Committee Summary for House Ways and Means (02/19/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
Unclear 00:04:44.400 - 9:04:35 AM	General Working Session	Unclear
HB669 00:19:39.320 - 9:19:30 AM	Executive Session	relative to requiring all revenue raised under the statewide education property tax to be deposited in the education trust fund, and setting an equalized statewide tax rate.	Smith, Marjorie(D)[CT]2024
HB669 00:22:26.880 - 9:22:17 AM	Executive Session	relative to requiring all revenue raised under the statewide education property tax to be deposited in the education trust fund, and setting an equalized statewide tax rate.	Smith, Marjorie(D)[CT]2024
HB290 00:25:05.919 - 9:24:56 AM	Executive Session	increasing the taxes on cigarettes and electronic cigarettes and establishing a committee to study taxes on tobacco and other nicotine products.	Stringham, Jerry(D)[CT]2024
HB402 00:38:46.520 - 9:38:37 AM	Executive Session	relative to liability as taxable income of education freedom account payments.	Luneau, David(D)[CT]2024
HB483 00:44:27.640 - 9:44:18 AM	Executive Session	relative to the definition of a scholarship organization for purposes of the education tax credit.	Luneau, David(D)[CT]2024
HB503 00:51:06.040 - 9:50:57 AM	Executive Session	amending how revenues from taxes are allocated to the education trust fund.	Schamberg, Thomas(D)[CT]2024
HB531 01:07:23.480 - 10:07:14 AM	Executive Session	setting annual limits on the amount of charitable gaming revenue which may be distributed to one charitable organization.	Ames, Dick(D)[CT]2024
HB588 01:09:52.759 - 10:09:43 AM	Executive Session	relative to the distribution of revenues generated from historic horse racing pari-mutuel pools.	Fellows, Sallie(D)[CT]2024
HB540 01:13:48.600 - 10:13:39 AM	Executive Session	relative to historic horse racing licenses for large facilities.	Ohm, Bill(R)[B]2018
Unclear 01:20:04.679 - 10:19:55 AM	General Working Session	Unclear

Unclear: Representative J Information Only00:04:44.400 - 9:04:35 AM; Representative J opened the Revenue estimate work session at 10:04 and discussed the LSR document containing the revenue estimates that the committee voted on the previous week. The representative verified the accuracy of the numbers on pages two and three and encouraged others to review them as well. They mentioned that the committee would vote to approve the estimates, after which it would be assigned a house resolution number.
Unclear: Cret Information Only00:05:32.560 - 9:05:23 AM; Cret provided an update on the process of assigning a house resolution number to the LSR. Once the LSR is signed off and sent to the clerk, it will receive a number and be included in the calendar for the next meeting on March 6. Cret noted that the resolution might be spoken to and tabled at that time.
Unclear: Representative Elme Information Only00:06:23.360 - 9:06:14 AM; Representative Elme asked for clarification on whether tabling the resolution automatically adds it to the end of the budget. It was explained that there is no law dictating this, but it is a tradition followed by the office, amending House Bill 1 under the finance chair's name to reflect the committee's revenue estimates.
Unclear: Representative YY Information Only00:07:12.160 - 9:07:03 AM; Representative YY discussed the possibility of pulling the resolution off the table if there are significant changes in revenue estimates. They mentioned that the house could propose new estimates if necessary.
Unclear: Representative YY Support00:08:12.159 - 9:08:03 AM; Representative YY moved to accept the house resolution, referencing the LSR number 25159, as ought to pass. The motion was seconded by Representative Elme.
Unclear: Representative Shamber Support00:08:54.000 - 9:08:45 AM; Representative Shamber expressed a belief that the business taxes estimates are too high and should be around $900 million. Despite this, they supported moving forward with the LSR.
Unclear: Clerk Information Only00:09:30.440 - 9:09:21 AM; The clerk conducted a roll call vote on LSR 25-11059, codifying the revenue estimates of the committee. The motion to pass was seconded by Representative Aly and Representative Olry, and the vote resulted in 19 in favor, 0 against, with one absent.
