Committee Summary for House Finance (04/01/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
HB66 10005H 00:07:23.919 - 9:06:14 AM	Executive Session	relative to material subject to disclosure under the right to know law.	Lynn, Bob(R)[A]2024
HB187 00:14:04.120 - 9:12:55 AM	Executive Session	relative to restraining orders sought by a parent on behalf of a minor child.	Belcher, Mike(R)[A]2024
HB215 00:17:34.240 - 9:16:25 AM	Executive Session	requiring a landfill permit applicant to submit a report listing potential harms and benefits of the project.	Germana, Nicholas(D)[CT]2024
HB219 00:20:24.720 - 9:19:15 AM	Executive Session	(New Title) relative to changes to the minimum electric renewable portfolio standards.	Harrington, Michael(R)[A]2024
HB365 00:24:58.640 - 9:23:49 AM	Executive Session	relative to proof of United States citizenship for indigent voters.	Lynn, Bob(R)[A]2024
HB511 2024-0785h 00:26:34.880 - 9:25:25 AM	Executive Session	relative to cooperation with federal immigration authorities.	Sweeney, Joe(R)[A-]2024
HB552 00:35:05.200 - 9:33:56 AM	Executive Session	relative to coverage of children under the state retiree insurance plan.	Newsom, James(D)
HB566 00:38:25.320 - 9:37:16 AM	Executive Session	requiring permit applications for new landfills to contain a detailed plan for leachate management.	Germana, Nicholas(D)[CT]2024
HB572 00:42:19.760 - 9:41:10 AM	Executive Session	(New Title) establishing the "partners in housing" program, an initiative under the housing champions fund to assist municipalities, counties, and developers in building workforce housing, and making an appropriation therefor.	Stavis, Laurel(D)[CT]2024
HB607 00:45:01.040 - 9:43:52 AM	Executive Session	relative to funding the Hampton Beach area commission and making appropriations therefor.	Muns, Chris(D)[CT]2024
HB611 00:47:33.359 - 9:46:24 AM	Executive Session	(New Title) relative to repayment regarding appointed counsel for indigent criminal defendants.	Scherr, Buzz(D)
HB624 00:49:38.480 - 9:48:29 AM	Executive Session	establishing a local river management advisory committee grant program and making an appropriation therefor.	Turer, Eric(D)[CT]2024
HB639 00:51:05.920 - 9:49:56 AM	Executive Session	relative to the use of and disputes over blockchain and digital currencies.	Ammon, Keith(R)[A+]2024
HB640 00:57:38.280 - 9:56:29 AM	Executive Session	relative to the transparency of federal agency operations within New Hampshire.	Ammon, Keith(R)[A+]2024
HB723 00:59:09.599 - 9:58:00 AM	Executive Session	repealing the multi-use energy data platform.	Berezhny, Lex(R)[A+]2024
HB733 01:05:12.960 - 10:04:03 AM	Executive Session	relative to reporting requirements for persons or entities financing lawsuits.	Cole, Brian(R)[B-]2024
HB115 01:16:02.199 - 10:14:53 AM	Executive Session	relative to universal eligibility for the education freedom account program.	McDonnell, Valerie(R)[B+]2024
HB563 01:20:59.120 - 10:19:50 AM	Executive Session	(New Title) relative to the cost of an opportunity for an adequate education, extraordinary need grants, fiscal capacity disparity aid, and determination of education grants.	Ladd, Rick(R)[B+]2024
HB675 01:22:57.360 - 10:21:48 AM	Executive Session	(New Title) limiting the authority of school districts to make certain appropriations.	Sweeney, Joe(R)[A-]2024
HB713 2025-1271H 01:36:48.159 - 10:35:39 AM	Executive Session	relative to mile markers along Route 112.	Stringham, Jerry(D)[CT]2024
HB773 01:43:21.760 - 10:42:12 AM	Executive Session	relative to aid to school districts for the cost of special education.	Ladd, Rick(R)[B+]2024
HB781 01:44:43.760 - 10:43:34 AM	Executive Session	(New Title) requiring school districts to adopt policies establishing a cell phone-free education.	Litchfield, Melissa(R)[A-]2022
HB675 03:09:47.840 - 12:08:38 PM	General Working Session	(New Title) limiting the authority of school districts to make certain appropriations.	Sweeney, Joe(R)[A-]2024
HB54 03:10:58.399 - 12:09:49 PM	Executive Session	allowing alternative treatment centers to operate for-profit.	Thomas, Wendy(D)[CT]2024
HB547 03:13:56.640 - 12:12:47 PM	Executive Session	relative to county reimbursement of funds.	Pearson, Stephen(R)[B]2024
HB570 03:16:45.200 - 12:15:36 PM	Executive Session	(New Title) repealing the prescription drug affordability board.	Edwards, Jess(R)[B+]2024
HB661 03:35:44.000 - 12:34:35 PM	Executive Session	relative to the department of health and human services management of social security payments, supplemental security income payments, and veterans benefits for children in foster care.	Wallner, Mary Jane(D)[CT]2024
HB704 03:38:53.439 - 12:37:44 PM	Executive Session	relative to caregiver respite and senior volunteer programs and making an appropriation therefor.	Wallner, Mary Jane(D)[CT]2024
HB751 03:42:34.160 - 12:41:25 PM	Executive Session	(New Title) requiring licensure of outpatient substance use disorder treatment facilities and relative to complaint investigation of treatment facilities by the department of health and human services office of the ombudsman and making an appropriation therefor.	McLean, Mark(R)[A-]2024
HB2 2025-1467H 03:44:48.319 - 12:43:39 PM	Executive Session	relative to state fees, funds, revenues, and expenditures.	Weyler, Kenneth(R)[B+]2024
HB2 2025-1467H 04:43:37.440 - 1:42:28 PM	Executive Session	relative to state fees, funds, revenues, and expenditures.	Weyler, Kenneth(R)[B+]2024

HB66 10005H: Representative McGuire Support00:07:23.919 - 9:06:14 AM; Representative McGuire introduced House Bill 66 and moved for its passage with amendment 10005H. He explained that the bill extends the right to know law by differentiating between requests from New Hampshire residents and out-of-state individuals. The amendment removes the no filing fee for appeals to the right to know ombudsman's unfavorable rulings, aligning it with other appeals that require a filing fee due to budget constraints.
HB66 10005H: Representative Ael Oppose00:09:45.480 - 9:08:36 AM; Representative Ael expressed opposition to House Bill 66, highlighting concerns about the expansion of the right to know law from 'citizen' to 'person', which could increase the compliance burden on municipalities. He noted that such requests could be used for marketing purposes, which he believes is not the intent of the right to know laws. He also mentioned opposition from the New Hampshire Municipal Association.
HB187: Representative McGuire Support00:14:04.120 - 9:12:55 AM; Representative McGuire introduced House Bill 187, which was unanimously supported for passage. The bill aims to allow parents or guardians to request protective orders on behalf of minors for abuse not limited to family or household members, thus closing a gap in current law. He noted that while there might be a slight increase in costs due to more protective orders, the financial impact is not significant.
HB215: Representative Griffin Information Only00:17:34.240 - 9:16:25 AM; Representative Griffin moved to retain House Bill 215, which requires landfill permit applicants to submit a report on potential harms and benefits. He noted that the bill's content is now part of House Bill 2, making HB215 redundant.
HB215: Representative Murray Support00:18:23.280 - 9:17:14 AM; Representative Murray supports the retention of HB215, noting that it passed the House on the consent calendar and was successfully incorporated into HB2. He also mentioned modifications based on input from the resources and recreation commission.
HB215: Clerk Information Only00:19:41.520 - 9:18:32 AM; The clerk conducted a roll call vote on the motion to retain House Bill 215, resulting in a unanimous 25 to 0 vote to retain the bill.
HB219: Representative Sweeney Information Only00:20:24.720 - 9:19:15 AM; Representative Sweeney moved to retain House Bill 219.
