Committee Summary for Senate Commerce (02/11/2025)

Bill/Time	Type	Title	Sponsor
SB88 00:04:01.879 - 8:33:03 AM	Public Hearing	prohibiting state government entities from including specified terms related to labor organization agreements in construction related contracts and grants.	Birdsell, Regina(R)[C+]2024
SB162 00:23:49.840 - 8:52:51 AM	Public Hearing	relative to restrictions on acquisition of ownership, controlling, and occupancy interests in real property by certain foreign principals on or around certain military installations, and criminal penalties and civil forfeiture procedures for illegal acquisition.	Birdsell, Regina(R)[C+]2024
SB86 00:52:39.640 - 9:21:41 AM	Public Hearing	relative to the housing finance authority's affordable housing guarantee program.	Perkins Kwoka, Rebecca(D)[D-]2024
SB279 01:16:14.600 - 9:45:16 AM	Public Hearing	establishing the housing champion business loan program and making appropriations to the department of business and economic affairs and the business finance authority.	Perkins Kwoka, Rebecca(D)[D-]2024
SB164 01:29:27.800 - 9:58:29 AM	Public Hearing	relative to homeowners and prohibiting certain types of service agreements.	Ricciardi, Denise(R)[C-]2024
SB27 0158 02:02:22.480 - 10:31:24 AM	Executive Session	relative to dwellings over water.	Lang, Timothy(R)[C+]2024
SB78 02:04:40.880 - 10:33:42 AM	Executive Session	relative to the zoning board of adjustments appeal period.	Murphy, Keith(R)[B+]2024
SB81 02:05:28.280 - 10:34:30 AM	Executive Session	increasing the annual real estate transfer tax revenue contribution and making an appropriation to the affordable housing fund.	Innis, Daniel(R)[C+]2024
SB82 02:06:17.199 - 10:35:19 AM	Executive Session	relative to the housing opportunity project extension and homes for homeland heroes grant program.	Ricciardi, Denise(R)[C-]2024
SB84 02:07:52.800 - 10:36:54 AM	Executive Session	relative to zoning procedures concerning residential housing.	Murphy, Keith(R)[B+]2024
SB87 02:16:30.960 - 10:45:32 AM	Executive Session	relative to one day liquor license requirements and making salons and barber shops eligible for on-premise licenses.	Watters, David(D)[CT]2024
SB89 308s 02:18:04.318 - 10:47:06 AM	Executive Session	enabling non-citizens who are legally authorized to work in the United States to deliver alcohol.	Ricciardi, Denise(R)[C-]2024
SB91 02:18:58.000 - 10:48:00 AM	Executive Session	allowing one-time special appraisals of residences located in commercial zones.	Murphy, Keith(R)[B+]2024
SB280 02:19:52.439 - 10:48:54 AM	Executive Session	requiring a food delivery service to enter into an agreement with a food service establishment or food retail store before offering delivery service from that restaurant.	Ricciardi, Denise(R)[C-]2024

SB88: Regina Burell, State Senator for District 19 (Derry, Hampstead, Windham) Support00:04:01.879 - 8:33:03 AM; Senator Burell introduced Senate Bill 88, aimed at protecting New Hampshire's construction businesses. She argued that state construction projects often require bidders to have a labor agreement, which excludes about 95% of New Hampshire businesses from bidding on state contracts. She highlighted that the New Hampshire construction labor force is over 90% non-union, and government-mandated project labor agreements (PLAs) increase construction costs by up to 20%. The bill applies only to state government projects and not to municipally funded ones, emphasizing that it does not prevent contractors from privately entering into PLAs. She mentioned that government-mandated PLAs can override privately negotiated union contracts and can lead to higher costs for taxpayers. Senator Burell also noted that similar mandates in Massachusetts have led to an exodus of businesses and residents to states like New Hampshire. She concluded by stating that passing the bill would protect the merit shop workforce and affirm that New Hampshire is open for business.