Unclear: Chairman Janigian Information Only00:11:08.760 - 9:10:59 AM; Chairman Janigian closed the session on Revenue estimates and mentioned the upcoming executive session around 10:15. They introduced Chris, who was to provide a handout with details from the governor's office.
Unclear: Chris Information Only00:12:50.320 - 9:12:41 AM; Chris explained a two-page document comparing the governor's revenue estimates to those of the House and Ways. The document detailed current law comparisons and new revenue proposals, such as video Lottery terminals in House Bill 2. Chris also discussed the proposed splits of revenue between the general fund and the education trust fund.
Unclear: Representative Elme Information Only00:15:55.199 - 9:15:46 AM; Representative Elme sought clarification on the current splits between the general fund and the education trust fund, particularly regarding video Lottery revenue and business taxes. Chris clarified that video Lottery revenue would be split 50/50, while business taxes are currently split 59/41.
Unclear: Representative Opal Information Only00:16:42.040 - 9:16:33 AM; Representative Opal asked about the current tobacco split, which Chris explained is complex due to the need to back out other than tobacco products. The proposed change would simplify the split to 60/40, reducing the education trust fund by about four and a half million each year.
Unclear: Representative Ors Information Only00:18:00.799 - 9:17:51 AM; Representative Ors requested clarification on the revenue split percentages for business taxes, tobacco, and redits. Chris reiterated the splits as previously mentioned, clarifying the complex calculation for tobacco.
Unclear: Representative Ulery Oppose00:19:39.320 - 9:19:30 AM; Representative Ulery moved to recommend HB 669 as inexpedient to legislate, stating that a separate committee is dealing with education funding and that the bill would increase taxes without appropriately directing funds to serve constituents. The motion was seconded by Representative Duet.
Unclear: Representative Elme Support00:20:26.720 - 9:20:17 AM; Representative Elme disagreed with the motion to recommend HB 669 as inexpedient to legislate, citing opinions from Dan Maguire and Doug Hall who believed in keeping parts of the concept alive. Elme suggested retaining the bill to allow for potential resurrection of its concepts.
HB669: Representative Ulery Oppose00:19:39.320 - 9:19:30 AM; Representative Ulery moved to recommend HB 669 as inexpedient to legislate, arguing that it would increase taxes without appropriately directing funds to serve constituents. The motion was seconded by Representative Duet.
HB669: Representative Elme Support00:20:26.720 - 9:20:17 AM; Representative Elme opposed the motion to recommend HB 669 as inexpedient to legislate, citing the opinions of Dan Maguire and Doug Hall who supported keeping parts of the concept alive. Elme suggested retaining the bill to allow for potential resurrection of its concepts.
HB669: Representative Alry Information Only00:22:26.880 - 9:22:17 AM; Representative Alry participated in the vote on the motion to find HB669 inexpedient to legislate (ITL).
HB669: Representative Duet Information Only00:22:26.880 - 9:22:17 AM; Representative Duet voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Clerk Information Only00:22:26.880 - 9:22:17 AM; The Clerk recorded votes on the ITL motion for HB669.
HB669: Representative Soti Information Only00:22:26.880 - 9:22:17 AM; Representative Soti voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Ores Information Only00:22:26.880 - 9:22:17 AM; Representative Ores voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Steven Smith Information Only00:22:26.880 - 9:22:17 AM; Representative Steven Smith voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Tierney Information Only00:22:26.880 - 9:22:17 AM; Representative Tierney voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Brier Information Only00:22:26.880 - 9:22:17 AM; Representative Brier voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Ford Information Only00:23:12.679 - 9:23:03 AM; Representative Ford voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Murphy Information Only00:23:12.679 - 9:23:03 AM; Representative Murphy voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Aly Information Only00:23:12.679 - 9:23:03 AM; Representative Aly voted against the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Southworth Information Only00:23:12.679 - 9:23:03 AM; Representative Southworth voted against the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Maloy Information Only00:23:12.679 - 9:23:03 AM; Representative Maloy voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Shamberg Information Only00:23:12.679 - 9:23:03 AM; Representative Shamberg voted against the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Bolton Information Only00:23:12.679 - 9:23:03 AM; Representative Bolton voted against the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Elberger Information Only00:23:12.679 - 9:23:03 AM; Representative Elberger voted against the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Jeffrey Smith Information Only00:23:12.679 - 9:23:03 AM; Representative Jeffrey Smith was absent during the vote on the ITL motion for HB669.