HB219: Representative Muns Oppose00:21:39.919 - 9:20:30 AM; Representative Muns explained that HB219 passed the House with a close vote and detailed the bill's impact on the renewable portfolio standard. He noted that the bill lowers the value of certain renewable energy certificates and eliminates others, which could discourage investment in renewable energy projects. He opposed retaining the bill, preferring a motion of Inexpedient To Legislate (ITL) to be introduced.
HB219: Clerk Information Only00:24:08.880 - 9:22:59 AM; The clerk conducted a roll call vote on the motion to retain House Bill 219, resulting in a 14 to 11 vote to retain the bill.
HB365: Representative Campbell Information Only00:24:58.640 - 9:23:49 AM; Representative Campbell moved to retain House Bill 365, noting it had a unanimous 9-0 vote out of the division.
HB365: Clerk Information Only00:25:49.760 - 9:24:40 AM; The clerk conducted a roll call vote on the motion to retain House Bill 365, resulting in a unanimous vote to retain the bill.
HB511 2024-0785h: Representative Sweeney Support00:26:34.880 - 9:25:25 AM; Representative Sweeney moved for the bill to pass with the amendment 0785H. He explained that House Bill 511 had strong bipartisan support and the amendment was proposed by the New Hampshire Counties Association to clarify the duration counties can hold an ICE detainee without a federal contract. He emphasized the importance of the bill in sending a message that New Hampshire is not a sanctuary state and will cooperate with ICE to ensure illegal immigrants are not welcome in the state.
HB511 2024-0785h: Representative Muns Oppose00:27:51.679 - 9:26:42 AM; Representative Muns expressed opposition to the amendment, citing concerns about holding individuals without proper documentation, which he stated is not a crime. He argued against the amendment, fearing it could lead to the deprivation of fundamental rights and likened it to historical injustices, referencing his father's experience in Nazi Germany. He urged others to vote against the amendment.
HB511 2024-0785h: Representative Edwards Support00:30:03.520 - 9:28:54 AM; Representative Edwards, a combat veteran, supported the amendment, resenting any comparison to Nazi Germany. He argued that individuals with ICE detainers are already in the due process system and emphasized the need to support ICE in enforcing immigration laws, reflecting the public's vote to address immigration issues.
HB511 2024-0785h: Representative McGuire Information Only00:31:17.360 - 9:30:08 AM; Representative McGuire pointed out that the amendment's language is similar to recently passed bail laws, which allow for a maximum of 48 hours of detention, excluding weekends and holidays.
HB552: Representative [Name not provided] Support00:35:05.200 - 9:33:56 AM; The speaker moved that House Bill 552 ought to pass. The bill aims to remove the full-time student requirement for retiree health insurance coverage for children aged 19 to 25, aligning it with the state employee plan and other ACA plans. The change will not cost New Hampshire taxpayers any money as all premiums will be paid by the retiree. The inclusion of healthier young adults in the insurance pool could potentially decrease state costs due to reduced need for eligibility verification. The bill had previously received strong support in both the House and the other body, though it failed due to a non-germane amendment. The speaker urged a favorable vote on the bill.
HB566: Representative Rung Support00:38:25.320 - 9:37:16 AM; Representative Rung moved that House Bill 566 ought to pass. The bill, with a fiscal impact of less than $10,000 annually from 2025 to 2028, aims to enhance statutory support for the Department of Environmental Services (DES) rules on landfill permits. It requires detailed leachate management plans, including descriptions of management, collection, storage, treatment, transport, and disposal of leachate. The bill also mandates estimates of weekly leachate transports and contingency plans for unforeseen complications, as well as information on contracts with facilities for leachate treatment and disposal. The regulated community found the requirements not overly burdensome. Representative Rung recommended and urged a vote to pass the bill.
HB566: Unnamed Representative Support00:41:02.000 - 9:39:53 AM; The unnamed representative expressed appreciation for Representative Rung's comments and highlighted that the bill adds statutory support to existing DES rules. The regulated community did not find the requirements problematic as they were already part of the rules. The representative sought the committee's support for the bill.
HB572: Representative Sweeney Information Only00:42:19.760 - 9:41:10 AM; Representative Sweeney moved to retain House Bill 572, explaining that the funds to include it in the budget were not found, but they hope to work on it next year based on the fiscal picture. It was clarified that the policy in the bill was included in HB2, but the appropriation was not.
HB607: Unnamed Representative Information Only00:45:01.040 - 9:43:52 AM; The unnamed representative moved to retain House Bill 607, noting that a small money component was removed and included in HB2 with slightly different language. Representative Muns from Hampton expressed disappointment over the lack of funding for the Hampton Beach Area Commission, describing it as an unfunded mandate. Despite the efforts to reduce requirements, the small funding request of $5,000 per year was not met, though appreciation was shown for the work done by the chair of division one.
HB611: Unnamed Representative Information Only00:47:33.359 - 9:46:24 AM; The unnamed representative moved to retain House Bill 611, stating that the bill, which concerns the office of cost containment, has language included in HB2. There was no further discussion on the motion to retain.
HB624: Representative Campbell Information Only00:49:38.480 - 9:48:29 AM; Representative Campbell moved to retain House Bill 624, noting that it received a unanimous 9 to 0 vote out of division. There was no further discussion on the motion to retain.
HB639: Representative Sweeney Support00:51:05.920 - 9:49:56 AM; Representative Sweeney moved that House Bill 639 ought to pass. The bill addresses the definition of securities and its interaction with digital currencies. After discussions with the prime sponsor and a representative from the Securities Division of the Secretary of State's office, it was decided to pass the bill to allow for further work in the other body. The representative from the Securities Division was not overly concerned about passing the bill as it was close to their desired outcome, though an amendment was not feasible within the current timeline. The motion to pass was supported by a 7 to 2 vote.
HB639: Representative Buns Oppose00:52:43.040 - 9:51:34 AM; Representative Buns expressed concerns about the impact of HB639 on the regulatory authority of the Bureau of Securities. He also highlighted potential issues with the bill's impact on energy resources and energy prices due to blockchain technology. Additionally, he mentioned concerns about the bill potentially limiting local control and the judicial branch's involvement in potential litigation. He voted against the bill in the division and encouraged others to do the same, feeling the bill was not ready for prime time.
HB639: Representative R Oppose00:54:01.280 - 9:52:52 AM; Representative R, who also voted against the bill in the division, shared similar concerns as Representative Buns. He emphasized his belief that the House should not pass a flawed bill and suggested that issues should be resolved in the House rather than relying on the Senate to fix them. He proposed voting against the 'ought to pass' (OTP) motion in hopes of retaining the bill for further work in the second year of the term.
HB639: Representative Ael Oppose00:55:02.720 - 9:53:53 AM; Representative Ael also voted against HB639, expressing concerns about the lack of opportunity for the Secretary of State's securities representative to testify before the commerce committee. He was uneasy about the bill due to his background in securities law and decided to vote against it, despite assurances that issues would be resolved in the Senate.
HB639: Committee Vote00:55:56.960 - 9:54:47 AM; The committee proceeded to vote on the motion to pass HB639. The vote resulted in 15 votes in favor and 10 against, with the motion to pass being adopted. Representative MS agreed to write the minority report.
HB640: Representative Griffin Information Only00:57:38.280 - 9:56:29 AM; Representative Griffin moved to retain HB640 due to a lack of funding. The motion to retain was seconded and passed unanimously with a vote of 25 to 0.
HB723: Representative Campbell Support00:59:09.599 - 9:58:00 AM; Representative Campbell moved to pass HB723 and intended to speak on the motion after it was seconded.
