Committee Summary for House Ways and Means (04/22/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
SB63 00:15:25.440 - 9:14:31 AM	General Working Session	relative to funding for the division of travel and tourism.	Lang, Timothy(R)[C+]2024
SB60 00:49:30.079 - 9:48:36 AM	Executive Session	relative to advanced deposit account wagering.	Lang, Timothy(R)[C+]2024
SB63 00:52:46.839 - 9:51:52 AM	Executive Session	relative to funding for the division of travel and tourism.	Lang, Timothy(R)[C+]2024
SB73 2025-1470H 00:54:53.760 - 9:53:59 AM	Executive Session	relative to the operation of bingo games.	Lang, Timothy(R)[C+]2024
SB147 00:59:44.000 - 9:58:50 AM	Executive Session	relative to licenses to sell pari-mutuel pools on simulcast horse races.	Lang, Timothy(R)[C+]2024
SB160 01:01:06.640 - 10:00:12 AM	Executive Session	relative to the administration of raffles.	Lang, Timothy(R)[C+]2024
SB83 03:17:36.479 - 12:16:42 PM	General Working Session	establishing an elderly, disabled, blind, and deaf property tax exemption reimbursement fund, authorizing video lottery terminals, renaming the lottery commission, and creating a voluntary statewide self-exclusion database.	Lang, Timothy(R)[C+]2024

SB63: Unidentified Speaker Information Only00:15:25.440 - 9:14:31 AM; The speaker opened the work session on SB63, expressing a general understanding of the bill and inviting questions or concerns from others. There was a mention of needing confirmation about the bill's impact on municipal funds under 78A26.
SB63: Unidentified Speaker Information Only00:16:45.040 - 9:15:51 AM; The speaker mentioned that two individuals, one of whom had sent an email, and Chris Shay, could provide further information on the bill. Jennifer Ramsey from the Department of Revenue Administration was called to provide insight.
SB63: Jennifer Ramsey, Department of Revenue Administration Information Only00:17:39.000 - 9:16:45 AM; Jennifer Ramsey clarified that the amendment in SB23 does not affect the distribution from meals and rooms. She explained that the calculation for the travel and tourism appropriation now considers the municipal fund transfer differently, impacting the budget calculation. She provided detailed explanations of how the appropriation is calculated and its historical changes.
SB63: Representative Opel Information Only00:20:06.880 - 9:19:12 AM; Representative Opel sought to clarify the process described by Jennifer Ramsey, confirming the calculation of the travel and tourism appropriation from rooms and meals collections, and the consideration of various deductions like the education trust fund and administrative costs.
SB63: Jennifer Ramsey, Department of Revenue Administration Information Only00:21:21.960 - 9:20:27 AM; Jennifer Ramsey further clarified the process, explaining the sequence of deductions and how the net income is used for distributions to school building aid and the MUN funds, not directly to travel and tourism which is funded from the general fund.
SB63: Representative Opel Information Only00:22:26.799 - 9:21:32 AM; Representative Opel suggested a future review of the RSAs related to rooms, meals, and rentals due to their complexity and suggested a statutory revision committee might be beneficial.
SB63: Representative Elman Information Only00:23:56.799 - 9:23:02 AM; Representative Elman agreed with the suggestion to review and clean up the statutes, noting their confusing nature and volunteered to help with the task.
SB63: Chris Shay, OBA Information Only00:24:47.679 - 9:23:53 AM; Chris Shay from the OBA (Office of Business Advocacy) spoke briefly to support Jennifer's earlier presentation, indicating that she covered the topic well. He confirmed his availability to work with administrative services to provide a list of areas and bureaucratic approaches for the newly formed subcommittee regarding meals and rooms tax.
SB63: Representative Shamberg Information Only00:25:59.960 - 9:25:05 AM; Representative Shamberg expressed confusion about the allocation of funds to municipalities from the meals and rooms tax. He inquired whether the allocation was 30% or as dictated by the trailer budget HB2. It was clarified that the statutory allocation is 30% of the M&R revenue after administrative costs and transfers to the education trust fund, but the House suspended this provision in HB2, opting for a flat appropriation of $137 million for fiscal years 26 and 27, which is slightly less than the projected 30%.