SB88: Unnamed Committee Member Information Only00:06:21.520 - 8:35:23 AM; An unnamed committee member expressed appreciation for Senator Burell's introduction of the bill and mentioned receiving a substantial number of emails from people supporting the passage of the bill.
SB88: Alan Ruff, New Hampshire AFL-CIO Information Only00:07:23.680 - 8:36:25 AM; Alan Ruff from the New Hampshire AFL-CIO began to speak but the transcript cuts off before he completes his statement. Therefore, no full summary of his testimony can be provided.
SB88: Alan Ruff, New Hampshire AFL-CIO Oppose00:07:27.599 - 8:36:29 AM; Alan Ruff, representing the New Hampshire AFL-CIO, read prepared testimony from President Glenn Bracket opposing Senate Bill 88. The testimony argued that the bill would ban Project Labor Agreements (PLAs), which are seen as market-based tools for efficient project delivery and ensuring local workers benefit from tax-funded projects. The testimony highlighted that no state-funded construction project in New Hampshire has ever used a PLA, questioning the necessity of the bill. It emphasized that PLAs create jobs with family-sustaining wages and safe working conditions, benefiting all stakeholders in construction projects. The testimony also refuted claims that PLAs limit competition, citing examples of non-union contractors successfully working under PLAs in other large projects. It concluded by questioning the relevance of the bill given the state's history and suggested that there are more pressing issues for the state to address.
SB88: Joshua R., Associated Builders and Contractors of New Hampshire Support00:11:19.160 - 8:40:21 AM; Joshua R., CEO and President of the Associated Builders and Contractors of New Hampshire, spoke in support of Senate Bill 88. He argued that the bill ensures fair and open competition in state public work contracts, providing a level playing field for all qualified contractors. He highlighted that PLAs can disadvantage non-union contractors by imposing union-specific work rules and potentially leading to wage theft. He emphasized that the bill does not prohibit union contractors from using their own PLAs but prevents government mandates. He contrasted New Hampshire's market with states like Massachusetts and New York, where mandatory PLAs have increased construction costs and reduced efficiency, advocating for maintaining New Hampshire's competitive advantage through free market principles.
SB88: Daryl Lutter, Fulcrum Associates, Amherst, New Hampshire Support00:15:36.759 - 8:44:38 AM; Daryl Lutter, President of Fulcrum Associates based in Amherst, New Hampshire, supported Senate Bill 88. He described his company as a merit shop-based construction management firm committed to employee training and safety. He argued that mandating PLAs would limit their workforce and drive up construction costs, negatively impacting community resources. He emphasized the importance of fair competition and a merit-based approach to construction, which he believes supports community growth and development.
SB88: Michael G., Rose Steel, Greenland, New Hampshire Support00:18:05.240 - 8:47:07 AM; Michael G., Operations Manager at Rose Steel in Greenland, New Hampshire, supported Senate Bill 88. He shared his 40-year experience in the steel industry, working in both union and merit shops. He argued that merit-based companies should have equal opportunities to bid on public work, as they represent 90% of the construction workforce. He highlighted that without PLAs, taxpayer dollars would stay in the state and be reinvested into the local community, saving money and supporting local workers.
SB88: Alice Kbis, Associated General Contractors of New Hampshire Support00:20:31.360 - 8:49:33 AM; Alice Kbis, representing the Associated General Contractors of New Hampshire, spoke in support of SB88. She argued that the bill codifies current procurement practices by not requiring Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) for state construction projects. Kbis emphasized that government-mandated PLAs would compel firms to change their labor policies to compete for state contracts, which they oppose. They believe that contracts should be awarded based on the best value, meaning the most qualified firm with the best price. She also mentioned that PLAs remove market economic forces and subvert competitive bidding laws and collective bargaining, making it difficult for the public to benefit from full competition. Kbis referenced a similar bill proposed by Senator Bradley in 2022 and provided a press release from their national organization to support her argument.