HB723: Unnamed Speaker Information Only00:59:57.880 - 9:58:48 AM; The speaker discussed the bill's intent to repeal the multi-use energy data platform law from 2019. The law required utilities to create and operate a statewide online energy data platform, which has not yet been built. There is significant overlap between the proposed platform features and what some utilities already offer. The normal cost-benefit justification process is bypassed by this law, and the costs to integrate and build the platform are estimated to be high. The majority on the committee felt the benefits of the platform were not clear.
HB723: Representative Munz Oppose01:01:06.480 - 9:59:57 AM; Representative Munz opposed the bill, stating it was passed by the House with a significant majority and was signed into law in 2019 at the request of the Office of Consumer Advocate. The platform was intended to allow utilities, customers, and third parties to securely exchange data. Delays in implementation were attributed to utilities' reluctance to participate. The platform aimed to support energy-related services and community choice aggregation plans, which allow consumers to select energy options based on their preferences. Representative Munz argued that canceling the project would hinder efforts to control the state's energy future and announced their intention to vote against the motion to pass the bill.
HB733: Representative Evil Support01:05:12.960 - 10:04:03 AM; Representative Evil moved to pass HB733, which aims to enhance consumer protections and promote transparency in commercial litigation funding. The bill establishes disclosure requirements and ethical limitations on third-party financiers, prohibits foreign entities from influencing litigation, and safeguards attorney-client decision-making. The fiscal note indicated no fiscal impact on state, county, or local expenditures or revenue. The hearing was straightforward, and the division unanimously supported the bill, leading to a quick conclusion to pass it.
HB115: Representative Papovich Support01:16:02.199 - 10:14:53 AM; Representative Papovich moved to pass the bill, arguing that the education freedom account program was not originally intended to be means-tested. He stated that the bill aims to return to the original intent of the program in a fiscally responsible manner.
HB115: Representative Murray Oppose01:17:15.760 - 10:16:06 AM; Representative Murray opposed the motion to pass the bill, citing significant public opposition during hearings and through town meetings. He highlighted the escalating costs of the program, from an initial estimate of $300,000 to over $28 million, and criticized the lack of accountability and the program's expansion during budget cuts. He argued that the program benefits wealthy families and lacks necessary oversight, especially when other state programs are being reduced.
HB563: Representative Papovich Information Only01:20:59.120 - 10:19:50 AM; Representative Papovich moved to retain the bill, explaining that it is part of HB1 and HB2 and thus no longer needed as a standalone bill.
HB675: Representative Papovich Information Only01:22:57.360 - 10:21:48 AM; Representative Papovich requested flexibility to introduce an amendment to add a CPI adjustment to parts of the bill where it was missing. He suggested retaining the bill until the amendment could be considered, indicating that the amendment would adjust the spending caps to be higher than initially proposed.
HB675: Representative Murray Oppose01:26:24.480 - 10:25:15 AM; Representative Murray opposed the motion to retain the bill, arguing that it represents legislative overreach and undermines local control over education spending. He noted the close vote on the measure previously and criticized the cap for potentially keeping underfunded schools underfunded indefinitely. He also mentioned the unrealistic requirement for a two-thirds vote to rescind the cap and the strong opposition from school districts.
HB675: Representative Papovich Support01:27:46.639 - 10:26:37 AM; Representative Papovich defended the bill, stating that communities have successfully voted to increase school budgets beyond the proposed cap, suggesting that the cap would not lock districts into their current spending levels. He argued that the bill would help control the rise of education costs above inflation and student numbers.
HB675: Representative Hawen Phillips Oppose01:28:54.719 - 10:27:45 AM; Representative Hawen Phillips opposed the bill, emphasizing the need for school districts to respond flexibly to budget changes, such as unexpected increases in student numbers. She criticized the high threshold for budget overrides and argued that the bill's focus on local spending does not address state budgetary concerns during a difficult budget year. She noted bipartisan opposition to the bill.
HB675: Representative Leeman Information Only01:30:10.639 - 10:29:01 AM; Representative Leeman asked Representative Papovich why he would oppose local decision-making on spending. Representative Papovich clarified that he is not opposed to local decision-making but proposed a higher threshold for budget increases significantly larger than CPI and justified by increasing attendance.
HB675: Representative Ael, Keene Oppose01:31:23.679 - 10:30:14 AM; Representative Ael expressed strong opposition to HB675, emphasizing the importance of local control in education. He argued that the bill represents an overreach and a usurpation of local authority. He highlighted the issue of accountability, suggesting that elections are the appropriate mechanism for holding elected officials accountable, rather than the mechanisms proposed in the bill. He also criticized the Education Freedom Accounts (EFAs) for lacking accountability in terms of educational outcomes.
HB675: Representative Papovichi, Manchester Support01:32:37.440 - 10:31:28 AM; Representative Papovichi defended the accountability measures in the EFA program, countering claims of no accountability by detailing the oversight and approval processes for expenditures. He compared this to the lack of similar detailed oversight in public schools, suggesting that while the level of oversight in EFAs might be excessive, it is incorrect to claim there is no accountability. He supported the bill, arguing that the facts about EFA accountability are verifiable.
HB675: Representative Murray, Concord Oppose01:33:56.080 - 10:32:47 AM; Representative Murray focused on the lack of accountability in terms of student performance within the EFA system. He argued that the real measure of accountability should be how well students are learning, not just how funds are spent. He opposed the bill, emphasizing the need for accountability in educational outcomes.
HB675: Representative I, Nashua Support01:34:55.159 - 10:33:46 AM; Representative I supported the bill, trusting parents to make the best educational decisions for their children. He argued for comparable levels of accountability between EFAs and public schools, suggesting that the issue of accountability should be addressed in future budget discussions. He highlighted the declining test scores in public schools as a point of concern.
HB713 2025-1271H: Representative Papovich, Laconia Support01:36:48.159 - 10:35:39 AM; Representative Papovich introduced HB713, explaining its purpose to install mile markers along Route 112, also known as the Kancamagus Highway. He highlighted the safety concerns due to the lack of cell service and the difficulty in locating incidents along the route. The bill was supported by local emergency services and passed unanimously in the public works committee. The amendment 2025-1271H was proposed to allow flexibility in combining projects and adjusting the effective date to 18 months after passage.
HB713 2025-1271H: Representative Edwards, Dover Information Only01:39:57.920 - 10:38:48 AM; Representative Edwards inquired about the specifics of the mile markers proposed in HB713, asking if they would be placed every tenth of a mile. He was informed that the department prefers markers every 0.2 miles but wants flexibility in the layout and feedback from local towns before finalizing.
HB773: Representative Papovichi Müller, Manchester Information Only01:43:21.760 - 10:42:12 AM; Representative Papovichi Müller moved to retain HB773, explaining that the bill is related to HB1 and HB2 and that the committee unanimously agreed to retain it for further consideration.
HB773: Representative Papovichi Müller, Manchester Information Only01:43:21.760 - 10:42:12 AM; Representative Papovichi Müller concluded their remarks on HB773, but the specific content of their testimony was not captured in the provided snippet.
HB781: Representative Papovichi, Manchester Support01:44:43.760 - 10:43:34 AM; Representative Papovichi moved for an Ought to Pass (OTP) on HB781, noting that the bill had bipartisan support and was unanimously voted on in the committee. They mentioned that the original $1 million allocation was removed, thus eliminating the fiscal impact of the bill.
HB781: Unnamed Representative Information Only01:46:06.239 - 10:44:57 AM; An unnamed representative asked for clarification on how the money was stripped from the bill without an amendment. Representative Papovichi explained that the bill came to the committee already amended without the money.
HB781: Chair Information Only01:47:19.040 - 10:46:10 AM; The chair called for a vote on the OTP motion for HB781, which passed unanimously with a vote of 25 to 0.
HB675: Representative Papovichi Müller, Manchester Information Only03:09:47.840 - 12:08:38 PM; Representative Papovichi Müller apologized for an error in an amendment intended for HB675, which was incorrectly written as an amendment to HB675 instead of HB2. They also noted a lack of understanding of the existing balance in the bill, leading to concerns about the amendment's language. As a result, they decided not to move forward with the amendment at this time.