SB60: Representative Murphy Vote00:49:30.079 - 9:48:36 AM; Representative Murphy moved to pass Senate Bill 60, which allows advanced deposit wagering on paramutual betting on horse racing, currently unregulated in New Hampshire. The bill establishes a revenue-sharing arrangement where licensed advanced deposit wagering will pay the state 1.25% of the handle on wagers from New Hampshire residents, expected to generate about a quarter of a million in additional lottery revenues in the first year. The motion passed unanimously with a vote of 19-0.
SB63: Representative Cole Vote00:52:46.839 - 9:51:52 AM; Representative Cole moved to pass Senate Bill 63, which restores the calculation to correctly fund the budget for travel and tourism. Representative ORS noted that the report should clarify that this money comes from an appropriation in the budget, as it was killed in the budget. The motion passed unanimously with a vote of 19-0.
SB73 2025-1470H: Representative Bolton Vote00:54:53.760 - 9:53:59 AM; Representative Bolton recommended passing Senate Bill 73, which revises the definition and operational rules of carryover coverall bingo games and increases the amount of prizes that may be awarded on a single game date. An amendment 2025-1470H was proposed to increase the total amount of prizes to $5,000. The amendment and the bill as amended passed unanimously with a vote of 19-0.
SB147: Representative Brier Vote00:59:44.000 - 9:58:50 AM; Representative Brier moved to recommend Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL) on Senate Bill 147, citing testimony that live racing facilities are in steady decline. The motion passed unanimously with a vote of 19-0.
SB160: Representative Cole Vote01:01:06.640 - 10:00:12 AM; Representative Cole moved to pass Senate Bill 160, which updates the maximum price at which raffle tickets may be sold from $1 (set in 1985) to $10 per ticket and increases the maximum allowable prize from $500 to $1,200. The motion passed unanimously with a vote of 19-0.
SB83: Ranking Member Information Only03:17:36.479 - 12:16:42 PM; The Ranking Member raised a question about how high stakes apply to video lottery terminals (VLTs), referencing a section in the bill that states there shall be no limit on betting on a VLT. They sought clarification from the Lottery Commissioner's office, with Charlie McIntyre, the law director, confirming that Section 287J5 of the bill indeed removes any bet limit imposed on VTs.
SB83: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:21:23.920 - 12:20:29 PM; The speaker discusses the specifics of racing table games and BLT wages, particularly focusing on the concept of a maximum wager and how it applies to different games. They mention that a maximum wager does not apply to any game of chance and question the practicality of a slot machine accepting a million dollars in bets from one person in a day, highlighting the physical and logistical challenges involved.
SB83: Representative Ulery Information Only03:22:09.600 - 12:21:15 PM; Representative Ulery suggests that the language concerning maximum bets versus cumulative bets may need clarification. They explain that if someone brought a large sum of money into a casino, the term 'maximum bet' could be misunderstood as it relates to the total money one has, not the limit per bet. They discuss how cumulative bets might be higher in scenarios like blackjack, where multiple hands could be played.
SB83: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:23:32.160 - 12:22:38 PM; The speaker continues the discussion on bets, explaining that each individual event in a game is considered a single bet. They use the example of blackjack to illustrate how cumulative bets could exceed the maximum bet due to multiple hands being played. They also mention the payout ratio and how it affects the actual amount wagered and lost.
SB83: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:24:42.640 - 12:23:48 PM; The speaker clarifies that the term 'maximum wager' needs definition, suggesting it might be jargon and should be clearly defined in the bill. They reference the language in SB83 regarding video lottery terminals (VTs) and a $50 wager limit, indicating a need for clarity in the bill's language.
SB83: Representative Elberger Information Only03:25:47.040 - 12:24:53 PM; Representative Elberger expresses confusion about why multiple topics (tax exemption, video lottery terminals, renaming, and a self-exclusion database) are combined in one bill, SB83. They suggest that these should be separate bills and are hesitant to vote on a bill that encompasses so many different issues.
SB83: Representative Opel Information Only03:27:14.880 - 12:26:20 PM; Representative Opel supports Representative Elberger's concerns about the multiple components of SB83. They question the bill's impact on the allocation of lottery and gaming revenue, noting that traditionally, this money went to the education trust fund, but the bill proposes sending it to the general fund instead.
SB83: Director McIntyre Information Only03:28:28.680 - 12:27:34 PM; Director McIntyre explains the historical allocation of lottery revenues, noting that before 2015, all revenues went to the education trust fund. After absorbing charitable gambling, the revenue streams were split differently. They clarify that the new revenue streams were not diversions but rather new functions under their regulatory purview.
