provisions from RSA 275 regarding the suspension of public employees with or without pay. The amendment applies to all public employees unless otherwise stated in a collective bargaining agreement. He noted that the bill originated from Representative Flanigan and was refiled after previous passage issues related to placement and definitions. A similar bill, HB 1150, was handled in the Labor Committee and consolidated into this version. The key purpose is to require that public employees suspended with or without pay be informed of the reasons within 7 days, addressing the current practice of indefinite paid suspensions that waste taxpayer money without due process.
HB1109 2025-0620h: Committee Chair Information Only01:11:09.520 - 10:10:00 AM; The Committee Chair facilitated the discussion on the amendment, called for any further discussion after Representative Pearson's explanation, noted that it was well laid out, and then directed the clerk to call the roll for adoption of the amendment 2025-0620h to HB 1109.
HB1109 2025-0620h: Committee Members Vote01:12:13.280 - 10:11:04 AM; The committee voted unanimously to adopt amendment 2025-0620h to HB 1109, with all members (Sloty, Pearson, Bailey, Sers, Kibo, Kelly, Roa, Dargy, Davis, Howard, Reese, Long, and the Chair) voting yes, resulting in 14-0 adoption.
HB1109 2025-0620h: Committee Members Vote01:12:13.280 - 10:11:04 AM; The committee votes on the motion to pass HB 1109 with amendment 0620h. The roll call results in unanimous approval: all 14 members vote yes. The motion passes 14-0. The chair then closes the executive session on HB 1109 and addresses the consent calendar with no objections.
HB1328 2025-0618h: Representative Groa Information Only01:14:13.679 - 10:13:04 AM; Representative Groa moves to adopt amendment 0618 to HB 1328. He explains that the amendment adjusts the composition of the board of alcohol and drug use professionals by reducing master licensed alcohol drug counselors from an unspecified number to three and increasing certified recovery workers to two, at the board's request due to the need for more such individuals. Additionally, lines 19 through the end of the bill incorporate components from HB 1572, added at the request of OPLC, as HB 1572's status was uncertain but these provisions were necessary. He asks if there are any questions on the amendment.
HB1328 2025-0618h: Chair Vote01:16:20.480 - 10:15:11 AM; The chair calls for a vote on the adoption of amendment 2025-0618h to HB 1328. The amendment passes unanimously 14-0 after roll call.
HB1328 2025-0618h: Chair Vote01:17:24.159 - 10:16:15 AM; The chair calls for a vote on ought to pass as amended (OTPA) for HB 1328. The bill passes unanimously 14-0 and is placed on the consent calendar. The executive session is closed.
HB1555 2025-0668h: Chair (Representative, sponsor) Information Only01:18:38.080 - 10:17:29 AM; The chair opens the executive session on HB 1555 and moves amendment 2025-0668h, a replace-all amendment. Explains the original bill addressed challenges for business owners renovating old buildings to code but notes complications. The amendment removes problematic parts and instead assigns the state fire marshal to handle appeals of local fire chief decisions de novo within specified timelines, allows further appeals to the building code review board, and grants the fire marshal authority to approve alternative materials, designs, and code modifications for municipalities to adapt international codes appropriately without risking life safety. Urges support for the amendment or to vote against it to gauge support for this scaled-back version.
HB1555 2025-0668h: Representative Howard Support01:21:38.480 - 10:20:29 AM; Supports the amendment, recalling testimony from Fire Marshal Tumi who indicated willingness to collaborate on such changes. Hopes the committee supports the amendment and moves ought to pass.
HB1555 2025-0668h: Representative Dere Information Only01:21:38.480 - 10:20:29 AM; Notes that their question was answered by Representative Groa.
HB1555 2025-0668h: Representative Dere Information Only01:22:32.080 - 10:21:23 AM; Recalls Fire Marshal's testimony on existing state fire code variance process and concerns over a 20-year moratorium on fire enforcement due to life safety risks. Confirms with the sponsor that the amendment is a replace-all removing the moratorium, incorporating only supported portions proposed by the fire marshal.
HB1555 2025-0668h: Representative Pearson Information Only01:23:30.480 - 10:22:21 AM; Questions the need for an additional appeal step to the building code review board after the state fire marshal, suggesting the marshal's decision should suffice. The sponsor explains the board covers fire and building codes comprehensively, proposed with the fire marshal, who has a seat on the board. Pearson notes it would be better if the fire marshal were present but it's not a dealbreaker.