HB54: Representative Edwards Information Only03:10:58.399 - 12:09:49 PM; Representative Edwards introduced HB54, explaining that it aimed to create a for-profit option for alternative treatment centers. The fiscal note showed no impact on DHS, and the bill was informally handed over to Division One. They moved to retain HB54, which was seconded and passed unanimously with a vote of 10 to 0.
HB547: Representative Edwards Information Only03:13:56.640 - 12:12:47 PM; Representative Edwards discussed the purpose of HB547, which was to have the department reimburse counties for excess payments received from the federal government during the early phase of the pandemic. The bill initially proposed to return over $22 million to the counties over two years, but it was amended and incorporated into HB2, distributing the funds over four payments across two budgets. This amendment was coordinated with the counties and passed without opposition. Representative Edwards moved to retain HB547, which was seconded and passed unanimously with a vote of 25 to 0.
HB570: Representative Edwards Information Only03:16:45.200 - 12:15:36 PM; Representative Edwards introduced HB570, which initially dealt with definitions but was amended by EDNA to include the repeal of the prescription drug affordability board (PDAB). The repeal was due to the board's perceived lack of productivity after four years. Despite a partisan but strong vote in the House, Edwards had concerns about the board's business plans. After receiving business plans that showed potential savings of about $2.4 to $2.5 million through biosimilars, the decision was made to retain the bill and adjust the budget to offset the costs of the PDAB. Edwards opened the floor for discussion on whether the right decision was made.
HB570: Representative McGuire Information Only03:19:17.200 - 12:18:08 PM; Representative McGuire inquired about the fiscal note of HB570 as amended, noting that the fiscal note shown was for the introduced version. It was clarified that a new fiscal note would show a decrease in expenditures due to the repeal of the PDAB, estimated at around $250,000 per year.
HB570: Representative Springham Information Only03:20:25.760 - 12:19:16 PM; Representative Springham discussed the significance of pharmacy payments within Medicaid, noting that they constitute 30% of payouts for approximately 160,000 recipients. He reviewed the business cases presented by the PDAB and expressed support for the board's efforts, considering it a wise investment given the substantial expenditures in this area.
HB570: Representative Leechman Oppose03:20:59.840 - 12:19:50 PM; Representative Leechman expressed concerns about the Prescription Drug Affordability Board (PDAB), noting its lack of tangible results in lowering drug costs despite significant funding. He mentioned that the responsibility for drug costs lies at the federal level and criticized the expenditure of half a million dollars over the biennium, especially when other pressing issues exist. He also highlighted that the House has not supported PDAB in the past.
HB570: Representative Edwards Oppose03:22:04.399 - 12:20:55 PM; Representative Edwards shared his observations from attending PDAB meetings, describing them as unproductive and focused on irrelevant matters. He pointed out that the New Hampshire Insurance Department has similar responsibilities without requiring general fund appropriations. He expressed concern over the lack of transparency and the significant funding allocated to PDAB, suggesting that the funds could be better utilized elsewhere.
HB570: Representative Daniel Oppose03:23:21.520 - 12:22:12 PM; Representative Daniel discussed his concerns about the effectiveness of PDAB, noting that despite funding since 2020, it has not produced the expected recommendations for drug savings. He reminded the committee of the House's recent vote to repeal PDAB and criticized the lack of a comprehensive business plan, which he believes is necessary for supporting the board's initiatives.
HB570: Representative Wallner Support03:25:51.760 - 12:24:42 PM; Representative Wallner expressed support for PDAB, citing the efforts of Representative Edwards and a staff member in working towards a viable business plan. He argued that the board deserves more time to prove its effectiveness, given its relatively short existence and the guidance from experienced board members.
HB570: Representative Muns Information Only03:26:33.040 - 12:25:24 PM; Representative Muns inquired about the potential loss of savings if PDAB were repealed, specifically referencing a $2.4 million savings from using bioimilars. The discussion clarified that the savings recommendation would continue independently of PDAB's funding, as it is already moving forward through other legislative channels.
HB570: Representative Cherki Support03:29:50.200 - 12:28:41 PM; Representative Cherki acknowledged the thorough discussions held by Division 3 about PDAB and expressed optimism about finding a path forward. He highlighted the importance of the conversations and the unanimous retain motions, indicating a collective belief in the potential for PDAB to contribute positively.
HB570: Representative Seaworth Information Only03:31:00.640 - 12:29:51 PM; Representative Seaworth raised a question about the implications of the House's amendment to HB570, which was to repeal the board and the HB1 line items. He noted that this could potentially unfund the staff supporting the board, leaving the board in place but without support, and he highlighted that this approach differs from simply zeroing out the budget.
HB570: Representative Edwards Information Only03:32:21.840 - 12:31:12 PM; Representative Edwards agreed with Seaworth's point, explaining that zeroing out the budget would not eliminate the policy or the board but would revert the situation to its early years, with no funding, no executive director, and no ability to contract, essentially suspending the PDAB.
HB570: Chair Information Only03:33:22.239 - 12:32:13 PM; The chair conducted a roll call vote on the motion to retain House Bill 570FN. The vote resulted in 25 yes votes and 5 no votes, indicating a decision to retain the bill.
HB570: Representative Information Only03:34:16.560 - 12:33:07 PM; A representative expressed support for the motion to retain, noting that it was appropriate and that there would be further opportunity to discuss funding levels during the budget phase.
HB661: Representative Walner Support03:35:44.000 - 12:34:35 PM; Representative Walner introduced HB661, which deals with the management of social security payments for children in foster care who are disabled or have a disabled or deceased parent. She mentioned that the bill had been brought forward twice, and last year, the division voted to amend it and hire a consultant to study the issue. The report received in December detailed the situation across the U.S., and due to time constraints during the budget process, she proposed retaining the bill for further study using the consultant's work.
HB661: Chair Information Only03:37:16.920 - 12:36:07 PM; The chair conducted a roll call vote on the motion to retain House Bill 661FN. The vote was unanimous in favor of retaining the bill.
HB661: Representative Murray Vote03:38:02.239 - 12:36:53 PM; Representative Murray voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 661FN.
HB661: Representative Eel Vote03:38:02.239 - 12:36:53 PM; Representative Eel voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 661FN.
HB661: Representative Tarski Vote03:38:02.239 - 12:36:53 PM; Representative Tarski voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 661FN.
HB661: Representative Hacken Phillips Vote03:38:02.239 - 12:36:53 PM; Representative Hacken Phillips voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 661FN.
HB661: Representative Stringham Vote03:38:02.239 - 12:36:53 PM; Representative Stringham voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 661FN.
HB661: Representative Priest Vote03:38:02.239 - 12:36:53 PM; Representative Priest voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 661FN.
HB661: Representative Rung Vote03:38:02.239 - 12:36:53 PM; Representative Rung voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 661FN.
HB661: Representative Muns Vote03:38:02.239 - 12:36:53 PM; Representative Muns voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 661FN.
HB661: Representative Kelly Vote03:38:02.239 - 12:36:53 PM; Representative Kelly voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 661FN.
HB661: Chair Wil Vote03:38:02.239 - 12:36:53 PM; Chair Wil voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 661FN. The motion to retain House Bill 661FN was adopted unanimously with a vote of 25 to zero.
HB704: Representative Walner Information Only03:38:53.439 - 12:37:44 PM; Representative Walner discussed House Bill 704, which focuses on caregivers for family members with Alzheimer's. The bill has four parts, each with an appropriation, some of which are included in the budget and some are not. Representative Walner suggested retaining the bill to monitor its progress through the system and mentioned the possibility of introducing an amendment on Thursday related to one part of the bill, which would be a technical amendment and not financial.