SB83: Representative Lori Information Only03:29:40.560 - 12:28:46 PM; Representative Lori seeks clarification on the distinction between lottery and gaming, to which Director McIntyre confirms there is a distinction, particularly as charities have received revenue from lottery-type products for years.
SB83: Representative Opel Information Only03:30:33.760 - 12:29:39 PM; Representative Opel questions whether the public understands the distinction between lottery and gaming, suggesting it might be seen as a distinction without a difference to the general public.
SB83: Representative Elman Information Only03:31:20.200 - 12:30:26 PM; Representative Elman expresses a view that any residual money from gambling should go to the education trust fund, similar to how municipalities receive money from rooms and meals taxes. They suggest that this might be a legal question for the courts.
SB83: Representative Uler Information Only03:32:30.720 - 12:31:36 PM; Representative Uler asks about the commonality of bills from the Senate containing multiple issues, to which Director McIntyre responds that it is not uncommon. They also mention that the renaming change in the bill was suggested by their department as it was relevant.
SB83: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:33:37.040 - 12:32:43 PM; The speaker discusses high betting limits in other jurisdictions, specifically mentioning facilities in New England that cater to high rollers with significant perks. They explain the risks involved with high rollers, known as 'whales,' who can financially impact a casino.
SB83: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:34:38.960 - 12:33:44 PM; The speaker addresses betting limits in New Hampshire, explaining that the $50 wager limit varies by day and is influenced by the cost of running table games. They discuss how minimum bets are set to ensure financial viability and how they compare to other local casinos.
SB83: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:35:40.239 - 12:34:46 PM; The speaker elaborates on the implications of having no betting limits in New Hampshire, explaining that operators would still set their own limits based on risk management. They mention that larger operators might offer higher limits on VIP nights, which smaller operators cannot.
SB83: Representative Wars Information Only03:36:39.120 - 12:35:45 PM; Representative Wars asks for clarification on the concept of 'minimum play,' to which the speaker explains it as the minimum bet set by the operator to attract players without discouraging them with too high a bet.
SB83: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:37:41.120 - 12:36:47 PM; The speaker suggests comparing SB83 side by side with HB2 to understand the differences better. They propose going through the bills subject by subject to gain more knowledge and possibly find a third option.
SB83: Director McIntyre Information Only03:38:51.760 - 12:37:57 PM; Director McIntyre explains the concept of a wide area progressive link, which allows betting across multiple locations to increase the pool and offer larger prizes. They discuss the logistical challenges but affirm it's possible with technology and coordination among operators.
SB83: Representative Almy Information Only03:40:00.239 - 12:39:06 PM; Representative Almy recalls a previous bill that proposed a similar wide area progressive link, which would allow people in different cities like Berlin and Manchester to compete. They discuss the challenges of managing such a system across multiple operators.
SB83: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:41:04.319 - 12:40:10 PM; The speaker addresses the feasibility of implementing a wide area progressive link, mentioning the need for high-speed internet and coordination among operators. They also discuss the potential for increased tax revenue due to increased play.
SB83: Unknown Speaker Information Only03:42:13.120 - 12:41:19 PM; The speaker clarifies that the role of the regulatory agency in managing a wide area progressive link would be supervisory and regulatory, ensuring proper accounting and compatibility across different systems.
SB83: Representative Shamber Information Only03:43:52.560 - 12:42:58 PM; Representative Shamber asks if the progressive jackpot would increase tax revenue, to which the response is that it would due to increased play.
SB83: Representative Elmy Information Only03:45:19.520 - 12:44:25 PM; Representative Elmy discussed the revenue sharing with DraftKings, mentioning a 15% offset for free bets with a current rate of 12.5%. They emphasized the need for rules to normalize the impact of free bets on charity revenue, suggesting monthly accounting to prevent charities from being disadvantaged by promotional offers. They confirmed comfort with the 12.5% rate.
SB83: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:46:20.319 - 12:45:26 PM; The speaker shared a personal anecdote about playing slot machines in Las Vegas and discussed the common use of free play to attract high rollers and for player club sign-ups. They mentioned the shift from coins to other forms due to the weight issues and historical use in gambling.
SB83: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:47:09.199 - 12:46:15 PM; The speaker discussed the enforcement commission outlined in the bill, mentioning its relevance when gambling was more mobile. They noted the active police presence in larger facilities like those in Nashua, funded by the facility, not the city. They explained the optional role of local police in enforcement and the historical context of the language.
