Warning: Bill numbers and names are based on text-to-speech transcript which may have errors due to transcription issues or ad hoc/incomplete language use by committee.
extending the authorization of the department of environmental services for the evaluation and mitigation of new community water system contamination risks.
Moves HB 1733 off the table and proposes amendment 1398-S to address non-bypassable issues by limiting them to extraordinary circumstances determined by the commission through an adjudicative process involving the POC. Suggests passing the amended bill to allow further discussion or committee conference.
HB1733 1398-S
Information Only00:07:52.688 - 1:06:44 PM
Acknowledges the amendment and notes that interim study was suggested due to ongoing PSE dockets investigating similar issues, but agrees to proceed with amendment for additional time to consider.
HB1766 2026-1421s
Support00:09:01.925 - 1:07:53 PM
Moves to pass HB 1766 with amendment 2026-1421s, explaining changes: clarifies involvement of animal shelter facilities defined in statute; requires DOJ to develop a form for law enforcement; references existing RSA for court language; extends timeline from 7 to 10 days for law enforcement; adds language that complainants are not part of investigations; allows surrender or care by shelters before euthanasia to address fiscal and stakeholder concerns.
HB1766 2026-1421s
Information Only00:14:23.748 - 1:13:15 PM
Questions clarity on 'at their own expense' in subparagraph B, suggesting it might ambiguously refer to the veterinarian instead of the person charged, proposes rephrasing to 'at the person's expense' for clarity.
HB1766 2026-1421s
Information Only00:15:56.774 - 1:14:48 PM
Agrees the language on expense could be read both ways and supports adding 'the person's' for clarity.
HB1766 2026-1421s
Information Only00:16:43.113 - 1:15:35 PM
Confirms the second bullet point in the amendment refers back to the original bill's paragraph B,a and does not need duplication.
HB1766 2026-1421s
Support00:17:52.647 - 1:16:44 PM
Appreciates work on the amendment to ensure opportunities for owners or facilities to take animals before euthanasia, emphasizing options for care, adoption, or shelter decision on euthanasia as a last resort, important for the commission's fund.
HB1425
Support00:19:02.382 - 1:17:54 PM
Moves ought to pass on HB 1425, excited about reducing time requirements for wetland permits by addressing redundancies and considering natural disasters to streamline the process.
HB1013
Information Only00:20:32.152 - 1:19:24 PM
Moves HB 1013 and offers a committee amendment to remove section 2.
HB1013
Support00:21:56.779 - 1:20:48 PM
Moves a committee amendment to remove section 2 (lines 15-18) of the bill, keeping only section 1 on best management practices (BMPs), as requested by the Department of Agriculture, noting that BMPs are guidance without enforcement ability.
HB1013
Support00:21:56.779 - 1:20:48 PM
Seconds the motion for the committee amendment.
HB1013
Support00:23:08.931 - 1:22:00 PM
Questions whether educational materials are sufficient without rules but supports the amendment to keep only section 1, noting the department's testimony on time for rules and rarity of enforcement in such cases. Raises concern about distribution of materials but accepts that publication likely includes website availability.
HB1013
Information Only00:26:05.924 - 1:24:57 PM
Suggests clarifying that 'published' includes making materials available on the department website, which is noted for the record.
HB1086
Support00:28:18.506 - 1:27:10 PM
Offers a committee amendment for discussion to make the study committee more neutral by adding duties to consider policies that rejected bans on neonicotinoid-treated seeds, review legislative records from those states, and include input from NH farmers, Farm Bureau, pesticide control board, and stakeholders. Emphasizes respect for the other body and value of a short-term study for open process.
HB1086
Support00:32:03.089 - 1:30:55 PM
Supports the amendment for providing balance but questions the need for the study, noting available information, repeated past bills rejected, and existing pesticide control board expertise. Will support amendment but not the bill as amended, doubting new insights or impact on future legislation.
HB1086
Support00:34:00.906 - 1:32:52 PM
Defends the value of a study committee for formal testimony and open input, expresses awkwardness in rejecting House requests for studies, and offers to proceed with the amendment vote.
HB1086
Oppose00:35:01.629 - 1:33:53 PM
Reiterates opposition to the bill as amended, citing repeated discussions and no need for legislative resources on this settled issue.
HB1086
Support00:35:52.509 - 1:34:44 PM
Offers friendly amendment to change first meeting to within 45 days instead of 90, and corrects '1 members' to '1 member' of the Senate.
HB1086
Information Only00:35:52.509 - 1:34:44 PM
Expresses concern about 45-day timeline potentially conflicting with summer meeting prohibitions but agrees to keep within 90 days, noting flexibility.
HB1148
Vote00:39:31.606 - 1:38:23 PM
Moves to pass HB 1148 after reviewing notes and finding no issues.
HB1148
Support00:40:17.508 - 1:39:09 PM
Sits on the exotic aquatic weeds committee and supports the bill as a good topic for discussion, noting no issues with line 11 on controlling milfoil as it is current statute.
HB1780 1397s
Vote00:41:29.493 - 1:40:21 PM
Moves to pass HB 1780 and offers amendment 1397s, explaining it addresses concerns about production date labeling developed with the seed industry and commissioner.
HB1780 1397s
Support00:43:04.745 - 1:41:56 PM
Gives thumbs up to the amendment, confirming it meets the department's concerns.
HB1780 1397s
Information Only00:43:56.179 - 1:42:48 PM
Explains the amendment language on relabeling stickers to ensure the original production date is not covered or is carried forward, detailing processes for retesting germination rates and flexibility in labeling.
HB1780 1397s
Information Only00:44:55.282 - 1:43:47 PM
Questions the grammar and intent of lines 26-28 on relabeling and production dates, seeking clarification.