HB1555 2025-0668h: Chair Vote01:24:34.239 - 10:23:25 AM; The chair calls for a vote on adopting amendment 2025-0668h to HB 1555. The amendment passes 13-0-1 (one absent).
HB1555 2025-0668h: Chair Vote01:25:43.679 - 10:24:34 AM; The chair moves ought to pass on HB 1555 with amendment 2025-0668h. After brief discussion confirming fire marshal's support via text from Representative Pearson, the vote is called and passes 13-0-1. The bill is placed on the consent calendar, and the executive session is closed.
HB1572 0654H: Chair Support01:40:54.880 - 10:39:45 AM; The Chair opens the executive session on HB 1572 and moves amendment 0654H, which removes the section on EMT-ALS to avoid risking reimbursement for all MLAs while retaining provisions for speech language pathologists, hearing professionals, and recreational therapists. Emphasizes the importance of updating reciprocity requirements and plans to table it on the floor after passing due to the fiscal note.
HB1572 0654H: Representative Slatchy Support01:41:55.760 - 10:40:46 AM; Seconds the motion for the amendment and agrees that the Chair covered it well.
HB1572 0654H: Representative Groa Support01:42:48.480 - 10:41:39 AM; Supports the amendment and ought to pass as amended, appreciating the work on the plan.
HB1572 0654H: Committee Roll Call Vote01:42:48.480 - 10:41:39 AM; Roll call on adoption of amendment 0654H: All members vote yes except Representative Bailey who votes present (I). Amendment passes 14-0.
HB1572 0654H: Chair Support01:44:02.400 - 10:42:53 AM; Moves HB 1572 ought to pass with amendment 0654H, notes it cannot go on consent calendar due to fiscal note, and closes the session after passage.
HB1572 0654H: Committee Roll Call Vote01:44:02.400 - 10:42:53 AM; Roll call on ought to pass with amendment: All members vote yes except Representative Bailey who votes present (I). Passes 14-0.
HB1572 0654H: Prime Sponsor (HB 1683) Support01:45:06.560 - 10:43:57 AM; Thanks the Chair and committee. Explains revisions to HB 1683 by removing financial liability elements like audits, focusing on aligning rules with statute and improving the petition process.
HB1683: Representative Penza Support01:46:10.400 - 10:45:01 AM; The speaker explains that the bill provides a constitutional pathway for citizens to petition agencies for rulemaking changes, referencing New Hampshire Constitution Parts 1 Articles 31 and 32. It prevents agencies from simply denying petitions, allowing them to go to the Joint Legislative Fiscal Committee (JLC) for review. The speaker notes the bill's origins in 2019-2020 efforts, emphasizes its specificity to rules with law-like impact, and acknowledges missing guardrails against abuse but sees it as a positive step. They appreciate the committee's work and suggest integrating it with other administrative rules bills.
HB1052: Chair Information Only01:52:47.920 - 10:51:38 AM; The chair moves for interim study on HB 1052, explaining it was introduced to allow reciprocity for an out-of-state licensed professional who does not meet current NH requirements. It faced hurdles, and hearing from the proponent in person would have been beneficial. The motion passes unanimously 14-0 and goes on the consent calendar.
HB1458 0638h: Chair Support01:54:49.679 - 10:53:40 AM; The chair reopens discussion on HB 1458, notes a pending motion for ought to pass with amendment 0638h, and requests waiving a proposed amendment to strike the massage license requirement for proprietorship operators to address concerns. They emphasize the importance of requiring social security or taxpayer ID numbers and state police background checks to combat human trafficking and money laundering. The chair supports a two-bill strategy and moves ought to pass with the amendment, which passes 9-5. A minority report for interim study is filed by Representative Howard.
HB1675: Chair Information Only03:02:40.080 - 12:01:31 PM; The chair opens the public hearing on House Bill 1675, notes the absence of a pink card for the prime sponsor, instructs the sponsor to introduce the bill, limits other testimony to three minutes, and calls on Ellen Reed to speak.