SB162: Regina Birdell, State Senator for District 19 (Derry, Hampstead, Windham) Support00:23:49.840 - 8:52:51 AM; Senator Regina Birdell, the prime sponsor of SB162, expressed her support for the bill. She highlighted her concerns about potential land grabs by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), citing the example of a Chinese company purchasing land near the Grand Forks Air Force Base in North Dakota. Birdell discussed the risks associated with such purchases near critical infrastructure, referencing federal investigations and the National Intelligence Law of China. She explained that SB162 is a narrower version of a previous bill, based on input from a study committee that included representatives from various sectors. The bill aims to protect specific military facilities in New Hampshire by requiring buyers or lessees within 10 miles of these facilities to submit an affidavit stating they are not agents of specified foreign adversaries. Birdell also mentioned ongoing amendments to address concerns about liability for realtors.
SB162: David Dinwoody, Defense Force Director, New Boston Space Force Station Support00:31:46.240 - 9:00:48 AM; David Dinwoody, from the New Boston Space Force Station, supported SB162, stating that the foreign countries listed in the bill are of concern to their mission. He emphasized that passing the bill would enhance the security of their defense-critical infrastructure, thus contributing to national security.
SB162: Thaddus Dickinson, US Space Force, New Boston Space Force Station Support00:32:54.120 - 9:01:56 AM; Thaddus Dickinson, representing the US Space Force at New Boston, supported SB162. He described the station's vital mission and the constant threats they face from adversaries. Dickinson stressed the importance of the legislation in protecting assets crucial to national security and highlighted the significance of the bill's success to the nation's way of life.
SB162: Chris Bond, Associate Attorney General, New Hampshire Department of Justice Support00:34:24.639 - 9:03:26 AM; Chris Bond, from the New Hampshire Department of Justice, supported SB162 and noted that his office assisted in drafting the bill. He mentioned that the definition of 'prohibited buyer' had been narrowed to avoid potential legal challenges faced by similar laws in other states. Bond also clarified that the bill targets specific critical infrastructure and explained the conditions under which property forfeiture would be applicable, ensuring due process.
SB162: Lily Tang Williams Support00:35:59.760 - 9:05:01 AM; Lily Tang Williams supported SB162 and shared her personal experience of living under the Chinese Communist Party's regime. She highlighted the broader threat posed by the CCP's international expansion, including their 'China Dream' to become the world's dominant power. Williams mentioned various methods used by the CCP, such as the Belt and Road initiative, Confucius Institutes, and technology, to exert influence globally. She supported the bill as a step to limit the CCP's influence near critical military bases, expressing a desire to expand the buffer zone beyond 10 miles if possible.
SB162: Chris Norwood, New Hampshire Association of Realtors Information Only00:44:21.559 - 9:13:23 AM; Chris Norwood, representing the New Hampshire Association of Realtors, testified with a neutral stance on SB162. He expressed concerns about the bill's implications on leasing and suggested that the 10-mile radius around protected facilities might be too broad, potentially impacting many buildings in downtown areas like Manchester and Portsmouth. Norwood recommended that the state issue maps to clarify the areas affected by the bill and questioned the role of realtors in enforcing the disclosure requirements, particularly when a buyer or tenant refuses to sign the disclosure form. He appreciated the sponsor's efforts to improve the bill but highlighted the need for clarity on realtor responsibilities and the potential liability issues.
SB162: Reen Information Only00:48:44.920 - 9:17:46 AM; Reen inquired about the timing of the notifications required by SB162, suggesting that it might be more effective to have disclosures at the time of purchase and sale rather than post-closing. This would ensure all parties are aware of the additional filing requirements if certain activities occur on the property. Reen referenced RSA 477 and existing disclosure requirements for lead paint, radon, and methamphetamine production, indicating a possible need for a similar approach to this bill.