HB1780 1397s
Information Only00:46:06.705 - 1:44:58 PM
Asks about the difference between 'kind' and 'kind and variety' on line 21, receiving explanation that they are distinct terms in seed law, with 'variety' being a subset, and noting it is existing law being renumbered.
HB1780 1397s
Vote00:47:26.974 - 1:46:18 PM
Calls for vote on amendment 1397s and then on the bill as amended, passing on consent.
HB1153
Vote00:48:59.826 - 1:47:51 PM
Moves committee amendment on line 16 to change quorum from 4 to 3 members, noting updates needed for contradictions in the bill.
HB1153
Vote00:49:57.020 - 1:48:49 PM
Seconds the amendment and motion to pass as amended, calls for vote, passes without objection.
HB1620
Vote00:51:37.502 - 1:50:29 PM
Moves to pass HB 1620, noting the minor number of underground oil tanks makes cleanup not a significant issue.
HB1620
Vote00:51:37.502 - 1:50:29 PM
Seconds the motion to pass.
HB1089
Information Only00:53:06.420 - 1:51:58 PM
The speaker mentions that HB 1089 has already been addressed and taken out, but confirms it was done earlier.
HB1089
Vote00:54:05.613 - 1:52:57 PM
The speaker moves for ought to pass on HB 1089, noting it was represented as ensuring the department's regulatory authority over new community water systems to prevent contamination from nearby wells. The department supports it, and concerns about small systems were clarified as not affected.
HB1089
Information Only00:55:06.658 - 1:53:58 PM
The speaker expresses support for the bill after clarification that it does not impact small systems.
HB1089
Vote00:55:54.775 - 1:54:46 PM
The speaker calls for a vote, all in favor of ought to pass, none opposed.
Unclear
Information Only00:56:45.112 - 1:55:37 PM
The speaker moves for an interim study on the bill concerning neonics, arguing that the pesticide control board is already addressing the issue and the legislature should not intervene. They express concern about the board being directed by the legislature and note past testimony on notifying beekeepers being problematic.
Unclear
Information Only00:57:36.286 - 1:56:28 PM
The senator notes that the bill originated from a subcommittee of the pesticide control board, which has already voted to start rulemaking in March, making the bill unnecessary. They also highlight issues with section three on notifying apiaries, as it's impractical due to incomplete lists of beekeepers.
Unclear
Information Only00:58:52.175 - 1:57:44 PM
The speaker hopes the board will act on the issue and supports interim study, noting potential need for legislative action if they do not progress.
Unclear
Information Only01:00:04.824 - 1:58:56 PM
The speaker expresses impatience with repeated delays on neonicotinoid bills over several years and mentions a letter from an industry group with inaccurate information claiming the chemicals prevent tick spread, which is not effective.
Unclear
Information Only01:00:52.524 - 1:59:44 PM
The speaker notes the prime sponsor's frustration with the board and accepts the interim study as a middle ground to keep pressure on, with potential for further action if unsatisfied.
Unclear
Vote01:01:41.704 - 2:00:33 PM
The speaker references the Farm Bureau's opposition but desire for reclassification through the board, votes for interim study, and calls for the vote: all in favor, one opposed, then moves out of consent.
HB1718
Support01:03:47.160 - 2:02:39 PM
Representative Vose introduces HB 1718-FN, explaining that it allows customer generators using net metering to store excess energy in batteries charged from solar or other systems and then export it to the grid for net metering credits. He notes technical issues in definitions, rules by the department or PUC, and clarification that it does not alter net metering principles but authorizes storage as part.
HB1718
Support01:06:48.360 - 2:05:40 PM
Dena Dennis expresses CPCNH's support for House Bill 1718 as passed by the House. The bill provides a practical clarification on how energy storage is used with solar and distributed energy under New Hampshire's net metering program. The House amendment balances rules by requiring storage to be charged from on-site generation but allows exceptions for utility-managed peak demand reduction or pre-storm charging for backup power. This flexibility prevents restrictions on beneficial programs. The bill unlocks value from distributed energy during peak times, enhances resiliency especially in rural areas, and promotes customer choice and innovation without being prescriptive.
HB1718
Support01:09:46.790 - 2:08:38 PM
Sam Evans-Brown supports the bill as a modest step forward. In the previous net metering docket DE 22-060, there was debate on pairing battery storage with solar. Liberty Utilities already has a pilot allowing batteries with net metering to export to the grid. Batteries provide firming capacity to maximize grid value from variable generators. The bill enables this, with further steps at the PUC to create tariffs and programs benefiting ratepayers.
HB1718
Information Only01:11:00.000 - 2:09:52 PM
The department is neutral on the bill. Josh Elliott highlights a technical issue in the bill's reference to RSA 374-H:2, where subsection B on line 27 incorrectly uses 'commission' instead of 'department'. He provides an attachment with the correction striking 'commission' and replacing it with 'department'. Otherwise, the bill is fine.
HB1738
Support01:14:44.047 - 2:13:36 PM
Introducing for the prime sponsor Representative Harrington, Representative Bowes explains HB 1738FN updates RGGI program parameters every five or seven years to continue receiving auction proceeds as a member. Last year, $68 million was received, with $65 million rebated to ratepayers, providing significant benefits alongside environmental gains. The bill ensures more proceeds than costs, making it a win for ratepayers.
HB1738
Support01:17:31.407 - 2:16:23 PM
The bill is housekeeping to keep New Hampshire in RGGI through 2030, with a future review. Without it, the state would forego around $100 million in revenue for ratepayers, as seen in recent auctions. They are available to answer questions on details.