SB83: Representative Shammer Information Only03:49:22.800 - 12:48:28 PM; Representative Shammer inquired about the timing and reporting of free play, learning that it is reported monthly with the ability to track it daily. They discussed the impact of free play on state revenue, noting it's an advertising expense for facilities.
SB83: Representative Uler Information Only03:51:45.600 - 12:50:51 PM; Representative Uler asked about the difference between 'shall' and 'must' in the bill, confirming they are essentially the same. They also discussed the impact of free play on overall revenue, understanding it as a marketing expense.
SB83: Representative Opel Information Only03:53:47.199 - 12:52:53 PM; Representative Opel raised a concern about a clause in HB2 that was not in SB83, questioning its effect on eligibility for video terminals. They learned it was likely duplicative and would not affect the licensing process.
SB83: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:54:54.880 - 12:54:00 PM; The speaker discussed the clause preventing the transfer or sale of a license, explaining its importance in preventing malfeasance. They also addressed concerns about partnerships, noting that investments over 10% require mandatory review, with permissive review for smaller investments.
SB83: Representative Almy Information Only03:58:21.040 - 12:57:27 PM; Representative Almy sought clarification on eligibility for licensure for parimutuel pools or historic horse racing, receiving an example of a facility in Salem that remains eligible despite ongoing litigation.
SB83: Unnamed Speaker Information Only03:59:44.800 - 12:58:50 PM; The speaker confirmed that nearly all current operators are majority owned by out-of-state interests, with one exception possibly being locally owned in Hampton Beach. They also noted the professionalization brought by national operators.
SB83: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:02:02.319 - 1:01:08 PM; The speaker discussed the possibility of new operators setting up in restaurants, stating that due to the moratorium, only games of chance could be offered, which are costly to run. They also addressed a clause potentially circumventing the moratorium, promising a legal review.
SB83: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:05:07.520 - 1:04:13 PM; The speaker explained the rule limiting floor space for video lottery terminals (VLTs) to 70% to protect charities. They discussed the revenue split between machines and table games, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a balance to support charities and enhance facility aesthetics.
SB83: Representative Opel Information Only04:07:24.720 - 1:06:30 PM; Representative Opel discussed the potential impact of allowing VLTs in bars and restaurants, noting the significant profitability and negative impact on charity revenues. They also mentioned the diminishing returns on the number of machines.
SB83: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:10:47.600 - 1:09:53 PM; The speaker clarified the differences in language between HB2 and SB83 regarding VLTs and historic horse racing, noting it's not duplicative but allows for a smooth transition between the two.
SB83: Unnamed Speaker Information Only04:13:19.399 - 1:12:25 PM; The speaker discussed the bet limits, confirming the $50 limit came from last session's table game rules. They also explained the impact of progressive links on payout rates, noting higher liquidity but lower required payouts.
SB83: Representative Opel Information Only04:17:46.880 - 1:16:52 PM; Representative Opel discussed the rulemaking authority granted in SB83, suggesting it might make some clauses in HB2 unnecessary. They confirmed that rulemaking cannot lower payout rates established by law.
SB83: Representative Southworth Information Only04:19:54.479 - 1:19:00 PM; Representative Southworth argued for a higher tax rate on gaming, suggesting 35% to maximize state revenue, believing it would not affect the quality of the casinos.
SB83: Representative Boris Information Only04:20:47.880 - 1:19:53 PM; Representative Boris questioned the optimal tax rate, noting previous support for 45%. They discussed the pushback on setting rates too high, which might affect casino development, and confirmed the state's interest in maximizing revenue.
SB83: Representative Mart Information Only04:23:55.279 - 1:23:01 PM; Representative Mart supported a 45% tax rate to maximize state profits, acknowledging the debate over accommodating operator preferences.
SB83: Representative Almy Information Only04:23:55.279 - 1:23:01 PM; Representative Almy emphasized the need for higher state revenue from gaming, noting much of the profit goes out of state, and expressed frustration over lowering the rate to 30%.