SB86: Senator Rebecca Perkins Kwoka, District 21 (Portsmouth and surrounding towns) Support00:52:39.640 - 9:21:41 AM; Senator Rebecca Perkins Kwoka introduced SB86, emphasizing its role in addressing the housing crisis in New Hampshire. She highlighted the bill's potential to provide a low-risk, cost-effective tool for the state to guarantee multifamily loans, leveraging public dollars to attract private investment. The senator stressed the urgency of the housing situation and its impact across all demographics, businesses, and community dynamics. She noted the bill's broad support from various stakeholders and mentioned a suggested amendment by the state treasurer to cap the amount of loans guaranteed at any given time.
SB86: Ryan Hill, New Hampshire Bankers Association Support00:55:48.319 - 9:24:50 AM; Ryan Hill, representing the New Hampshire Bankers Association, supported SB86, noting that it would establish a loan guarantee program within the New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority. He highlighted the program's potential to reduce financial risk for lenders and encourage investment in affordable housing projects. Hill emphasized the housing crisis's impact on banks through their customers and their ability to recruit and retain talent. He urged the committee to advance the bill as a helpful tool in addressing the housing shortage.
SB86: Abby Bronson, New Hampshire Community Loan Fund, Manchester Support00:58:55.000 - 9:27:57 AM; Abby Bronson, from the New Hampshire Community Loan Fund, supported SB86, stressing its importance in preserving and expanding affordable homeownership opportunities, particularly in manufactured home parks. She explained the increasing costs of purchasing these parks due to out-of-state private equity firms and the need for additional capital to support resident purchases. Bronson noted that a loan guarantee program would attract more investors and provide them with added security, thereby facilitating more affordable housing deals.
SB86: Rob Dapice, New Hampshire Housing Support01:02:01.200 - 9:31:03 AM; Rob Dapice, Executive Director of New Hampshire Housing, supported SB86, explaining the organization's role in promoting and financing housing solutions. He discussed the limitations of existing federal loan guarantee programs and the need for a state program to fill the gaps, particularly for manufactured housing and small rural properties. Dapice outlined the process for creating rules for the program, emphasizing transparency and stakeholder input. He highlighted the program's potential to bring capital to the market, support housing developments that wouldn't otherwise happen, and do so without exposing the state to unnecessary risk.
SB86: Chris Norwood, New Hampshire Association of Realtors Support01:09:00.319 - 9:38:02 AM; Chris Norwood, representing the New Hampshire Association of Realtors and serving on the board of the New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority, supported SB86. He discussed the challenging lending environment and the need for creative financing solutions like the loan guarantee program to de-risk projects for banks and developers. Norwood highlighted the potential of the bill to bolster housing development amidst diminishing federal stimulus funds, emphasizing its importance in supporting the housing market.
SB86: Nick Taylor, Housing Action New Hampshire Support01:10:58.120 - 9:40:00 AM; Nick Taylor, representing Housing Action New Hampshire, expressed support for Senate Bill 886. He highlighted the challenges of building housing due to high costs and the lending environment, particularly affecting affordable housing projects. He appreciated the bill's flexibility in allowing various types of developers to participate, which aligns with their broad membership base including developers, lenders, and homeless shelters.
SB86: Kristen Evans, AEL New Hampshire Support01:12:36.800 - 9:41:38 AM; Kristen Evans, from AEL New Hampshire, strongly supported Senate Bill 886. She emphasized the housing crisis's impact on people with disabilities, stating it goes beyond affordability to issues of accessibility and independence. She praised the bill for incentivizing affordable and accessible housing development through a state-backed loan guarantee program, which could significantly benefit the disability community in New Hampshire.