HB1675: Ellen Reed, Prime Sponsor Support03:04:07.760 - 12:02:58 PM; Ellen Reed introduces HB 1675, emphasizing transparency and accountability for public funds allocated to the New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence (Coalition), a private nonprofit receiving 98% of its funding from federal and state sources to perform government functions like maintaining the sexual offender registry, training police and SANE nurses, and providing victim advocacy. She describes the Coalition's monopoly on these services, lack of oversight such as RSA 91-A access, and contrasts it with other funded NGOs like COAST and NH Housing Finance Authority that comply with transparency laws. Reed shares her personal experiences as a victim of domestic violence and sexual assault, detailing failures in evidence collection and rights notification, and how the Coalition opposed her bills aimed at improving victim rights, including one for rape kit notifications and another for domestic violence lease escapes. She highlights suspicious patterns, such as the Coalition's opposition to pro-victim legislation, potential misuse of funds for lobbying (prohibited for 98% of their funding), discrepancies in financial reporting, and involvement in high-profile cases like Marcy's Law lobbying funded by a controversial billionaire. Reed outlines the bill's structure: establishing an investigative commission to probe 10 specific areas including lobbying violations, fraud in federal grants, discrimination against male victims, conflicts of interest in YDC cases, improper influence on courts, confidentiality breaches, kickback schemes in settlements, and mission deviations. The bill suspends non-direct survivor funding pending investigation, removes statutory references, mandates LBA audits, and proposes an amendment for 91-A access. She addresses committee questions on accountability, venue, DOJ responsibilities, funding impacts, and denies external influences like a California resident prompting the bill.
HB1675: Representative Jodie Nelson, Rockingham 13, Derry Oppose04:12:43.840 - 1:11:34 PM; Representative Jodie Nelson shares her personal history as a domestic violence survivor 40 years ago, where police discouraged pressing charges, and contrasts it with her daughter's recent experience where the Coalition's crisis hotline and Manchester police provided crucial support and reassurance without needing shelter. She praises the Coalition's work on teen dating violence awareness, resources for victims and families, and opportunities to break abuse cycles. Nelson expresses concern over the bill's funding suspension, fearing it could disrupt services if not reallocated properly, and worries about the effective date causing immediate gaps in support for victims.
HB1675: Representative Jack Flanigan, Hillsboro 45, Hollis/Brookline/Mason/Greenville Support04:18:44.000 - 1:17:35 PM; Representative Jack Flanigan supports the bill, noting tactics to demonize bill introducers and co-sponsors via social media. He addresses gender equity in abuse, stating abuse rates are equal or slightly higher for men, but men access shelters only 8% of the time, and 33% of sexual assaults target young men. He cites underreported cases like a Manchester middle school teacher, Cardigan Mountain School incident, YDC abuse, and a guidance counselor's assault on a male minor, where the Coalition's responses were muted or absent, suggesting gender bias. Flanigan advocates for oversight of taxpayer-funded organizations, comparing it to circuit court reviews, emphasizing the need to investigate the $11-12 million in funding for accountability.
HB1675: Representative Jennifer Roads, Chester County District 17 (Winchester, Richmond, Swanzey, Troy, Fitzwilliam) Oppose04:25:47.199 - 1:24:38 PM; Representative Roads opposes HB 1675. She shares an anecdote from her first term about misinformation regarding prison populations, noting that one-third of the 1,992 inmates are incarcerated for sexual assault crimes, with 68 specifically for such offenses. She highlights that only one organization in the state provides advocacy and support for victims, emphasizing the importance of proper lobbying. She references a recent bill killed in committee that would have required protective orders to be filed online, illustrating that bill titles do not guarantee good content. She urges the committee to vote against HB 1675 to protect victim advocacy.
HB1675: Representative Chris Schultz, Concord City Councilor Oppose04:28:13.920 - 1:27:04 PM; Representative Schultz opposes HB 1675, stressing the need for expert testimony on nonprofit governance, as the allegations against the coalition do not align with how nonprofits operate. He argues that the claims are baseless and risk harming victims of abuse by eroding trust in support systems. He notes that the attacks have escalated to harassment of coalition staff and families, which he learned about through his role in Concord where a council member works for the coalition. As a victim of domestic violence himself, he warns that amplifying these reckless allegations could deter victims from seeking help, potentially keeping them in dangerous situations. He emphasizes that this issue should not be politicized and urges the committee to seek expert input, mentioning a nonprofit governance expert who had signed up but left early.