HB669: Representative Opel Information Only00:23:12.679 - 9:23:03 AM; Representative Opel voted against the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Representative Spar Information Only00:23:12.679 - 9:23:03 AM; Representative Spar voted against the ITL motion on HB669.
HB669: Chairman Janigian Information Only00:23:12.679 - 9:23:03 AM; Chairman Janigian voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB669 and confirmed the vote count as 12 yes and 7 no, passing the ITL motion. A minority report was requested by Representative Aly.
HB290: Representative Duet Support00:25:05.919 - 9:24:56 AM; Representative Duet moved for an ITL on HB290, supporting the motion based on the New Hampshire Advantage of keeping taxes low and the potential impact of legislation in the other body concerning electronic and vape products. He highlighted the state's substantial revenue from cigarette taxes and the need to keep those revenues coming in.
HB290: Representative Ores Support00:25:19.520 - 9:25:10 AM; Representative Ores supported the ITL motion on HB290, discussing the testimony heard for and against raising the tax. He noted that the state derives significant revenue from cigarette taxes and mentioned the potential for other legislation to address related issues.
HB290: Representative Shamberg Oppose00:26:05.360 - 9:25:56 AM; Representative Shamberg opposed the ITL motion on HB290, discussing amendments proposed by Representative Stringham that would address the revenue deficit. He mentioned that the cigarette tax rate has not increased since 2013 and suggested that an increase could help keep up with inflation and potentially generate more revenue for the general fund.
HB290: Representative Southworth Oppose00:26:59.520 - 9:26:50 AM; Representative Southworth opposed the ITL motion on HB290, discussing the proposed amendments and the need to address the revenue deficit. He emphasized that the state's cigarette tax has not kept up with inflation since 2013 and suggested that an increase could help maintain the revenue level.
HB290: Representative Spire Oppose00:28:36.120 - 9:28:27 AM; Representative Spire opposed the ITL motion on HB290, expressing concern over the cigarette tax not being adjusted for inflation since 2009. He argued that keeping the tax rate up with inflation is necessary to maintain the state's budget and mentioned the governor's plans to use the rainy day fund due to the deficit.
HB290: Representative Aly Oppose00:29:34.240 - 9:29:25 AM; Representative Aly opposed the ITL motion on HB290, discussing the impact of state taxes on local property taxes. He argued that not increasing state revenue leads to higher local property taxes, which does not provide a New Hampshire advantage.
HB290: Representative Duet Support00:30:20.880 - 9:30:11 AM; Representative Duet supported the ITL motion on HB290, arguing against increasing the cigarette tax due to the potential loss of revenue as the customer base declines. He emphasized his commitment to not supporting new taxes and highlighted the importance of local control over property taxes.
HB290: Representative Elme Oppose00:31:58.559 - 9:31:49 AM; Representative Elme opposed the ITL motion on HB290, suggesting consideration of Representative Stringham's amendment that would automatically increase the tax if Maine does so. He argued that inflation has reduced the effectiveness of the tax in deterring smoking and generating revenue.
HB290: Representative Spar Oppose00:33:29.559 - 9:33:20 AM; Representative Spar opposed the ITL motion on HB290, arguing for keeping the cigarette tax up with inflation. He responded to Representative Duet's point about declining smoking rates, suggesting that a higher tax might encourage more people to quit.