SB279: Senator Rebecca Perkins Kwoka, District 21 (Portsmouth and surrounding towns) Support01:16:14.600 - 9:45:16 AM; Senator Rebecca Perkins Kwoka introduced Senate Bill 279, aimed at expanding the Housing Champions program. She shared the program's success since its unanimous passage two years prior and its over-subscription with 18 cities and towns awarded funds. She advocated for replenishing the program's funds and expanding benefits, including low-interest loans to businesses in designated communities, to further address the housing crisis in partnership with municipalities.
SB279: Chris Norwood, New Hampshire Association of Realtors Support01:18:36.679 - 9:47:38 AM; Chris Norwood, representing the New Hampshire Association of Realtors, supported Senate Bill 279. He highlighted the importance of infrastructure development, such as water and sewer projects, facilitated by the Housing Champions program. He noted the program's potential to increase density and support commercial real estate growth, urging the committee to support the bill for its benefits to municipalities.
SB279: Nick Taylor, Housing Action New Hampshire Support01:20:08.639 - 9:49:10 AM; Nick Taylor, from Housing Action New Hampshire, expressed strong support for Senate Bill 279. He praised the Housing Champions program's early success and its broad impact across various communities in New Hampshire, including both cities and smaller towns. He encouraged the committee to support the bill to continue the program's momentum in increasing housing supply.
SB279: Kristen Evans, AEL New Hampshire Support01:21:16.800 - 9:50:18 AM; Kristen Evans, representing AEL New Hampshire, supported Senate Bill 279. She emphasized the housing crisis's disproportionate impact on individuals with disabilities, citing financial constraints and discrimination as major barriers. She highlighted the bill's potential to increase affordable housing and improve living conditions for the disability community, stressing its importance in upholding their rights and dignity.
SB279: James Key Wallace, Business Finance Authority Information Only01:22:53.159 - 9:51:55 AM; James Key Wallace, the Executive Director of the Business Finance Authority, provided neutral testimony on Senate Bill 279. He explained the bill's intent to incentivize communities to adopt the Housing Champions designation by offering low-cost loans to businesses in those areas. He expressed concerns about the $1 million allocation being insufficient for multiple loans across the 18 designated communities, suggesting a larger program size between $50 and $100 million. He viewed the current proposal as a potential pilot program.
SB279: Nat Grace, Business Industry Association Support01:27:24.760 - 9:56:26 AM; Nat Grace, representing the Business Industry Association, supported Senate Bill 279. She mentioned their earlier submitted letter of support and affirmed the association's backing for expanding the Housing Champions program. She expressed readiness to collaborate on addressing the housing crisis and welcomed any questions.
SB164: Denise Rardy, State Senator for District 9 Support01:29:27.800 - 9:58:29 AM; Senator Denise Rardy, representing District 9 which includes Bedford to Hinsdale, introduced Senate Bill 164. She highlighted the issue of deceptive real estate practices nationwide, particularly non-title recorded agreements for personal services, which add cost and complexity to property transfers. These agreements, often from out-of-state companies, offer a nominal upfront payment for a 40-year contract, clouding the title. SB164 aims to void these agreements automatically, removing the financial incentive for such practices in New Hampshire. The bill was developed with input from the New Hampshire Association of Realtors, the New Hampshire Banking Association, and the New Hampshire Consumer Protection Bureau. The Attorney General supports the bill, and it aligns with legislation in 30 other states, including Maine and Connecticut, aimed at prohibiting this practice.
SB164: Mike Padmore, Director of Advocacy, AARP New Hampshire Support01:32:41.440 - 10:01:43 AM; Mike Padmore from AARP New Hampshire expressed support for Senate Bill 164. He explained that these agreements, referred to as unfair service agreements, are a predatory practice identified nationally by AARP. They partnered with the American Land Title Association to develop model legislation, which has been passed in 30 states. The agreements tie not just the homeowner but also subsequent property owners to long-term contracts. The bill aims to make these agreements unlawful and unenforceable, thereby deterring out-of-state companies from engaging in such practices in New Hampshire. They have worked with local stakeholders and suggested a small change to align the bill with Maine's law.