HB704: Representative Maguire Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Maguire voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Earth Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Earth voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Mooney Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Mooney voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Edwards Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Edwards voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Clerk Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; The clerk voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Bean Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Bean voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Campbell Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Campbell voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Pompichi Mueller Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Pompichi Mueller voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Sweeney Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Sweeney voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Daniels Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Daniels voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Seaworth Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Seaworth voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Roy Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Roy voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Neleno Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Neleno voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Walner Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Walner voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Leechman Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Leechman voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Murray Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Murray voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Eel Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Eel voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Tereski Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Tereski voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Hiken Phillips Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Hiken Phillips voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Stringham Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Stringham voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Priest Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Priest voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative R Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative R voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Muns Vote03:41:04.080 - 12:39:55 PM; Representative Muns voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Representative Kelly Vote03:41:43.840 - 12:40:34 PM; Representative Kelly voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704.
HB704: Chair Wila Vote03:41:43.840 - 12:40:34 PM; Chair Wila voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 704. The motion to retain House Bill 704 was adopted unanimously with a vote of 25 to zero.
HB751: Representative Terski Information Only03:42:34.160 - 12:41:25 PM; Representative Terski discussed House Bill 751, which deals with substance use disorder treatment centers. The bill aims to provide licensing and structure for these facilities due to reports of patient abuse and the lack of oversight on the number of operating facilities. There was an appropriation for one employee, but Representative Terski suggested retaining the bill to work on the policy and potentially remove the need for the appropriation.
HB751: Representative Maguire Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Maguire voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Ver Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Ver voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Mooney Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Mooney voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Edwards Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Edwards voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Clerk Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; The clerk voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Bean Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Bean voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Campbell Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Campbell voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Papichi Mueller Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Papichi Mueller voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Sweeney Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Sweeney voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Daniels Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Daniels voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Seaworth Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Seaworth voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Doy Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Doy voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Naleno Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Naleno voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Walner Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Walner voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Leechman Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Leechman voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Murray Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Murray voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Eel Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Eel voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Terski Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Terski voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Hacken Phillips Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Hacken Phillips voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Stringham Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Stringham voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Priest Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Priest voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative R Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative R voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Muns Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Muns voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Representative Kelly Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Representative Kelly voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751.
HB751: Chair Wiler Vote03:43:38.160 - 12:42:29 PM; Chair Wiler voted yes on the motion to retain House Bill 751. The motion to retain House Bill 751 was adopted unanimously with a vote of 25 to zero.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unidentified Speaker Information Only03:44:48.319 - 12:43:39 PM; The speaker introduced an updated amendment to House Bill 2 regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion, identified as amendment number 2025-1467H. The amendment includes a new definition of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) that focuses on programs, policies, trainings, or initiatives classifying individuals based on race, sex, ethnicity, or other group characteristics to achieve demographic outcomes rather than treating individuals equally under the law. The amendment also removes provisions about contract termination, specifying that existing contracts will not be terminated but no new or renewed contracts will include DEI provisions. The speaker moved for the adoption of the amendment and it was seconded by Representative Daniels. A recess was called for Democrats to review the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unidentified Speaker Support03:53:30.960 - 12:52:21 PM; The speaker expressed support for the amendment, highlighting that it prevents state funds from being used for DEI-related activities in state agencies, departments, offices, commissions, and public schools. They noted that the amendment targets state dollars in the budget, specifically in HB1 and HB2.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unidentified Speaker Information Only03:54:44.399 - 12:53:35 PM; The speaker asked about the germaneness of the amendment, referencing a previous ruling by the speaker that it was germane due to its reference to funds. They inquired about the changes that made the amendment germane.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unidentified Speaker Information Only03:55:19.120 - 12:54:10 PM; The speaker thanked Representative Hen Phillips for pointing out issues in the previous draft of the amendment, which were addressed in the current version to withstand legal challenges.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Hacken Phillips Oppose03:56:33.439 - 12:55:24 PM; Representative Hacken Phillips expressed concerns about the amendment's language, particularly the term 'other group characteristics' in the DEI definition, which they found vague. They worried about the potential exclusion of people with disabilities, who are protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the impact on businesses. They also highlighted potential liabilities due to unclear provisions about existing and future contracts, and the lack of funding for mandated reviews in public schools. They criticized the amendment as a rush job likely to lead to expensive litigation, referencing past cases like SB3 and divisive concepts, and urged the committee to retain the bill for further review in a policy committee.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative McGuire Information Only04:00:49.160 - 12:59:40 PM; Representative McGuire interpreted the term 'other group characteristics' differently, suggesting it refers to characteristics similar to race, sex, and ethnicity, which are group-based and inherent at birth, unlike disabilities which can be individual and acquired over time.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Hacken Phillips Oppose04:02:09.359 - 1:01:00 PM; Representative Hacken Phillips used Representative McGuire's remarks to illustrate why litigation occurs due to differing interpretations of legal text. They questioned the fiscal responsibility of pursuing a course that could lead to costly legal battles, especially in a budget year with an $800 million gap.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Murray Information Only04:03:20.720 - 1:02:11 PM; Representative Murray sought clarification on what 'group characteristics' might include, specifically asking for examples from Representative McGuire, who mentioned nationality or national origin as potential examples.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Sweeney Information Only04:03:49.600 - 1:02:40 PM; Representative Sweeney clarified that the bill's focus is on programs, policies, trainings, and initiatives based on race, sex, ethnicity, or other group characteristics aimed at achieving demographic outcomes. They emphasized that accessibility in public schools and buildings is not targeted by the bill. They also discussed the forward-looking nature of contract language, indicating that contracts need to be reviewed and not renewed in their current form to align with the bill's objectives.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Muns Oppose04:04:50.960 - 1:03:41 PM; Representative Muns expressed concerns about the lack of clarity in the bill's definitions, such as 'demographic outcome', 'implicit bias training', 'DEI assessments', and 'critical race theory'. They argued that without clear definitions, the bill cannot move forward effectively.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Murray Information Only04:06:45.680 - 1:05:36 PM; Representative Murray inquired about the number of reviews required by the bill, specifically mentioning the deadline of September 30, 2025, for these reviews to be completed.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Terski Oppose04:08:04.800 - 1:06:55 PM; Representative Terski criticized the timing of the bill's introduction, likening it to past instances where policy decisions were added to the budget without proper public hearings. They expressed concern that such actions could erode public trust in the legislative body.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Edwards Oppose04:09:29.120 - 1:08:20 PM; Representative Edwards discussed the perception that DEI is a rebranding of affirmative action, which they believe contradicts the principle of equal opportunity. They cited an example from Southern New Hampshire University where DEI principles were integrated into the curriculum, questioning the fairness of assigning group characteristics to individuals.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Ron Oppose04:10:47.560 - 1:09:38 PM; Representative Ron focused on the lack of discussion about the fiscal impact of the bill, except for concerns about liability and exposure mentioned by Representative Hecen Phillips. They argued that the bill should not be part of the budget and should be discussed in a policy committee with stakeholder input.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Muns Oppose04:11:56.239 - 1:10:47 PM; Representative Muns echoed concerns about the bill's introduction timing and questioned why it was not introduced during the normal legislative process, which would allow for a full public hearing and discussion. They also mentioned that DEI was never voted on by any legislative body but was pushed from the top.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Papovich Support04:13:35.120 - 1:12:26 PM; Representative Papovich defended the bill's inclusion in the budget process, stating it addresses how state funds are spent and does not affect private entities. They acknowledged the lack of a detailed fiscal note but emphasized the need to address the issue found during the budget process. They suggested that if there is support for DEI, a formal bill could be introduced later.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Priest Oppose04:15:42.239 - 1:14:33 PM; Representative Priest expressed unawareness of any state funds lost due to DEI mentions in departments but highlighted potential fiscal impacts from court cases and economic impacts from businesses considering relocation due to the bill's wording.