HB290: Representative Ulery Oppose00:34:15.040 - 9:34:06 AM; Representative Ulery opposed the ITL motion on HB290, expressing concern over the difficulty in predicting the impact of a tax increase on smoking rates and revenue. He supported keeping the tax at its 2009 level, adjusted for inflation.
HB290: Representative Opel Oppose00:35:00.320 - 9:34:51 AM; Representative Opel opposed the ITL motion on HB290, discussing the potential revenue increase and the health benefits of reduced smoking. He noted the fiscal note's estimate of an 87.5 million dollar increase in revenue and the potential reduction in healthcare costs.
HB290: Representative Duet Support00:36:33.079 - 9:36:24 AM; Representative Duet supported the ITL motion on HB290, arguing that increasing the tax by a dollar per pack would harm the market and reduce revenue. He highlighted the economic disadvantage of driving to New Hampshire for cheaper cigarettes if taxes were increased.
HB290: Clerk Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; The Clerk called the roll for the vote on the ITL motion for HB290.
HB290: Representative Alry Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Alry voted against the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Duet Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Duet voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Soti Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Soti voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Ores Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Ores voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Steven Smith Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Steven Smith voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Tierney Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Tierney voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Brier Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Brier voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Ford Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Ford voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Murphy Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Murphy voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Aly Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Aly voted against the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Southworth Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Southworth voted against the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Malloy Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Malloy voted against the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Shamberg Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Shamberg voted against the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Bolton Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Bolton voted against the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Elberger Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Elberger voted against the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Jeffrey Smith Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Jeffrey Smith was absent during the vote on the ITL motion for HB290.
HB290: Representative Opel Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Opel voted against the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Representative Spar Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Representative Spar voted against the ITL motion on HB290.
HB290: Chairman Janigian Information Only00:36:44.040 - 9:36:35 AM; Chairman Janigian voted in favor of the ITL motion on HB290 and confirmed the vote count as 11 yes and 8 no, passing the ITL motion. A minority report was requested, and further discussion was suggested.
HB402: Chairman Information Only00:38:46.520 - 9:38:37 AM; The Chairman moved to find HB402 inexpedient to legislate, arguing that only individual families can determine the taxability of Education Freedom Accounts (EFAs) based on their unique tax situations, not the state through broad legislation. He highlighted that the issue has not been problematic as EFAs are currently restricted to low-income families with simpler tax filings. He expressed concern over potential unintended consequences of the bill as written.
HB402: Representative Sod Information Only00:39:32.280 - 9:39:23 AM; Representative Sod seconded the motion to find HB402 inexpedient to legislate.
HB402: Representative Elme Information Only00:40:18.760 - 9:40:09 AM; Representative Elme suggested an amendment to HB402 that would inform EFA recipients of their immunity from New Hampshire taxes but possible subjection to federal taxation. He believed this amendment would address the misleading aspect of the current bill language and prevent state liability for misinformation.
HB402: Representative Southworth Information Only00:41:06.920 - 9:40:57 AM; Representative Southworth shared insights from the EFA handbook, pointing out a discrepancy between what homeschoolers can use their EFA funds for and what is taxable. He emphasized the need for further investigation into the matter and corrected a misconception about the use of EFA funds for theme parks.
HB402: Representative Elberger Information Only00:42:17.760 - 9:42:08 AM; Representative Elberger challenged the notion that all EFA recipients are low-income, citing the current cap of $135,000 for a family of four as not indicative of low income.
HB483: Representative Tierney Oppose00:44:27.640 - 9:44:18 AM; Representative Tierney moved to find HB483 inexpedient to legislate, arguing that mandating the scholarship organization handling EFA accounts to be incorporated in New Hampshire could violate the US Constitution's Commerce Clause, given its current incorporation in New York.
HB483: Representative Sod Information Only00:45:14.280 - 9:45:05 AM; Representative Sod seconded the motion to find HB483 inexpedient to legislate.