SB164: Pat McDermot, Volunteer State President, AARP New Hampshire from Hooksett Support01:35:29.719 - 10:04:31 AM; Pat McDermot, representing AARP New Hampshire from Hooksett, supported Senate Bill 164. He emphasized that these unfair service agreements target vulnerable seniors, often leading them into long-term financial commitments without full understanding. The bill aligns with AARP's mission to protect seniors and their most valuable asset, their home. He urged the committee to support the bill and mentioned a proposed change to align the legislation with Maine's law.
SB164: Brian Townsend II, Senior Assistant Attorney General, New Hampshire Department of Justice Support01:44:06.280 - 10:13:08 AM; Brian Townsend II from the New Hampshire Department of Justice expressed support for Senate Bill 164. He noted that the bill would protect vulnerable adults, particularly those over 60, from financial exploitation. The legislation would enable the Consumer Protection Bureau to pursue legal action against businesses offering these predatory agreements. Although no complaints have been received in New Hampshire, the bill would serve as a deterrent. He also addressed the fiscal impact, stating that the current staff could handle any potential increase in complaints without additional resources.
SB164: Chris Norwood, Vice Chair of the 2025 Realtors New Hampshire Association of Realtors Public Policy Committee and a broker Support01:50:06.920 - 10:19:08 AM; Chris Norwood expressed support for Senate Bill 164, appreciating the collaboration with the senator and AARP. He highlighted the importance of the two-year period mentioned on page one, line 15 of the bill, aligning it with similar legislation in Maine. Norwood referenced the case of MV Realty, which engaged in predatory practices such as 40-year agreements that penalized homeowners upon the transfer of title, even in the event of a spouse's death. He noted that while these practices have not yet infiltrated the realtor's market in New Hampshire, the bill aims to prevent such issues from becoming prevalent. Norwood also mentioned that similar legislation has been enacted in various states across the political spectrum, indicating bipartisan support. He raised two concerns for future discussion: the definition of residential real estate on page one, line one, and the implications of service agreement assignments on page one, lines 19 and 20. Despite these questions, he affirmed full support for the bill and thanked the sponsor and AARP for the opportunity to speak.
SB27 0158: Senator Murphy Information Only02:02:22.480 - 10:31:24 AM; Senator Murphy introduced an amendment to Senate Bill 27, which aims to clarify the language regarding dwellings over water. The amendment addresses concerns raised by Senator Fenton about the ambiguity of the original bill, particularly the potential for wide-ranging interpretations. The amendment specifies that any expansion of such dwellings should not cause new penetrations of the water, which Senator Murphy believes should address Senator Fenton's concerns.
SB27 0158: Senator Fenton Information Only02:03:08.079 - 10:32:10 AM; Senator Fenton expressed appreciation for the consideration of his concerns regarding the ambiguity of the original language in Senate Bill 27. He stated that he is okay with the amendment as it addresses his concerns about the potential for new water penetrations.
SB78: Committee Member Information Only02:04:40.880 - 10:33:42 AM; The committee discussed Senate Bill 78, which proposes to extend the appeal period for the Zoning Board of Adjustments to 30 days. The discussion suggested that this extension was considered adequate based on testimony received. A motion to not pass the bill was made and seconded, with the committee voting in favor of not passing it and moving to consent.
SB81: Committee Member Information Only02:05:28.280 - 10:34:30 AM; The committee discussed Senate Bill 81, which deals with allocating real estate transfer tax to the affordable housing fund. The bill's sponsor expressed intent to pass the bill and take it out of committee. A motion to pass was made and seconded, with the committee voting in favor of passing it and moving to consent.
SB82: Committee Member Information Only02:06:17.199 - 10:35:19 AM; The committee discussed Senate Bill 82, which was intended to be an extension but was mistakenly labeled as SB81 in notes. The bill's sponsor requested to re-refer it due to technical difficulties that need to be addressed to align the language with the bill's intent. A motion to re-refer was made and seconded, with the committee voting in favor of re-referral and moving to consent.