HB1675: Representative Alicia Greg, Hillsboro District 7, NSHA Oppose04:33:11.439 - 1:32:02 PM; Representative Alicia Greg, a state representative and survivor of domestic violence who has helped survivors pro bono across 33 states and four countries, opposes HB 1675. She highlights the bill's lack of transparency and improper approach to oversight, arguing it irresponsibly cuts state funding for two years before any investigation, affecting critical services like the 24/7 crisis line, law enforcement training, legal advocacy, court accompaniment, crisis center coordination, prevention education, federal grant assistance, the sexual assault nurse examiner program, and anti-human trafficking efforts. She notes existing oversight mechanisms through the Attorney General and IRS for nonprofits, emphasizing the coalition's essential role in supporting victims, including the average seven attempts needed to leave abusive situations. During questioning, she clarifies her non-leadership role in providing direct safety planning and stresses that the bill would severely impair services, including training for police on dangerous domestic violence calls.
HB1675: Destiny Bard Support04:39:33.840 - 1:38:24 PM; Destiny Bard supports HB 1675, sharing her personal story and that of her friend Lindsay Smith, a survivor of domestic abuse and attempted murder. Lindsay reported to Hampton Police but received inadequate investigation and advocate support, leading to denial of protection and her subsequent shooting. Bard recounts her own experience dating a Massachusetts police officer who abused his authority, filing a false restraining order against her based on social media posts after their breakup. Despite evidence of his misconduct, the order was granted by default because she didn't appear, fearing manipulation of the system. It lasted over seven years, leading to her arrest for attending church in New Hampshire, where she spent three days in detention before being found not guilty. Bard criticizes the coalition at the center of the system for failing both victims like Lindsay (by not providing protection) and those wrongly accused like herself (by enabling weaponization of the system). She submits written testimony from Lindsay.
HB1675: Sue Hamola, Malden, New Hampshire (former Republican state rep) Support04:44:45.360 - 1:43:36 PM; Sue Hamola, a former Republican state representative from Malden, New Hampshire, supports HB 1675 and praises the bipartisan sponsors. Drawing from her 2021-2022 research into New Hampshire's sexual assault mechanisms, inspired by cases like Owen Liber and national efforts by Rep. Annie Kuster, she notes the coalition's significant role in the state's response to sexual violence, receiving 10-12 million annually in federal and state funds without RSA 91-A oversight or legislative due diligence. She views the bill as a modest request for transparency and accountability, not seeking to alter operations but merely to investigate, which aligns with principles of government oversight.
HB1675: Representative Dere Support04:46:47.440 - 1:45:38 PM; Representative Dere, with experience in ministry for children in state custody and awareness of Youth Development Center (YDC) issues, strongly supports HB 1675 for increased transparency and accountability in the coalition's use of taxpayer funds. She details concerns from following YDC trials: the civil case preceded the criminal one, leading to massive settlements (e.g., $38 million, $100 million) without convictions, with poor media access in the criminal proceedings despite public interest. She criticizes lack of disclosure to victims about non-privileged information shared with the coalition, which has retraumatized them; the victims' fund being misrepresented as a grant rather than a loan; awards from settlements going to the coalition while victims wait; and operational failures like unstaffed positions, unanswered hotlines, and unfilled roles despite contracts. As a former triage nurse, she was unaware of the sexual assault nurse examiner program. She urges oversight to ensure funds reach victims, not attorneys or the coalition, and suggests amendments to protect essential services like the 24/7 hotline. She submits a motion related to filming transparency issues in YDC cases.
HB1675: Leah Kushman, former state representative and resident of New Hampshire Support04:55:02.160 - 1:53:53 PM; Leah Kushman supports HB 1675, focusing on section 1F. She discusses conflicts of interest in YDC cases, where the Attorney General's website directs claimants to the Coalition, which is 98% taxpayer-funded and refers victims to preferred attorneys, including one who took a prominent case. She highlights violations of ABA Rule 1.11 by legal professionals switching sides from government to private representation. She notes the revolving door involving figures like Gordon McDonald and questions why the Coalition, which trained DCYF employees, was not named in civil suits despite potential responsibility. Examples include whistleblower Anna Carrian mentioning the Coalition and lenient sentencing of trainer Christy Bean. She argues for separation of roles in prosecution and protection, blurring lines between state and nonprofit status. Kushman emphasizes the legislature's role as grand inquest for investigations, citing precedents, and supports pausing funding until issues are resolved, suggesting direct funding to victims to avoid monopoly and concealment of mismanagement.