HB2 2025-1467H: Former Airline Pilot Information Only04:17:10.600 - 1:16:01 PM; Expressed concerns about the FAA's diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies, suggesting that these policies may have contributed to recent accidents and the firing of white male controllers. The speaker highlighted issues with the Obama library construction as an example of DEI-related challenges.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Priest Information Only04:18:26.479 - 1:17:17 PM; Responded to a question about desired demographic outcomes, stating that the goal is to hire and promote based on individual merit and talent, not race. Cited Martin Luther King Jr.'s influence on his views on equality.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Hacken Phillips Oppose04:19:08.199 - 1:17:59 PM; Expressed concerns that the amendment's vague language could negatively impact people with disabilities, potentially excluding them from special education, parking permits, and accessible voting machines. Advised against passing the amendment due to potential legal challenges.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Stringham Oppose04:20:16.319 - 1:19:07 PM; Acknowledged the value of equal opportunity initiatives but felt that the bill still had issues and planned to vote against it. Emphasized the importance of addressing feelings of exclusion while striving for American success for all.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Ael Oppose04:22:33.120 - 1:21:24 PM; Echoed colleagues' sentiments and criticized the process of bringing the amendment forward at the last minute without full discussion. Expressed concerns about partisanship and the amendment's potential to fuel public distrust.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Edwards Oppose04:23:45.680 - 1:22:36 PM; Opposed using the HB2 process to bypass policy committees and suggested retaining the bill for further discussion. Noted that the budget process was too advanced for retention to be effective.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Roy Information Only04:26:10.319 - 1:25:01 PM; Clarified that DEI was not an official state policy and questioned if it had been reviewed by the committee or voted on by the House.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Papovichi Müller Support04:26:10.319 - 1:25:01 PM; Supported the amendment, noting that some state agencies had adopted DEI policies, making the amendment relevant to state funding.
HB2 2025-1467H: Clerk Vote04:27:11.279 - 1:26:02 PM; Conducted a roll call vote on amendment 1467H to HB2, with the amendment failing to pass by a vote of 12 to 13.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Information Only04:28:02.399 - 1:26:53 PM; Suggested that the bill be sent to a policy committee for a proper public discussion, acknowledging the need for a fair process.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative R Information Only04:29:11.279 - 1:28:02 PM; Questioned the timing of the amendment and whether it would need to wait for the next filing period for a bill.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative McGuire Information Only04:29:11.279 - 1:28:02 PM; Clarified that a committee could hold a public hearing on a non-germane amendment, suggesting that the amendment could be considered in another committee.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Information Only04:32:18.439 - 1:31:09 PM; Discussed the budget challenges faced by Division Three, focusing on the need to reduce the budget by $290 million and prioritizing direct care services. Mentioned potential revenue sources like the opioid abatement trust fund, liquor funds, Medicaid recoveries, and the sale of state assets like the Terrell House and Phil Brook Center.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unidentified Speaker Information Only04:43:37.440 - 1:42:28 PM; The speaker discussed several budget-related items. They highlighted that the general funds were expecting a $12.6 million surplus in the first year and $1 million in the second year. They also mentioned the Prescription Drug Affordability Board's recommendations on biologics, suggesting potential savings of $2.5 million by adopting similar strategies used by another state. Additionally, they noted the suspension of the WIC Farmers Market Program, which would free up $560,000 for the general treasury. The speaker also discussed an investment in DocuSign software for the Department of Corrections, expected to result in a net gain of $478,000 for the general fund. Lastly, they mentioned a controversial 3% reduction in Medicaid rates, expected to save $17.5 million in the first year and $35 million in the second year, and a delay in MCO payments to shift a payment into the next budget, saving $25 million in the second year.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unidentified Speaker Information Only04:50:32.480 - 1:49:23 PM; The speaker continued discussing budget items, starting with a potential 10% reduction in residential placements by the Child and Family Services, which could result in a budget reduction of over $3 million in the first year and $3.7 million in the second year. They also mentioned the elimination of a contract for master licensed alcohol and drug counselors to save $1.9 million, and a swap of education trust funds for general funds by Division 3, which is net neutral when considered with Division 2's actions. The speaker discussed reductions in funding for the Cenounu Center, expecting savings of $1.9 million in the first year and $2.9 million in the second year, and highlighted the transition to a new trauma-informed center near Hamstead Hospital. Lastly, they mentioned a proposal to allow the child workforce program to draw up to $7.5 million from TANF funds, which are federal.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unidentified Speaker Information Only04:51:20.200 - 1:50:11 PM; The speaker discussed further budget items, including the elimination of a contract for Project Walk to save nearly $0.5 million over the biennium, an expected 3% growth in Medicaid enhancement tax revenue, adjustments to drug rebate revenue projections, and an initiative to incentivize home-based dialysis, expecting savings of $50,000 in the second year. They also mentioned a House bill on circumcision expected to save $25,000 in the first year and $50,000 in the second year, and adjustments to county payments related to overcollections during the pandemic and long-term nursing care. Additionally, they discussed reductions in funding for maternal health, family planning, and various other programs, including the termination of the parental education program at the Department of Corrections and the tobacco cessation program.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unidentified Speaker Information Only05:00:25.040 - 1:59:16 PM; The speaker continued discussing budget items, including the suspension of a rural scholarship program, ensuring no broken promises to current enrollees but freezing new enrollments. They highlighted the need for increased funding for Glen Cliff due to staffing shortages, suggesting a shortfall of at least $2 million per year. They also mentioned cuts to the Choose Love program and adjustments to the governor's fund, with $10.7 million being redirected to the general treasury each year. Lastly, they discussed changes to the Manchester Safe Station program funding, reducing it by $64,000 after discussions with the mayor and fire chief.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unidentified Speaker Information Only05:09:33.840 - 2:08:24 PM; The speaker discussed the budget lines related to child and family services, specifically highlighting three lines that should sum up to $2 million. They explained the reductions in residential placements across different accounting units, which result in a 10% reduction overall. They also mentioned the discontinuation of the Friends of Anie peer-to-peer grief support program, which was cut to prioritize direct spending. The community mental health program support was discussed, noting a significant increase proposed by the governor's budget compared to historical spending, and the decision to cap it at the prior high of $31 million to save nearly $19 million per year. A footnote regarding funding for the Waypoint youth shelter in Manchester was clarified. The developmental disability wait list funding was reduced based on estimates, with a safety net allowing reallocation if needed. The New Hampshire Hospital was noted as underfunded, with a small amount of $5,000 per year proposed as a signal for the Senate to consider additional funding. The Turski mold amendment was mentioned, addressing maintenance needs to prevent mold issues. The speaker also discussed potential revenue gains from Medicaid recovery, suggesting investments in personnel to increase collections from estates.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unidentified Speaker Information Only05:15:39.920 - 2:14:30 PM; The speaker continued discussing budget details, focusing on the Prescription Drug Affordability Board (PDAB). They mentioned earlier votes to retain the bill and the need to discuss funding for the PDAB. The governor's budget proposed around $256,000 for the first year and $267,000 for the second year, but these were reduced in cooperation with the PDAB chair. The speaker questioned whether to fund the PDAB, noting its lack of performance over four years and recent promises of activity as funding was at risk. They referenced a study by the Edna committee suggesting the board should be eliminated. The speaker emphasized prioritizing direct care and suggested redirecting PDAB funding to address budget shortfalls at Glen Cliff, which might need to reduce its census due to insufficient funding. They also mentioned an amendment in the House Bill 2 packet related to this issue, suggesting a delay in decision-making until more details are available.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative McGuire Oppose05:18:56.080 - 2:17:47 PM; Representative McGuire expressed opposition to funding the PDAB, citing its lack of performance over four years and recent activity only when funding was threatened. He mentioned that the Edna committee had already recommended eliminating the board after their hearings and decision-making process. He argued that the board's cost did not justify its value, especially considering the small boards that were cut in Division 1 for being too costly relative to their performance.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Seawork Information Only05:20:12.760 - 2:19:03 PM; Representative Seawork clarified that the funding in question was not for the PDAB itself but for departmental support to the board. He noted that eliminating this line would not kill the board but would remove departmental support. He also discussed the need to prioritize direct care, referencing the Glen Cliff situation where funding cuts might force a reduction in census. He suggested that the funding intended for PDAB support might be better used to address the Glen Cliff budget shortfall. He mentioned an amendment in the House Bill 2 packet related to this issue, suggesting a delay in decision-making until more details are available.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Priest Information Only05:22:37.798 - 2:21:28 PM; Representative Priest sought clarification on the employment start date of the executive director for the PDAB board, confirming it was in October 2023, roughly a year and a half ago. He expressed conflict regarding the allocation of funds, suggesting a potential motion to reallocate funding from the PDAB line to the Glen Cliff personnel line, indicating a higher and better use of scarce resources.