SB84: Committee Member Information Only02:07:52.800 - 10:36:54 AM; The committee discussed Senate Bill 84, which addresses zoning procedures concerning residential housing. A motion to not pass was made and seconded. An amendment was proposed to change the effective date to July 1st, 2026, which was considered a sensible adjustment. One committee member expressed opposition to the bill, citing concerns over state mandates on local control and potential costs to towns without a fiscal note to address the downshift in costs. Another member argued in favor of the bill, emphasizing the role of the state in dictating town policies and supporting individual land development rights. Despite the arguments, the committee voted in favor of not passing the bill and moved to consent.
SB84: Senator from Keene Support02:11:11.159 - 10:40:13 AM; The senator expressed support for Senate Bill 84, mentioning that Keene had reduced lot sizes from five acres to two acres without negative consequences. They emphasized the importance of starter homes in New Hampshire to attract workforce and first-time home buyers, viewing the bill as a tool to help local control address housing issues. They indicated their intention to vote in favor of the bill.
SB84: Senator Support02:11:57.320 - 10:40:59 AM; The senator voiced support for the bill, acknowledging the statewide housing crisis and the efforts of many cities and towns. They noted that the bill does not drastically change the landscape of cities and towns, as it only requires a portion of properties to be rezoned, and adjustments are made based on existing infrastructure. They will support the bill to reward cities and towns that have stepped up to address the housing issue.
SB84: Senator Oppose02:12:43.119 - 10:41:45 AM; The senator expressed opposition to Senate Bill 84, citing a report from the Business and Economic Affairs on zoning which suggests that the bill could lead to a downshift in taxpayer costs. They acknowledged the housing crisis and their support for other affordable housing bills but felt that this particular bill crosses a line due to potential increased property taxes.
SB84: Senator Support02:13:32.480 - 10:42:34 AM; The senator supported the bill, emphasizing the ongoing housing crisis and the numerous bills introduced to address it. They argued that the bill does not downshift costs to taxpayers and includes sensible guardrails related to existing infrastructure. Despite some opposition from constituents, they will support the bill, hoping their colleagues in the Senate will do the same.
SB84: Senator Murphy Information Only02:14:58.440 - 10:44:00 AM; Senator Murphy clarified that the bill requires 50.1% of a town to allow for 1.5-acre lots, questioning whether this could be seen as the extinction of single-family housing. They did not explicitly state support or opposition but provided information on the bill's specifics.
SB87: Senator Support02:16:30.960 - 10:45:32 AM; The senator supported Senate Bill 87, which would make salons and barber shops eligible for one-day liquor licenses. They noted that this would legalize an existing practice, as many such establishments already serve alcohol. They viewed this as a positive step to legalize activities that are already occurring.
SB89 308s: Senator Support02:18:04.318 - 10:47:06 AM; The senator moved to pass Senate Bill 89 with amendment 308s, indicating their support for the bill. There was no further discussion mentioned on the amendment or the bill itself, suggesting a general consensus in favor.
SB91: Senator Support02:18:58.000 - 10:48:00 AM; The senator moved to pass Senate Bill 91, which would allow one-time appraisals of residences in commercial zones. There was no discussion mentioned, indicating support for the bill.
SB280: Senator Support02:19:52.439 - 10:48:54 AM; The senator moved to pass Senate Bill 280 with a committee amendment to clarify that a food delivery platform shall not take and arrange for the delivery of an order from a food service establishment without agreement. They supported the bill and the amendment, indicating a sensible change was requested and supported.

Innis, Daniel(Chairman)(R)[C+]2024	Ricciardi, Denise(V Chairman)(R)[C-]2024	Murphy, Keith(R)[B+]2024
Fenton, Donovan(D)[F]2024	McGough, Tim(R)	Reardon, Tara(D)