HB1675: Betty Gay, former representative from Salem Support05:02:22.000 - 2:01:13 PM; Betty Gay supports HB 1675, driven by her passion to protect victims of domestic abuse. She shares her disappointing experience with the New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence (NHCADSV), expecting partnership but facing rudeness and lack of support for her bills aimed at changing court rules that hinder victims. The Coalition dismissed her proposals without constructive feedback, focusing on abusers' dislike rather than victim aid. She highlights page two, line 22 of the bill, questioning if the Coalition violated its mission and fund intents by lobbying against survivor-benefiting policies in favor of their own interests. Gay distributes lists of her unpassed bills addressing specific victim obstacles and others the Coalition opposed, including a recent one ensuring written rights notices for sexual assault victims at medical providers or police. She recounts a case where a victim drugged with Benadryl was denied a rape kit, suggesting the Coalition's opposition stems from bills not generating revenue for them. She advocates breaking the monopoly to ensure proper execution of contracts and support for victims.
HB1675: Stacy Brown, Concord resident and city councilor Support05:11:20.958 - 2:10:11 PM; Stacy Brown supports HB 1675 for promoting transparency and accountability in public funds usage, prioritizing victim services. She discusses point B of the bill regarding potential violations of state law by coalition employees in lobbying for Marsy's Law in 2017-2018, funded by billionaire Henry Nicholas with a documented history of drug use, domestic and sexual violence accusations, and Epstein connections. She notes Nicholas filed required paperwork but coalition members did not, and highlights the coalition's public affairs director as a highly paid lobbyist defending Nicholas. On point C, she addresses potential undue influence over government officials, noting the director's roles as Concord city councilor and public safety board chair, yet minimal meetings during the Marsy's Law promotion period, and use of city council chambers for a coalition meeting with paid lobbyists and officials. She argues HB 1675 would establish a commission to examine these practices, restoring public trust in an organization 98% funded by public dollars. Additionally, she mentions raising conflict of interest questions at city council meetings, facing backlash for seeking transparency.
HB1675: Donald Gilbert, from Belknap County Support05:16:38.160 - 2:15:29 PM; Donald Gilbert, experienced in auditing DCYF and DHS funding issues and with a family background in program integrity auditing, supports HB 1675. He highlights conflicts of interest involving the coalition's attorneys like Shaheen and Gordon, Nixon Peabody (linked to former AG Gordon MacDonald), and Chuck Douglas in YDC victim representation. He references RSA 173-B where civil domestic violence provisions overlap with criminal codes, and a DOJ memo emphasizing federal grants for criminal prosecution, not civil activities. He criticizes the coalition's push for HB 1651 to treat sexual assault as a civil matter with lower due process standards and their receipt of portions of criminal restitutions, settlements, and marriage fees. He describes the coalition as a gatekeeper to victim compensation funds, with political entanglements via donations and board members. He notes the AG's inability to investigate due to contractor conflicts, emphasizing legislative need for public redress. From his audits, he reveals Title IV-E foster care funding discrepancies, with only $1.3 million directly to services out of $22 million federal funds, $2.4 million contracted to the coalition for understaffed roles, and IRS compliance issues where private donations exceed 5% limits, potentially affecting nonprofit status. He points out discrepancies in reported lobbying expenses between coalition filings and employee reports.
HB1675: Mo Baxley, Laconia resident Oppose05:25:24.240 - 2:24:15 PM; Mo Baxley opposes HB 1675, viewing it as a personal vendetta against a nonprofit, setting a dangerous precedent where legislators could threaten investigations to coerce support. She argues that suspicions of inappropriate behavior should be reported to the Attorney General's office, not handled by a legislative 'kangaroo court.' She warns that targeting funding for an organization aiding violent crime victims could harm those victims during investigations. She echoes concerns about standard nonprofit practices like using the same accountant for audits and taxes, urging the committee to consult the nonprofit sector before proceeding.