HB2 2025-1467H: Vice Chair Information Only05:23:23.200 - 2:22:14 PM; The Vice Chair added that the decision to retain the repeal of the PDAB and fund it at a lower level than requested by the board was made after considerable discussion, consideration, and witness testimony.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Seaworth Support05:24:47.920 - 2:23:38 PM; Representative Seaworth proposed a motion to zero out the PDAB line (line 61) and transfer the savings to the Glen Cliff personnel line (line 37) on the change sheet, indicating a desire to discuss and determine the will of the board regarding the allocation of funds.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Mooney Oppose05:25:59.718 - 2:24:50 PM; Representative Mooney opposed the motion to zero out the PDAB line, emphasizing the extensive time spent on this issue and the compromise reached on the path forward. He urged a 'no' vote to continue working on Division 3's other tasks.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unidentified Speaker Information Only05:26:54.638 - 2:25:45 PM; The speaker clarified the motion's intent to zero out line 61 and benefit line 37, effectively increasing the annual budget for Glen Cliff from a quarter million to half a million dollars.
HB2 2025-1467H: Clerk Information Only05:27:41.760 - 2:26:32 PM; The clerk conducted a roll call vote on the motion to reallocate funds from PDAB to Glen Cliff, with the majority voting in favor of the reallocation.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Sweeney Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted yes on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Daniels Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted yes on the amendment, though with a lack of enthusiasm.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Seaworth Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted yes on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Doy Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted yes on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Nelen Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted yes on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Waln Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted no on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Leeman Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted yes on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Murray Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted no on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Eel Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted yes on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Tereski Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted no on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Hacken Phillips Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted no on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Stringham Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted no on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Priest Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted no on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Rung Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted no on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Muns Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted no on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Kelly Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted no on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Chair Wila Vote05:28:29.440 - 2:27:20 PM; Voted yes on the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:29:21.760 - 2:28:12 PM; Discussed a technical change requested by the department to correct accounting and bookkeeping errors, ensuring the budget year starts with the correct allocations. The correction involves CHIP premiums being understated by $3.3 million in the first year and $11 million in the second year, with no net change in surplus or deficit.
HB2 2025-1467H: Mr. Ripple Information Only05:30:12.958 - 2:29:03 PM; Confirmed that the increase in revenue matches the increase in expenditures, explaining the governor's budget had assumed premium revenue for the children's health insurance program but decreased general funds and related appropriations accordingly.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Terski Vote05:31:12.320 - 2:30:03 PM; Commented on the necessity of a correction to numbers in House Bill One, despite not agreeing with the policy. Voted yes and moved to accept the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:32:28.600 - 2:31:19 PM; Discussed DHHS back of the budget reduction, ensuring dates and dollar amounts are correct for a $23 million reduction each year to keep the finance budget under revenue projections.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:33:44.958 - 2:32:35 PM; Talked about suspending the WIC Farmer Market Nutrition Program due to budget constraints, though it was accepted as necessary by the public.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:33:44.958 - 2:32:35 PM; Discussed gifts accepted by the DHS Commissioner, raising the limit from $1,000 to $4 million to facilitate fundraising for a project at the Noo-Noo Center.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:35:02.000 - 2:33:53 PM; Discussed access to court-appointed counsel for children in dependency proceedings, believing it could save money by providing representation before out-of-state placements.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:35:02.000 - 2:33:53 PM; Mentioned the cap on county long-term expenditures being increased to 2% with an additional 1% premium for this budget, ensuring no increase in property taxes.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:36:30.240 - 2:35:21 PM; Discussed technical corrections and policy changes such as repealing the liquor transfer to the alcohol fund, redirecting funds to the general fund, and using opioid abatement trust funds to keep the Governor's Commission on Alcohol and Other Drug Misuse funded.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:37:45.360 - 2:36:36 PM; Talked about prioritizing the use of opioid abatement trust funds, allowing cancellation of contracts signed after May 1st to facilitate fund transfers.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:38:43.000 - 2:37:34 PM; Discussed the requirement for the Governor's Commission on Alcohol and Other Drugs to itemize spending, aiming for more legislative oversight in future budgets.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:39:47.040 - 2:38:38 PM; Mentioned incorporating HP73 into HB2, repealing the volunteer grant program due to funding issues, and directing contract compliance with the Patients' Bill of Rights.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:41:06.638 - 2:39:57 PM; Discussed accelerating implementation of home dialysis, incorporating circumcision coverage, and creating a Medicaid outpatient procedure incentive program to encourage cost-effective care.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:43:29.840 - 2:42:20 PM; Talked about the Medicaid adult dental benefit, requiring clinical and financial research to validate cost savings, and revising the statute on the Prescription Drug Affordability Board.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:44:42.480 - 2:43:33 PM; Discussed incorporating HP 117 into HB2, regarding substitution of biological products, known as biosimilars.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:45:27.600 - 2:44:18 PM; The speaker discusses the progress of a bill related to autonomous vehicles, mentioning that it was repositioned by the PAB (presumably a committee or board) to be claimed as their initiative. The bill moved forward without reference to the PAB and is considered a standalone. The speaker emphasizes the importance of maintaining the substitution bill to ensure continued funding of $2.5 million in the next budget. The speaker also discusses another amendment related to standing orders for medications and medical services, which was coordinated with Medicaid and the Department of Insurance to enable commercial insurance to use the standing order system, thereby saving time and money.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:46:40.000 - 2:45:31 PM; The speaker continues discussing amendments, including one that renames the Office of Health Equity to Office of Health Access due to political sensitivities around the term 'equity'. The amendment also continues a hiring freeze for the office and addresses concerns about DEI by using 'divisive concepts' language, ensuring that the office serves every person with dignity and respect and complies with civil rights laws. Another amendment extends the application of these policies to the entire department.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:50:21.200 - 2:49:12 PM; The speaker addresses amendments concerning the suspension of new enrollment in the state loan repayment program for the biennium and allowing general funds to support infrastructure at the CNU replacement center. They also mention renaming the CNU Youth Development Center and discuss flexibility in healthcare facility licensing. An amendment related to Medicaid to schools is discussed, ensuring it continues as long as parental consent is required.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only05:52:47.240 - 2:51:38 PM; The speaker discusses extending lapses for funds allocated to recovery-friendly workplace initiatives and recreational and socialization services, allowing the latter to operate as a charity to receive gaming revenue. They also mention seeking maximum Title 4E funds and utilizing TANF reserve funds to avoid a child care waitlist, noting a significant surplus in TANF. Further amendments involve reducing Medicaid provider rates by 3%, delaying MCO capitation payments, and selling state properties to free up resources for future budgets.