SB83: Representative Opel Information Only04:24:47.720 - 1:23:53 PM; Representative Opel discussed the potential impact of video lottery terminal rates on gaming operators' decisions to stay in the state. He highlighted that operators would not leave due to higher rates for video lottery terminals compared to historical horse racing machines (HHR). He also expressed skepticism about the operators' profitability claims, suggesting that they might be keeping some profits for themselves.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:25:40.080 - 1:24:46 PM; The speaker expressed concern about the current system of charity gaming where operators choose the charities that benefit. They suggested that this decision should be made by the state or a commission to ensure fair distribution. The speaker also pointed out the issue of many charities not participating or benefiting from the system.
SB83: Director Information Only04:26:59.760 - 1:26:05 PM; The Director explained the historical context of charity gaming, noting that operators originally chose charities due to low revenue and high paperwork. With revenue now significant and paperwork reduced, the system remains based on historical practices. The Director mentioned the Gambling Study Commission, tasked with reviewing this issue, and expressed reluctance to be involved in choosing charities.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:27:56.399 - 1:27:02 PM; The speaker shared their experience on the Charitable Gaming Commission, indicating that the issue of charity selection was discussed but not easily solvable. They expressed hope that the next round of the commission could address this and suggested that if a solution could be found, it might be added to SB83.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:29:07.279 - 1:28:13 PM; The speaker expressed concern about missing an opportunity to reform the charity gaming system, fearing that without change, the system would continue unchanged due to inertia. They suggested the need for a solution and mentioned that future amendments to laws could address the issue.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:30:09.680 - 1:29:15 PM; The speaker highlighted the growing revenue from charity gaming and the uneven distribution among charities. They expressed concern about the allocation of large sums to some charities, such as a Little League receiving over $100,000, and the need for a solution to ensure broader benefit.
SB83: Representative Sworth Information Only04:31:16.720 - 1:30:22 PM; Representative Sworth requested a detailed chart showing the revenue impact of different tax rates on video lottery terminals. They emphasized the need to understand the real money involved and anticipated increased demand for charitable funds due to potential federal and state cuts.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:32:22.920 - 1:31:28 PM; The speaker questioned the vetting process for charities participating in gaming, asking about the sufficiency of IRS Form 990 and the potential overhead of vetting a larger number of charities. The Director responded that vetting is based on nonprofit status, not the use of funds, and suggested that creating a grant program might be more appropriate.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:34:37.840 - 1:33:43 PM; The speaker highlighted the complexity of distributing funds to charities, noting that only a small fraction of registered charities currently receive funds. They suggested that a separate bill might be needed to address this issue, as it is distinct from the immediate topic of SB83.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:35:39.919 - 1:34:45 PM; The speaker discussed the discrepancy between IRS and New Hampshire definitions of nonprofit organizations and the need to review this area. They also questioned the origin of the proposed 30% rate for video lottery terminals, suggesting it came from the operators themselves.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:36:31.879 - 1:35:37 PM; The speaker discussed the operators' initial investment in gaming facilities, suggesting it was based on research and not speculation. They questioned how a higher tax rate might have affected the operators' willingness to invest in certain locations.
SB83: Director Information Only04:37:45.039 - 1:36:51 PM; The Director discussed the profitability of historical horse racing and suggested that if they could change the initial tax rate, they would have set it higher. They also noted the operators' interest in video lottery terminals and the potential for higher state revenue.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:40:04.280 - 1:39:10 PM; The speaker questioned the lack of transparency from operators about their expenses and profits. They discussed the origin of the 30% rate and the potential impact of higher rates on the operators' decision to switch to video lottery terminals.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:41:04.000 - 1:40:10 PM; The speaker discussed the operators' preference for video lottery terminals over historical horse racing due to higher profitability. They noted the potential for increased state revenue through business profits tax if operators made more money.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:42:30.240 - 1:41:36 PM; The speaker discussed the potential impact of tax rates on operators' decisions to switch to video lottery terminals. They highlighted the importance of considering the business profits tax and the need for a balanced approach to encourage investment while ensuring state revenue.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:43:43.760 - 1:42:49 PM; The speaker discussed the potential for operators to make more money with video lottery terminals and the impact on state revenue. They suggested that a phased increase in tax rates could be considered to encourage the switch without deterring investment.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:44:55.920 - 1:44:01 PM; The speaker discussed the potential for operators to make more money with video lottery terminals due to lower costs compared to historical horse racing. They noted the potential impact on state revenue through business profits tax.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:45:52.798 - 1:44:58 PM; The speaker discussed the impact of tax rates on operators' decisions to invest in New Hampshire. They suggested that sudden changes in tax rates could negatively affect the state's business climate.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:46:38.240 - 1:45:44 PM; The speaker discussed the potential for phased increases in tax rates to encourage operators to switch to video lottery terminals. They highlighted the need to balance state revenue with business investment.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:47:52.160 - 1:46:58 PM; The speaker discussed the need for hypothetical scenarios to understand the financial implications of different tax rates and the potential for state revenue. They suggested that the Department of Revenue Administration could provide such analysis.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:53:46.680 - 1:52:52 PM; The speaker discussed the potential for a single video lottery terminal license to be auctioned to the highest bidder. They highlighted the complexities involved in determining the value of such a license.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:54:31.920 - 1:53:37 PM; The speaker suggested that the market should determine the value of a video lottery terminal license, using the example of sports betting where DraftKings offered high rates and local benefits. They also mentioned previous large offers for casino rights in New Hampshire.