HB1675: Claire Best, part-time resident taxpayer Support05:28:41.920 - 2:27:32 PM; Claire Best introduces herself as a part-time resident taxpayer in New Hampshire with deep family ties to the state, having been a victim of domestic violence, sexual violence, and cyberstalking by the New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence. She explains that victims of cyberstalking in New Hampshire are directed solely to this coalition, but her testimony focuses on concerns regarding Item I of HB 1675. She urges the committee to investigate why victims of YDC abuse in 2017 were dismissed, while the coalition prioritized investigations into private schools and colleges with out-of-state students between 2017 and 2020. She details the coalition's involvement in lobbying for a grand jury investigation into St. Paul's School in 2017, which led to lawsuits, media strategies co-authored by the coalition's director of public affairs, and a settlement requiring the school to fund coalition training and services. She highlights conflicts, including the coalition's lawyer representing school personnel in the grand jury and petitioning to keep proceedings private despite public funding. Best discusses similar issues in 2019 with a class action lawsuit against Dartmouth College, settled for $14 million by the same attorneys, with the coalition receiving a financial SI press award not disclosed in their reports, raising kickback concerns. She notes the coalition's contract with Phillips Exeter Academy for training, undisclosed fees, and a $1.8 million payment to their law firm, which also represented the school. She points out DCYF's admission of possibly deleting abuse files during the Exeter investigation, contradicting the coalition's claims, and a later conviction of a teacher for abuse during that period. Given the coalition's funding from DCYF, she sees significant conflicts. Best supports HB 1675 for promoting transparency without hindering victim services. She refutes accusations of harassment, stating she reported issues to authorities like Concord, AG's office, IRS, and FBI since 2019 with vague responses. Recently, she realized the coalition acts as a lobbyist for law enforcement and the AG's office.
HB1675: Robert Tangu Support05:37:16.160 - 2:36:07 PM; Robert Tangu, author of New Hampshire Oliver Twist, testified in support of HB 1675, alleging corruption and bias in the domestic violence coalition, particularly in Hillsborough County and Manchester. He described a personal incident where the coalition called 911 on him after he followed their instructions to visit, claiming he has video evidence of a false report. Tangu accused the coalition of operating as a political patronage prosecution and protection racket, connected to the Women's Bar Association and influenced by figures like Supreme Court Justice Hans Maronei. He highlighted biased DOJ VAWA grant funding that only protects women, ignoring men, and cited statistics showing higher rates of male abuse victims in New Hampshire. Tangu detailed his family court experiences, including a fictitious domestic violence petition against him with impossible claims, and read from his ex-partner's testimony alleging his harassment through legal motions, online content, and withholding child support. He claimed the coalition fueled her fears by issuing a no-trespass order and emailing statewide about his behavior, despite no probable cause found by police. Tangu is suing his ex's lawyer and the City of Manchester for fraud, stating he hasn't seen his children in three years. He urged the committee to pass the bill for accountability, arguing the coalition expands the definition of domestic violence beyond physical or sexual abuse to secure funding and assets, and offered to provide public records.
HB1675: Russ Chester, Bedford, NH Oppose05:46:03.840 - 2:44:54 PM; Russ Chester testified about his experiences with the New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence, initially coming in support of victims but realizing potential negative impacts from the organization's behaviors. He described the coalition's noble origins in 1977 but criticized how money, power, and lack of transparency have led to corruption. Chester shared a personal story from 1987 when he was a domestic violence victim, beaten unconscious by his estranged husband while trying to protect their children; he detailed calling the police, the assault, and his daughter's emergency call to 911. He was denied a rape kit despite suspicions of assault because the perpetrator was her husband. Chester also recounted working for DCYF and referring a YDC victim to the coalition, who received dismissive treatment regarding male victimization. He raised concerns about conflicts of interest involving a public safety chair linked to the coalition and a political figure, a former state rep denied help due to same-sex domestic violence, and the problematic overlap of personnel trained by the coalition now in the AG's office, likening it to 'the fox guarding the hen house.'
HB1675: Grace Gatto Support05:53:17.200 - 2:52:08 PM; Grace Gatto testified in support of HB 1675, emphasizing the need for oversight, transparency, and accountability for the statewide coalition against domestic and sexual violence, which receives nearly all its funding from taxpayers. She shared her personal experience as a domestic violence survivor who sought help in March 2021 via a public tweet, only to be contacted by the coalition's executive communications director. Assistance was conditioned on ending her friendship with critic Claire Best, and she was subsequently blocked from their social media. Gatto highlighted broader concerns including gatekeeping, conflicts of interest, discrepancies in IRS filings and lobbying, use of public funds to influence legislation, potential violations of federal grant conditions, discrimination against certain victims, and breaches of confidentiality. She argued that an independent commission with subpoena power would protect legitimate services, strengthen public trust, and ensure responsible stewardship of public funds, especially for vulnerable populations.