HB483: Representative Aly Information Only00:46:01.400 - 9:45:52 AM; Representative Aly provided documentation showing that the New York-based organization administers the EFA program in New Hampshire. He argued that the program's administration details did not align with the notion of state incorporation and suggested further investigation into the legal situation instead of killing the bill.
HB483: Representative Opel Information Only00:48:22.640 - 9:48:13 AM; Representative Opel believed that HB483 was consistent with the governor's initiative to target out-of-state contractors and suggested retaining the bill for further examination.
HB483: Representative Buy Information Only00:50:03.720 - 9:49:54 AM; Representative Buy discussed the possibility of retaining HB483 for further consideration rather than passing it with an amendment, clarifying the committee's options in handling the bill.
HB503: Representative ORS Oppose00:51:06.040 - 9:50:57 AM; Representative ORS moved to recommend that HB503 be found Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL). They argued that the bill increases various taxes such as business profits tax, business enterprise tax, meals and rooms tax, and reinstates the interest and dividends tax. They highlighted the contradiction with previous political promises of no new taxes and expressed concern over the reduction of funds to the general fund despite assurances of sufficient funding. They believe the state will manage well without these tax increases.
HB503: Representative Schenberg Support00:52:54.280 - 9:52:45 AM; Representative Schenberg supported HB503, stating that it would redirect over $700 million to state coffers by 2027 due to tax cuts since 2015. The bill aims to raise tax rates back to their original levels, with specific increases mentioned for the Business Profits Tax (BPT), Business Enterprise Tax (BET), meals and rooms tax, and a newly named Market Distribution Revenue tax. They argued that these increases would go into the Education Trust Fund, helping address funding issues and property tax relief, and would not reduce the general fund.
HB503: Representative from Wilmot Oppose00:55:13.319 - 9:55:04 AM; The representative from Wilmot expressed concern about the impact of the proposed tax increases on their constituents, particularly noting that many are struggling. They questioned how constituents would react to these tax hikes and pointed out that while some taxes would not affect everyday homeowners, small businesses with LLCs would be impacted. They expressed doubt that their constituents would support tax increases on businesses, even if it meant potential relief in property taxes.
HB503: Representative ORS Oppose00:56:46.240 - 9:56:37 AM; Representative ORS continued their opposition to HB503, arguing that historical data shows that cutting taxes has led to increased revenues, contrary to what the bill suggests. They referenced previous presentations showing increased revenue in the Education Trust Fund and dismissed the idea that new taxes would benefit the general fund, suggesting that the proposed taxes would not generate the expected revenue.
HB503: Representative Shamur Oppose00:57:56.799 - 9:57:47 AM; Representative Shamur challenged the notion that cutting taxes leads to increased revenues, citing federal budget deficits as evidence. They argued for a proper tax system that generates necessary revenue without increasing deficits and expressed skepticism about directing all new tax revenue to the Education Trust Fund, highlighting the need for general fund support for state services.
HB503: Representative El Oppose01:01:11.480 - 10:01:02 AM; Representative El argued against the narrative that tax cuts lead to revenue increases, attributing past revenue increases to stimulus money rather than tax policy changes. They expressed concern about the long-term effects of tax reforms and questioned the effectiveness of the proposed tax increases in HB503.
HB503: Representative Elberger Oppose01:03:14.799 - 10:03:05 AM; Representative Elberger noted that despite state-level property tax decreases, local property taxes have increased significantly, impacting essential services like education and public safety. They shared an anecdote from a diner in Hudson, where a waitress expressed a preference for lower property taxes over a reduced meals tax. They criticized the reliance on traditional methods without considering new solutions.
HB503: Chair Information Only01:05:16.359 - 10:05:07 AM; The chair initiated the process to call the roll for voting on HB503.
HB503: Clerk Information Only01:05:19.400 - 10:05:10 AM; The clerk conducted the roll call vote on the motion to find HB503 inexpedient to legislate (ITL). The vote resulted in 16 votes in favor and 3 against the ITL motion.