SB83: Representative Information Only04:56:30.160 - 1:55:36 PM; The speaker questioned the potential negative impact of issuing one video lottery terminal license and whether existing operators would feel slighted. They also asked if current historical horse racing operators would be eligible to bid on the license.
SB83: Representative Spar Information Only04:57:48.638 - 1:56:54 PM; Representative Spar discusses the phasing in of changes related to HHR and expresses concern about the operational and financial implications of having two different gaming platforms. He mentions the strain on staff due to the need to test multiple platforms and machines, and the difficulty in providing specific numbers without more details on the phasing and timetable.
SB83: Representative Shamber Information Only05:00:17.520 - 1:59:23 PM; Representative Shamber discusses the distribution of funds as per HB2 and SB83, mentioning the governor's interest in allocating a percentage to group two benefits. He questions the breakdown of percentages in both bills and suggests a need for clarity and possibly a rephrasing of the legislation.
SB83: Representative Oalt Information Only05:01:49.920 - 2:00:55 PM; Representative Oalt raises concerns about the allocation of funds in HB2 and SB83, particularly questioning the distribution of the remaining percentages after allocations to charities. He suggests the need for a detailed breakdown to understand the impact on different funds.
SB83: Representative Yuly Information Only05:05:46.240 - 2:04:52 PM; Representative Yuly discusses the fiscal implications of SB83, questioning the calculations and percentages used in the fiscal note. He expresses confusion about the state's share and the allocation to various funds, suggesting the need for more precise data.
SB83: Jennifer Ramsey, Department of Revenue Administration Information Only05:09:56.718 - 2:09:02 PM; Jennifer Ramsey explains the fiscal note for SB83, clarifying the calculations for state revenue share from VLTS and HHR. She mentions the expected migration from HHR to VT machines and the costs associated with this transition.
SB83: Representative Elmy Information Only05:13:25.280 - 2:12:31 PM; Representative Elmy discusses the potential increase in VT machines and the associated costs. He questions the fiscal planning based on current data and suggests a need for updated figures to reflect potential changes in machine numbers.
SB83: Director McIntyre Information Only05:26:33.440 - 2:25:39 PM; Director McIntyre explains the concept of a central monetary system for real-time monitoring of gaming machines. He discusses the feasibility and cost implications of implementing such a system, indicating it as a desirable feature without committing to immediate action.
SB83: Representative Opel Information Only05:32:55.280 - 2:32:01 PM; Representative Opel discusses the scheduling of future work sessions and public hearings for SB83 and other bills. He mentions the possibility of amendments to SB83 and the need for further discussions to reach an agreement.

Janigian, John(Chairman)(R)[B+]2024	Ohm, Bill(Clerk)(R)[B]2018	Ulery, Jordan(V Chairman)(R)[A-]2024
Almy, Susan(D)[CT]2024	Oppel, Thomas(D)	Smith, Steven(R)[B+]2024
Malloy, Dennis(D)[CT]2024	Schamberg, Thomas(D)[CT]2024	Southworth, Thomas(D)[CT]2024
Tierney, James(R)[B-]2024	Cole, Brian(R)[B-]2024	Aures, Cyril(R)[A]2024
Bolton, Bill(D)[CT]2024	Elberger, Susan(D)[D-]2024	Smith, Geoffrey(D)[D-]2024
Soti, Julius(R)[A+]2024	Spahr, Terry(D)	Bryer, Scott(R)
Murphy, Mary(R)	Ford, Mary(R)