HB1675: Representative Linda Haskins Support05:57:47.920 - 2:56:38 PM; Representative Linda Haskins expressed support for HB 1675, noting that she listened to the testimony and recognized the problem as deeper than she initially knew. She referenced her colleague Representative Zoe Manos's sensible bills on domestic violence reporting and electronic records, which the coalition did not support, finding that strange. Haskins emphasized the need for transparency in the coalition's operations.
HB1675: Unnamed Speaker Support05:59:12.160 - 2:58:03 PM; The speaker shares their 20-year career at Philip Exiter, where they worked with men involved in issues mentioned by the previous testifier regarding St. Paul's school. They emphasize the importance of transparency in cases of sexual assault and domestic violence, questioning how funds are being used if not to support victims. The speaker expresses growing concern about the coalition based on what they've heard and urges the committee to move the bill forward.
HB1675: Jenny, midwife from White Mountains Support06:00:17.200 - 2:59:08 PM; Jenny shares her personal experience as a survivor of domestic violence married into a wealthy family with a brother-in-law convicted of child pornography. She describes the challenges in fleeing abuse and seeking help from the coalition, who refused assistance and targeted her instead. She poses questions about accountability when police fail victims and emphasizes the need for transparency, supporting the bill because if the coalition has nothing to hide, transparency should not be an issue.
HB1675: Randy Collier Support06:01:23.120 - 3:00:14 PM; Randy urges support for the bill, citing the compromised CFL committee, derogatory remarks by its chair towards family court parents, and the chair's removal yet continued membership. He criticizes the judicial conduct committee for not hearing administrative complaints, references case law on police protective orders, and highlights violations in family court practices involving referees, MOUs, child support enforcement, and constitutional rights infringements, particularly affecting military veterans. He calls for transparency to address these systemic issues.
HB1675: Representative Matt Sabor Schwanier Information Only06:05:40.480 - 3:04:31 PM; Representative Schwanier, from the Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee, testifies in support but raises questions about the coalition's $12,000 lobbying budget funding seven full-time lobbyists, noting their professionalism but seeking clarification on financial management.
HB1675: Representative Kathleen Pette, Hillsboro 25 Manchester Oppose06:06:27.680 - 3:05:18 PM; Representative Pette corrects earlier testimony, clarifying that the coalition does not benefit from restitution payments, which go directly to victims via the Department of Corrections, nor from the victims' fund, which reimburses victims directly. She opposes the bill for potentially delaying victim services like rape kits and court help for two years, arguing it would harm victims who are the focus of the coalition's work.
HB1675: Representative Kelly Patenza, Stratford District 19 Support06:09:40.718 - 3:08:31 PM; Representative Patenza supports the bill, sharing positive experiences with the coalition but arguing it's not an attack; issues should be fixed. She references page three, lines 11-14, ensuring funding for direct survivor benefits like food, shelter, and medicine continues. She emphasizes that 98% of funding is taxpayer dollars, requiring audits and transparency, questions underfilled SANE program positions, and stresses fiduciary responsibility amid state budget deficits, advocating for policy over sides.
HB1675: Dana Albrech, NHSA Support06:13:57.360 - 3:12:48 PM; Dana argues the coalition functions as a government agency under RSA 173-B:15-23 but is exempt from RSA 91-A, preventing right-to-know requests. He cites failures in advocate training leading to Lindsay Smith's shooting, contrasts reassurance with actual protection, and criticizes opposition arguments as 'magic incantations' like 'hurts DV victims' or 'conspiracy theories' to shut down debate, quoting Dietrich Bonhoeffer on stupidity's dangers, urging focus on documented victim testimonies.
HB1675: Representative Wheeler Support06:18:55.920 - 3:17:46 PM; As co-sponsor, Representative Wheeler affirms support for fiduciary oversight of $7.1 million in public funds to the private coalition providing public services. He addresses concerns by noting the bill protects funding for direct victim benefits and offers amendment flexibility to focus solely on investigation if needed, emphasizing legislative duty to redress citizen grievances without ending essential services.