HB503: Representative Shamberg Information Only01:06:05.079 - 10:05:56 AM; Representative Shamberg announced the intention to file a Minority Report on HB503 following the vote.
HB531: Representative Ducet Information Only01:07:23.480 - 10:07:14 AM; Representative Ducet moved to find HB531 inexpedient to legislate (ITL) and the motion was seconded by Representative Aly.
HB531: Representative Aly Support01:07:38.440 - 10:07:29 AM; Representative Aly supported the ITL motion on HB531, suggesting that the issue should be addressed by the newly formed gaming commission.
HB531: Chair Information Only01:08:11.119 - 10:08:02 AM; The chair proceeded with the roll call vote on HB531, which resulted in 19 votes in favor and none against the ITL motion.
HB588: Representative Duet Information Only01:09:52.759 - 10:09:43 AM; Representative Duet moved to recommend HB588 as inexpedient to legislate (ITL). They suggested that the issue could be better addressed by the Gaming Commission along with other related matters.
HB588: Clerk Information Only01:10:37.640 - 10:10:28 AM; The clerk conducted a roll call vote on the motion to ITL HB588, which passed unanimously with a vote of 19 to 0. The bill was considered for consent due to its fiscal note but was ultimately decided to be put on consent as it was recommended as ITL.
HB540: Representative Duet Oppose01:13:48.600 - 10:13:39 AM; Representative Duet moved to recommend HB540 as ITL. They argued that the bill singles out a specific entity for an exorbitant tax and suggested that the issue should be addressed by the upcoming commission rather than through legislation.
HB540: Representative Elberger Information Only01:15:02.040 - 10:14:53 AM; Representative Elberger agreed with Representative Duet and hoped that the commission would consider graduated levels of machines to address the issue.
HB540: Representative Aly Information Only01:15:47.920 - 10:15:38 AM; Representative Aly also supported the ITL recommendation, expressing concern about the amount of money being requested from large casinos and comparing it to casino operations in other states.
HB540: Representative Opal Information Only01:16:33.880 - 10:16:24 AM; Representative Opal questioned whether the legislature could provide guidance to the commission regarding the issues they would like addressed, to which it was suggested that public testimony could be provided to the commission.
HB540: Clerk Information Only01:17:36.040 - 10:17:27 AM; The clerk conducted a roll call vote on the motion to ITL HB540, which passed with a vote of 17 to 1 with 2 absent. The bill was placed on consent.
Unclear: Chair Information Only01:20:04.679 - 10:19:55 AM; The Chair announced the cancellation of the scheduled meeting for Friday and no meetings the following week due to the completion of early bills and the proximity to the deadline for remaining bills. The next meetings were tentatively scheduled for the first Monday and Tuesday of March, with a potential focus on Tuesdays if only one day is needed.
Unclear: Representative Opal Information Only01:21:37.520 - 10:21:28 AM; Representative Opal inquired about the planning for future meetings, to which the Chair responded that meetings would likely be held on Mondays and Tuesdays through March 20th, with a preference for Tuesdays if only one day is needed.

Janigian, John(Chairman)(R)[B+]2024	Ohm, Bill(Clerk)(R)[B]2018	Ulery, Jordan(V Chairman)(R)[A-]2024
Almy, Susan(D)[CT]2024	Oppel, Thomas(D)	Smith, Steven(R)[B+]2024
Malloy, Dennis(D)[CT]2024	Schamberg, Thomas(D)[CT]2024	Doucette, Fred(R)[A-]2024
Southworth, Thomas(D)[CT]2024	Tierney, James(R)[B-]2024	Aures, Cyril(R)[A]2024
Bolton, Bill(D)[CT]2024	Elberger, Susan(D)[D-]2024	Smith, Geoffrey(D)[D-]2024
Soti, Julius(R)[A+]2024	Spahr, Terry(D)	Bryer, Scott(R)
Murphy, Mary(R)	Ford, Mary(R)