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Magcguire Information Only05:59:11.680 - 2:58:02 PM; Representative Magcguire compliments the budget's savings in general funds and questions potential double-counting in revenue adjustments. They also question a line item's growth assumptions and express concerns about the budget's impact on future credit ratings due to delaying payments, using dedicated funds, and lowering estimates.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only06:08:02.798 - 3:06:53 PM; The speaker discusses the DD system waitlist, explaining that the budget factors in workforce and reimbursement issues affecting service utilization. They address concerns about the impact of budget cuts on families and children transitioning from school services to the waitlist. The speaker also defends the 3% Medicaid rate cut as necessary for budget management.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Walner Information Only06:14:40.080 - 3:13:31 PM; Representative Walner questions the lack of federal fund loss calculations in the budget documents, particularly related to the 3% Medicaid rate reduction and other line items. They highlight the potential double impact on the DD community and request more transparency in future budget documents.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only06:19:12.680 - 3:18:03 PM; The speaker responds to Representative Walner, explaining that detailed federal fund impact analyses are typically not available at this stage in the budget process. They mention that the department will need to calculate these impacts as the budget is implemented.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Terski Information Only06:20:14.958 - 3:19:05 PM; Representative Terski addresses concerns about the family planning line, clarifying that it does not fund abortions and its importance in underserved areas like Coos County. They also discuss the state loan repayment program's role in attracting healthcare workers to underserved areas and question the impact of freezing this program.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only06:22:41.840 - 3:21:32 PM; The speaker defends the family planning line decision, clarifying that no one believed it funded abortions. They discuss the state loan repayment program's role in addressing workforce shortages and suggest alternative methods to attract healthcare workers. The speaker also expresses a desire to support Coos County specifically but notes time constraints.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Murray Information Only06:26:09.120 - 3:25:00 PM; Representative Murray comments on the policy of not encumbering future budgets and questions the impact of delaying $25 million to the next budget. They also clarify a line item referring to federal money and seek details on the human impact of proposed premiums for the Granite Advantage program.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only06:28:04.958 - 3:26:55 PM; The speaker acknowledges the policy against encumbering future budgets but notes exceptions. They mention that the Granite Advantage premium proposal came from the governor's office, and they have not changed it or calculated its social costs.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Ron Information Only06:28:43.120 - 3:27:34 PM; Representative Ron questions the rationale behind amendment 1277H, but the transcript ends before a full response is given.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Stra Information Only06:32:45.200 - 3:31:36 PM; Representative Stra discussed the budget process, expressing gratitude for the committee's work and the presentations by Commissioner Weaver and CFO White. They highlighted the positive impacts of previous budget decisions like increased Medicaid rates, which led to reduced ED boardings and shorter waitlists at New Hampshire Hospital. They expressed concerns about the proposed budget cuts, particularly in Medicaid services, which could affect service provision and increase costs due to the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP). They also mentioned the challenges of replacing contract workers with full-time staff due to budget constraints and the potential negative impacts of the proposed 3% cut on service providers.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Walner Information Only06:35:37.920 - 3:34:28 PM; Representative Walner discussed the implications of budget cuts on Medicaid services, highlighting that a dollar cut from the state budget could result in at least two dollars in cuts to Medicaid services. They explained the complexities of the FMAP and how it affects the department's ability to predict the impact of budget cuts across different service categories.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Muns Information Only06:42:28.718 - 3:41:19 PM; Representative Muns apologized for their behavior during the session and acknowledged the difficulty of the budget decisions. They expressed understanding for the challenging situation the committee faces with the need to make significant budget cuts due to potential revenue shortfalls.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Daniels Oppose06:44:06.798 - 3:42:57 PM; Representative Daniels expressed strong opposition to the proposed budget amendments. They predicted negative long-term impacts, including people going without necessary care, delayed diagnoses, and issues with accessing treatment for substance use disorders and mental health. They also mentioned potential negative effects on the developmentally disabled community and predicted that the budget decisions would lead to increased costs and efforts to rectify the situation in the future.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Edwards Information Only06:46:30.718 - 3:45:21 PM; Representative Edwards acknowledged the difficult budget process and praised the work of the committee and the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). They expressed appreciation for the efforts of Commissioner Weaver and her team in providing clear assessments of the budget's impacts. While not happy with the budget outcome, they were satisfied with the collegiality and cooperation within the committee despite the challenging circumstances.
HB2 2025-1467H: Chair Wila Vote06:47:46.240 - 3:46:37 PM; Chair Wila conducted a roll call vote on the motion to approve the amendments to HB1 and HB2 recommended by Division 3. The vote resulted in 14 yes votes and 10 no votes, with some representatives absent or not voting.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Edwards Information Only06:59:05.920 - 3:57:56 PM; Representative Edwards moved to reconsider the vote on amendment 1467H to HB2, which pertains to the prohibition on diversity, equity, and inclusion. The motion was seconded and a roll call was initiated to reconsider the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Various Representatives Vote07:00:02.160 - 3:58:53 PM; A roll call vote was conducted on the motion to reconsider amendment 1467H to HB2. The vote resulted in 14 yes and 10 no votes, with the motion to reconsider being adopted.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Edwards Information Only07:00:55.040 - 3:59:46 PM; Following the successful reconsideration, Representative Edwards moved to adopt amendment 1467H to HB2. The motion was seconded by Representative Sweeney, and further discussion was opened.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Seerung Oppose07:02:21.798 - 4:01:12 PM; Representative Seerung expressed strong opposition to the reconsideration and adoption of amendment 1467H, citing hypocrisy and disrespect towards the principles of dignity and respect discussed earlier in the session.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Hacken Phillips Oppose07:03:44.840 - 4:02:35 PM; Representative Hacken Phillips criticized the procedural tactics used to pass the amendment through the budget, noting that the only change since the earlier vote was the number of people in the room. They warned of future consequences and costs associated with the amendment.
HB2 2025-1467H: Representative Chelki Oppose07:04:56.320 - 4:03:47 PM; Representative Chelki raised concerns about the amendment's impact on veterans, suggesting that it could prevent them from benefiting from certain programs designed to assist them, such as job selection and other support initiatives.
HB2 2025-1467H: Various Representatives Vote07:05:41.360 - 4:04:32 PM; A second roll call vote was conducted on the motion to adopt amendment 1467H to HB2. The vote resulted in 14 yes and 10 no votes, with the amendment being adopted.
HB2 2025-1467H: Chair Wiler Information Only07:06:28.638 - 4:05:19 PM; Chair Wiler authorized the Legislative Budget Assistant (LBA) to make any necessary technical and mechanical changes to reflect the committee's intent regarding the adopted amendment. The session was then recessed until April.
HB2 2025-1467H: Unnamed Speaker Information Only07:07:18.320 - 4:06:09 PM; The speaker announced that the committee will reconvene at 1 p.m. on Thursday to vote on HP1 and HB2. They mentioned that the Legislative Budget Assistant (LBA) needs time to finalize the documents and expressed appreciation for the LBA's efforts. The meeting was adjourned until Thursday at 1:00 p.m., with a note that the position numbers for the vote are not yet known and need to be looked up.

Weyler, Kenneth(Chairman)(R)[B+]2024	Griffin, Gerald(Clerk)(R)[A]2024	McGuire, Dan(V Chairman)(R)[A+]2024
Wallner, Mary Jane(D)[CT]2024	Daniels, Gary(R)	Leishman, Peter(D)[D-]2024
Ebel, Karen(D)[CT]2024	Muns, Chris(D)[CT]2024	Sweeney, Joe(R)[A-]2024
Seaworth, Brian(R)[A]2024	Preece, David(D)[CT]2024	Nalevanko, Rich(R)
Mooney, Maureen(R)[B+]2024	Edwards, Jess(R)[B+]2024	Murray, Kate(D)[CT]2024
Cambrils, Jose(R)[A]2024	Popovici-Muller, Daniel(R)[A+]2024	Rung, Rosemarie(D)[CT]2024
Bean, Harry(R)[A-]2024	Kelly, Eileen(D)	Hakken-Phillips, Mary(D)[CT]2024
Telerski, Laura(D)[CT]2024	Stringham, Jerry(D)[CT]2024	Erf, Keith(R)[A]2024
DeRoy, Susan(R)