HB1675: Representative Marjorie Smith, Durham Oppose06:23:12.718 - 3:22:03 PM; Representative Smith, representing Durham since 1996, expresses fatigue after 30 years but reinforces the coalition's vital role for domestic violence victims, both women and men. She opposes punitive elements in the bill and certain sections, advocating for its importance to well-being despite flaws.
HB1675: Unknown Speaker Information Only06:24:04.000 - 3:22:55 PM; The speaker suggests that the coalition should and could perform an incredibly important role, addressing areas where the legislature falls short. However, over many years, questions have arisen about the coalition's actions in supporting or opposing particular bills, and in balancing their financial interests with those of assumed victims. The speaker notes that this presents a problem because the legislature needs the coalition to operate effectively.
HB1675: Unknown Speaker Information Only06:24:59.280 - 3:23:50 PM; The speaker suggests amending the bill to ensure the domestic violence coalition operates with pure intentions and actions. They propose that the committee or another legislative agency take responsibility for providing oversight to evaluate the coalition's performance. The speaker notes that their testimony may sound confusing due to the complexity of the issue.
HB1675: Lynn Shallet, New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence Oppose06:25:52.400 - 3:24:43 PM; Lynn Shallet testified in opposition to House Bill 1675 on behalf of the New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence. She aimed to be brief, noting the committee's timelines, and indicated that her comments would address several questions raised during the hearing. She expressed willingness to answer questions afterward.
HB1675: Executive Director, New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence Oppose06:26:57.600 - 3:25:48 PM; The speaker, as Executive Director of the New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence, provides an overview of the organization's statewide role in training, policy, support, and coordination for 12 crisis centers, operating programs like SANE, human trafficking efforts, prevention education, and housing justice, with over 80% of funding passing through to local centers. She explains the bill's origins as part of a 6.5-year harassment campaign involving anonymous tweets, emails to funders and officials, and formal complaints to various agencies like the DOJ, FBI, and law enforcement, none of which resulted in action because the allegations—such as trafficking children, embezzling funds, tampering with evidence, and cutting power in a courthouse—are false and farcical. She criticizes reckless statements from bill proponents lacking factual support and notes the bill's path stemmed from failed collaboration on prior legislation, with over 1,000 signatures in opposition from victims, professionals, and donors who could have attended but were discouraged to focus resources on core work. She strongly supports public accountability for nonprofits, detailing existing oversight: annual filings with the Charitable Trust Unit including IRS Form 990 and audits (with clean audits for 25 years), five-year extensive documentation, funder reviews from federal, state, and private sources requiring detailed reporting and data collection down to county levels, and recent clean monitoring by the US DOJ Office of Inspector General. These entities can investigate complaints at any time but found no issues. HB 1675 is criticized as an unconstitutional bill of attainder, expanding legislative power to target one organization without due process or court involvement, violating separation of powers. The bill's true intent is to limit victim support by restricting Executive Council contracts to only shelter, food, and medicine, ignoring complex needs like education, helplines, advocacy, safety planning, financial tools, and training, which would isolate victims and revert New Hampshire's response decades backward. It also removes coalition staff from statewide boards and commissions, silencing victim voices in policy-making and chilling advocacy amid harassment. She shares FY25 data: services to 9,144 domestic violence victims, 2,241 sexual assault, 1,058 stalking, 135 human trafficking, 57 teen dating violence victims, including over 1,000 minors and 1,162 men, plus 27,664 shelter nights; each of 12 centers is independently governed and audited. The bill diverts resources, erodes trust, discourages reporting, and urges the committee to kill it.

Layon, Erica(Chairman)(R)[A+]2025	Sytek, John(Clerk)(R)[B-]2025	Slottje, Jeremy(V Chairman)(R)[A+]2025
Schmidt, Peter(D)[F]2025	Thibault, James(R)[A]2025	Howard, Heath(D)[F]2025
Sellers, John(R)[A-]2025	de Vries, Erica(D)[CT]2025	Dargie, Paul(D)[F]2025
Davis, Fred(D)[D-]2025	Bailey, Glenn(R)[A+]2025	Kelley, Diane(R)[A-]2025
Pearson, Stephen(R)[B-]2025	Grote, Jaci(D)[CT]2025	Long, Patrick(D)[D]2025
DeRoy, Susan(R)[A-]2025